Commit Graph
17 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Claude (0pt session)andClaude Sonnet 5 e9dff491ca docs(compliance): add BLOCKERS.md (§1.4)
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 16s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 19s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 43s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 26s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 21s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (pull_request) Successful in 46s
Golden Standard §1.4 requires an unresolved blocker to be recorded in
docs/compliance/BLOCKERS.md; this file was confirmed absent in a recent
audit pass, which is itself a delivery defect per the framework's own
rule. Records four blockers, each freshly re-verified against current
main rather than copied from prior findings:

- WAF-bypass/Tor/FlareSolverr stack (services/scrapers/*): the account
  owner's decision (keep) is now on record via merged PR #15 as of
  today; PR #7 (removal) stays closed/unmerged. Documented as decided,
  not left as still-pending.
- No Coolify app / Infisical project provisioned (cd.yml still carries
  the TODO placeholder on current main).
- 0pt.app / 0pt.dev DNS still delegated to Vercel nameservers (live NS
  lookup today), despite PowerDNS holding shadow zone copies.
- middleware.ts still answers anonymously live even after a merged
  auth fix (PR #11) — confirmed with a fresh live probe today, which
  sharpens the existing P0-1 backlog item.

Scope: documentation only, this one new file. Does not touch
services/scrapers/*, services/infra/docker-compose.data-stack.yml,
docs/compliance/BACKLOG.md, or PR #7.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 13:04:53 +02:00
admin 5f41047546 docs(compliance): record final CI run IDs on main 3af2ac8
Deploy to Coolify / deploy (push) Failing after 2s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 19s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 19s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 38s
2026-08-10 04:23:46 +02:00
admin 3af2ac894e docs(compliance): FAS 8 evidence + FAS 10 final report
Deploy to Coolify / deploy (push) Failing after 2s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 38s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 16s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 15s
2026-08-10 04:18:00 +02:00
admin 8db56f1b4c docs: FAS 9 - README/SECURITY updates, CONTRIBUTING, AGENTS, runbooks (deploy/incident/backup-restore/oncall), SLO, prompts 2026-08-10 04:16:30 +02:00
admin d2b5ec8e4f docs(compliance): FAS 0-5 - inventory, relations, OSS, golden standard, backlog + repo classification (siax.repo.json) 2026-08-10 04:03:40 +02:00
adminandClaude Sonnet 5 ad042d825f fix(deploy): declare Coolify as the deploy target, not Vercel
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 18s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 39s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (pull_request) Successful in 41s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 19s
siax.config.json declared deploy.target: "vercel", which conflicts with
the SIAX Cloud platform pattern every sibling OS repo (n0d, st0re, aud0)
follows: a Dockerfile "for Coolify" (already present in this repo) plus a
.gitea/workflows/deploy.yml that POSTs a restart to a Coolify app UUID.

Investigated before changing anything:
- 0pt.app is confirmed live on Vercel (Server: Vercel, 200 OK) but its own
  /api/health reports db/queue "not_configured", and POSTing to /api/orders
  creates an order that is not durably persisted (in-memory store only, per
  this repo's own docs/08-infrastructure.md and docs/architecture/
  ARCHITECTURE.md, both independently verified live 2026-07-19 / 2026-08-07,
  and reconfirmed live again today). It's a fully-built marketing/demo
  surface with no real backend behind it -- not a live product serving real
  customer data. Safe to change deploy config without a cutover plan.
- Dockerfile already exists and is already written "for Coolify" (node:24-
  alpine multistage, non-root, /api/health healthcheck) -- no changes needed
  there.
- No .gitea/workflows/deploy.yml existed. Added one following the exact
  pattern used by n0d and st0re (POST /api/v1/deploy?uuid=...&force=false
  with COOLIFY_TOKEN). No Coolify app has been provisioned for 0pt yet, so
  the app UUID is a literal placeholder and the workflow fails loudly by
  design until a real app + token are in place -- this does not silently
  ship a broken deploy config.

This changes only this repo's declared *intent*. It does NOT touch the live
Vercel deployment, delete the Vercel project, or move any traffic --
that cutover (provision Coolify app -> verify -> DNS -> decommission
Vercel) is a separate, larger decision. README and ARCHITECTURE.md updated
to state this plainly rather than let them contradict the new config.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-09 12:36:24 +02:00
SIAX Ops 44e83ad1de resolve: README adopts main (newer, fail-closed auth docs)
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 17s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 39s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (pull_request) Successful in 46s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 20s
2026-08-09 11:30:18 +02:00
admin 4cf833bb82 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into docs/1p-egress-measurement-point
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 41s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 21s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 16s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (pull_request) Successful in 40s
2026-08-09 10:49:30 +02:00
Claude (SIAX platform session) bb58617540 docs(standard): add code-verified ARCHITECTURE.md + siax.config.json (S1-S7)
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 17s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 39s
Brings 0pt to the SIAX repo standard. README, LICENSE (proprietary, correct
for this repo), Dockerfile and .gitea/workflows/ci.yml already existed and are
left untouched; no .github/workflows exists.

