cf373e9dd1
* fix(vat): map 3231-3233 to ruta 41 in the momsdeklaration Ruta 41 (försäljning när köparen är betalningsskyldig i Sverige) existed in the type, the eSKD file and the Skatteverket mapper, but no account could ever reach it: 3231-3233 were deliberately parked in RUTA_05_EXCLUDED_ACCOUNTS, so byggmoms/omvänd-skattskyldighet sales vanished from the declaration entirely. Map them statically in ACCOUNT_RUTA and ACCOUNT_TO_BOX; the ACCOUNT_TO_BOX guard now keeps them out of the dynamic ruta 05 set instead of the exclusion list. RC sales carry no output VAT, so they stay out of the ruta 05-08 vs 10-12 pairing checks, pinned by test. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: record the ruta 41 static-mapping decision Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <311770904+jakobwennberg-oss@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1585 lines
64 KiB
TypeScript
1585 lines
64 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
|
||
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
// Mock: sequential result queue
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
|
||
let resultIdx: number
|
||
let results: Array<{ data?: unknown; error?: unknown }>
|
||
|
||
/**
|
||
* The company's own class 3 accounts, as fetchDynamicRuta05Accounts reads
|
||
* them. Answered off a table-routed builder rather than the sequential queue:
|
||
* every calculateVatDeclaration test would otherwise have to seed one, and a
|
||
* missing seed would silently hand the chart query the ledger result.
|
||
*/
|
||
let chartAccounts: Array<{
|
||
account_number: string
|
||
account_name?: string
|
||
default_vat_rate: number | null
|
||
}>
|
||
|
||
function makeBuilder() {
|
||
const b: Record<string, unknown> = {}
|
||
for (const m of ['select', 'eq', 'neq', 'in', 'gte', 'lte', 'lt', 'or', 'not', 'order', 'range', 'limit']) {
|
||
b[m] = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(b)
|
||
}
|
||
b.single = vi.fn().mockImplementation(async () => results[resultIdx++] ?? { data: null, error: null })
|
||
b.maybeSingle = vi.fn().mockImplementation(async () => results[resultIdx++] ?? { data: null, error: null })
|
||
b.then = (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) => resolve(results[resultIdx++] ?? { data: null, error: null })
|
||
return b
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/**
|
||
* chart_of_accounts builder. The real query returns all active class 3 rows:
|
||
* fetchDynamicRuta05Accounts applies configured-rate and narrow missing-rate
|
||
* fallback rules in memory.
|
||
*/
|
||
function makeChartBuilder() {
|
||
const b: Record<string, unknown> = {}
|
||
for (const m of ['select', 'eq', 'in', 'not', 'order', 'range']) {
|
||
b[m] = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(b)
|
||
}
|
||
b.then = (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) =>
|
||
resolve({
|
||
data: chartAccounts.map((account) => ({ account_name: '', ...account })),
|
||
error: null,
|
||
})
|
||
return b
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
function makeClient() {
|
||
return {
|
||
from: vi.fn().mockImplementation((table: string) =>
|
||
table === 'chart_of_accounts' ? makeChartBuilder() : makeBuilder()
|
||
),
|
||
rpc: vi.fn().mockImplementation(async () => results[resultIdx++] ?? { data: null, error: null }),
|
||
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
|
||
} as any
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/**
|
||
* Seed one get_vat_declaration_totals RPC result from line-level fixtures.
|
||
* The helper only SUMS the seeded lines per account (plain arithmetic on the
|
||
* fixture, mirroring what SQL's GROUP BY returns); settlement-shape
|
||
* detection and exclusion happen inside the RPC and are covered by
|
||
* tests/pg/vat-declaration-totals-rpc.pg.test.ts against real Postgres.
|
||
*/
|
||
function seedLedger(
|
||
lines: Array<{ account_number: string; debit_amount: number; credit_amount: number }>,
|
||
sourceTypes: string[] = [],
|
||
) {
|
||
const byAccount = new Map<string, { debit: number; credit: number }>()
|
||
for (const l of lines) {
|
||
const t = byAccount.get(l.account_number) ?? { debit: 0, credit: 0 }
|
||
t.debit += l.debit_amount
|
||
t.credit += l.credit_amount
|
||
byAccount.set(l.account_number, t)
|
||
}
|
||
const source_type_counts: Record<string, number> = {}
|
||
for (const s of sourceTypes) source_type_counts[s] = (source_type_counts[s] ?? 0) + 1
|
||
results.push({
|
||
data: {
|
||
totals: [...byAccount].map(([account_number, t]) => ({
|
||
account_number,
|
||
debit: t.debit,
|
||
credit: t.credit,
|
||
})),
|
||
settlement_shaped_entries: [],
|
||
source_type_counts,
|
||
},
|
||
error: null,
|
||
})
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
import {
|
||
calculatePeriodDates,
|
||
formatPeriodLabel,
|
||
getVatDeclarationSummary,
|
||
calculateVatDeclaration,
|
||
rcInputTotalsFromDeclaration,
|
||
rutorFromTotals,
|
||
} from '../vat-declaration'
|
||
import { runVatDeclarationChecks } from '../vat-declaration-checks'
|
||
import type { VatDeclaration } from '@/types'
|
||
|
||
let supabase: ReturnType<typeof makeClient>
|
||
|
||
beforeEach(() => {
|
||
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
||
resultIdx = 0
|
||
results = []
|
||
chartAccounts = []
|
||
supabase = makeClient()
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
// Pure function tests: no mocks needed
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
|
||
describe('rutorFromTotals: ruta 41 (omvänd skattskyldighet, sales side)', () => {
|
||
it('projects 3231/3232/3233 credit balances into ruta 41', () => {
|
||
const totals = new Map([
|
||
['3231', { debit: 0, credit: 100_000 }],
|
||
['3232', { debit: 500, credit: 10_500 }],
|
||
['3233', { debit: 0, credit: 0 }],
|
||
])
|
||
const rutor = rutorFromTotals(totals)
|
||
expect(rutor.ruta41).toBe(110_000)
|
||
// Buyer accounts for the VAT: an RC sale must not leak into the
|
||
// taxable-sales pairing (rutor 05-08) nor into the net (ruta 49).
