8322830f46
* feat(assets): allow editing fixed asset fields before depreciation The fixed asset register only offered a "Dispose" action, so correcting a mis-entered acquisition date/cost/category meant running the disposal flow — which posts a real divestment voucher plus a Ch. 8a VAT adjustment. Disproportionate and wrong for a data-entry fix. Add an Edit action that allows correcting those fields directly, gated for correctness: - service: extend updateAsset() with category/acquisition_date/ acquisition_cost; block the change once the asset is disposed or has posted depreciation (AssetCorrectionBlockedError) where it would desync posted vouchers from the register; realign the BAS triple on category change. Name, useful life, and method stay editable. - api: extend the PATCH schema; annotate GET /api/assets with has_posted_depreciation so the UI can lock basis fields proactively. - ui: EditAssetDialog + pencil action; disables date/cost/category when depreciation has been booked, with an inline explanation. - errors: register ASSET_CORRECTION_BLOCKED (409). - tests: unit tests for the guard; pg test for pre-disposal editability. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(assets): also block basis edits when depreciation was hand-posted The correction guard only consulted depreciation_schedules, so an avskrivning booked as a manual journal entry (no schedule row) slipped through and a basis correction was wrongly allowed. Add a ledger scan: any posted credit to the asset's ackumulerade- avskrivningar account (12x9) counts as depreciation. Entries that depreciation_schedules attributes to a *different* asset are excluded, so a sibling's engine avskrivning on a shared 12x9 account doesn't produce a false block. What remains is depreciation tied to this asset (engine or manual); a basis correction is blocked there and must go through storno. Adds two unit tests: blocks on a hand-posted credit, allows when the only 12x9 credit belongs to a sibling's engine entry. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(invoices): allow negative unit prices for discount lines The invoice creation form rejected negative unit prices via a frontend superRefine check, blocking valid discount lines (e.g. "Rabatt -100"). The unit_price error was never rendered inline, so submission failed silently. The backend schema already allows negative unit prices (see CreateInvoiceItemSchema test), so the form was simply out of sync. Remove the non-negative constraint; empty/NaN prices are still rejected by the base z.number() type. Drop the now-unused validation_price_positive translation key from both locale files. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(invoices): allow editing draft invoices Drafts could be saved but not edited — the only way to change a draft's lines, customer, dates or amounts was to delete and recreate it. Add a "Redigera" action on draft invoices that opens the invoice editor pre-filled with the draft and saves changes in place. A verifikat is only created when an invoice is sent (or paid, under kontantmetoden), so every status=draft invoice is uncommitted and safe to edit; sent/paid invoices stay immutable and still require a credit note. - Extract buildInvoiceWriteData() with the shared validation + computation (VAT rules, ROT/RUT, accruals, totals, currency, item rows); POST now uses it too, behaviour unchanged. - Add UpdateInvoiceSchema and PATCH /api/invoices/[id], guarded to drafts (status=draft, no journal entry, not self-billed); number and status are preserved and no invoice.created is emitted. - Extract the invoice creator into a shared InvoiceEditor with create / edit modes; /invoices/new is now a thin wrapper and /invoices/[id]/edit is the new edit page. - Add a "Redigera" button on draft invoice detail pages + sv/en strings. - Tests for the builder, UpdateInvoiceSchema and the PATCH route. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(reports): make Huvudbok findable via account/saldo search terms Searching the command palette for natural phrases like 'saldo per konto', 'kontoutdrag', 'kontoanalys' or 'transaktioner per konto' returned nothing, so users couldn't find the general ledger. Enrich the Huvudbok entry's keywords with those synonyms, and let Saldobalans and Balansrapport match 'saldo per konto' too since they are genuinely per-account balance views. Companion change — the clearer Huvudbok report description ('Saldo och alla transaktioner per konto') — already landed in d5f474cb. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(settings): let users edit their personal name Add an editable Namn field to /settings/account that updates profiles.full_name and best-effort syncs auth user_metadata. Previously the personal name was only ever set from BankID's legal name at signup with no way to correct it, so users whose tilltalsnamn isn't their first given name were greeted by the wrong name (and email/password users had no name at all). New POST /api/user/profile route (requireAuth, RLS-scoped update) mirrors /api/user/locale. sv/en strings added. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(invoices): per-invoice öresavrundning override Add a display-only öresavrundning flag per invoice that wins over the company-wide setting. Resolution order in getDisplayTotal: per-invoice override -> company setting -> default-on. The stored total and the booked verifikat keep the exact öre; only the rendered total changes. Supplier invoices gain the same flag but resolve a null to off (they never had rounding historically), exposed via a toggle on the new-invoice form and a rounding row on the detail page. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(transactions): warn on possible duplicate before booking Before committing a transaction (via book or categorize), detect an already-booked sibling with the same date and amount and return a 409 TRANSACTION_BOOK_POSSIBLE_DUPLICATE instead of silently double-booking. The user can override with force=true, which must be bound to the reviewed sibling via expected_duplicate_transaction_id; the candidate is re-detected server-side, so a stale or guessed id is rejected with TRANSACTION_BOOK_FORCE_CANDIDATE_MISMATCH. Detection is fail-open on the non-force path and fail-closed under force. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(transactions): shadow-mode scope-drift dedup counter in bank ingest Count rows that an enforcing same-feed scope-drift rule WOULD treat as re-imports (the IBAN-drift re-imports the external_id check misses) and surface it as IngestResult.shadow_scope_drift_candidates. Nothing is blocked yet -- the counter only measures how often the rule would fire so it can be validated against real data before enforcement. Also gitignore scripts/delete-duplicate-transactions.ts: a destructive, hand-run cleanup tool kept out of the repo so it can't run in CI/cron or be mistaken for a supported feature. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(bokslut): base bolagsskatt on post-disposition result Bokslutsdispositioner are booked as source_type='year_end', which the income statement excludes, so net_result alone overstates resultat före skatt and the booked tax ignored the periodiseringsfond avsättning (too-high tax, ÅR/INK2 mismatch). calculateBolagsskatt now accepts resultBeforeTaxOverride. The preview builder mirrors each proposal's P&L effect (+återföring, -avsättning, -SLP) onto the pre-disposition result; the commit path sums the already-posted dispositions via the new sumPostedYearEndDispositions (class 88 + 7533) since bolagsskatt is committed last. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(settings): fiscal years manager Add a FiscalYearsManager to the bookkeeping settings that lists fiscal periods with their status (closed > locked > open) and creates the next year via CreatePeriodDialog, seeded to chain forward from the latest period end. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(api): return 400 when locking a period with unbooked transactions lockPeriod() refuses to lock a period that still has uncategorized business transactions. Detect that message in the lock route and surface it as a clear PERIOD_HAS_UNBOOKED_TRANSACTIONS (400) instead of a generic 500. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(invoices): implement isEditableInvoiceDraft utility and apply it across invoice edit routes feat(transactions): log duplicate dismissal events in behandlingshistorik test(invoices): add tests for isEditableInvoiceDraft function test(transactions): enhance tests to verify behandlingshistorik logging refactor(bokslut): update tax calculation test descriptions for clarity --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
497 lines
17 KiB
TypeScript
497 lines
17 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* pg-real tests for the assets and depreciation_schedules tables introduced
|
|
* in 20260516120000_assets_and_depreciation.sql.
|
|
*
|
|
* Verifies:
|
|
* - enforce_asset_post_disposal_immutability blocks financial-field edits
|
|
* after disposal, but lets notes/name through.
|
|
* - assets_disposal_atomic CHECK requires both disposed_at and disposed_proceeds.
|
|
* - enforce_depreciation_schedule_immutability blocks edits after a journal
|
|
* entry has been linked.
|
|
* - The depreciation_schedules delete RLS policy refuses to delete rows
|
|
* that have a journal_entry_id set (posted) but allows it before posting.
