Six documents on main assert that no Coolify app has been provisioned for 0pt and
that cd.yml's COOLIFY_APP_ID is a literal placeholder whose guard fails the job on
purpose. That is no longer true, and the gap is not cosmetic: it means a merge to
main silently ships to production while the repo's own docs promise it cannot.
Measured, not assumed:
* repo Actions secret COOLIFY_TOKEN exists, created 2026-08-31T11:34:34Z
(GET /api/v1/repos/sax3l/0pt/actions/secrets)
* repo Actions variable COOLIFY_APP_ID exists with a real 24-character value,
not the "TODO-no-coolify-app-provisioned-yet" literal
(GET /api/v1/repos/sax3l/0pt/actions/variables)
* both guards in .gitea/workflows/cd.yml therefore pass; on the push to main at
1ff34410 (2026-09-06) the job "Deploy to Coolify / deploy" (run 11695, job
26295) finished SUCCESS with "coolify deploy HTTP 200" in its log
Deliberately NOT claimed: that the Coolify app builds, starts or serves, or that
0pt.app DNS points at it rather than Vercel. Nobody probed the running site, and
every corrected passage says so explicitly rather than replacing one unverified
claim with another.
Corrected: README.md "Deploy", docs/02-architecture.md hosting callout,
docs/architecture/decisions/0001 (consequence annotated, decision untouched --
an ADR is a historical record), docs/runbook/incident.md (the symptom row is now
inverted: the risk is an unintended deploy, not a red job),
docs/compliance/GOLDEN-STANDARD-REPORT.md D4 (❌ -> ⚠️, not ✅, because "webhook
accepted" is not "app serves"), docs/compliance/INVENTORY.md CI row.
Falsifiable check over all six files (stale claim present without a correction
marker = red):
origin/main -> FAIL (12 findings)
this branch -> PASS
mutation: drop only the README bullet -> FAIL
mutation: drop only the runbook correction -> FAIL
The check initially passed vacuously on docs/02-architecture.md because PR #32 had
already put the string "CORRECTED 2026-09-06" in that file for an unrelated reason;
the marker was made specific so the check could actually fail there too.
Docs only. No workflow files, no .gitignore, no source.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
0pt — your data
Data services on demand for the Nordics + Europe. Compose a data job, pay 50 % to start, watch production live, validate with full provenance, deliver anywhere. Owned by SIAX Technology AB. Honest accuracy is the moat: every field carries source, freshness and confidence; nothing is guessed.
Live: https://0pt.app · Contract: CLAUDE.md + docs/
Architecture (verified against code, not aspirational):
docs/architecture/ARCHITECTURE.md. It documents the real API surface, the real persistence story, and the known security gaps — including several places where this README is optimistic. Read it before trusting any capability claim below. Repo identity + estate classification:siax.repo.json+siax.config.json. Compliance state:docs/compliance/(INVENTORY, RELATIONS, OSS-INVENTORY, GOLDEN-STANDARD-REPORT, BACKLOG, SLUTRAPPORT).
Two planes (see docs/02-architecture.md)
- Edge (Vercel, this app) — marketing, catalog, the order lifecycle, customer portal,
admin portal, and the API route handlers. Defers to the data engine when
ENGINE_URLis set. - Engine (
services/api, runs on a VPS) — FastAPI orchestrator + worker pipeline doing the compliant sourcing (official API → bulk → authorized web → licensed → else level 0). Never on Vercel (long jobs). Bypass/stealth/proxy-rotation/fake-account paths are excluded by design (CLAUDE.md §1).
Routes
| Area | Routes |
|---|---|
| Marketing | / (hero, filosofi, katalog, motorn, visualiseringar, täckning, editorial, bevis, priser, footer) |
| Catalog | /katalog, /katalog/[id] |
| Sourcing map | /kallor |
| Order lifecycle | /bestall → /bestall/forskott → /order/[id] → /order/[id]/validera |
| Customer portal | /portal, /portal/subscriptions, /portal/files, /portal/integrationer, /portal/settings |
| Admin portal | /admin, /admin/sources, /admin/jobs, /admin/customers |
| API | /api/{health,estimates,catalog,sources,orders,orders/[id],subscriptions,admin/metrics,uploads,auth/*,payments/*,webhooks/stripe,connections/db-grant} |
Design system
Mono/editorial, light, radius 0, Inter + JetBrains Mono, single red #e40014, animated grain,
scroll-reveal motion. No photography — imagery is rendered data (DataArtifact). Every fact
shows a provenance square (ProvenanceBadge). Full spec: docs/05-design-system.md.
