chore(scripts): add prod repair scripts for Arcim and Capelix incidents (#773)

* chore(scripts): add prod repair scripts for Arcim and Capelix incidents

Two idempotent, dry-run-by-default repair scripts, committed for the audit
trail (matching the existing scripts/repair-*.ts convention). Neither runs
automatically — applying requires an explicit --execute/--commit flag.

- repair-arcim-supplier-payments.ts: Arcim Technology AB (2026-06-11). Two
  supplier invoices left in inconsistent half-states (swallowed
  AccountsNotInChartError on 3740; bank-sync auto-link without a booked
  payment) plus expense booked on 5010 instead of 5420/6580. Runs through the
  real engine (createJournalEntry/correctEntry) so voucher numbering and
  balance triggers behave as in-app; every step checks its precondition.

- repair-capelix-invoice-payment.ts: Capelix AB invoice-001 double-booking
  (2026-05-29), root-caused to the invoiceAlreadyBooked dead-column read fixed
  in PR #713. Storno-only per BFL/BFNAR 2013:2: reverse the wrong cash entry,
  post the correct 1930/1510 clearing entry, relink the bank tx + payment row.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(scripts): scope Capelix invoice_payments relink to company_id

Address review (PR Agent + compliance swarm): the Step 3b invoice_payments
update filtered on journal_entry_id only; add .eq('company_id', COMPANY_ID) to
match the sibling transactions update directly above it (tenant isolation /
defense-in-depth). invoice_payments carries company_id (multi-tenant refactor).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jakob Wennberg
2026-06-25 13:42:57 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent 10a0b1d8dd
commit bc09cea07e
2 changed files with 498 additions and 0 deletions
+290
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,290 @@
/**
* One-off prod repair for Arcim Technology AB (2026-06-11).
*
* Context: two supplier invoices were left in inconsistent half-states:
* - 20250928 (TIC): match-supplier-invoice marked it paid but the payment
* voucher failed (AccountsNotInChartError: 3740 missing) and the failure
* was swallowed. No payment JE, payments row + tx unlinked to any JE.
* - 18299 (RosholmDell): bank sync auto-linked transactions.supplier_invoice_id
* at high confidence without booking a payment; invoice stuck 'registered'.
* - Both registration vouchers (A64/A65) booked the expense on 5010 (form
* default) instead of 5420 / 6580.
*
* Runs through the real engine (createJournalEntry / correctEntry) so voucher
* numbering, balance triggers, and correction links behave exactly as in-app.
* Idempotent: every step checks its precondition and skips if already done.
*
* Usage: npx tsx scripts/repair-arcim-supplier-payments.ts [--execute]
* Without --execute it only prints the plan and preconditions (dry run).
*/
import fs from 'fs'
import path from 'path'
import { createClient } from '@supabase/supabase-js'
import { createJournalEntry, findFiscalPeriod } from '@/lib/bookkeeping/engine'
import { correctEntry } from '@/lib/core/bookkeeping/storno-service'
const COMPANY_ID = 'ed461bc1-dbb5-4568-ae20-9337515878e2'
const USER_ID = '9762dd12-7009-4ba2-aa9f-f9966d53e077'
const TIC_INVOICE_ID = '580b3c81-ced8-4a5a-8757-97ddef7919d5'
const TIC_PAYMENT_ROW_ID = 'bcfc57d3-2a8a-47cc-8b70-a0650089d9d1'
const TIC_TX_ID = '8e608944-a82c-4a1b-8807-bb7d2d6092b6'
const TIC_REGISTRATION_JE = '667db3a5-c388-42eb-a05f-0b45f26fb3db' // A64
const RD_INVOICE_ID = 'bbb2ecd4-e373-4b1e-9908-927d9c906fbc'
const RD_TX_ID = 'b5339acc-d47c-406a-8f3d-d1d9b4d82f93'
const RD_REGISTRATION_JE = 'f1a06d39-331b-4eb5-92cb-5f47d5e52881' // A65
