12 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
admin a1557b2a7d feat(payments): bind orders to verified tenant and buyer
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (push) Has been skipped
masterplan-lock / check (push) Successful in 4s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 14s
masterplan-lock / check (pull_request) Successful in 4s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 14s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 30s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 35s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (pull_request) Successful in 25s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 54s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m31s
2026-09-15 19:53:58 +02:00
admin cecc2bc637 fix(payments): authenticate order detail and deposit checkout
masterplan-lock / check (push) Successful in 4s
masterplan-lock / check (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 17s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 17s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (pull_request) Successful in 36s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 1m14s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m12s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 1m22s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (push) Failing after 1m22s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (pull_request) Failing after 1m22s
2026-09-15 19:09:53 +02:00
admin 7ce92827c0 fix: close demo payment bypass and guard order transitions
masterplan-lock / check (pull_request) Successful in 4s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 14s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 15s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 16s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (pull_request) Successful in 26s
masterplan-lock / check (push) Successful in 35s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (pull_request) Successful in 37s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 1m4s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (push) Successful in 1m14s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 2m12s
2026-09-15 18:52:23 +02:00
admin ae190fa60d fix: advance orders only after matching paid Stripe events
masterplan-lock / check (pull_request) Successful in 5s
masterplan-lock / check (push) Successful in 8s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 18s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 16s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 18s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 18s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (push) Successful in 28s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 36s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (pull_request) Successful in 48s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (pull_request) Successful in 56s
2026-09-15 18:15:42 +02:00
admin 8911709931 fix: do not acknowledge unverified Stripe webhooks
masterplan-lock / check (push) Successful in 10s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 14s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (pull_request) Successful in 27s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 39s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (pull_request) Successful in 32s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 43s
masterplan-lock / check (pull_request) Successful in 41s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m12s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m14s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (push) Successful in 1m36s
2026-09-15 18:08:13 +02:00
Claude Opus 5 d7a1c4d5e1 docs: the Coolify deploy hook is LIVE — six docs still say it is a placeholder
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 31s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (push) Successful in 42s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 44s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 1m6s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 30s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (pull_request) Successful in 37s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 26s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m2s
Six documents on main assert that no Coolify app has been provisioned for 0pt and
that cd.yml's COOLIFY_APP_ID is a literal placeholder whose guard fails the job on
purpose. That is no longer true, and the gap is not cosmetic: it means a merge to
main silently ships to production while the repo's own docs promise it cannot.

Measured, not assumed:

  * repo Actions secret  COOLIFY_TOKEN   exists, created 2026-08-31T11:34:34Z
    (GET /api/v1/repos/sax3l/0pt/actions/secrets)
  * repo Actions variable COOLIFY_APP_ID exists with a real 24-character value,
    not the "TODO-no-coolify-app-provisioned-yet" literal
    (GET /api/v1/repos/sax3l/0pt/actions/variables)
  * both guards in .gitea/workflows/cd.yml therefore pass; on the push to main at
    1ff34410 (2026-09-06) the job "Deploy to Coolify / deploy" (run 11695, job
    26295) finished SUCCESS with "coolify deploy HTTP 200" in its log

Deliberately NOT claimed: that the Coolify app builds, starts or serves, or that
0pt.app DNS points at it rather than Vercel. Nobody probed the running site, and
every corrected passage says so explicitly rather than replacing one unverified
claim with another.

Corrected: README.md "Deploy", docs/02-architecture.md hosting callout,
docs/architecture/decisions/0001 (consequence annotated, decision untouched --
an ADR is a historical record), docs/runbook/incident.md (the symptom row is now
inverted: the risk is an unintended deploy, not a red job),
docs/compliance/GOLDEN-STANDARD-REPORT.md D4 (❌ -> ⚠️, not ✅, because "webhook
accepted" is not "app serves"), docs/compliance/INVENTORY.md CI row.