|
||
expect(rutor.ruta05).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(rutor.ruta49).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('a pure ruta 41 declaration passes the sales/output pairing checks', () => {
|
||
const totals = new Map([['3231', { debit: 0, credit: 50_000 }]])
|
||
const rutor = rutorFromTotals(totals)
|
||
const findings = runVatDeclarationChecks(rutor)
|
||
expect(findings.map((f) => f.code)).not.toContain('TAXABLE_SALES_WITHOUT_OUTPUT')
|
||
expect(findings.map((f) => f.code)).not.toContain('OUTPUT_VAT_WITHOUT_SALES_BASE')
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
describe('calculatePeriodDates', () => {
|
||
it('returns correct dates for monthly period', () => {
|
||
const { start, end } = calculatePeriodDates('monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
expect(start).toBe('2024-01-01')
|
||
expect(end).toBe('2024-01-31')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('returns correct dates for monthly period 12 (December)', () => {
|
||
const { start, end } = calculatePeriodDates('monthly', 2024, 12)
|
||
expect(start).toBe('2024-12-01')
|
||
expect(end).toBe('2024-12-31')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('returns correct dates for quarterly period', () => {
|
||
const q1 = calculatePeriodDates('quarterly', 2024, 1)
|
||
expect(q1.start).toBe('2024-01-01')
|
||
expect(q1.end).toBe('2024-03-31')
|
||
|
||
const q4 = calculatePeriodDates('quarterly', 2024, 4)
|
||
expect(q4.start).toBe('2024-10-01')
|
||
expect(q4.end).toBe('2024-12-31')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('returns full year for yearly period', () => {
|
||
const { start, end } = calculatePeriodDates('yearly', 2024, 1)
|
||
expect(start).toBe('2024-01-01')
|
||
expect(end).toBe('2024-12-31')
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
describe('formatPeriodLabel', () => {
|
||
it('formats monthly period', () => {
|
||
expect(formatPeriodLabel('monthly', 2024, 1)).toBe('Januari 2024')
|
||
expect(formatPeriodLabel('monthly', 2024, 6)).toBe('Juni 2024')
|
||
expect(formatPeriodLabel('monthly', 2024, 12)).toBe('December 2024')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('formats quarterly period', () => {
|
||
expect(formatPeriodLabel('quarterly', 2024, 3)).toBe('Kvartal 3 2024')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('formats yearly period', () => {
|
||
expect(formatPeriodLabel('yearly', 2024, 1)).toBe('Helår 2024')
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
describe('getVatDeclarationSummary', () => {
|
||
const emptyRc = { ruta20: 0, ruta21: 0, ruta22: 0, ruta23: 0, ruta24: 0, ruta30: 0, ruta31: 0, ruta32: 0 }
|
||
const zeroExtras = { ruta08: 0, ruta35: 0, ruta36: 0, ruta37: 0, ruta38: 0, ruta41: 0, ruta42: 0, ruta50: 0, ruta60: 0, ruta61: 0, ruta62: 0 }
|
||
|
||
it('calculates totals and detects payment', () => {
|
||
const declaration: VatDeclaration = {
|
||
period: { type: 'monthly', year: 2024, period: 1, start: '2024-01-01', end: '2024-01-31' },
|
||
rutor: {
|
||
ruta05: 10000, ruta06: 0, ruta07: 0,
|
||
ruta10: 2500, ruta11: 0, ruta12: 0,
|
||
ruta20: 0, ruta21: 0, ruta22: 0, ruta23: 0, ruta24: 0,
|
||
ruta30: 0, ruta31: 0, ruta32: 0,
|
||
ruta39: 0, ruta40: 0,
|
||
ruta48: 1000, ruta49: 1500,
|
||
...zeroExtras,
|
||
},
|
||
invoiceCount: 5,
|
||
transactionCount: 10,
|
||
breakdown: {
|
||
invoices: { ruta05: 10000, ruta06: 0, ruta07: 0, ruta10: 2500, ruta11: 0, ruta12: 0, ruta39: 0, ruta40: 0, base25: 10000, base12: 0, base6: 0 },
|
||
transactions: { ruta48: 1000 },
|
||
receipts: { ruta48: 0 },
|
||
reverseCharge: emptyRc,
|
||
},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
const summary = getVatDeclarationSummary(declaration)
|
||
expect(summary.totalOutputVat).toBe(2500)
|
||
expect(summary.totalInputVat).toBe(1000)
|
||
expect(summary.vatToPay).toBe(1500)
|
||
expect(summary.isRefund).toBe(false)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('identifies refund when ruta49 is negative', () => {
|
||
const declaration: VatDeclaration = {
|
||
period: { type: 'monthly', year: 2024, period: 1, start: '2024-01-01', end: '2024-01-31' },
|
||
rutor: {
|
||
ruta05: 2000, ruta06: 0, ruta07: 0,
|
||
ruta10: 500, ruta11: 0, ruta12: 0,
|
||
ruta20: 0, ruta21: 0, ruta22: 0, ruta23: 0, ruta24: 0,
|
||
ruta30: 0, ruta31: 0, ruta32: 0,
|
||
ruta39: 0, ruta40: 0,
|
||
ruta48: 3000, ruta49: -2500,
|
||
...zeroExtras,
|
||
},
|
||
invoiceCount: 1,
|
||
transactionCount: 20,
|
||
breakdown: {
|
||
invoices: { ruta05: 2000, ruta06: 0, ruta07: 0, ruta10: 500, ruta11: 0, ruta12: 0, ruta39: 0, ruta40: 0, base25: 2000, base12: 0, base6: 0 },
|
||
transactions: { ruta48: 3000 },
|
||
receipts: { ruta48: 0 },
|
||
reverseCharge: emptyRc,
|
||
},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
const summary = getVatDeclarationSummary(declaration)
|
||
expect(summary.isRefund).toBe(true)
|
||
expect(summary.vatToPay).toBe(-2500)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('includes ruta30-32 in totalOutputVat', () => {
|
||
const declaration: VatDeclaration = {
|
||
period: { type: 'monthly', year: 2024, period: 1, start: '2024-01-01', end: '2024-01-31' },
|
||
rutor: {
|
||
ruta05: 10000, ruta06: 0, ruta07: 0,
|
||
ruta10: 2500, ruta11: 0, ruta12: 0,
|
||
ruta20: 0, ruta21: 5000, ruta22: 0, ruta23: 0, ruta24: 0,
|
||
ruta30: 1250, ruta31: 0, ruta32: 0,
|
||
ruta39: 0, ruta40: 0,
|
||
ruta48: 2250, ruta49: 1500,
|
||
...zeroExtras,
|
||
},
|
||
invoiceCount: 2,
|
||
transactionCount: 0,
|
||
breakdown: {
|
||
invoices: { ruta05: 10000, ruta06: 0, ruta07: 0, ruta10: 2500, ruta11: 0, ruta12: 0, ruta39: 0, ruta40: 0, base25: 10000, base12: 0, base6: 0 },
|
||
transactions: { ruta48: 0 },
|
||
receipts: { ruta48: 0 },
|
||
reverseCharge: { ruta20: 0, ruta21: 5000, ruta22: 0, ruta23: 0, ruta24: 0, ruta30: 1250, ruta31: 0, ruta32: 0 },
|
||
},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
const summary = getVatDeclarationSummary(declaration)
|
||
// totalOutputVat = ruta10 + ruta30 = 2500 + 1250 = 3750
|
||
expect(summary.totalOutputVat).toBe(3750)
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
// Ledger-based VAT declaration tests
|
||
//
|
||
// The calculator makes ONE get_vat_declaration_totals RPC call per period
|
||
// (per-account totals + settlement-shaped entries + source_type counts in a
|
||
// single jsonb payload). Yearly periods with a fiscalPeriodId additionally
|
||
// look up fiscal_periods first. Settlement-shape exclusion (#984) lives in
|
||
// the RPC's SQL and is covered by the pg-real test
|
||
// (tests/pg/vat-declaration-totals-rpc.pg.test.ts).