const PAYMENT_DATE = '2026-06-08'
// BAS 2026 metadata, copied verbatim from lib/bookkeeping/bas-data/
const MISSING_ACCOUNTS = [
{
account_number: '3740',
account_name: 'Öres- och kronutjämning',
account_class: 3,
account_group: '37',
account_type: 'revenue',
normal_balance: 'debit',
description: 'Öresskillnad som uppstår vid avrundning av betalningar (öret).',
sru_code: '7310',
k2_excluded: false,
},
{
account_number: '6580',
account_name: 'Advokat- och rättegångskostnader',
account_class: 6,
account_group: '65',
account_type: 'expense',
normal_balance: 'debit',
description: 'Advokat- och rättegångskostnader',
sru_code: '7321',
k2_excluded: false,
},
]
function loadEnv(): { url: string; key: string } {
const envPath = path.resolve(process.cwd(), '.env.local')
const lines = fs.readFileSync(envPath, 'utf8').split('\n')
const vars: Record<string, string> = {}
for (const line of lines) {
const m = line.match(/^([A-Z0-9_]+)=(.*)$/)
if (m) vars[m[1]] = m[2].trim()
}
const url = vars.NEXT_PUBLIC_SUPABASE_URL
const key = vars.SUPABASE_SERVICE_ROLE_KEY
if (!url || !key) throw new Error('Missing Supabase env in .env.local')
if (!url.includes('pwxtzglxptnnvjrpixpg')) {
throw new Error(`Refusing to run against unexpected project: ${url}`)
}
return { url, key }
}
const EXECUTE = process.argv.includes('--execute')
async function main() {
const { url, key } = loadEnv()
const supabase = createClient(url, key, { auth: { persistSession: false } })
const mode = EXECUTE ? 'EXECUTE' : 'DRY RUN'
console.log(`=== Arcim supplier payment repair — ${mode} ===\n`)
// ---------- Step 0: verify preconditions ----------
const { data: tic } = await supabase
.from('supplier_invoices')
.select('status, paid_amount, remaining_amount, payment_journal_entry_id')
.eq('id', TIC_INVOICE_ID).eq('company_id', COMPANY_ID).single()
const { data: rd } = await supabase
.from('supplier_invoices')
.select('status, paid_amount, remaining_amount, payment_journal_entry_id')
.eq('id', RD_INVOICE_ID).eq('company_id', COMPANY_ID).single()
if (!tic || !rd) throw new Error('Could not load invoices')
console.log('TIC invoice:', tic)
console.log('RD invoice :', rd)
const fiscalPeriodId = await findFiscalPeriod(supabase, COMPANY_ID, PAYMENT_DATE)
if (!fiscalPeriodId) throw new Error(`No fiscal period for ${PAYMENT_DATE}`)
console.log('Fiscal period:', fiscalPeriodId, '\n')
// ---------- Step 1: ensure 3740 + 6580 exist ----------
for (const acc of MISSING_ACCOUNTS) {
const { data: existing } = await supabase
.from('chart_of_accounts')
.select('id')
.eq('company_id', COMPANY_ID)
.eq('account_number', acc.account_number)
.maybeSingle()
if (existing) {
console.log(`[skip] account ${acc.account_number} already in chart`)
continue
}
console.log(`[plan] add account ${acc.account_number} ${acc.account_name}`)
if (EXECUTE) {
const { error } = await supabase.from('chart_of_accounts').insert({
...acc,
company_id: COMPANY_ID,
user_id: USER_ID,
is_active: true,
})
if (error) throw new Error(`Insert ${acc.account_number} failed: ${error.message}`)
console.log(`[done] account ${acc.account_number} added`)
}
}
// ---------- Step 2: TIC payment voucher + link backfill ----------
if (tic.payment_journal_entry_id) {
console.log('[skip] TIC already has payment_journal_entry_id')
} else {
console.log('[plan] TIC payment voucher: D 2440 11231.25 / K 1930 11231.00 / K 3740 0.25')
if (EXECUTE) {
const je = await createJournalEntry(supabase, COMPANY_ID, USER_ID, {
fiscal_period_id: fiscalPeriodId,
entry_date: PAYMENT_DATE,
description:
'Utbetalning leverantörsfaktura 20250928, The Intelligence Company AB (publ)',
source_type: 'supplier_invoice_paid',