Run locally
pnpm install
pnpm dev # Next.js on http://localhost:3000
# data engine (separate, optional)
cd services/api && pip install -r requirements.txt && uvicorn orchestrator.main:app --reload
Deploy
- Config target (as of 2026-08-09):
siax.config.jsondeclaresdeploy.target: "coolify", matching every other SIAX Cloud OS repo (n0d, st0re, aud0, ...) — a Dockerfile "for Coolify" (already committed, seeDockerfile) plus.gitea/workflows/cd.yml(renamed fromdeploy.yml2026-08-10) that POSTs a restart to a Coolify app UUID onCOOLIFY_TOKENpush. Actually live right now: the only running instance ofSee0pt.appis still on Vercel (project0pt, scope Simon Axelsson's projects) — no Coolify app has been provisioned for this repo yet, sodeploy.yml's app UUID is a placeholder that fails the job on purpose until someone fills it in. Flipping the config declares intent; it does not move traffic.docs/architecture/ARCHITECTURE.md§5/§8 for the full "Vercel or fleet" state and what's still open (Coolify app provisioning + DNS cutover — a separate decision from this config change, since the live Vercel deployment is not being touched).- CORRECTED 2026-09-06 — the bullet above is no longer true. The Coolify deploy hook is LIVE.
The repo secret
COOLIFY_TOKENexists (created 2026-08-31T11:34:34Z) and the repo Actions variableCOOLIFY_APP_IDholds a real 24-character UUID, not theTODO-no-coolify-app-provisioned-yetliteral. Both guard conditions in.gitea/workflows/cd.ymltherefore pass. Measured on the push tomainat1ff34410(2026-09-06): jobDeploy to Coolify / deploy(run 11695, job 26295) finished success withcoolify deploy HTTP 200in its log. Every merge intomainnow fires a real redeploy againstcloud.siax.io— know what you are shipping before you merge. Still not verified by anyone: whether that Coolify app actually builds, starts and serves, and whether0pt.appDNS points at it or still at Vercel. Nobody has probed the running site, so treat "which host answers0pt.app" as an open question rather than assuming either answer. - Engine + DB + embeds → one VPS via
infra/docker-compose.yml(Postgres+pgvector, Redis, api, worker, NocoDB, Metabase, Caddy). - Env inventory:
.env.example. - Auth on
/api/0pt/*is fail-closed: withAUTH_ENFORCEunset the middleware REQUIRES a verified Zitadel Bearer token (401 without one). Only the literalAUTH_ENFORCE=falsedisables it, and that is refused whenNODE_ENV=production(the process throws at startup rather than serving anonymously). Caveat (live-verified 2026-08-10): the deployed instance still answersGET /api/0ptwith 200 anonymously — the middleware appears not to run in production (gap S1, root cause unknown). Do not rely on this being enforced until an anonymous request gets a real 401. - Fonts: self-hosted via
@fontsource-variable/inter+@fontsource-variable/jetbrains-mono(no Google Fonts /next/font/google). - API contract (SSOT):
contracts/openapi.yaml.
Status
Frontend, full order lifecycle, customer + admin portals, edge API, payment/auth/embed infrastructure, the compliant data engine, schema and infra are all in place and building green. Integrations are env-guarded and activate when their keys/DB are provided:
- Database — Vercel → Storage → Postgres (sets
POSTGRES_URL) → durable persistence (schema insql/001_init.sql). - Stripe + Resend keys → payments + email.
- VPS for the engine → set
ENGINE_URL. AUTH_SECRET+DEV_LOGIN_KEY→ login (full OAuth via Auth.js lands with the DB).
© 2026 SIAX Technology AB. Not affiliated with Protosell.