Falsifiable check over all six files (stale claim present without a correction
marker = red):

  origin/main                                  -> FAIL (12 findings)
  this branch                                  -> PASS
  mutation: drop only the README bullet        -> FAIL
  mutation: drop only the runbook correction   -> FAIL

The check initially passed vacuously on docs/02-architecture.md because PR #32 had
already put the string "CORRECTED 2026-09-06" in that file for an unrelated reason;
the marker was made specific so the check could actually fail there too.

Docs only. No workflow files, no .gitignore, no source.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-06 09:56:53 +02:00
admin 77e5137c9a Merge pull request 'docs+chore: repo hygiene -- v2.0 manifests, ADRs, changelog, doctor, guides' (#20) from docs/repo-hygiene-v2-standard into main
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 44s
Deploy to Coolify / deploy (push) Failing after 3s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 23s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 19s
2026-08-11 12:32:19 +00:00
admin 328f8a46cb docs+chore: repo hygiene -- v2.0 manifests, ADRs, changelog, doctor, guides
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 19s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 19s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 44s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 21s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 20s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (pull_request) Successful in 42s
BACKLOG P1-1: siax.repo.json/siax.config.json rewritten to be schema-valid
against sax3l/siax-standard's actual v2.0 schemas (lifecycle,
operationalState, gitHost, domains-as-objects, consumedBy, children,
contracts -- validated with jsonschema, not just eyeballed). config.json
restructured to the real deploy-descriptor shape (framework/build/start/
port/healthcheck/environments) instead of duplicating repo.json's identity
fields, which the schema doesn't allow.

BACKLOG P1-2: 3 ADRs for decisions already made and evidenced elsewhere in
this repo (Coolify-not-Vercel, Zitadel-not-NextAuth, Iceberg-format pointer
to n0d ADR-0030) -- retroactive documentation, not new decisions. The
Stripe/Revolut and services/scrapers/* questions are explicitly NOT written
as ADRs here; both are account-owner-gated or actively under review
elsewhere (see docs/architecture/decisions/README.md).

BACKLOG P1-3: CHANGELOG.md from real git log history (no tags/releases
exist yet -- this doesn't invent version numbers that were never cut).

BACKLOG P1-19: `pnpm siax:doctor` (scripts/siax-doctor.mjs, AGENT-04) --
zero-dependency, checks required files + manifest shape, prints
control-IDs. .devcontainer/devcontainer.json (DX-03). compose.dev.yaml
(DX-02 -- UNVERIFIED, no Docker available in this environment to smoke-test,
flagged in the file itself). All 4 prompts + the index rewritten to AGENT-03
shape (goal/context/prerequisites/scope/contract/acceptance-criteria/
control-ID/forbidden-actions).

BACKLOG P1-20: docs/architecture/ARCHITECTURE.md migrated to the v2.0
9-heading template -- new §5 "Ytor och paritet" (capability x
API/CLI/MCP/console coverage table, grounded in the same registry facts
docs/02-architecture.md already established), §6-9 renumbered from the old
§5-8 (all internal cross-references fixed, CLAUDE.md's own §-numbers left
untouched). docs/api/ added (points at contracts/openapi.yaml as the one
SSOT instead of duplicating it as drift-prone prose).

BACKLOG P1-21: packages/schemas now has a real package.json (was loose JSON
files with no package -- pnpm-workspace.yaml's packages/* glob matched an
empty package). Verified `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` and the full
typecheck/test/build suite still pass with 2 real workspace projects.
apps/ restructuring explicitly NOT attempted (BACKLOG's own effort estimate
is "L" / large -- moving the whole app tree is a bigger, riskier change than
belongs in this pass). Import-boundary check added via dependency-cruiser
(ARK-14) -- installed for real, config tested against this codebase (179
modules, 310 deps, 0 violations), wired as `pnpm run deps:check` (advisory,
not yet a CI gate).

BACKLOG P2-5: docs/02-architecture.md's "Hosting" section marked SUPERSEDED
(the Vercel plan was superseded by the Coolify deploy.target flip,
2026-08-09 -- ADR-0001). README.md/.env.example were checked and are
already accurately framed (live-on-Vercel vs. config-target-is-Coolify) --
not touched.