|
|
* - RLS scopes both tables to user_company_ids() — a user in company A
|
|
* cannot see / edit company B's rows.
|
|
*/
|
|
import { describe, it, expect, beforeAll } from 'vitest'
|
|
import { randomUUID } from 'node:crypto'
|
|
import { getPool, withUserContext } from './setup'
|
|
import {
|
|
insertAuthUser,
|
|
insertCompany,
|
|
insertCompanyMember,
|
|
insertFiscalPeriod,
|
|
} from './fixtures'
|
|
|
|
async function insertAsset(params: {
|
|
userId: string
|
|
companyId: string
|
|
disposedAt?: string | null
|
|
disposedProceeds?: number | null
|
|
category?: string
|
|
}): Promise<string> {
|
|
const id = randomUUID()
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.assets
|
|
(id, user_id, company_id, name, category, acquisition_date, acquisition_cost,
|
|
useful_life_months, bas_asset_account, bas_accumulated_account, bas_expense_account,
|
|
disposed_at, disposed_proceeds)
|
|
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'Test Asset', $4, '2025-01-01', 60000, 60,
|
|
'1220', '1229', '7832', $5, $6)`,
|
|
[
|
|
id,
|
|
params.userId,
|
|
params.companyId,
|
|
params.category ?? 'equipment',
|
|
params.disposedAt ?? null,
|
|
params.disposedProceeds ?? null,
|
|
],
|
|
)
|
|
return id
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function insertDepreciationSchedule(params: {
|
|
userId: string
|
|
companyId: string
|
|
assetId: string
|
|
fiscalPeriodId: string
|
|
journalEntryId?: string | null
|
|
amount?: number
|
|
}): Promise<string> {
|
|
const id = randomUUID()
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.depreciation_schedules
|
|
(id, user_id, company_id, asset_id, fiscal_period_id,
|
|
planned_depreciation, journal_entry_id, posted_at)
|
|
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, $6, $7, $8)`,
|
|
[
|
|
id,
|
|
params.userId,
|
|
params.companyId,
|
|
params.assetId,
|
|
params.fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
params.amount ?? 12_000,
|
|
params.journalEntryId ?? null,
|
|
params.journalEntryId ? new Date().toISOString() : null,
|
|
],
|
|
)
|
|
return id
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Insert a real posted journal entry we can FK-link a depreciation_schedule
|
|
// to (the FK has ON DELETE RESTRICT so we need a genuine row).
|
|
async function insertPostedEntry(params: {
|
|
userId: string
|
|
companyId: string
|
|
fiscalPeriodId: string
|
|
voucherNumber?: number
|
|
}): Promise<string> {
|
|
const id = randomUUID()
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.journal_entries
|
|
(id, user_id, company_id, fiscal_period_id, voucher_number, voucher_series,
|
|
entry_date, description, source_type, status)
|
|
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, 'A', '2025-12-31', 'Test', 'year_end', 'posted')`,
|
|
[id, params.userId, params.companyId, params.fiscalPeriodId, params.voucherNumber ?? 1],
|
|
)
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.journal_entry_lines
|
|
(journal_entry_id, account_number, debit_amount, credit_amount)
|
|
VALUES ($1, '7832', 12000, 0), ($1, '1229', 0, 12000)`,
|
|
[id],
|
|
)
|
|
return id
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let companyA: { userId: string; companyId: string; fiscalPeriodId: string }
|
|
let companyB: { userId: string; companyId: string; fiscalPeriodId: string }
|
|
|
|
beforeAll(async () => {
|
|
for (const slot of ['A', 'B'] as const) {
|
|
const userId = await insertAuthUser()
|
|
const companyId = await insertCompany({ createdBy: userId })
|
|
await insertCompanyMember({ companyId, userId, role: 'owner' })
|
|
const fiscalPeriodId = await insertFiscalPeriod({
|
|
userId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
periodStart: '2025-01-01',
|
|
periodEnd: '2025-12-31',
|
|
})
|
|
if (slot === 'A') companyA = { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId }
|
|
else companyB = { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId }
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('assets table — immutability after disposal', () => {
|
|
it('allows changing notes/name on a disposed asset', async () => {
|
|
const assetId = await insertAsset({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
disposedAt: '2025-12-31',
|
|
disposedProceeds: 5_000,
|
|
})
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`UPDATE public.assets SET notes = 'updated', name = 'renamed' WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[assetId],
|
|
)
|
|
const { rows } = await getPool().query(
|
|
`SELECT notes, name FROM public.assets WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[assetId],
|
|
)
|
|
expect(rows[0]?.notes).toBe('updated')
|
|
