Files
accounted/tests/pg/ledger-usage-stats-rpc.pg.test.ts
T
Mattsson cd344b6dbb fix(db): enforce balance check on directly inserted posted journal entries (v2) (#1439)
* fix(db): enforce balance check on directly inserted posted journal entries

check_balance_on_post only fires on the draft-to-posted UPDATE transition,
so any code path that INSERTs a row with status 'posted' directly skipped
balance validation entirely. The invariant sum(debit) = sum(credit) on
every posted entry was DB-enforced only for the engine's commit lifecycle.

Add check_balance_on_posted_insert, a deferred constraint trigger on
AFTER INSERT WHEN (NEW.status = 'posted') reusing the existing
check_journal_entry_balance() function, which already handles the
journal_entries INSERT context via NEW.id/NEW.status. Deferred semantics
let an atomic transaction insert header and lines together; zero-line and
unbalanced posted inserts are rejected at constraint evaluation. All
existing checks stay intact; this only adds coverage.

The one first-party posted-INSERT path outside an RPC, the sandbox seed,
now books through the bookkeeping engine (createJournalEntry) instead of
raw inserts. SIE import already inserts header and lines in a single
transaction via its structured RPC and passes unchanged.

pg tests cover the new path (zero-line rejected, unbalanced rejected at
SET CONSTRAINTS IMMEDIATE, balanced same-transaction insert accepted) and
existing posted-entry fixtures move to a transactional
insertPostedJournalEntry helper so they stay valid setup.

Fixes #327

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(tests): insert list-filters pg fixtures in one transaction

The list-filters suite (landed via a sibling merge) inserted posted
headers with getPool().query, where each query autocommits: the deferred
check_balance_on_posted_insert constraint fired at the header's own
commit with zero lines and correctly rejected the fixture. Header and
balanced lines now share one BEGIN/COMMIT so the constraint evaluates
the complete entry, mirroring the insertPostedJournalEntry helper.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(seed): insert journal headers as drafts, post after lines land

check_balance_on_posted_insert (renamed to apply-time version
20260806130000) rejects a posted header whose transaction has no lines.
PostgREST autocommits each request, so every seed path that inserted
posted headers first would die with "has zero total": the sandbox seed
(ledger history, invoice vouchers, salary vouchers), seed-demo-account
and seed-export-data. All now insert draft headers, insert lines, then
flip to posted so check_balance_on_post validates the finished
verifikat. The sandbox seed keeps its documented no-events design.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(db): preserve a preset committed_at on draft-to-posted transition

set_committed_at() stamped now() unconditionally, so the seed flows that
post backdated drafts lost their historical booking timestamps and every
demo verifikat read as booked today (CodeRabbit finding on PR 1439).
Stamp only when committed_at is NULL: the engine path (drafts carry no
committed_at) behaves exactly as before and a posted entry still always
has a committed_at; an explicitly supplied value now survives posting.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(db): preserve preset committed_at only for trusted roles

The IS NULL guard alone (20260806150000, never shipped; replaced by
20260806160000) let any RLS-permitted member backdate committed_at
through PostgREST by presetting it on a draft and posting, which the
Swedish accounting review flagged: committed_at is what the BFL 5 kap
timeliness checks and behandlingshistorik treat as the genuine
transition time. Preset values now survive posting only for
service_role/postgres/supabase_admin; authenticated and anon writers
always get the now() stamp. Consequence: the sandbox seed (runs as the
requesting user) gets committed_at = posting time, accepted and
documented in the route; the demo scripts run as service_role and keep
their backdated history. pg tests cover all four paths, with the upper
timestamp bound CodeRabbit asked for.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(db): restore superseded migration so the preview tracker stays consistent

The preview branch had already applied 20260806150000 when the previous
commit deleted the file, orphaning the preview's migration tracker
("Remote migration versions not found in local migrations directory").
Restored with a header explaining it is superseded in the same deploy by
20260806160000, so the unguarded semantics are never live on their own.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(db): decide committed_at trust by JWT claims, not current_user