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
|
||
describe('calculateVatDeclaration', () => {
|
||
it('returns all zeros when no ledger lines exist', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta11).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta12).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta30).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta31).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta32).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.invoiceCount).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.transactionCount).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('does not report a refundable deposit credited to a liability account as turnover', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger(
|
||
[
|
||
{ account_number: '1510', debit_amount: 10000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2897', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 10000 },
|
||
],
|
||
['invoice_created'],
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta42).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.invoiceCount).toBe(1)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('sums output VAT to ruta10/11/12 and revenue to ruta05', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger(
|
||
[
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2621', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 600 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2631', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 180 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 10000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3002', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 5000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3003', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 3000 },
|
||
],
|
||
['invoice_created', 'invoice_created'],
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(2500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta11).toBe(600)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta12).toBe(180)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(18000)
|
||
expect(result.breakdown.invoices.base25).toBe(10000)
|
||
expect(result.breakdown.invoices.base12).toBe(5000)
|
||
expect(result.breakdown.invoices.base6).toBe(3000)
|
||
expect(result.invoiceCount).toBe(2)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('sums input VAT from 2641 debit balance', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger(
|
||
[
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 250, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 120, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
],
|
||
['bank_transaction', 'bank_transaction'],
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(370)
|
||
expect(result.transactionCount).toBe(2)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('includes calculated input VAT (2645) from EU reverse charge in ruta48', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2645', debit_amount: 500, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 200, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(700)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('maps EU/export revenue to ruta39/ruta40', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3308', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 8000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3305', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 12000 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta39).toBe(8000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta40).toBe(12000)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('handles credit notes as net reduction on revenue/VAT accounts', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger(
|
||
[
|
||
// Invoice: C2611 2500, C3001 10000
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 10000 },
|
||
// Credit note reversal: D2611 625, D3001 2500
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 625, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 2500, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
],
|
||
['invoice_created', 'credit_note'],
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(1875)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(7500)
|
||
expect(result.invoiceCount).toBe(2)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('calculates ruta49 as output minus input VAT', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 10000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 350, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(2500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(10000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(350)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(2150) // 2500 - 350
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('detects refund when input VAT exceeds output VAT', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 3000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(-2500) // 500 - 3000
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
|
||
it('throws a labelled error when the RPC fails', async () => {
|
||
results = [{ data: null, error: { message: 'permission denied' } }]
|
||
|
||
await expect(
|
||
calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1),
|
||
).rejects.toThrow('get_vat_declaration_totals failed: permission denied')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('handles all three VAT rates in a single period', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 10000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3002', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 5000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2621', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 600 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3003', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 3000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2631', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 180 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 1000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'quarterly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(2500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta11).toBe(600)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta12).toBe(180)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(18000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(1000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(2280)
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
// Reverse charge: purchase bases (ruta 20-24) sourced from cost accounts
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
|
||
describe('calculateVatDeclaration: reverse charge', () => {
|
||
it('maps 2614/2624/2634 credit balances to ruta30/31/32', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1250 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2624', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 120 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2634', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 60 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2645', debit_amount: 1430, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta30).toBe(1250)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta31).toBe(120)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta32).toBe(60)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(1430)
|
||
// ruta49 = (0+0+0 + 1250+120+60) - 1430 = 0
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('includes ruta30-32 in ruta49 formula', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 10000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 300, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2645', debit_amount: 500, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(2500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta30).toBe(500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(800)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(2200) // (2500 + 500) - 800
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('populates ruta20 from EU goods cost accounts (4515/4516/4517)', async () => {
|
||
// EU goods purchase: D 4515 25000, D 2645 6250, C 2614 6250, C 2440 25000
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '4515', debit_amount: 25000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 6250 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2645', debit_amount: 6250, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta20).toBe(25000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta21).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta30).toBe(6250)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(6250)
|
||
// Reverse charge is VAT-neutral: output VAT exactly offsets input VAT
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('populates ruta21 from EU services cost accounts (4535/4536/4537)', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '4535', debit_amount: 5000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1250 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2645', debit_amount: 1250, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta21).toBe(5000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta20).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta22).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta30).toBe(1250)
|
||
expect(result.breakdown.reverseCharge.ruta21).toBe(5000)
|
||
expect(result.breakdown.reverseCharge.ruta30).toBe(1250)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('populates ruta22 from non-EU services cost accounts (4531/4532/4533)', async () => {
|
||
// Anthropic-style: D 4531 3000, D 2645 750, C 2614 750, C 2440 3000
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '4531', debit_amount: 3000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 750 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2645', debit_amount: 750, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta22).toBe(3000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta21).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta20).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta30).toBe(750)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('populates ruta23 from domestic goods reverse-charge cost accounts (4415/4416/4417)', async () => {
|
||
// Domestic mobile reverse charge: D 4415 100000, D 2647 25000, C 2614 25000, C 2440 100000
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '4415', debit_amount: 100000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 25000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2647', debit_amount: 25000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta23).toBe(100000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta24).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta30).toBe(25000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(25000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(0) // VAT-neutral