expect(rows[0]?.name).toBe('renamed')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('blocks acquisition_cost edit on a disposed asset', async () => {
|
|
const assetId = await insertAsset({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
disposedAt: '2025-12-31',
|
|
disposedProceeds: 5_000,
|
|
})
|
|
await expect(
|
|
getPool().query(
|
|
`UPDATE public.assets SET acquisition_cost = 99999 WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[assetId],
|
|
),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/disposed asset/i)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('blocks useful_life_months and depreciation_method edits on a disposed asset', async () => {
|
|
const assetId = await insertAsset({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
disposedAt: '2025-12-31',
|
|
disposedProceeds: 5_000,
|
|
})
|
|
await expect(
|
|
getPool().query(
|
|
`UPDATE public.assets SET useful_life_months = 120 WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[assetId],
|
|
),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/disposed asset/i)
|
|
await expect(
|
|
getPool().query(
|
|
`UPDATE public.assets SET depreciation_method = 'declining_balance_30' WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[assetId],
|
|
),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/disposed asset/i)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('blocks BAS account edits on a disposed asset', async () => {
|
|
const assetId = await insertAsset({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
disposedAt: '2025-12-31',
|
|
disposedProceeds: 5_000,
|
|
})
|
|
await expect(
|
|
getPool().query(
|
|
`UPDATE public.assets SET bas_expense_account = '7831' WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[assetId],
|
|
),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/disposed asset/i)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('allows the same edits while not yet disposed', async () => {
|
|
const assetId = await insertAsset({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
})
|
|
// acquisition_date is included here because the asset-edit feature lets
|
|
// users correct it before depreciation is booked — the immutability
|
|
// trigger must NOT block it on a non-disposed asset.
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`UPDATE public.assets
|
|
SET acquisition_cost = 70000, useful_life_months = 72,
|
|
acquisition_date = '2025-08-15', category = 'computer'
|
|
WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[assetId],
|
|
)
|
|
const { rows } = await getPool().query(
|
|
`SELECT acquisition_cost, useful_life_months,
|
|
acquisition_date::text AS acquisition_date, category
|
|
FROM public.assets WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[assetId],
|
|
)
|
|
expect(Number(rows[0]?.acquisition_cost)).toBe(70_000)
|
|
expect(rows[0]?.useful_life_months).toBe(72)
|
|
expect(rows[0]?.acquisition_date).toBe('2025-08-15')
|
|
expect(rows[0]?.category).toBe('computer')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('disposal CHECK requires both disposed_at and disposed_proceeds', async () => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
insertAsset({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
disposedAt: '2025-12-31',
|
|
disposedProceeds: null,
|
|
}),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/assets_disposal_atomic|check constraint/i)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('depreciation_schedules — immutability after posting', () => {
|
|
it('blocks planned_depreciation edits once a journal entry is linked', async () => {
|
|
const assetId = await insertAsset({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
})
|
|
const entryId = await insertPostedEntry({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
fiscalPeriodId: companyA.fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
voucherNumber: 100,
|
|
})
|
|
const scheduleId = await insertDepreciationSchedule({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
assetId,
|
|
fiscalPeriodId: companyA.fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
journalEntryId: entryId,
|
|
})
|
|
await expect(
|
|
getPool().query(
|
|
`UPDATE public.depreciation_schedules SET planned_depreciation = 99999 WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[scheduleId],
|
|
),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/posted depreciation schedule/i)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('allows planned_depreciation edits BEFORE a journal entry is linked', async () => {
|
|
const assetId = await insertAsset({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
})
|
|
const scheduleId = await insertDepreciationSchedule({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