source_id: TIC_INVOICE_ID,
lines: [
{ account_number: '2440', debit_amount: 11231.25, credit_amount: 0, line_description: 'Kvittning leverantörsskuld' },
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 11231, line_description: 'Utbetalning från bank' },
{ account_number: '3740', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 0.25, line_description: 'Öresavrundning' },
],
})
console.log(`[done] TIC payment voucher ${je.voucher_series}-${je.voucher_number} (${je.id})`)
const upd1 = await supabase.from('supplier_invoices')
.update({ payment_journal_entry_id: je.id, transaction_id: TIC_TX_ID })
.eq('id', TIC_INVOICE_ID).eq('company_id', COMPANY_ID)
if (upd1.error) throw new Error(`TIC invoice backfill failed: ${upd1.error.message}`)
const upd2 = await supabase.from('supplier_invoice_payments')
.update({ journal_entry_id: je.id })
.eq('id', TIC_PAYMENT_ROW_ID).eq('company_id', COMPANY_ID)
if (upd2.error) throw new Error(`TIC payment row backfill failed: ${upd2.error.message}`)
const upd3 = await supabase.from('transactions')
.update({ journal_entry_id: je.id })
.eq('id', TIC_TX_ID).eq('company_id', COMPANY_ID)
if (upd3.error) throw new Error(`TIC tx backfill failed: ${upd3.error.message}`)
console.log('[done] TIC links backfilled (invoice, payment row, transaction)')
}
}
// ---------- Step 3: RosholmDell payment voucher + full settle ----------
if (rd.status === 'paid') {
console.log('[skip] RD invoice already paid')
} else {
console.log('[plan] RD payment voucher: D 2440 29890 / K 1930 29890; settle invoice')
if (EXECUTE) {
const je = await createJournalEntry(supabase, COMPANY_ID, USER_ID, {
fiscal_period_id: fiscalPeriodId,
entry_date: PAYMENT_DATE,
description: 'Utbetalning leverantörsfaktura 18299, RosholmDell Advokatbyrå AB',
source_type: 'supplier_invoice_paid',
source_id: RD_INVOICE_ID,
lines: [
{ account_number: '2440', debit_amount: 29890, credit_amount: 0, line_description: 'Kvittning leverantörsskuld' },
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 29890, line_description: 'Utbetalning från bank' },
],
})
console.log(`[done] RD payment voucher ${je.voucher_series}-${je.voucher_number} (${je.id})`)
const upd1 = await supabase.from('supplier_invoices')
.update({
status: 'paid',
paid_amount: 29890,
remaining_amount: 0,
paid_at: new Date().toISOString(),
payment_journal_entry_id: je.id,
transaction_id: RD_TX_ID,
})
.eq('id', RD_INVOICE_ID).eq('company_id', COMPANY_ID).eq('status', 'registered')
.select('id')
if (upd1.error || !upd1.data?.length) {
throw new Error(`RD invoice settle failed: ${upd1.error?.message ?? 'status changed concurrently'}`)
}
const ins = await supabase.from('supplier_invoice_payments').insert({
user_id: USER_ID,
company_id: COMPANY_ID,
supplier_invoice_id: RD_INVOICE_ID,
payment_date: PAYMENT_DATE,
amount: 29890,
currency: 'SEK',
exchange_rate_difference: 0,
journal_entry_id: je.id,
transaction_id: RD_TX_ID,
})
if (ins.error) throw new Error(`RD payment row insert failed: ${ins.error.message}`)
const upd2 = await supabase.from('transactions')
.update({ journal_entry_id: je.id, is_business: true })
.eq('id', RD_TX_ID).eq('company_id', COMPANY_ID)
if (upd2.error) throw new Error(`RD tx backfill failed: ${upd2.error.message}`)
console.log('[done] RD invoice settled + links backfilled')
}
}
// ---------- Step 4: corrections A64 (5010→5420) and A65 (5010→6580) ----------
const corrections = [
{
label: 'A64 (TIC): 5010 → 5420 Programvaror',
entryId: TIC_REGISTRATION_JE,
lines: [
{ account_number: '5420', debit_amount: 8985, credit_amount: 0, line_description: 'Leverantörsfaktura 20250928, The Intelligence Company AB (publ) (ankomst 1)' },