The Swedish review found the current_user guard bypassable:
commit_journal_entry is SECURITY DEFINER and granted to authenticated,
so inside it current_user is the function owner and a member could
preset a backdated committed_at on a direct-inserted draft and launder
it through the RPC. The guard now reads the JWT claims role (same
primitive as the RPC's own tenant guard): preset values survive only
for service_role or claim-less backend connections; authenticated and
anon callers are always stamped now(), on both the direct UPDATE and
the RPC path (new pg test). Both migration files now carry the
identical final body so no unguarded intermediate exists as a
standalone applyable unit. Behandlingshistorik logging of trusted
overrides is follow-up #1444.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-06 23:00:05 +02:00

502 lines
20 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* pg-real test for get_ledger_usage_stats + normalize_counterparty_key.
*
* The RPC backs the Accounted://ledger/context MCP resource: one jsonb
* document with windowed account-usage, counterparty-pattern, and
* supplier-pattern aggregates. Verifies: posted-only filtering, the date
* window, dominant category/account derivation (19xx contra exclusion),
* splinter-merging merchant normalization (payment-rail prefixes, dates,
* legal suffixes), storno exclusion from account_usage, supplier-side
* aggregation (credit notes and reversed invoices excluded), and two-company
* isolation (a foreign company id yields empty sections).
*/
import { describe, it, expect, beforeAll } from 'vitest'
import { randomUUID } from 'node:crypto'
import { getPool } from './setup'
import {
seedCompany,
insertDraftJournalEntry,
insertPostedJournalEntry,
} from './fixtures'
async function insertLines(
journalEntryId: string,
lines: Array<{ account: string; debit: number; credit: number }>,
): Promise<void> {
for (const line of lines) {
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.journal_entry_lines
(journal_entry_id, account_number, debit_amount, credit_amount)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4)`,
[journalEntryId, line.account, line.debit, line.credit],
)
}
}
async function insertBookedTransaction(params: {
companyId: string
userId: string
journalEntryId: string
merchantName: string
category: string
date: string
amount?: number
}): Promise<void> {
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.transactions
(id, company_id, user_id, currency, amount, date, description,
journal_entry_id, merchant_name, category)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'SEK', $4, $5, $6, $7, $8, $9)`,
[
randomUUID(),
params.companyId,
params.userId,
params.amount ?? -500,
params.date,
`Payment ${params.merchantName}`,
params.journalEntryId,
params.merchantName,
params.category,
],
)
}
/** ISO date + n days, as a UTC timestamptz string (for committed_at). */
function plusDays(isoDate: string, n: number): string {
const d = new Date(`${isoDate}T00:00:00Z`)
d.setUTCDate(d.getUTCDate() + n)
return d.toISOString()
}
// Posted entry + lines + a booked transaction pointing at it, in one call.
async function bookMerchant(params: {
userId: string
companyId: string
fiscalPeriodId: string
merchantName: string
category: string
date: string
expenseAccount: string
voucherNumber: number
sourceType?: string
}): Promise<string> {
const entryId = await insertPostedJournalEntry({
userId: params.userId,
companyId: params.companyId,
fiscalPeriodId: params.fiscalPeriodId,
entryDate: params.date,
voucherNumber: params.voucherNumber,
sourceType: params.sourceType ?? 'bank_transaction',
// Booked 3 days after the transaction: exercises the committed_at-based
// lag (entry_date == transaction date would give 0).
committedAt: plusDays(params.date, 3),
lines: [
{ accountNumber: params.expenseAccount, debitAmount: 500, creditAmount: 0 },
{ accountNumber: '1930', debitAmount: 0, creditAmount: 500 },
],
})
await insertBookedTransaction({
companyId: params.companyId,