assetId,
|
|
fiscalPeriodId: companyA.fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
})
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`UPDATE public.depreciation_schedules SET planned_depreciation = 8888 WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[scheduleId],
|
|
)
|
|
const { rows } = await getPool().query(
|
|
`SELECT planned_depreciation FROM public.depreciation_schedules WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[scheduleId],
|
|
)
|
|
expect(Number(rows[0]?.planned_depreciation)).toBe(8_888)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('depreciation_schedules — delete RLS policy', () => {
|
|
it('user can DELETE a draft schedule (no journal_entry_id)', async () => {
|
|
const assetId = await insertAsset({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
})
|
|
const scheduleId = await insertDepreciationSchedule({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
assetId,
|
|
fiscalPeriodId: companyA.fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
})
|
|
const deletedCount = await withUserContext(companyA.userId, async (client) => {
|
|
const result = await client.query(
|
|
`DELETE FROM public.depreciation_schedules WHERE id = $1 RETURNING id`,
|
|
[scheduleId],
|
|
)
|
|
return result.rowCount
|
|
})
|
|
expect(deletedCount).toBe(1)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('user CANNOT DELETE a posted schedule (RLS policy filters it out)', async () => {
|
|
const assetId = await insertAsset({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
})
|
|
const entryId = await insertPostedEntry({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
fiscalPeriodId: companyA.fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
voucherNumber: 101,
|
|
})
|
|
const scheduleId = await insertDepreciationSchedule({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
assetId,
|
|
fiscalPeriodId: companyA.fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
journalEntryId: entryId,
|
|
})
|
|
// RLS-filtered DELETE returns 0 affected rows rather than raising — the
|
|
// row is invisible to the DELETE statement under the authenticated role.
|
|
const deletedCount = await withUserContext(companyA.userId, async (client) => {
|
|
const result = await client.query(
|
|
`DELETE FROM public.depreciation_schedules WHERE id = $1 RETURNING id`,
|
|
[scheduleId],
|
|
)
|
|
return result.rowCount
|
|
})
|
|
expect(deletedCount).toBe(0)
|
|
// And the row still exists when checked as superuser.
|
|
const { rows } = await getPool().query(
|
|
`SELECT id FROM public.depreciation_schedules WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[scheduleId],
|
|
)
|
|
expect(rows).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('RLS — cross-company isolation', () => {
|
|
it('company A user cannot SELECT company B assets', async () => {
|
|
const bAssetId = await insertAsset({
|
|
userId: companyB.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyB.companyId,
|
|
})
|
|
const visibleToA = await withUserContext(companyA.userId, async (client) => {
|
|
const result = await client.query<{ id: string }>(
|
|
`SELECT id FROM public.assets WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[bAssetId],
|
|
)
|
|
return result.rowCount ?? 0
|
|
})
|
|
expect(visibleToA).toBe(0)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('company A user can SELECT their own assets', async () => {
|
|
const aAssetId = await insertAsset({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
})
|
|
const visibleToA = await withUserContext(companyA.userId, async (client) => {
|
|
const result = await client.query<{ id: string }>(
|
|
`SELECT id FROM public.assets WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[aAssetId],
|
|
)
|
|
return result.rowCount ?? 0
|
|
})
|
|
expect(visibleToA).toBe(1)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('company A user cannot INSERT a depreciation_schedule into company B', async () => {
|
|
const bAssetId = await insertAsset({
|
|
userId: companyB.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyB.companyId,
|
|
})
|
|
await expect(
|
|
withUserContext(companyA.userId, async (client) => {
|
|
await client.query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.depreciation_schedules
|
|
(user_id, company_id, asset_id, fiscal_period_id, planned_depreciation)
|
|
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, 1000)`,
|
|
[companyA.userId, companyB.companyId, bAssetId, companyB.fiscalPeriodId],
|
|
)
|
|
}),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/row-level security|new row violates/i)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Asset disposal VAT + jämkning constraints (migration 20260526120300).