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('populates ruta24 from domestic services reverse-charge cost accounts (4425/4426/4427)', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '4425', debit_amount: 8000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2647', debit_amount: 2000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta24).toBe(8000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta23).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta30).toBe(2000)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('returns zero ruta20-24 when no reverse-charge cost-account activity', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 10000 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta20).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta21).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta22).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta23).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta24).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('reverse-charge credit notes net out the cost-account debit balance', async () => {
|
||
// Original purchase: D 4535 5000; reversal (credit note): C 4535 1000
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '4535', debit_amount: 5000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '4535', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1250 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 250, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2645', debit_amount: 1250, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2645', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 250 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta21).toBe(4000) // 5000 - 1000
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta30).toBe(1000) // 1250 - 250
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(1000) // 1250 - 250
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('maps domestic reverse-charge input VAT (2647) to ruta48', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2647', debit_amount: 500, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta30).toBe(500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
// Import (ruta 50, 60-62) and Ruta 06 (uttag) and Ruta 42 (exempt)
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
|
||
describe('calculateVatDeclaration: import, uttag, exempt', () => {
|
||
it('maps import VAT accounts (2615/2625/2635) to ruta60/61/62', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2615', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2625', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 600 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2635', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 180 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 3280, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta60).toBe(2500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta61).toBe(600)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta62).toBe(180)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(0) // 3280 - 3280
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('populates ruta50 (import beskattningsunderlag) from 4545-4547', async () => {
|
||
// Full import flow: D 4545 10000, C 2615 2500, D 2641 2500
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '4545', debit_amount: 10000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2615', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 2500, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
// Ruta 50 (base) and Ruta 60 (output VAT) BOTH non-zero: required by SKV §4.1.1.4
|
||
// ERROR rule "Det måste finnas ett belopp i fält 50, eftersom det finns ett belopp i 60-62"
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta50).toBe(10000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta60).toBe(2500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(2500)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('populates ruta06 from uttag accounts (3401/3402/3403)', async () => {
|
||
// Uttag: D 2010 (private withdrawal); C 3401 1000 + C 2612 250 (25% rate uttag)
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3401', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2612', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 250 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta06).toBe(1000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(250) // 2612 maps to ruta10 (25% output VAT including uttag)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('expanded ruta42 covers 3004, 3100, 3404, 3994, 3980', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3004', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3100', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3404', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3980', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 3000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3994', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1500 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta42).toBe(8000) // 1000+2000+500+3000+1500
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('maps EU/export revenue variants (3108/3105) to ruta35/36', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3108', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 15000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3105', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 8000 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta35).toBe(15000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta36).toBe(8000)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('maps output VAT variant accounts (2612/2623/2636) to correct rutor', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2612', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1000 }, // egna uttag 25%
|
||
{ account_number: '2623', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 200 }, // uthyrning 12%
|
||
{ account_number: '2636', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 50 }, // VMB 6%
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(1000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta11).toBe(200)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta12).toBe(50)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('handles zero output VAT on some rates but non-zero on others', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger(
|
||
[
|
||
{ account_number: '2621', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 600 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3002', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 5000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 200, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
],
|
||
['invoice_created'],
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta11).toBe(600)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta12).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(200)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(400) // 600 - 200
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('rounds sub-öre amounts via Math.round * 100 / 100', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 0.001 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 0.004 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
// SKV §4.1.1.4 cross-field contract checks
|
||
//
|
||
// Skatteverket's kontrollera endpoint runs these checks server-side. Mirror
|
||
// them locally so we catch declaration drift in unit tests, before a network
|
||
// call. ERROR rules block submission; WARNING rules don't.
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
|
||
describe('SKV §4.1.1.4 cross-field contracts', () => {
|
||
it('ERROR: taxable sales base requires output VAT (rule 1)', async () => {
|
||
// SKV: if any of momspliktigForsaljning/momspliktigaUttag/vinstmarginal/hyresInkomst > 0,
|
||
// at least one of momsForsaljningUtgaende{Hog,Medel,Lag} must be > 0.
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 10000 },
|
||
// No 2611/2621/2631 booked: would trigger SKV ERROR
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
const r = result.rutor
|
||
|
||
const hasBase = r.ruta05 + r.ruta06 + r.ruta07 + r.ruta08 > 0
|
||
const hasOutput = r.ruta10 + r.ruta11 + r.ruta12 > 0
|
||
expect(hasBase).toBe(true)
|
||
expect(hasOutput).toBe(false)
|
||
// Local invariant: this combination would fail SKV kontrollera with ERROR.
|
||
// The calculator does not auto-correct: the ledger must be fixed upstream.
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('ERROR: reverse-charge purchase base requires output VAT (rule 3)', async () => {
|
||
// If any of inkopVarorEU/inkopTjansterEU/inkopTjansterUtanforEU/inkopVarorSE/inkopTjansterSE > 0,
|
||
// at least one of momsInkopUtgaende{Hog,Medel,Lag} must be > 0.
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '4535', debit_amount: 5000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
// No 2614/2624/2634 booked: would trigger SKV ERROR
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
const r = result.rutor
|
||
|
||
const hasRcBase = r.ruta20 + r.ruta21 + r.ruta22 + r.ruta23 + r.ruta24 > 0
|
||
const hasRcOutput = r.ruta30 + r.ruta31 + r.ruta32 > 0
|
||
expect(hasRcBase).toBe(true)
|
||
expect(hasRcOutput).toBe(false)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('ERROR: import base requires import output VAT (rule 5)', async () => {
|
||
// If import (ruta50) > 0, at least one of momsImportUtgaende{Hog,Medel,Lag} must be > 0.
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '4545', debit_amount: 10000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
// No 2615/2625/2635 booked: would trigger SKV ERROR
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
const r = result.rutor
|
||
|
||
expect(r.ruta50).toBe(10000)
|
||
expect(r.ruta60 + r.ruta61 + r.ruta62).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('ERROR: import output VAT requires import base (rule 6)', async () => {
|
||
// If any of momsImportUtgaende{Hog,Medel,Lag} > 0, import (ruta50) must be > 0.
|
||
// This is the BLOCKER scenario the Phase 1b refactor fixes: previously ruta50 was
|
||
// never populated, so any import VAT booking would fail SKV's contract.
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2615', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 2500, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '4545', debit_amount: 10000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
const r = result.rutor
|
||
|
||
// Both populated: passes SKV's rule 6
|
||
expect(r.ruta50).toBe(10000)
|
||
expect(r.ruta60).toBe(2500)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('ERROR: summaMoms must equal (ruta10+11+12+30+31+32+60+61+62) − ruta48 (rule 7)', async () => {
|
||
// The calculator computes ruta49 from the formula directly, so this invariant
|
||
// holds by construction. This test is the canary that catches drift if anyone
|
||
// ever adds an extra term or rate to the form.