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 2246.25, credit_amount: 0, line_description: 'Ingående moms 25% Leverantörsfaktura 20250928, The Intelligence Company AB (publ) (ankomst 1)' },
{ account_number: '2440', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 11231.25, line_description: 'Leverantörsfaktura 20250928, The Intelligence Company AB (publ) (ankomst 1)' },
],
},
{
label: 'A65 (RosholmDell): 5010 → 6580 Advokat- och rättegångskostnader',
entryId: RD_REGISTRATION_JE,
lines: [
{ account_number: '6580', debit_amount: 23912, credit_amount: 0, line_description: 'Leverantörsfaktura 18299, RosholmDell Advokatbyrå AB (ankomst 2)' },
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 5978, credit_amount: 0, line_description: 'Ingående moms 25% Leverantörsfaktura 18299, RosholmDell Advokatbyrå AB (ankomst 2)' },
{ account_number: '2440', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 29890, line_description: 'Leverantörsfaktura 18299, RosholmDell Advokatbyrå AB (ankomst 2)' },
],
},
]
for (const c of corrections) {
const { data: orig } = await supabase
.from('journal_entries')
.select('status')
.eq('id', c.entryId).eq('company_id', COMPANY_ID).single()
if (!orig) throw new Error(`Original entry not found for ${c.label}`)
if (orig.status !== 'posted') {
console.log(`[skip] ${c.label} — original status is '${orig.status}' (already corrected?)`)
continue
}
console.log(`[plan] correct ${c.label}`)
if (EXECUTE) {
const { reversal, corrected } = await correctEntry(
supabase, COMPANY_ID, USER_ID, c.entryId, c.lines,
)
console.log(
`[done] ${c.label}: storno ${reversal.voucher_series}-${reversal.voucher_number}, ` +
`corrected ${corrected.voucher_series}-${corrected.voucher_number}`,
)
}
}
// ---------- Step 5: verify ----------
if (EXECUTE) {
const { data: ap } = await supabase
.from('journal_entry_lines')
.select('debit_amount, credit_amount, journal_entry:journal_entries!inner(company_id, status)')
.eq('account_number', '2440')
.eq('journal_entry.company_id', COMPANY_ID)
.in('journal_entry.status', ['posted', 'reversed'])
const apNet = (ap ?? []).reduce((s, l) => s + (l.credit_amount ?? 0) - (l.debit_amount ?? 0), 0)
console.log(`\n2440 net balance over posted entries: ${Math.round(apNet * 100) / 100} (expect 0)`)
}
console.log('\nDone.')
}
main().catch((err) => {
console.error('\nREPAIR FAILED:', err)
process.exit(1)
})
+208
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
#!/usr/bin/env npx tsx
/**
* Repair the Capelix AB invoice-001 double-booking (2026-05-29).
*
* Incident: v1 mark-paid read invoiceAlreadyBooked from a column its select
* never fetched (fixed in PR #713). Capelix (kontantmetoden) had invoice 001
* registered at send (voucher A6: Dr 1510 / Cr 3001 1500 / Cr 2611 375), so
* mark-paid should have CLEARED 1510 — instead it booked a cash entry
* (voucher A41: Dr 1930 / Cr 3001 1500 / Cr 2611 375). Net damage: revenue
* 3001 and VAT 2611 double-counted, 1510 carries an orphaned 1 875 kr debit.
*
* Fix (engine-faithful, storno-only per BFL/BFNAR 2013:2 — period is open,
* moms_period=yearly with no declaration filed, so no rättelse needed):
* 1. reverseEntry(A41) — storno the wrong cash entry per 2026-05-29.
* 2. createInvoicePaymentJournalEntry(...) — the correct clearing entry
* (Dr 1930 / Cr 1510, 1 875 kr) per 2026-05-29.
* 3. Relink the bank transaction and invoice_payments row from A41 to the
* new clearing entry (same economics — keeps reconciliation intact).
*
* Net account effect: 3001 1500, 2611 375, 1510 1875 (cleared), 1930
* unchanged (matches the real bank inflow).
*
* Every step checks preconditions and skips completed work — safe to re-run.