The architecture document was written by reading the code (entrypoints,
routes, services, migrations, Dockerfile, env, tests) and by probing the live
0pt.app instance -- not from the templates. It therefore contradicts the
existing docs in several places, deliberately:

* /api/0pt/* answers ANONYMOUSLY in production (live-verified 2026-08-07):
  GET https://0pt.app/api/0pt returns 200 with no token, and 200 with a
  deliberately invalid one. The deployment is current (the newer lakehouse
  routes are present), so middleware.ts is simply not running. README lines
  49-52 and merge 6531384 claim the opposite. Root cause UNKNOWN -- flagged,
  not guessed.
* No handler reads x-0pt-verified-tenant. middleware.ts sets it; nothing else
  in the repo reads it. Every /api/0pt/* handler takes tenant_id from the
  request body/query instead, so tenant isolation is not implemented.
* Everything outside /api/0pt/* has no auth at all (matcher scope), including
  GET /api/admin/metrics and GET /api/orders (both live-verified 200 anon) and
  POST /api/payments/{id}/release, which flips an order to "delivered"
  regardless of payment.
* CL0UD policy client is fail-open and AUD0 audit is a silent no-op when their
  URLs are unset, with no production guard -- unlike AUTH_ENFORCE, which has one.
* connections/db-grant documents AES-GCM encryption it does not implement.
* The FastAPI engine (services/api) has zero authentication despite
  lib/engine.ts sending X-Internal-Token.
* services/scrapers/waf_bypass.py (FlareSolverr, Tor, cloudscraper, proxy pool,
  undetected browser, fake identities) plus flaresolverr/tor-proxy in
  services/infra/docker-compose.data-stack.yml directly contradict CLAUDE.md
  §1 and the README's compliance claim. Left in place -- deletion is a Simon
  decision, recorded as open question 2.
* Production has NO database (live /api/health reports db:not_configured) and
  the whole /api/0pt/* capability layer is per-module in-memory Maps, so state
  does not survive a cold start and is not even shared between route modules.

siax.config.json deviates from the template on two fields, on purpose:
deploy.target is "vercel" (live-verified Server: Vercel header), not "coolify",
and designSystem is null because @siax/ui is not a dependency here. Both
deviations are documented in ARCHITECTURE.md §5 and §8.

Docs-only change. No code, CI, LICENSE or workflow files were modified.
2026-08-07 21:48:35 +02:00
Claude (SIAX platform session)andClaude Opus 5 bcf285f057 merge: unify GitHub main into Gitea main (0pt)
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 38s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 17s
Merges github/main (6 commits: 17-bug audit fix, CI quality gate,
.env.example + .gitignore fix, missing platform clients + registry
services, docs accuracy overhaul) into gitea/main (8 commits: Iceberg
write boundary + live ST0RE verification, lakehouse mapping routes,
Waves 1-4 foundational hardening).

16 conflicts. Both sides had independently written the four
src/clients/*.ts and the two registry services, so those are combined
rather than picked:

- st0re-client.ts: GitHub's endpoint wins on evidence. POST goes to
  /v1/st0re/artifacts/register, not /v1/st0re/artifacts -- verified in
  sax3l/st0re src/api/routes/artifacts.ts, where the bare path is a
  GET-only list route. Gitea's URL normalisation, error-body text and
  mock kept.
- n0d-client.ts: field is `status`, not `state`, with N0D's real 13-state
  union -- verified in sax3l/n0d packages/schemas/n0d.job.schema.json,
  which says explicitly not to add "succeeded". Gitea's mock echo,
  URL normalisation and error-body text kept.
- cl0ud-client.ts: Gitea's fail-closed HTTP normalisation kept (a 200
  with no `decision` reads as "deny", not as a silent allow). GitHub's
  PolicyDecision/PolicyDecisionValue naming kept; PolicyResult retained
  as an alias.
- aud0-client.ts: permissive union of both input types (optional
  payload/metadata/correlation_id), GitHub's echo return, Gitea's URL
  normalisation and error-body text, plus a JSON-parse fallback so a
  successful POST with an empty body does not throw.
- dataset-service.ts / source-service.ts: GitHub's record/DTO split and
  event naming (0pt.source_created / 0pt.create_source, which the merged
  docs already reference) plus Gitea's name validation, description /
  created_by fields and actor_id derivation. List filters are the union.
- lakehouse mapping routes: GitHub's shared lakehouse-mapping-registry
  singletons (without which every write 400'd "mapping not found") AND
  Gitea's Zod parseBody validation. Both, not either.
- src/types/source.ts, src/types/dataset.ts: unions of both vocabularies;
  GitHub's `access` legal-sourcing field kept.
- .env.example: GitHub's audited inventory plus Gitea's Zitadel /
  AUTH_ENFORCE block.
- CLAUDE.md, docs/ICEBERG_WRITE_BOUNDARY.md: GitHub's corrections kept,
  Gitea's live-verification kept and marked as superseding the
  "would 400 outright" finding (Gitea had already added the required
  X-Tenant-Id/X-Actor-Id headers).
- pnpm-lock.yaml: regenerated with pnpm 9.15.9, not merged.