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2621', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 600 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2631', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 180 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1250 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2615', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 1000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2645', debit_amount: 1250, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
const r = result.rutor
|
||
|
||
const expected = r.ruta10 + r.ruta11 + r.ruta12
|
||
+ r.ruta30 + r.ruta31 + r.ruta32
|
||
+ r.ruta60 + r.ruta61 + r.ruta62
|
||
- r.ruta48
|
||
expect(r.ruta49).toBe(expected)
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
// Parent/summary BAS accounts: 2610/2620/2630 (output),
|
||
// 2618/2628/2638 (vilande), 2640 (input parent).
|
||
//
|
||
// Users who post directly to the group account (manual entries, SIE imports,
|
||
// alternate templates) had their balances silently dropped before this fix
|
||
// because only the leaf accounts were mapped.
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
|
||
describe('calculateVatDeclaration: parent/summary accounts', () => {
|
||
it('maps 2610 (parent) to ruta10 when posted directly', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 10000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2610', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(10000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(2500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(2500) // owed, not refund
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('maps 2620 (parent) to ruta11 and 2630 (parent) to ruta12', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2620', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 600 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2630', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 180 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta11).toBe(600)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta12).toBe(180)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('maps vilande output VAT (2618/2628/2638) to ruta10/11/12', async () => {
|
||
// Vilande accounts hold output VAT for invoices that have been sent but not
|
||
// yet paid, used by cash-method bookkeepers per BFNAR 2006:1.
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2618', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2628', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 120 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2638', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 60 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta11).toBe(120)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta12).toBe(60)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('sums parent and sub-account balances on the same ruta', async () => {
|
||
// If a ledger has activity on both the parent and the sub-accounts (mixed
|
||
// bookkeeping practice, SIE imports, etc.), the ruta reflects the literal
|
||
// ledger total: accounting truth wins.
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2610', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(1500)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('maps 2640 (input VAT parent) to ruta48', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2640', debit_amount: 200, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(200)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(-200) // refund
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('reproduces the user-reported bug: 2610 balance now reaches ruta10', async () => {
|
||
// Customer screenshot scenario (simplified): 3001 + 2610 booked with the
|
||
// correct VAT amount on the parent account. Before the fix, ruta10 read 0
|
||
// and ruta49 incorrectly showed a refund.
|
||
// Yearly without fiscalPeriodId now looks up the räkenskapsår ending in
|
||
// the year first; no fiscal period rows → calendar fallback.
|
||
results = [{ data: null, error: null }]
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 21600 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2610', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 9768 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 7048.45, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'yearly', 2025, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(21600)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(9768)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(7048.45)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(2719.55) // 9768 − 7048.45, owed (was −7048.45 pre-fix)
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
// #1261: the company's OWN revenue accounts reach ruta 05.
|
||
//
|
||
// ACCOUNT_RUTA maps 3000-3003 only, and Accounted's BAS chart ships no
|
||
// varugrupp accounts at all, so a company selling on 3013 had that revenue
|
||
// dropped from the declaration entirely: the map's keys ARE the account filter
|
||
// sent to the aggregation RPC. Membership now comes from the konto's own
|
||
// "Standard moms" (chart_of_accounts.default_vat_rate).
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
|
||
describe('calculateVatDeclaration: company-specific ruta 05 accounts', () => {
|
||
it('infers a missing rate only from a matching domestic-sales number and label (#1289)', async () => {
|
||
chartAccounts = [{
|
||
account_number: '3011',
|
||
account_name: 'Försäljning tjänster inom Sverige, 25 % moms',
|
||
default_vat_rate: null,
|
||
}]
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3011', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 9725 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2431.25 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
const findings = runVatDeclarationChecks(result.rutor)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(9725)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(2431.25)
|
||
expect(result.breakdown.invoices.base25).toBe(9725)
|
||
expect(findings.map((f) => f.code)).not.toContain('OUTPUT_VAT_WITHOUT_SALES_BASE')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('includes a user-added revenue account carrying a moms-sats', async () => {
|
||
chartAccounts = [{ account_number: '3013', default_vat_rate: 0.06 }]
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3013', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 8000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2631', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 480 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(8000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta12).toBe(480)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('books the account into the base bucket of its own sats', async () => {
|
||
// Without this the ruta 05 total would have no matching base25/12/6, and
|
||
// the proportional SALES_OUTPUT_VAT_SHORTFALL check reads an unaccounted
|
||
// base as missing utgående moms.
|
||
chartAccounts = [
|
||
{ account_number: '3011', default_vat_rate: 0.25 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3013', default_vat_rate: 0.06 },
|
||
]
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3011', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 4000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3013', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2000 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(7000)
|
||
expect(result.breakdown.invoices.base25).toBe(6000) // 3001 + 3011
|
||
expect(result.breakdown.invoices.base6).toBe(1000) // 3013
|
||
expect(result.breakdown.invoices.base12).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('counts a 3000 gruppkonto balance in ruta 05 exactly once', async () => {
|
||
// 3000 is already summed into ruta 05 by the static map. Surfacing its
|
||
// "Standard moms" must not also add it to the dynamic account list, which
|
||
// would double the filed figure.
|
||
chartAccounts = [{ account_number: '3000', default_vat_rate: 0.25 }]
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3000', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 5000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1250 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(5000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(1250)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('books a rated 3000 into its base bucket so the split adds up to ruta 05', async () => {
|
||
chartAccounts = [{ account_number: '3000', default_vat_rate: 0.25 }]
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3000', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 5000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2000 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(7000)
|
||
expect(result.breakdown.invoices.base25).toBe(7000) // 3001 + 3000
|
||
expect(result.breakdown.invoices.base12).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.breakdown.invoices.base6).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('leaves 3000 in ruta 05 with no base bucket when no sats is set', async () => {
|
||
// The filed figure is unaffected: only the breakdown is incomplete, and
|
||
// the checks derive their expected base from the output-VAT rutor.
|
||
chartAccounts = []
|
||
seedLedger([{ account_number: '3000', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 5000 }])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(5000)
|
||
expect(result.breakdown.invoices.base25).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('nets a credit note booked as a debit on the account', async () => {
|
||
chartAccounts = [{ account_number: '3013', default_vat_rate: 0.06 }]
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3013', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 8000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3013', debit_amount: 1000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(7000)
|
||
expect(result.breakdown.invoices.base6).toBe(7000)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('does not double-count an account the static map already owns', async () => {
|
||
// The BAS backfill sets 3001 = 25 %, so it comes back from the chart query
|
||
// too. Counting it in both projections would double ruta 05.