*
* Usage:
* npx tsx scripts/repair-capelix-invoice-payment.ts # dry run
* npx tsx scripts/repair-capelix-invoice-payment.ts --commit # apply
*/
import { config } from 'dotenv'
config({ path: '.env.local' })
import { createClient, type SupabaseClient } from '@supabase/supabase-js'
import { reverseEntry } from '../lib/bookkeeping/engine'
import { createInvoicePaymentJournalEntry } from '../lib/bookkeeping/invoice-entries'
import type { Invoice } from '../types'
const COMPANY_ID = 'c02c8b65-c7c3-4830-b099-853ad174fbd0' // Capelix AB
const OWNER_USER_ID = '81526a33-df2d-41a6-a3dd-98bea1efa80d'
const INVOICE_ID = '2a9ba8c4-8c2b-45b6-a492-8367b881b968' // invoice 001
const REGISTRATION_ENTRY_ID = '3f721508-5ab4-468f-9f35-36b41a8d26a5' // A6
const WRONG_CASH_ENTRY_ID = 'b25b0f6f-d88e-465e-a966-f3a57638638d' // A41
const PAYMENT_DATE = '2026-05-29'
const COMMIT = process.argv.includes('--commit')
const supabaseUrl = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_SUPABASE_URL
const serviceRoleKey = process.env.SUPABASE_SERVICE_ROLE_KEY
if (!supabaseUrl || !serviceRoleKey) {
console.error('Missing NEXT_PUBLIC_SUPABASE_URL or SUPABASE_SERVICE_ROLE_KEY in .env.local')
process.exit(1)
}
const supabase = createClient(supabaseUrl, serviceRoleKey) as SupabaseClient
async function entryStatus(id: string): Promise<{ status: string; voucher: string } | null> {
const { data } = await supabase
.from('journal_entries')
.select('status, voucher_series, voucher_number')
.eq('company_id', COMPANY_ID)
.eq('id', id)
.maybeSingle()
if (!data) return null
return { status: data.status, voucher: `${data.voucher_series}${data.voucher_number}` }
}
async function main() {
console.log('─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────')
console.log(`Capelix invoice-001 repair — ${COMMIT ? 'COMMIT' : 'DRY RUN'}`)
console.log('─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────')
// ── Preconditions ──────────────────────────────────────────────
const registration = await entryStatus(REGISTRATION_ENTRY_ID)
const wrongCash = await entryStatus(WRONG_CASH_ENTRY_ID)
if (!registration || registration.status !== 'posted') {
throw new Error(`Registration entry A6 not found/posted (got ${registration?.status}) — aborting`)
}
console.log(`✓ Registration ${registration.voucher}: posted`)
const { data: invoiceRow } = await supabase
.from('invoices')
.select('*, customer:customers(name)')
.eq('company_id', COMPANY_ID)
.eq('id', INVOICE_ID)
.maybeSingle()
if (!invoiceRow) throw new Error('Invoice not found — aborting')
if (invoiceRow.journal_entry_id !== REGISTRATION_ENTRY_ID) {
throw new Error(
`invoice.journal_entry_id is ${invoiceRow.journal_entry_id}, expected the A6 registration entry — aborting`,
)
}
console.log(`✓ Invoice ${invoiceRow.invoice_number}: status=${invoiceRow.status}, total=${invoiceRow.total}, linked to A6`)
// Existing correct clearing entry? (idempotency for step 2)
const { data: existingClearing } = await supabase
.from('journal_entries')
.select('id, status, voucher_series, voucher_number')
.eq('company_id', COMPANY_ID)
.eq('source_type', 'invoice_paid')
.eq('source_id', INVOICE_ID)
.eq('status', 'posted')
.maybeSingle()
// ── Step 1: storno A41 ─────────────────────────────────────────
let stornoDone = false
if (!wrongCash) throw new Error('Wrong cash entry A41 not found — aborting')
if (wrongCash.status === 'reversed') {
console.log(`✓ Step 1 already done: ${wrongCash.voucher} is reversed`)
stornoDone = true
} else if (wrongCash.status === 'posted') {
if (COMMIT) {
const storno = await reverseEntry(supabase, COMPANY_ID, OWNER_USER_ID, WRONG_CASH_ENTRY_ID, PAYMENT_DATE)
console.log(`✓ Step 1: stornoed ${wrongCash.voucher} → reversal voucher ${storno.voucher_series}${storno.voucher_number}`)
stornoDone = true
} else {
console.log(`→ Step 1 (dry run): would storno ${wrongCash.voucher} (Dr 1930 / Cr 3001 / Cr 2611) per ${PAYMENT_DATE}`)
}
} else {
throw new Error(`Unexpected A41 status: ${wrongCash.status} — aborting`)
}
// ── Step 2: correct clearing entry ─────────────────────────────
let clearingId: string | null = existingClearing?.id ?? null
if (existingClearing) {
console.log(`✓ Step 2 already done: clearing entry ${existingClearing.voucher_series}${existingClearing.voucher_number} exists`)
} else if (COMMIT) {
if (!stornoDone) throw new Error('Refusing to book clearing before storno — aborting')
const clearing = await createInvoicePaymentJournalEntry(
supabase,
COMPANY_ID,
OWNER_USER_ID,
invoiceRow as unknown as Invoice,
PAYMENT_DATE,
undefined,
(invoiceRow as { customer?: { name?: string } }).customer?.name,
// Full invoice total: the engine would otherwise read remaining_amount,
// which is 0 on this already-paid row.
