Files
accounted/components/transactions/MatchAllocationDialog.tsx
T
Jakob Wennberg fc7a46c3f2 fix(match-batch): cross-currency allocations + widened tolerance (#607)
* fix(match-batch): cross-currency allocations + widened tolerance

Reported by jakob testing PR #603's MatchAllocationDialog with a SEK
bank tx + a mix of SEK and USD invoices:

1. Tally rendered "1 USD + 1 SEK = 2 kr" — summing different currencies
   as if they were the same.
2. The 0.005 SEK tolerance blocked confirm on any FX rounding delta.

## What changed

**UI (MatchAllocationDialog.tsx)**
- Per-row amount input is explicitly in TRANSACTION currency (SEK for a
  Swedish bank import). Cross-currency rows show an "≈ X.XX (invoice
  currency)" hint under the input so the user can verify the FX result.
- Default amount for a cross-currency allocation is
  `invoice.remaining × invoice.exchange_rate` (booked SEK), so the user
  doesn't have to mental-math the FX.
- Overshoot tolerance widened from 0.005 SEK to `max(1 SEK, 0.5% × tx)`
  so bank-side FX rounding doesn't block confirm. A 2 400 kr tx now
  accepts ~12 kr of tolerance, a 100 kkr transfer accepts 500 kr.

**RPC (match_batch_allocate cross_currency migration)**
- BATCH_CURRENCY_MISMATCH dropped per-allocation. Mixed currencies now
  accepted with the convention that the cross-currency row pays the
  FULL invoice remaining (matches the single-tx match-supplier-invoice
  behavior). Partial cross-currency is out of scope for v1.
- AR/AP line is booked at `invoice.remaining × invoice.exchange_rate`
  (the SEK that was originally on 1510/2440). FX residual is posted
  to 7960 (Valutakursförluster) or 3960 (Valutakursvinster) per BAS.
- Sign conventions per direction documented inline:
    Customer: bank > booked → Cr 3960 (gain); bank < booked → Dr 7960
    Supplier: bank < booked → Cr 3960 (gain); bank > booked → Dr 7960
- New BATCH_FX_RATE_MISSING when the cross-currency invoice has no
  exchange_rate on file (would otherwise silently book at 0).
- New BATCH_FX_DEVIATION_TOO_LARGE when the user-entered amount
  deviates more than 10% from booked SEK — catches typos like "140"
  (USD invoice currency) when they meant "1390" (SEK equivalent)
  without rejecting genuine rate-day FX movement.

RPC patched on remote via Supabase MCP. Same-currency path is
byte-identical to the previous behavior.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(match-batch): PR review — strict sum, bank line = tx_abs, FX validation

Round-1 review fixes on the cross-currency batch allocation flow:

UI (MatchAllocationDialog):
- Tighten tolerance to 0.005 SEK so the "balanced ✓" indicator matches
  what the server will accept. The previous widened tolerance (max 1 SEK
  or 0.5% × tx) created a reconciliation gap where the JE's bank line
  could legitimately disagree with the actual bank receipt.
- Require balanced before confirm — undershoot is now a blocking state
  with an explicit warning, not a silent "leave unallocated".
- Cross-currency default no longer caps at remainingTxBudget. Capping a
  USD invoice's default to the leftover SEK budget could silently
  trigger BATCH_FX_DEVIATION_TOO_LARGE on submit. The user re-balances
  the other rows to fit.
- Add explicit FX-rate validation (bound check 0 < rate < 100000).
- When a cross-currency invoice has no usable exchange_rate on file,
  leave the amount blank and surface a warning instead of guessing.

RPC (match_batch_allocate):
- New code BATCH_AMOUNT_BELOW_TX. Strict sum check on both sides means
  the server can't be coaxed by a direct API caller into the same
  broken state the UI now blocks.
- Bank line credit/debit = v_tx_abs (the actual bank movement) instead
  of sum-of-allocations. Same value within rounding under the strict
  sum check, but it makes intent legible and lets per-row FX diff lines
  absorb rounding.
- Defense-in-depth company_id filter on all re-queries / UPDATEs in
  the line-build + payment-row passes.
- Drop the v_booked_sek-aliasing-for-invoice.total foot-gun. Use a
  dedicated v_inv_total var.
- Truncate invoice_number to 32 chars in line_description.