|
||
chartAccounts = [{ account_number: '3001', default_vat_rate: 0.25 }]
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 10000 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(10000)
|
||
expect(result.breakdown.invoices.base25).toBe(10000)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('leaves accounts that belong to another ruta out of ruta 05', async () => {
|
||
// VMB (3211) is ruta 07 and 3231 is ruta 41. Neither is mappable yet, so
|
||
// they stay out of the declaration: filing an amount in the wrong box is
|
||
// worse than omitting it.
|
||
chartAccounts = [
|
||
{ account_number: '3211', default_vat_rate: 0.25 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3231', default_vat_rate: 0.25 },
|
||
]
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3211', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 5000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3231', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 3000 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('keeps an account the ACCOUNT_TO_BOX mirror already maps in its own ruta', async () => {
|
||
// 3108 is momsfri EU-leverans (ruta 35). A user who sets a sats on it must
|
||
// not move it to ruta 05.
|
||
chartAccounts = [{ account_number: '3108', default_vat_rate: 0.25 }]
|
||
seedLedger([{ account_number: '3108', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 4000 }])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta35).toBe(4000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('routes momspliktig EU-försäljning (3106) to ruta 05', async () => {
|
||
// 3106 carries Swedish moms (buyer not VAT-registered), so it is ordinary
|
||
// momspliktig försäljning. Neither ACCOUNT_RUTA nor the mirror maps it; the
|
||
// MCP report has widened ruta 05 with it by hand for the same reason.
|
||
chartAccounts = [{ account_number: '3106', default_vat_rate: 0.25 }]
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3106', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(2000)
|
||
expect(result.breakdown.invoices.base25).toBe(2000)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('ignores missing rates without matching evidence and keeps explicit 0 % authoritative', async () => {
|
||
// A number or a free-text label alone is not enough, and an explicit
|
||
// "Ingen moms" always wins over the fallback convention.
|
||
chartAccounts = [
|
||
{ account_number: '3013', account_name: 'Varugrupp C', default_vat_rate: null },
|
||
{ account_number: '3011', account_name: 'Varugrupp A, 25 % moms', default_vat_rate: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3098', account_name: 'Försäljning 25 % moms', default_vat_rate: null },
|
||
{ account_number: '3023', account_name: 'Försäljning 25 % moms', default_vat_rate: null },
|
||
]
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3013', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 8000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3011', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3098', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3023', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('requires the word "moms" after the percent and refuses an ambiguous label', async () => {
|
||
// Two deliberate rules, pinned here so neither is loosened by accident:
|
||
// - a bare percent is not a moms-sats. "provision 25 %" and "konsult 25 %"
|
||
// are a margin and a rate of pay; reading either as a sats would file
|
||
// revenue into ruta 05 off a word the user never wrote.
|
||
// - a label naming two different sats resolves to nothing rather than to
|
||
// whichever it spells out first: neither figure is trustworthy, and
|
||
// picking one silently splits breakdown.invoices.base25/12/6 wrong.
|
||
chartAccounts = [
|
||
{ account_number: '3011', account_name: 'Försäljning konsult 25 %', default_vat_rate: null },
|
||
{
|
||
account_number: '3021',
|
||
account_name: 'Försäljning varugrupp 1, provision 25 %',
|
||
default_vat_rate: null,
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
account_number: '3031',
|
||
account_name: 'Försäljning 25 % moms och 6 % moms',
|
||
default_vat_rate: null,
|
||
},
|
||
]
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3011', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 4000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3021', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 3000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3031', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2000 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('lets a contradicting label veto the fallback even when number and sats agree', async () => {
|
||
// The 30x1 suffix and the "25 % moms" label both point at domestic taxable
|
||
// sales, but the rest of the name says the konto is something else: omvänd
|
||
// betalningsskyldighet belongs in ruta 41, VMB in ruta 07, export in
|
||
// ruta 36 and momsfritt in ruta 42. Ruta 05 is the wrong box for all four,
|
||
// so the fallback stands down and the konto keeps its unresolved
|
||
// behaviour (omission) rather than being filed somewhere it does not go.
|
||
chartAccounts = [
|
||
{
|
||
account_number: '3011',
|
||
account_name: 'Försäljning byggtjänster 25 % moms, omvänd betalningsskyldighet',
|
||
default_vat_rate: null,
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
account_number: '3021',
|
||
account_name: 'Försäljning begagnat 25 % moms (VMB)',
|
||
default_vat_rate: null,
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
account_number: '3031',
|
||
account_name: 'Export utanför EU, tidigare 25 % moms',
|
||
default_vat_rate: null,
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
account_number: '3041',
|
||
account_name: 'Momsfri försäljning, tidigare 25 % moms',
|
||
default_vat_rate: null,
|
||
},
|
||
]
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3011', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 5000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3021', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 4000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3031', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 3000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3041', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2000 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('does not let a percentage ending in zero trip the 0 % veto', async () => {
|
||
// The veto's "0 %" alternative needs a leading word boundary: without one it
|
||
// also matches the trailing zero of "10/20/30/100 %", so an ordinary
|
||
// domestic sales konto whose name happens to mention a discount or a share
|
||
// would be dropped from ruta 05 and then raise a blocking
|
||
// OUTPUT_VAT_WITHOUT_SALES_BASE. Both names below are momspliktig
|
||
// försäljning inom Sverige: agreeing 30x1 suffix, agreeing "25 % moms".
|
||
chartAccounts = [
|
||
{
|
||
account_number: '3011',
|
||
account_name: 'Försäljning varor 25 % moms, rabatt 30 %',
|
||
default_vat_rate: null,
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
account_number: '3021',
|
||
account_name: 'Försäljning varor 25 % moms, 100 % ägt dotterbolag',
|
||
default_vat_rate: null,
|
||
},
|
||
]
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3011', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 5000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3021', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 3000 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(8000)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('still vetoes a konto whose label states a genuine 0 % sats', async () => {
|
||
// The other side of the boundary fix: a real "0 %" label must keep vetoing.
|
||
chartAccounts = [
|
||
{
|
||
account_number: '3011',
|
||
account_name: 'Försäljning 0 % moms',
|
||
default_vat_rate: null,
|
||
},
|
||
]
|
||
seedLedger([{ account_number: '3011', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 5000 }])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('adds the accounts to p_accounts but never to p_ruta_accounts', async () => {
|
||
// p_ruta_accounts is the settlement SHAPE detector inside the RPC: an entry
|
||
// touching it plus 2650/1650 is classified a momsredovisning and dropped
|
||
// from the totals. A plain sale booked 1930 / 3013 / 2650 would then vanish
|
||
// from its own declaration. This is invisible to an outcome assertion, so
|
||
// assert the RPC arguments directly.