userId: params.userId,
journalEntryId: entryId,
merchantName: params.merchantName,
category: params.category,
date: params.date,
})
return entryId
}
async function insertSupplierWithInvoices(params: {
userId: string
companyId: string
name: string
invoices: Array<{
invoiceDate: string
account: string
vatTreatment?: string
status?: string
isCreditNote?: boolean
extraItemAccounts?: string[]
}>
arrivalStart: number
}): Promise<void> {
const supplierId = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.suppliers (id, user_id, company_id, name)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4)`,
[supplierId, params.userId, params.companyId, params.name],
)
let arrival = params.arrivalStart
for (const inv of params.invoices) {
const invoiceId = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.supplier_invoices
(id, user_id, company_id, supplier_id, arrival_number,
supplier_invoice_number, invoice_date, due_date, status,
vat_treatment, is_credit_note, subtotal, vat_amount, total)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, $6, $7, $7, $8, $9, $10, 1000, 250, 1250)`,
[
invoiceId,
params.userId,
params.companyId,
supplierId,
arrival++,
`SI-${arrival}`,
inv.invoiceDate,
inv.status ?? 'registered',
inv.vatTreatment ?? 'standard_25',
inv.isCreditNote ?? false,
],
)
for (const account of [inv.account, ...(inv.extraItemAccounts ?? [])]) {
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.supplier_invoice_items
(supplier_invoice_id, description, quantity, unit_price, line_total,
account_number, vat_rate, vat_amount)
VALUES ($1, 'Line', 1, 1000, 1000, $2, 0.25, 250)`,
[invoiceId, account],
)
}
}
}
type LedgerStats = {
account_usage: Array<{
account_number: string
account_name: string | null
postings: number
last_used: string
}>
counterparty_patterns: Array<{
counterparty: string
counterparty_key: string
occurrences: number
last_booked: string
dominant_category: string | null
dominant_category_count: number
dominant_account_number: string | null
}>
supplier_patterns: Array<{
supplier: string
invoices: number
last_invoice: string
vat_treatment: string | null
dominant_account_number: string | null
dominant_account_count: number
}>
vat_treatments_used: string[]
median_booking_lag_days: number | null
}
async function callRpc(companyId: string, fromDate: string): Promise<LedgerStats> {
const res = await getPool().query(
`SELECT public.get_ledger_usage_stats($1, $2) AS stats`,
[companyId, fromDate],
)
return res.rows[0].stats as LedgerStats
}
describe('normalize_counterparty_key', () => {
async function normalize(raw: string): Promise<string> {
const res = await getPool().query(
`SELECT public.normalize_counterparty_key($1) AS key`,
[raw],
)
return res.rows[0].key as string
}
it('mirrors normalizeCounterpartyName for the splinter cases', async () => {
// Payment-rail prefix + trailing date.
expect(await normalize('KLARNA AB 2026-07-01')).toBe('klarna')
expect(await normalize('KLARNA AB')).toBe('klarna')
expect(await normalize('SWISH KLARNA AB')).toBe('klarna')
expect(await normalize('KORTKÖP KLARNA AB')).toBe('klarna')
// Faithful-mirror check: bare KORT is NOT a stripped prefix in
// normalizeCounterpartyName() either (only KORTKÖP). Hardening the prefix
// list is Layer B of bank_transaction_ai_normalization.md and must change
// the TS + SQL pair together, or the categorization_templates join drifts.
expect(await normalize('KORT KLARNA AB')).toBe('kort klarna')
// Legal suffix + casing.
expect(await normalize('Telia Sverige AB')).toBe('telia sverige')
// Trailing initials and month tokens (the ngrok bug).
expect(await normalize('ngrok JW')).toBe('ngrok')
expect(await normalize('Ngrok Mars')).toBe('ngrok')
// Invoice references.
expect(await normalize('Acme INV-123')).toBe('acme')
// Card-network descriptors: merchant segment before the star, per-charge
// product/ref/city tail dropped (the Anthropic splinter bug). Processor
// prefixes keep the merchant AFTER the star instead.
expect(await normalize('ANTHROPIC* CLAUDE SUB SAN FRANCISCO')).toBe('anthropic')