Also corrects CLAUDE.md's claim that the banned services/scrapers stack
was "since removed" -- the removal PR is open, not merged, and this
branch inherits that code from Gitea main. Nothing here resurrects,
extends or re-wires any of it; services/scrapers/ is byte-identical to
Gitea main.

Verified on the merged tree: typecheck (src/ + tests/) clean;
17 test files, 121 passed, 1 skipped (the realinfra test skipping
honestly on ST0RE HTTP 401), 0 failures. Gitea main baseline was the
same 121/1; GitHub main baseline could not even `pnpm install`
("packages field missing or empty") -- Gitea's pnpm-workspace.yaml fix
resolves that. Whole-repo `typecheck:app` reports 9 errors, an identical
set to Gitea main's baseline, so it is advisory in both CI workflows
rather than deleted. Lint: 16 problems, identical to Gitea baseline.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-28 12:38:01 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 5 a06f86095f docs(data-engine): 1p extends the provenance chain to the network layer
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 23s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 40s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (pull_request) Successful in 42s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 25s
bridge_provenance answers which source a field came from; it does not
answer what happened on the wire. 1p (the SIAX egress measurement point)
adds the robots decision + sha256 of the robots.txt it was read from,
body_sha256 per fetch, and blocked_soft detection — HTTP 200 whose body
is a block page, which otherwise gets scored as corroborating data.

Consistent with CLAUDE.md §1: a measurement point, not a bypass.
Documentation only; not in use, no worker routes through it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-26 13:57:38 +02:00
adminandClaude Sonnet 5 2902a26bac docs: full accuracy overhaul, grounded claim-by-claim in real code (#4)
* docs: full accuracy overhaul, grounded claim-by-claim in real code

Every doc in this repo (CLAUDE.md, README.md, SECURITY.md, docs/*.md) was
audited and rewritten by a multi-pass process: independent rewrite per
cluster, adversarial re-verification of that rewrite against the actual
code, then a final cross-doc consistency pass — each stage re-checking
claims against the repo directly rather than trusting the previous stage.

Two corrections matter most:

1. docs/ICEBERG_WRITE_BOUNDARY.md, docs/11-lakehouse-write-plan.md, and
   docs/P0_QUERY_SOURCE_FLOW.md asserted src/services/quality-check-service.ts,
   quality-report-service.ts, src/data-platform/services/catalog-service.ts,
   and sql/002_p0_dataset_quality.sql/sql/003_*.sql as real, tested code.
   git log --all across every branch shows zero commits for any of these
   paths, ever. 0pt's data-quality/QA enforcement does not exist in code.
   Corrected everywhere, with a new docs/P0_DATASET_QUALITY_FLOW.md added
   as an explicit target-spec (not-yet-built) replacement.

2. github.com/sax3l/0pt (this repo) and git.siax.io/sax3l/0pt (Gitea) are
   two diverged remotes sharing part of the same history (services/api/
   workers/adaptive_router.py is byte-identical between them). Gitea's main
   independently accumulated a WAF-bypass/proxy-rotation scraper stack in
   three 2026-07-13 commits, since removed via a Gitea PR; GitHub's main
   never had it. Which remote is canonical/deployed is unresolved — flagged
   consistently across the corpus, not decided here.