|
|
// The columns are populated by disposeAsset() after the journal entry posts;
|
|
// these pg tests cover the CHECK constraints directly so future schema changes
|
|
// can't loosen them without us noticing.
|
|
describe('assets — disposal VAT + jämkning constraints', () => {
|
|
it('accepts a disposed_vat_treatment from the allowed enum', async () => {
|
|
const assetId = await insertAsset({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
disposedAt: '2025-12-31',
|
|
disposedProceeds: 100_000,
|
|
})
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`UPDATE public.assets
|
|
SET disposed_proceeds_vat = 20000, disposed_vat_treatment = 'standard_25'
|
|
WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[assetId],
|
|
)
|
|
const { rows } = await getPool().query(
|
|
`SELECT disposed_proceeds_vat, disposed_vat_treatment FROM public.assets WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[assetId],
|
|
)
|
|
expect(Number(rows[0]?.disposed_proceeds_vat)).toBe(20_000)
|
|
expect(rows[0]?.disposed_vat_treatment).toBe('standard_25')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects a disposed_vat_treatment outside the enum', async () => {
|
|
const assetId = await insertAsset({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
disposedAt: '2025-12-31',
|
|
disposedProceeds: 100_000,
|
|
})
|
|
await expect(
|
|
getPool().query(
|
|
`UPDATE public.assets SET disposed_vat_treatment = 'reduced_999' WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[assetId],
|
|
),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/check/i)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects disposed_proceeds_vat > 0 without a disposed_vat_treatment', async () => {
|
|
const assetId = await insertAsset({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
disposedAt: '2025-12-31',
|
|
disposedProceeds: 100_000,
|
|
})
|
|
// Treatment NULL + VAT > 0 must violate the consistency CHECK.
|
|
await expect(
|
|
getPool().query(
|
|
`UPDATE public.assets
|
|
SET disposed_proceeds_vat = 20000, disposed_vat_treatment = NULL
|
|
WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[assetId],
|
|
),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/check|consistency/i)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('accepts zero VAT with null treatment (legacy / non-VAT disposal)', async () => {
|
|
const assetId = await insertAsset({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
disposedAt: '2025-12-31',
|
|
disposedProceeds: 50_000,
|
|
})
|
|
// Default values from the migration — should already pass on insert.
|
|
const { rows } = await getPool().query(
|
|
`SELECT disposed_proceeds_vat, disposed_vat_treatment FROM public.assets WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[assetId],
|
|
)
|
|
expect(Number(rows[0]?.disposed_proceeds_vat)).toBe(0)
|
|
expect(rows[0]?.disposed_vat_treatment).toBeNull()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('persists jämkning audit metadata on the row', async () => {
|
|
const assetId = await insertAsset({
|
|
userId: companyA.userId,
|
|
companyId: companyA.companyId,
|
|
disposedAt: '2025-12-31',
|
|
disposedProceeds: 60_000,
|
|
})
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`UPDATE public.assets
|
|
SET jamkning_amount = 8000,
|
|
jamkning_remaining_months = 24,
|
|
jamkning_total_months = 60,
|
|
jamkning_original_input_vat = 20000
|
|
WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[assetId],
|
|
)
|
|
const { rows } = await getPool().query(
|
|
`SELECT jamkning_amount, jamkning_remaining_months, jamkning_total_months,
|
|
jamkning_original_input_vat
|
|
FROM public.assets
|
|
WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[assetId],
|
|
)
|
|
expect(Number(rows[0]?.jamkning_amount)).toBe(8_000)
|
|
expect(rows[0]?.jamkning_remaining_months).toBe(24)
|
|
expect(rows[0]?.jamkning_total_months).toBe(60)
|
|
expect(Number(rows[0]?.jamkning_original_input_vat)).toBe(20_000)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|