Tests:
- pg-real: cross-currency happy path (USD invoice paid by SEK tx with
  FX loss to 7960, bank line = tx_abs).
- pg-real: BATCH_AMOUNT_BELOW_TX rejection on undershoot.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(match-batch): PR review round 2 - caller user_id verification + FX bound

Compliance-swarm + swedish-compliance findings on round 1:

- CC6.3 (HIGH): p_user_id was caller-supplied and written into
  journal_entries.user_id / payment-row user_id without verifying it
  equals auth.uid(). Membership covered the company; nothing covered
  the user attribution. Two-layer fix: explicit guard rejects when
  p_user_id <> auth.uid(), and all writes now resolve v_caller =
  auth.uid() directly so the guard cant be silently bypassed.
- A.8.28 (MED): server-side FX upper-bound (0 < rate < 100000) matches
  the UI. Previously RPC only checked > 0, allowing the UI guard to
  diverge.
- V1.2.5 (LOW): truncate v_tx.date when concatenated into
  line_description (defense alongside round 1s invoice_number trunc).
- Symmetry: populate supplier_invoice_payments.exchange_rate (column
  existed, INSERT omitted it). Customer side already populated. Matches
  swedish-compliances traceability note on AP rorelseskulder.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(match-batch): PR review round 3 - drop p_user_id, CHECK constraints, payment-day rate

Genuine round-2 review findings (compliance-swarm + swedish-compliance):

- V4.5: p_user_id dropped from RPC signature entirely. Round-2 added a
  guard; this removes the attack surface at the API boundary. Caller is
  resolved via auth.uid() inside the function. Route updated.
- V2.2: CHECK constraint on invoices.exchange_rate and
  supplier_invoices.exchange_rate (0 < rate < 100000). Three layers now
  enforce the bound: schema, RPC, UI.
- swedish-compliance traceability gap: payment_exchange_rate column on
  both invoice_payments and supplier_invoice_payments. Populated as
  v_alloc_amount / v_inv_remaining for cross-currency rows so FX diffs
  are reconstructible from the payment record alone (BFL 7 kap
  behandlingshistorik). NULL for same-currency. The existing
  exchange_rate column continues to store the invoicing rate.
- CC6.1: extract isValidExchangeRate() to lib/utils.ts. UI's three
  inline bound checks now share one validator.
- Dead code: drop unused leftover_note i18n key (sv + en).

Tests:
- pg-real signature updated (4-arg -> 3-arg) across all 9 call sites.
- Added payment_exchange_rate assertion to cross-currency happy path
  (invoicing rate 10.0 stays, payment-day rate stored as 10.5).

Migration applied to remote.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(test): missed 4th arg in BATCH_UNAUTHORIZED pg-real test

Round-3 dropped p_user_id from match_batch_allocate. The replace_all
caught the userId/companyId pattern but missed the BATCH_UNAUTHORIZED
test which uses outsiderId instead of userId. CI failed with
"bind message supplies 4 parameters, but prepared statement requires 3".