expect(await normalize('ANTHROPIC*CLAUDE SUB +14155551234')).toBe('anthropic')
expect(await normalize('PAYPAL *SPOTIFY')).toBe('spotify')
expect(await normalize('SQ *BLUE BOTTLE COFFEE')).toBe('blue bottle coffee')
expect(await normalize('AMZN MKTP SE*A12B34CD5')).toBe('amzn mktp')
// Never strips to empty: keeps the last token.
expect(await normalize('SEB')).toBe('seb')
// NULL-safe.
const res = await getPool().query(
`SELECT public.normalize_counterparty_key(NULL) AS key`,
)
expect(res.rows[0].key).toBe('')
})
})
describe('get_ledger_usage_stats', () => {
let userId: string
let companyId: string
let fiscalPeriodId: string
beforeAll(async () => {
const seeded = await seedCompany()
userId = seeded.userId
companyId = seeded.companyId
fiscalPeriodId = seeded.fiscalPeriodId
// 3x Klarna to 6570 under splintered labels (prefix/date/casing variants
// that must merge), 1x Klarna miscategorized, 2x SL to 5810, plus a draft
// that must not count and an old entry outside the window.
await bookMerchant({ userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId, merchantName: 'KLARNA AB', category: 'expense_bank_fees', date: '2026-05-01', expenseAccount: '6570', voucherNumber: 1 })
await bookMerchant({ userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId, merchantName: 'KORTKÖP KLARNA AB 2026-05-15', category: 'expense_bank_fees', date: '2026-05-15', expenseAccount: '6570', voucherNumber: 2 })
await bookMerchant({ userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId, merchantName: 'Klarna AB', category: 'expense_bank_fees', date: '2026-06-01', expenseAccount: '6570', voucherNumber: 3 })
await bookMerchant({ userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId, merchantName: 'SWISH KLARNA AB', category: 'expense_other', date: '2026-06-10', expenseAccount: '6570', voucherNumber: 4 })
await bookMerchant({ userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId, merchantName: 'SL', category: 'expense_travel', date: '2026-06-05', expenseAccount: '5810', voucherNumber: 5 })
await bookMerchant({ userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId, merchantName: 'SL', category: 'expense_travel', date: '2026-06-20', expenseAccount: '5810', voucherNumber: 6 })
// A storno pair: original already excluded via status='reversed'; the
// storno entry itself is posted and must be excluded from account_usage
// by the source_type filter. 4010 must NOT gain postings from either.
const stornoOriginalId = await insertDraftJournalEntry({
userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId,
entryDate: '2026-06-15', status: 'reversed', voucherNumber: 8,
sourceType: 'bank_transaction',
})
await insertLines(stornoOriginalId, [
{ account: '4010', debit: 300, credit: 0 },
{ account: '1930', debit: 0, credit: 300 },
])
const stornoId = await insertPostedJournalEntry({
userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId,
entryDate: '2026-06-15', voucherNumber: 9,
sourceType: 'storno',
lines: [
{ accountNumber: '1930', debitAmount: 300, creditAmount: 0 },
{ accountNumber: '4010', debitAmount: 0, creditAmount: 300 },
],
})
// Legacy shape: a transaction still linked to the storno entry (predates
// reverseEntry() unlinking). Must not create a counterparty pattern.
await insertBookedTransaction({
companyId, userId,
journalEntryId: stornoId,
merchantName: 'STORNO VENDOR',
category: 'expense_other',
date: '2026-06-15',
})
// Draft entry: must not appear in account_usage.
const draftId = await insertDraftJournalEntry({
userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId,
entryDate: '2026-06-25', status: 'draft', voucherNumber: 0,
})
await insertLines(draftId, [
{ account: '9999', debit: 100, credit: 0 },
{ account: '1930', debit: 0, credit: 100 },
])
// Outside the window: must not count.
await bookMerchant({ userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId, merchantName: 'OLD VENDOR', category: 'expense_other', date: '2026-01-05', expenseAccount: '4010', voucherNumber: 7 })