Number(invoiceRow.total),
)
if (!clearing) throw new Error('Clearing entry was not created (no open fiscal period?) — aborting')
clearingId = clearing.id
console.log(`✓ Step 2: booked clearing Dr 1930 / Cr 1510 ${invoiceRow.total} kr → voucher ${clearing.voucher_series}${clearing.voucher_number}`)
} else {
console.log(`→ Step 2 (dry run): would book clearing entry Dr 1930 / Cr 1510 ${invoiceRow.total} kr per ${PAYMENT_DATE}`)
}
// ── Step 3: relink bank transaction + payment row ──────────────
if (COMMIT && clearingId) {
const { data: relinkTx } = await supabase
.from('transactions')
.update({ journal_entry_id: clearingId })
.eq('company_id', COMPANY_ID)
.eq('journal_entry_id', WRONG_CASH_ENTRY_ID)
.select('id')
console.log(`✓ Step 3a: relinked ${relinkTx?.length ?? 0} bank transaction(s) A41 → clearing`)
const { data: relinkPay } = await supabase
.from('invoice_payments')
.update({ journal_entry_id: clearingId })
.eq('company_id', COMPANY_ID)
.eq('journal_entry_id', WRONG_CASH_ENTRY_ID)
.select('id')
console.log(`✓ Step 3b: relinked ${relinkPay?.length ?? 0} invoice_payments row(s) A41 → clearing`)
} else if (!COMMIT) {
const { count: txCount } = await supabase
.from('transactions')
.select('id', { count: 'exact', head: true })
.eq('company_id', COMPANY_ID)
.eq('journal_entry_id', WRONG_CASH_ENTRY_ID)
console.log(`→ Step 3 (dry run): would relink ${txCount ?? 0} bank transaction(s) + invoice_payments row(s) to the clearing entry`)
}
// ── Verify ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
if (COMMIT) {
// True ledger net: include 'reversed' entries too — a reversed entry's
// lines stay in the GL and its storno (which carries the same source_id)
// cancels them. Filtering to 'posted' only would count the storno without
// its counterpart and report a false imbalance.
const { data: lines } = await supabase
.from('journal_entry_lines')
.select('account_number, debit_amount, credit_amount, journal_entry:journal_entries!inner(company_id, source_id, status)')
.eq('journal_entry.company_id', COMPANY_ID)
.eq('journal_entry.source_id', INVOICE_ID)
.in('journal_entry.status', ['posted', 'reversed'])
const net = new Map<string, number>()
for (const l of lines ?? []) {
const acct = l.account_number as string
net.set(acct, (net.get(acct) ?? 0) + Number(l.debit_amount) - Number(l.credit_amount))
}
console.log('Net per account over posted entries for this invoice:')
for (const [acct, sum] of [...net.entries()].sort()) {
console.log(` ${acct}: ${Math.round(sum * 100) / 100}`)
}
const ok =
Math.abs(net.get('1510') ?? 0) < 0.005 &&
Math.round(Math.abs(net.get('3001') ?? 0)) === 1500 &&
Math.round(Math.abs(net.get('2611') ?? 0)) === 375 &&
Math.round(net.get('1930') ?? 0) === 1875
console.log(ok ? '✓ VERIFIED: 1510 cleared, revenue/VAT single-counted, 1930 matches bank inflow' : '✗ VERIFY FAILED — inspect manually')
if (!ok) process.exit(1)
}
console.log('─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────')
console.log(COMMIT ? 'Repair complete.' : 'Dry run complete — re-run with --commit to apply.')
}
main().catch((err) => {
console.error('Repair failed:', err)
process.exit(1)
})