|
||
chartAccounts = [{ account_number: '3013', default_vat_rate: 0.06 }]
|
||
seedLedger([{ account_number: '3013', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 8000 }])
|
||
|
||
await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
const [, args] = supabase.rpc.mock.calls[0]
|
||
expect(args.p_accounts).toContain('3013')
|
||
expect(args.p_ruta_accounts).not.toContain('3013')
|
||
expect(args.p_ruta_accounts).toContain('3001') // static list still intact
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('clears the blocking OUTPUT_VAT_WITHOUT_SALES finding (#1261)', async () => {
|
||
// The reported symptom was not just an understated ruta 05: with ruta05 = 0
|
||
// and output VAT on 2611, runVatDeclarationChecks failed the declaration
|
||
// with a blocking ERROR and the user could not file at all.
|
||
chartAccounts = [{ account_number: '3013', default_vat_rate: 0.06 }]
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3013', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 8000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2631', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 480 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
const findings = runVatDeclarationChecks(result.rutor)
|
||
|
||
expect(findings.map((f) => f.code)).not.toContain('OUTPUT_VAT_WITHOUT_SALES')
|
||
expect(findings.map((f) => f.code)).not.toContain('SALES_OUTPUT_VAT_SHORTFALL')
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
describe('calculateVatDeclaration: annual VAT spans the räkenskapsår', () => {
|
||
it('uses the fiscal period bounds for yearly when a fiscalPeriodId is given', async () => {
|
||
// Förlängt räkenskapsår (extended first year, 18 months): annual VAT
|
||
// (helårsmoms) must cover the whole period, not the calendar year that
|
||
// period_start falls in. The first queued result feeds the fiscal_periods
|
||
// lookup; seedLedger then queues the RPC payload.
|
||
results = [
|
||
{ data: { period_start: '2025-07-03', period_end: '2026-12-31' }, error: null },
|
||
]
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 21600 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2610', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 9768 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 7048.45, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(
|
||
supabase, 'company-1', 'yearly', 2026, 1, 'accrual', { fiscalPeriodId: 'fp-1' },
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.period.start).toBe('2025-07-03')
|
||
expect(result.period.end).toBe('2026-12-31')
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(21600)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(9768)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(7048.45)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('falls back to the calendar year when the fiscal period cannot be resolved', async () => {
|
||
results = [
|
||
{ data: null, error: null }, // fiscal_periods lookup → not found
|
||
]
|
||
seedLedger([])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(
|
||
supabase, 'company-1', 'yearly', 2026, 1, 'accrual', { fiscalPeriodId: 'missing' },
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.period.start).toBe('2026-01-01')
|
||
expect(result.period.end).toBe('2026-12-31')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('resolves the räkenskapsår ending in the year for yearly WITHOUT a fiscalPeriodId', async () => {
|
||
// Broken FY 2025-07-01 → 2026-06-30: a yearly submission for 2026 with no
|
||
// explicit fiscal period (e.g. before the FY selector populated) must
|
||
// still target the actual räkenskapsår, not calendar 2026
|
||
// (SFL 26 kap 10-11 §§).
|
||
results = [
|
||
{ data: { period_start: '2025-07-01', period_end: '2026-06-30' }, error: null },
|
||
]
|
||
seedLedger([])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(
|
||
supabase, 'company-1', 'yearly', 2026, 1, 'accrual',
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.period.start).toBe('2025-07-01')
|
||
expect(result.period.end).toBe('2026-06-30')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('falls back to the calendar year for yearly without a fiscalPeriodId when no fiscal period exists', async () => {
|
||
results = [
|
||
{ data: null, error: null }, // no fiscal period ending in 2026
|
||
]
|
||
seedLedger([])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(
|
||
supabase, 'company-1', 'yearly', 2026, 1, 'accrual',
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.period.start).toBe('2026-01-01')
|
||
expect(result.period.end).toBe('2026-12-31')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('ignores fiscalPeriodId for monthly periods (calendar month, no lookup)', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(
|
||
supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2026, 3, 'accrual', { fiscalPeriodId: 'fp-1' },
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.period.start).toBe('2026-03-01')
|
||
expect(result.period.end).toBe('2026-03-31')
|
||
// The räkenskapsår path is yearly-only: monthly never touches
|
||
// fiscal_periods. (chart_of_accounts is read on every period type, for the
|
||
// company's own ruta 05 accounts.)
|
||
expect(supabase.from).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('fiscal_periods')
|
||
expect(supabase.rpc).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
// The reverse-charge input pair that travels with the declaration
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
//
|
||
// Why the declaration carries 2645/2647 at all: runVatDeclarationChecks only
|
||
// runs the sharp RC_INPUT_VAT_MISMATCH comparison when a caller hands it
|
||
// per-account totals. The web UI reads the declaration over HTTP and has no
|
||
// ledger access of its own, so without this pair on the response it was stuck
|
||
// with the ruta 48 fallback, and ruta 48 aggregates 2640-2649: ordinary
|
||
// debiterad ingående moms on 2641 hid a completely missing RC input.
|
||
|
||
/**
|
||
* Same per-account aggregation seedLedger feeds the RPC mock, as the FULL totals
|
||
* map. Used to prove the 2-entry projection produces identical findings, which
|
||
* is also what pins RC_INPUT_VAT_ACCOUNTS to the private RC_INPUT_ACCOUNTS list
|
||
* inside vat-declaration-checks: the fixtures below carry a balance on every
|
||
* OTHER ruta 48 account, so if one of them ever counted as reverse-charge input
|
||
* the two maps would disagree here.
|
||
*/
|
||
function totalsFromLines(
|
||
lines: Array<{ account_number: string; debit_amount: number; credit_amount: number }>,
|
||
): Map<string, { debit: number; credit: number }> {
|
||
const byAccount = new Map<string, { debit: number; credit: number }>()
|
||
for (const l of lines) {
|
||
const t = byAccount.get(l.account_number) ?? { debit: 0, credit: 0 }
|
||
t.debit += l.debit_amount
|
||
t.credit += l.credit_amount
|
||
byAccount.set(l.account_number, t)
|
||
}
|
||
return byAccount
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
const debit = (account_number: string, debit_amount: number) =>
|
||
({ account_number, debit_amount, credit_amount: 0 })
|
||
const credit = (account_number: string, credit_amount: number) =>
|
||
({ account_number, debit_amount: 0, credit_amount })
|
||
|
||
/**
|
||
* The masking case, as a ledger: 50 000 kr of fiktiv utgående moms (2614) with
|
||
* its basbelopp correctly on 4535, no beräknad ingående moms at all, and 60 000
|
||
* kr of ordinary 2641 alongside it. Every other ruta 48 account carries a
|
||
* balance too, so ruta 48 (70 000) stays above the RC output and the aggregate
|
||
* comparison is silent while 50 000 kr of deductible moms is missing.