BACKLOG P3-5: 2 stale github.com/sax3l/0pt/pull/3 links removed (the PR
merged long ago, .env.example is real and current) -- docs/09-build-plan.md,
docs/08-infrastructure.md. The "two diverged remotes, unresolved which is
canonical" language elsewhere (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, SECURITY.md, etc.) is
deliberately NOT touched -- that's a live, correctly-flagged, account-owner-
owned open question per the Gitea-exclusivity mandate, not a stale link.

BACKLOG P6 (19 items): concrete artifacts for the ones that are actually a
file (.editorconfig, dependency-cruiser, deprecation policy, K8s reference
manifest, .actrc, Makefile, ONBOARDING.md); docs/guides/P6-GUIDES.md for the
rest (CLI-13, DOC-18, UI-30, IAM-19, PAY-11, AI-18, OBS-21, TEST-20, NET-19,
SCALE-13, OSS-10, AGENT-13) -- each grounded in this repo's actual code/gaps,
not generic advice.

NOT attempted (out of this task's scope, noted for the record):
- P2-1 (cl0ud app-registry.ts mismatch) -- lives in a different repo
  (sax3l/cl0ud), not cloned/authorized for this task's single-repo PR flow.
- The CI "doctor step" half of P1-15 -- deliberately left out of this PR's
  .gitea/workflows/ci.yml to avoid a 3-way merge conflict with
  ci/security-headers-and-scanning, which already restructured that file;
  add it as a follow-up once that PR merges.

This branch was authored independently of, but shares docs/architecture/
ARCHITECTURE.md and docs/slo.md with, fix/honest-health-check and
ci/security-headers-and-scanning -- expect a small, normal merge conflict
if this is rebased after either of those merge first (both already rebased
cleanly against each other and against main as of this commit).
2026-08-11 14:18:00 +02:00
admin a88ad04867 fix(health): report real per-dependency status instead of hardcoded ok:true
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 21s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 21s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 41s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 22s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 21s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (pull_request) Successful in 41s
BACKLOG P0-3: /api/health only ever checked *presence* of DATABASE_URL/
REDIS_URL and always returned ok:true regardless of whether anything was
reachable -- ARCHITECTURE.md's own words, "an uptime monitor watching HTTP
200 would show green for a dying instance".

lib/health-checks.ts adds real dependency probes:
  - db: a live `select 1` round trip (not just DATABASE_URL presence)
  - engine: a real HTTP call to the FastAPI engine's own GET /health
  - stripe: Stripe's documented lightweight balance.retrieve() liveness call
  - queue: honestly reports "not_integrated" when REDIS_URL is set but
    unused -- no Redis client is wired anywhere in this repo, so reporting
    "ok" would fabricate a check that doesn't exist

/api/health stays a liveness check (always 200 while the process can
respond; the body's `ok` field is the honest signal). New GET /api/ready
fails closed with 503 when the load-bearing dependency (db) isn't both
configured and reachable -- the "no /ready route" gap.

contracts/openapi.yaml, docs/architecture/ARCHITECTURE.md, and docs/slo.md
updated to match. 17 new unit tests (dependency-injected fakes, no real
network/DB) + 5 route-level tests.
2026-08-11 13:49:23 +02:00
admin d2b5ec8e4f docs(compliance): FAS 0-5 - inventory, relations, OSS, golden standard, backlog + repo classification (siax.repo.json) 2026-08-10 04:03:40 +02:00
adminandClaude Sonnet 5 ad042d825f fix(deploy): declare Coolify as the deploy target, not Vercel
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 18s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 39s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (pull_request) Successful in 41s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 19s
siax.config.json declared deploy.target: "vercel", which conflicts with
the SIAX Cloud platform pattern every sibling OS repo (n0d, st0re, aud0)
follows: a Dockerfile "for Coolify" (already present in this repo) plus a
.gitea/workflows/deploy.yml that POSTs a restart to a Coolify app UUID.