// Reverse-charge EU purchase (foreign SaaS): lines are expense (5420) +
// calc input VAT (2645) + calc output VAT (2614) + bank (1930), tying at
// equal counts. The dominant contra must be the expense 5420, NOT the low
// VAT number 2614 that the account_number tiebreak would otherwise pick
// (regression for 20260708110000; observed on prod as 2614).
let rcVoucher = 20
for (const d of ['2026-05-20', '2026-06-18']) {
const rcEntry = await insertPostedJournalEntry({
userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId,
entryDate: d,
voucherNumber: rcVoucher++, sourceType: 'bank_transaction',
committedAt: plusDays(d, 3),
lines: [
{ accountNumber: '5420', debitAmount: 500, creditAmount: 0 },
{ accountNumber: '2645', debitAmount: 125, creditAmount: 0 },
{ accountNumber: '2614', debitAmount: 0, creditAmount: 125 },
{ accountNumber: '1930', debitAmount: 0, creditAmount: 500 },
],
})
await insertBookedTransaction({
companyId, userId, journalEntryId: rcEntry,
merchantName: 'GOOGLE WO', category: 'expense_software', date: d,
})
}
// Suppliers: Telia with 3 consistent invoices (one of them multi-line,
// which must not outvote), one credit note and one reversed invoice that
// must both be excluded; Blandat with a 1/2 split staying below any
// dominance and one invoice outside the window.
await insertSupplierWithInvoices({
userId, companyId, name: 'Telia Sverige AB', arrivalStart: 1,
invoices: [
{ invoiceDate: '2026-05-05', account: '6212' },
{ invoiceDate: '2026-06-05', account: '6212', extraItemAccounts: ['6212', '6212'] },
{ invoiceDate: '2026-06-25', account: '6212' },
{ invoiceDate: '2026-06-26', account: '6212', isCreditNote: true },
{ invoiceDate: '2026-06-27', account: '6212', status: 'reversed' },
],
})
await insertSupplierWithInvoices({
userId, companyId, name: 'Blandat AB', arrivalStart: 10,
invoices: [
{ invoiceDate: '2026-06-01', account: '4010' },
{ invoiceDate: '2026-06-02', account: '5460' },
{ invoiceDate: '2026-01-02', account: '4010' },
],
})
// Invoices carrying VAT treatments: one in-window, one before the window.
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.invoices
(company_id, user_id, invoice_number, invoice_date, due_date, vat_treatment)
VALUES ($1, $2, 'INV-1', '2026-06-01', '2026-06-30', 'standard_25'),
($1, $2, 'INV-2', '2026-01-02', '2026-01-31', 'reverse_charge_eu')`,
[companyId, userId],
)
})
it('aggregates posted account usage within the window, excluding stornos', async () => {
const stats = await callRpc(companyId, '2026-04-01')
const byAccount = Object.fromEntries(
stats.account_usage.map((a) => [a.account_number, a]),
)
// 8 posted in-window bank entries each carry a 1930 line (6 simple + 2
// reverse-charge); the storno's 1930 line is excluded by source_type.
expect(byAccount['1930'].postings).toBe(8)
expect(byAccount['6570'].postings).toBe(4)
expect(byAccount['5810'].postings).toBe(2)
expect(byAccount['5810'].last_used).toBe('2026-06-20')
// The reverse-charge fixture's expense and VAT lines all appear in
// account_usage (which does not exclude 26xx: it answers "what accounts
// are used", not "what characterizes a counterparty").
expect(byAccount['5420'].postings).toBe(2)
expect(byAccount['2614'].postings).toBe(2)
// Neither the reversed original nor its storno may credit 4010 postings,
// and the draft line and out-of-window account are absent.
expect(byAccount['4010']).toBeUndefined()
expect(byAccount['9999']).toBeUndefined()
})
it('merges splintered merchant labels into one normalized counterparty', async () => {
const stats = await callRpc(companyId, '2026-04-01')
const klarna = stats.counterparty_patterns.find(
(p) => p.counterparty_key === 'klarna',
)
expect(klarna).toBeDefined()
// KLARNA AB / KORTKÖP ... 2026-05-15 / Klarna AB / SWISH KLARNA AB: one key.
expect(klarna!.occurrences).toBe(4)
expect(klarna!.dominant_category).toBe('expense_bank_fees')
expect(klarna!.dominant_category_count).toBe(3)
// 1930 excluded, so the expense side wins.
expect(klarna!.dominant_account_number).toBe('6570')