|
||
*/
|
||
const MASKED_RC_LINES = [
|
||
debit('4535', 200000), // ruta 21 basis: 50 000 / 0.25, so no FK004 finding
|
||
credit('2614', 50000), // ruta 30 fiktiv utgående moms
|
||
debit('2641', 60000), // ordinary debiterad ingående moms: the mask
|
||
debit('2640', 1000),
|
||
debit('2642', 2000),
|
||
debit('2646', 3000),
|
||
debit('2649', 4000), // blandad verksamhet: deliberately NOT reverse-charge input
|
||
]
|
||
|
||
describe('calculateVatDeclaration: rcInputAccountTotals', () => {
|
||
it('exposes both RC input accounts, netting credits against debits', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
debit('2645', 12000),
|
||
credit('2645', 2000), // storno of one fiktiv-moms pair
|
||
debit('2647', 500),
|
||
debit('2641', 60000), // not part of the pair
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2026, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rcInputAccountTotals).toEqual({
|
||
'2645': { debit: 12000, credit: 2000 },
|
||
'2647': { debit: 500, credit: 0 },
|
||
})
|
||
// Only the pair, never the rest of the period's account balances.
|
||
expect(Object.keys(result.rcInputAccountTotals!)).toEqual(['2645', '2647'])
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('carries both keys as zeros when the period has no RC input', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([debit('2641', 60000)])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2026, 1)
|
||
|
||
// Present-and-zero, not absent: absent has to keep meaning "this producer
|
||
// does not carry the pair", which is what the HTTP fallback reads.
|
||
expect(result.rcInputAccountTotals).toEqual({
|
||
'2645': { debit: 0, credit: 0 },
|
||
'2647': { debit: 0, credit: 0 },
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('warns on the masked RC shortfall, which the ruta 48 fallback misses', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger(MASKED_RC_LINES)
|
||
|
||
const declaration = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2026, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(declaration.rutor.ruta30).toBe(50000)
|
||
expect(declaration.rutor.ruta48).toBe(70000)
|
||
|
||
// Unwired: no second argument, so the check compares against ruta 48 and
|
||
// says nothing at all.
|
||
expect(runVatDeclarationChecks(declaration.rutor)).toEqual([])
|
||
|
||
// Wired the way the web UI now calls it.
|
||
const findings = runVatDeclarationChecks(
|
||
declaration.rutor,
|
||
rcInputTotalsFromDeclaration(declaration),
|
||
)
|
||
const mismatch = findings.find((f) => f.code === 'RC_INPUT_VAT_MISMATCH')
|
||
expect(mismatch?.status).toBe('WARNING')
|
||
// \s, not a literal space: sv-SE groups thousands with a no-break space.
|
||
expect(mismatch?.message).toMatch(/50\s000 kr saknas/)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('behaves identically on the 2-entry projection and the full totals map', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger(MASKED_RC_LINES)
|
||
const declaration = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2026, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(
|
||
runVatDeclarationChecks(declaration.rutor, rcInputTotalsFromDeclaration(declaration)),
|
||
).toEqual(
|
||
runVatDeclarationChecks(declaration.rutor, totalsFromLines(MASKED_RC_LINES)),
|
||
)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('behaves identically on a partial shortfall too, values and not just zeros', async () => {
|
||
const lines = [...MASKED_RC_LINES, debit('2645', 20000)] // 20 000 of the 50 000 booked
|
||
seedLedger(lines)
|
||
const declaration = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2026, 1)
|
||
|
||
const projected = runVatDeclarationChecks(
|
||
declaration.rutor,
|
||
rcInputTotalsFromDeclaration(declaration),
|
||
)
|
||
expect(projected).toEqual(
|
||
runVatDeclarationChecks(declaration.rutor, totalsFromLines(lines)),
|
||
)
|
||
expect(
|
||
projected.find((f) => f.code === 'RC_INPUT_VAT_MISMATCH')?.message,
|
||
).toMatch(/30\s000 kr saknas/)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('stays silent when 2645 mirrors the fiktiv utgående moms exactly', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([...MASKED_RC_LINES, debit('2645', 50000)])
|
||
const declaration = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2026, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(
|
||
runVatDeclarationChecks(declaration.rutor, rcInputTotalsFromDeclaration(declaration)),
|
||
).toEqual([])
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('leaves a company with no reverse charge at all untouched', async () => {
|
||
// Plain domestic SEK trading: sales with output VAT and ordinary input VAT.
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
credit('3001', 400000),
|
||
credit('2611', 100000),
|
||
debit('2641', 60000),
|
||
])
|
||
const declaration = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2026, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(
|
||
runVatDeclarationChecks(declaration.rutor, rcInputTotalsFromDeclaration(declaration)),
|
||
).toEqual([])
|
||
expect(runVatDeclarationChecks(declaration.rutor)).toEqual([])
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
describe('rcInputTotalsFromDeclaration', () => {
|
||
it('rebuilds the map the checks consume, keyed by account number', () => {
|
||
const map = rcInputTotalsFromDeclaration({
|
||
rcInputAccountTotals: { '2645': { debit: 1250, credit: 0 }, '2647': { debit: 0, credit: 0 } },
|
||
})
|
||
expect(map?.get('2645')).toEqual({ debit: 1250, credit: 0 })
|
||
expect(map?.size).toBe(2)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('returns undefined, not an empty map, when the pair is absent', () => {
|
||
// A response from a deploy that predates the field. undefined makes the
|
||
// check fall back to ruta 48; an empty map would read as "0 kr beräknad
|
||
// ingående moms" and turn a correct declaration into a false warning.
|
||
expect(rcInputTotalsFromDeclaration({})).toBeUndefined()
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
// #984 (settlement-shaped entries never zero the report) moved to
|
||
// tests/pg/vat-declaration-totals-rpc.pg.test.ts: the shape detection and
|
||
// exclusion now live inside the get_vat_declaration_totals RPC, so the
|
||
// behavior is verified against real Postgres rather than a mocked client.
|