Also newly and consistently documented: the tenant_id/project_id-read-from-
client-body gap on the P0 lakehouse/rate-policy/source-query routes (no
auth/session system exists anywhere in this repo yet); that every CL0UD/
N0D/AUD0/ST0RE platform client is real but mock-only (zero process.env
reads for any of their *_URL vars); that two P0 mutation routes
(lakehouse/mappings, sources/rate-policies) always fail over HTTP today
because their prerequisite entity can never be created via any route; a
schema bug in sql/004 (FK references to opt_datasets/opt_sources, which
don't exist); and that 0pt.app's live deployment was independently
confirmed (curled this pass) to be running this exact codebase with
DATABASE_URL/REDIS_URL unset in production.

New file: docs/12-edge-capability-api.md — the edge-native P0 TypeScript
capability contract (app/api/0pt/*, /api/screen, /api/ai/parse), previously
undocumented and distinct from docs/04-api.md's FastAPI-engine-only scope.

Verified before commit: tsc --noEmit clean; vitest run 88 passed, 1 todo,
0 failures (13 files) — docs-only change, no source touched.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: reflect PR #5's lakehouse-mapping-registry + status-code fixes

Follow-up to keep docs/12-edge-capability-api.md accurate once both PRs
land: fix/0pt-full-bug-hunt (#5) fixed the shared-instance bug in the
lakehouse mapping routes and added proper status-code mapping to the
document extraction route. This doc was written against the pre-fix
state in the same pass that added it, so it needs the same correction.

Does not claim the lakehouse write path fully works now -- the deeper
dataset-registration gap (no route ever calls DatasetService.registerDataset)
is unchanged and still blocks it end-to-end; only the shared-instance half
of the bug is fixed.

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-22 18:49:01 +02:00
adminandClaude Sonnet 5 bda21e87eb Live-verify Iceberg write path against ST0RE + close field/contract gaps
Re-runs this session's task spec against 0pt's actual repo state, which
turned out to already have a substantial, tested implementation from a
prior pass (35b6ec6): dataset<->Iceberg-table mapping, source rate policy,
and an ST0RE lakehouse client that was honestly marked "not live-verified".

This pass found api.st0re.siax.io IS reachable from this environment and
used it -- first via curl to safely discover the real contract, then
through 0pt's own updated code -- to drive a real namespace -> table ->
snapshot write against production ST0RE (task item 3's "write ONE first
test dataset" proof). That surfaced and fixed three real bugs the
mock-only pass could not have caught:

- ST0RE requires X-Tenant-Id/X-Actor-Id headers on every lakehouse route;
  the previous HTTP client sent none. Fixed via a threaded
  St0reRequestContext.
- IcebergTableInput.datasetId is a foreign key into ST0RE's OWN dataset
  table, not a free-form string -- sending 0pt's dataset_id 400s live with
  a Postgres FK violation. Fixed by no longer sending it; 0pt's
  dataset<->table linkage lives entirely in DatasetIcebergMapping.
- ST0RE enforces a real unique constraint on lakehouse namespaces
  (tenant_id, project_id, name) with no upsert route. Fixed with a
  client-side lookup-or-create (listNamespaces + findOrRegisterNamespace).

Also closed a field-level gap against the task's literal schema spec:
0pt.dataset_iceberg_mapping.schema.v1 now carries namespace_id (a real
reference to ST0RE's LakehouseNamespace.namespaceId, not guessed) and
mapped_at, both additive alongside the existing namespace/created_at
fields (sql/005, JSON schema, types, service).

tests/p0/iceberg-write-service.realinfra.test.ts replaces the prior
it.todo with a real SEAM-pattern live test: attempts the real HTTP call,
skips honestly if ST0RE is unreachable, never fabricates success. It ran
successfully against production ST0RE this session (real namespace/table/
snapshot UUIDs logged in docs/ICEBERG_WRITE_BOUNDARY.md).

Two ST0RE-side cross-tenant read bugs were found and flagged (not fixed
here -- out of scope for this repo): GET .../namespaces ignores its own
tenant header and query filters; GET .../tables/:id doesn't check the
caller's tenant against the table's owner.

npm test: 155 passed, 0 failed, 0 todo (up from 154 passed + 1 todo).
npx tsc --noEmit: 1 pre-existing, unrelated error in
quality-report-service.ts (present before this pass, part of the wider
uncommitted P0 data-platform build already in this repo) -- not touched.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-13 00:18:10 +02:00
adminandClaude Sonnet 5 35b6ec63bf Add 0pt Iceberg write-path ownership: dataset<->table mapping + source rate policy
Real, tested implementation of docs/11-lakehouse-write-plan.md's items 2-8
(the "future implementation session" that doc named): 0pt is now the
canonical writer of Iceberg tables through ST0RE's real, shipped
/v1/st0re/lakehouse/* table registry (sax3l/st0re commit 9ea0abb), never
persisting lakehouse table/catalog/snapshot state itself.