expect(klarna!.last_booked).toBe('2026-06-10')
// No second Klarna-ish row survives the merge.
expect(
stats.counterparty_patterns.filter((p) => p.counterparty_key.includes('klarna')),
).toHaveLength(1)
const sl = stats.counterparty_patterns.find((p) => p.counterparty_key === 'sl')
expect(sl!.occurrences).toBe(2)
expect(sl!.dominant_account_number).toBe('5810')
// Out-of-window merchant absent.
expect(
stats.counterparty_patterns.find((p) => p.counterparty === 'OLD VENDOR'),
).toBeUndefined()
// A transaction still linked to a storno entry (legacy rows predating the
// reverseEntry unlink) must not surface as a pattern.
expect(
stats.counterparty_patterns.find((p) => p.counterparty === 'STORNO VENDOR'),
).toBeUndefined()
})
it('picks the expense over a VAT contra for reverse-charge bookings', async () => {
const stats = await callRpc(companyId, '2026-04-01')
const google = stats.counterparty_patterns.find((p) => p.counterparty_key === 'google')
expect(google).toBeDefined()
expect(google!.occurrences).toBe(2)
// 5420/2645/2614 tie at equal counts; excluding 26xx leaves the expense.
// Without the fix the account_number tiebreak would return 2614.
expect(google!.dominant_account_number).toBe('5420')
})
it('orders counterparties by occurrences descending', async () => {
const stats = await callRpc(companyId, '2026-04-01')
const occurrences = stats.counterparty_patterns.map((p) => p.occurrences)
expect(occurrences).toEqual([...occurrences].sort((a, b) => b - a))
})
it('aggregates supplier patterns excluding credit notes and reversed invoices', async () => {
const stats = await callRpc(companyId, '2026-04-01')
const telia = stats.supplier_patterns.find((s) => s.supplier === 'Telia Sverige AB')
expect(telia).toBeDefined()
// 3 live invoices; the credit note and the reversed one are excluded.
expect(telia!.invoices).toBe(3)
expect(telia!.last_invoice).toBe('2026-06-25')
expect(telia!.vat_treatment).toBe('standard_25')
expect(telia!.dominant_account_number).toBe('6212')
// Counted per invoice, not per line: the multi-line invoice adds 1.
expect(telia!.dominant_account_count).toBe(3)
const blandat = stats.supplier_patterns.find((s) => s.supplier === 'Blandat AB')
// Only the two in-window invoices; 1/2 agree on the dominant account.
expect(blandat!.invoices).toBe(2)
expect(blandat!.dominant_account_count).toBe(1)
})
it('reports window-scoped VAT treatments and median booking lag', async () => {
const stats = await callRpc(companyId, '2026-04-01')
expect(stats.vat_treatments_used).toContain('standard_25')
expect(stats.vat_treatments_used).not.toContain('reverse_charge_eu')
// Every booked fixture sets committed_at = transaction date + 3 days, so
// the lag is measured from committed_at (not entry_date, which == the
// transaction date and would give a misleading 0).
expect(stats.median_booking_lag_days).toBe(3)
})
it('returns empty sections for a company with no data (isolation)', async () => {
const other = await seedCompany()
const stats = await callRpc(other.companyId, '2026-04-01')
expect(stats.account_usage).toEqual([])
expect(stats.counterparty_patterns).toEqual([])
expect(stats.supplier_patterns).toEqual([])
expect(stats.vat_treatments_used).toEqual([])
expect(stats.median_booking_lag_days).toBeNull()
})
it('does not leak data across companies with identical merchants', async () => {
const other = await seedCompany()
await bookMerchant({
userId: other.userId,
companyId: other.companyId,
fiscalPeriodId: other.fiscalPeriodId,
merchantName: 'KLARNA AB',
category: 'expense_card_fees',
date: '2026-06-01',
expenseAccount: '6580',
voucherNumber: 1,
})
const stats = await callRpc(other.companyId, '2026-04-01')
const klarna = stats.counterparty_patterns.find(
(p) => p.counterparty_key === 'klarna',
)
// Only its own single booking; the first company's 4 do not bleed in.
expect(klarna!.occurrences).toBe(1)
expect(klarna!.dominant_category).toBe('expense_card_fees')
expect(klarna!.dominant_account_number).toBe('6580')
})
})