Investigated before changing anything:
- 0pt.app is confirmed live on Vercel (Server: Vercel, 200 OK) but its own
  /api/health reports db/queue "not_configured", and POSTing to /api/orders
  creates an order that is not durably persisted (in-memory store only, per
  this repo's own docs/08-infrastructure.md and docs/architecture/
  ARCHITECTURE.md, both independently verified live 2026-07-19 / 2026-08-07,
  and reconfirmed live again today). It's a fully-built marketing/demo
  surface with no real backend behind it -- not a live product serving real
  customer data. Safe to change deploy config without a cutover plan.
- Dockerfile already exists and is already written "for Coolify" (node:24-
  alpine multistage, non-root, /api/health healthcheck) -- no changes needed
  there.
- No .gitea/workflows/deploy.yml existed. Added one following the exact
  pattern used by n0d and st0re (POST /api/v1/deploy?uuid=...&force=false
  with COOLIFY_TOKEN). No Coolify app has been provisioned for 0pt yet, so
  the app UUID is a literal placeholder and the workflow fails loudly by
  design until a real app + token are in place -- this does not silently
  ship a broken deploy config.

This changes only this repo's declared *intent*. It does NOT touch the live
Vercel deployment, delete the Vercel project, or move any traffic --
that cutover (provision Coolify app -> verify -> DNS -> decommission
Vercel) is a separate, larger decision. README and ARCHITECTURE.md updated
to state this plainly rather than let them contradict the new config.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-09 12:36:24 +02:00
Claude (SIAX platform session) bb58617540 docs(standard): add code-verified ARCHITECTURE.md + siax.config.json (S1-S7)
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 17s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 39s
Brings 0pt to the SIAX repo standard. README, LICENSE (proprietary, correct
for this repo), Dockerfile and .gitea/workflows/ci.yml already existed and are
left untouched; no .github/workflows exists.

The architecture document was written by reading the code (entrypoints,
routes, services, migrations, Dockerfile, env, tests) and by probing the live
0pt.app instance -- not from the templates. It therefore contradicts the
existing docs in several places, deliberately:

* /api/0pt/* answers ANONYMOUSLY in production (live-verified 2026-08-07):
  GET https://0pt.app/api/0pt returns 200 with no token, and 200 with a
  deliberately invalid one. The deployment is current (the newer lakehouse
  routes are present), so middleware.ts is simply not running. README lines
  49-52 and merge 6531384 claim the opposite. Root cause UNKNOWN -- flagged,
  not guessed.
* No handler reads x-0pt-verified-tenant. middleware.ts sets it; nothing else
  in the repo reads it. Every /api/0pt/* handler takes tenant_id from the
  request body/query instead, so tenant isolation is not implemented.
* Everything outside /api/0pt/* has no auth at all (matcher scope), including
  GET /api/admin/metrics and GET /api/orders (both live-verified 200 anon) and
  POST /api/payments/{id}/release, which flips an order to "delivered"
  regardless of payment.
* CL0UD policy client is fail-open and AUD0 audit is a silent no-op when their
  URLs are unset, with no production guard -- unlike AUTH_ENFORCE, which has one.
* connections/db-grant documents AES-GCM encryption it does not implement.
* The FastAPI engine (services/api) has zero authentication despite
  lib/engine.ts sending X-Internal-Token.
* services/scrapers/waf_bypass.py (FlareSolverr, Tor, cloudscraper, proxy pool,
  undetected browser, fake identities) plus flaresolverr/tor-proxy in
  services/infra/docker-compose.data-stack.yml directly contradict CLAUDE.md
  §1 and the README's compliance claim. Left in place -- deletion is a Simon
  decision, recorded as open question 2.
* Production has NO database (live /api/health reports db:not_configured) and
  the whole /api/0pt/* capability layer is per-module in-memory Maps, so state
  does not survive a cold start and is not even shared between route modules.

siax.config.json deviates from the template on two fields, on purpose:
deploy.target is "vercel" (live-verified Server: Vercel header), not "coolify",
and designSystem is null because @siax/ui is not a dependency here. Both
deviations are documented in ARCHITECTURE.md §5 and §8.

Docs-only change. No code, CI, LICENSE or workflow files were modified.
2026-08-07 21:48:35 +02:00