- src/types + src/services for 0pt.dataset_iceberg_mapping.schema.v1
  (dataset -> ST0RE tableId reference) and 0pt.source_rate_policy.schema.v1
  (the sourceRatePolicy ownership repair, moved out of N0D per ADR-0030).
- src/clients/st0re-lakehouse-client.ts: new client matching ST0RE's actual
  camelCase route contract, with the same mock/HTTP boundary convention as
  this repo's existing cl0ud/n0d/aud0/st0re clients. Honest caveat in its
  module doc comment: not verified against a live ST0RE instance in this
  pass (no reachable ST0RE_URL); every test exercises the deterministic mock.
- src/services/iceberg-write-service.ts: registers tables/snapshots through
  ST0RE, requests N0D jobs only for heavy writes (never executes them
  in-process), emits all four AUD0 event names
  (dataset_iceberg_table_mapped / iceberg_write_requested /
  iceberg_snapshot_created / source_rate_policy_created).
- sql/004, packages/schemas/*.json, app/api/0pt/lakehouse + sources/rate-policies
  routes, tests/p0/*.test.ts (154 passed + 1 honest it.todo for the live-ST0RE
  case, up from 142 baseline, 0 failures).
- Reconciled a real collision: an earlier untracked draft schema/test pair
  (tests/p0/enterprise-data-os-expansion.test.ts) asserted a different,
  now-superseded source_rate_policy shape; updated that one test block only.
- docs/ICEBERG_WRITE_BOUNDARY.md states the ownership boundary plainly and
  is explicit throughout about what's real-and-tested vs. contract-only.
  docs/11-lakehouse-write-plan.md gets a status-update section, not a rewrite.
- Data quality rules (quality-check-service.ts, quality-report-service.ts)
  were not touched -- confirmed still 0pt-owned.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:46:47 +02:00
adminandClaude Sonnet 5 2545218265 Document lakehouse write-path ownership decision (ADR-0030)
Points at n0d's ADR-0030 (Apache Iceberg canonical, Delta rejected for
P0/P1) and lays out 0pt's write-path plan: dataset-to-Iceberg-table
mapping, writes through ST0RE's future table registry, keeping QA and
source-rate/crawl-compliance logic in 0pt. Schema/event names specified
precisely for a future implementation session. Written adjacent to, not
touching, the substantial live P0 data-platform build in progress in this
repo (data-contract/dataset/quality-check services).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-11 15:11:15 +02:00
adminandClaude Sonnet 5 c89731115c feat: add 0pt.query_source, 0pt.document_ocr, 0pt.write_external_record capabilities
Three new, tenant-agnostic P0 capabilities:

- 0pt.query_source: bounded, timeout/row-capped ad-hoc SQL query execution
  against registered database sources, via a Fabric/OneLake adapter
  (Azure AD credential-based mssql connection), with AUD0 audit events
  and an app/api/0pt/sources/[sourceId]/query endpoint.

- 0pt.document_ocr (document capture + extraction): mailbox-based document
  intake via Microsoft Graph, OCR/field extraction via Azure Document
  Intelligence, with capture/extraction API endpoints and services that
  never fabricate extracted values.

- 0pt.write_external_record (external writeback): a generic writeback-adapter
  contract plus a concrete Odoo bills adapter that matches partners via
  Fabric, backing an external-writeback-service for pushing records to
  downstream systems of record.

Known interim gaps:
- src/adapters/local-blob-store.ts is an interim ST0RE substitute pending
  the real ST0RE artifact-store integration.
- mssql is used by the Fabric/OneLake adapter but deliberately not yet
  added to package.json (pending `pnpm add mssql` once the concurrent
  session's package.json/dependency changes settle).

A separate, concurrently-active session has unrelated in-flight changes
in this same working tree (data-platform catalog/lineage/feature-store,
dataset quality, lakehouse/Iceberg docs, deploy scaffolding, package.json/
pnpm-lock.yaml updates, etc.) — none of that is touched or included here.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-08 19:32:43 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 4.8 22e09d984d feat: rebrand MONO->0pt (hero, header, layout) + add project docs/contract
Hero is now a data-native 0pt artifact (no photos, keeps grain/reveal/float); header is the 0pt wordmark with Swedish nav; layout is sv + loads JetBrains Mono + 0pt metadata; globals wires the loaded fonts. Adds CLAUDE.md + docs/01-09 as the build contract. next build green (5 routes).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-24 17:38:07 +02:00