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-29 16:30:42 +02:00

549 lines
21 KiB
TypeScript

'use client'
import { useEffect, useMemo, useState } from 'react'
import { useTranslations } from 'next-intl'
import { createClient } from '@/lib/supabase/client'
import { useCompany } from '@/contexts/CompanyContext'
import {
Dialog,
DialogContent,
DialogDescription,
DialogFooter,
DialogHeader,
DialogTitle,
} from '@/components/ui/dialog'
import { Button } from '@/components/ui/button'
import { Input } from '@/components/ui/input'
import { Skeleton } from '@/components/ui/skeleton'
import { Badge } from '@/components/ui/badge'
import { useToast } from '@/components/ui/use-toast'
import { getErrorMessage } from '@/lib/errors/get-error-message'
import { formatCurrency, formatDate, cn, isValidExchangeRate } from '@/lib/utils'
import { Loader2, Search, X, Plus, Check, AlertTriangle } from 'lucide-react'
import type { Invoice, Customer, SupplierInvoice, Supplier } from '@/types'
import type { TransactionWithInvoice } from './transaction-types'
interface MatchAllocationDialogProps {
open: boolean
onOpenChange: (open: boolean) => void
transaction: TransactionWithInvoice | null
onSuccess: () => void
}
/**
* Direction-aware allocation candidate. The dialog normalizes customer and
* supplier invoices to the same shape so the row renderer + tally math stay
* a single code path. The `kind` discriminator drives the underlying API
* payload at submit time.
*
* `remaining` is in the invoice's own `currency` (USD, EUR, etc.).
* `exchangeRate` is the invoice's SEK-per-foreign-unit at invoicing time
* — used to compute the default SEK amount for cross-currency rows so the
* user doesn't have to mental-math the FX (PR #607).
*/
interface AllocationCandidate {
kind: 'customer_invoice' | 'supplier_invoice'
id: string
label: string
counterpartyName: string
remaining: number
total: number
currency: string
exchangeRate: number | null
dueDate: string
}
type AllocationDraft = {
candidateId: string
amount: string
}
type CustomerInvoiceRow = Invoice & { customer?: Customer | null }
type SupplierInvoiceRow = SupplierInvoice & { supplier?: Supplier | null }
function parseAmount(s: string): number {
// Accept Swedish-style decimal comma + thousand spaces. Empty string → 0.
const cleaned = s.replace(/\s+/g, '').replace(',', '.')
const n = parseFloat(cleaned)
return Number.isFinite(n) ? n : 0
}
function round2(n: number): number {
return Math.round(n * 100) / 100
}
export default function MatchAllocationDialog({
open,
onOpenChange,
transaction,
onSuccess,
}: MatchAllocationDialogProps) {
const { toast } = useToast()
const { company } = useCompany()
const supabase = useMemo(() => createClient(), [])
const t = useTranslations('tx_match_allocation')
const kind: 'customer_invoice' | 'supplier_invoice' = useMemo(() => {
// Strict > 0 (was >= 0): a zero-amount tx would otherwise load customer
// candidates and the RPC would reject with BATCH_TX_ZERO_AMOUNT after
// the user has already filled in allocations. PR #603 review fix.
return transaction && transaction.amount > 0 ? 'customer_invoice' : 'supplier_invoice'
}, [transaction])
const [candidates, setCandidates] = useState<AllocationCandidate[]>([])
const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true)
const [search, setSearch] = useState('')
const [drafts, setDrafts] = useState<Record<string, AllocationDraft>>({})
const [submitting, setSubmitting] = useState(false)
useEffect(() => {
if (!open || !transaction || !company) return
const companyId = company.id
let cancelled = false
async function load() {
setLoading(true)
try {
if (kind === 'customer_invoice') {
// Mirror InvoicePicker's filter: only true invoices (no proformas)
// in an open state with a positive remaining balance.
const { data } = await supabase
.from('invoices')
.select('*, customer:customers(id, name)')
.eq('company_id', companyId)
.eq('document_type', 'invoice')
.in('status', ['sent', 'overdue', 'partially_paid'])
.gt('remaining_amount', 0)
.order('due_date', { ascending: true })
if (cancelled) return
const rows = (data ?? []) as CustomerInvoiceRow[]
setCandidates(
rows.map((r) => ({
kind: 'customer_invoice',
id: r.id,
label: r.invoice_number ?? r.id.slice(0, 8),
counterpartyName: r.customer?.name ?? t('unknown_customer'),
remaining: Number(r.remaining_amount ?? r.total ?? 0),
total: Number(r.total ?? 0),
currency: r.currency,
exchangeRate: r.exchange_rate != null ? Number(r.exchange_rate) : null,
dueDate: r.due_date,
})),
)
} else {
const { data } = await supabase
.from('supplier_invoices')
.select('*, supplier:suppliers(id, name)')
.eq('company_id', companyId)
.in('status', ['registered', 'approved', 'overdue', 'partially_paid'])
.gt('remaining_amount', 0)
.order('due_date', { ascending: true })
if (cancelled) return
const rows = (data ?? []) as SupplierInvoiceRow[]
setCandidates(
rows.map((r) => ({
kind: 'supplier_invoice',
id: r.id,
label: r.supplier_invoice_number ?? `LF-${r.arrival_number}`,
counterpartyName: r.supplier?.name ?? t('unknown_supplier'),
remaining: Number(r.remaining_amount ?? r.total ?? 0),
total: Number(r.total ?? 0),
currency: r.currency,
exchangeRate: r.exchange_rate != null ? Number(r.exchange_rate) : null,
dueDate: r.due_date,
})),
)
}
} finally {
if (!cancelled) setLoading(false)
}
}
load()
return () => {
cancelled = true
}
}, [open, transaction, company, kind, supabase, t])
// Reset state every time the dialog re-opens for a new tx.
useEffect(() => {
if (!open) {
setDrafts({})
setSearch('')
}
}, [open])
const txAmountAbs = transaction ? Math.abs(transaction.amount) : 0
const txCurrency = transaction?.currency ?? 'SEK'
// Each draft's `amount` is the allocation in TRANSACTION currency (SEK
// for a Swedish bank import). For cross-currency invoices the FX
// rounding lives inside per-row FX diff lines (Dr 7960 / Cr 3960) — NOT
// in the tolerance. So the sum must equal tx_abs exactly: anything
// unallocated would leave the bank line on 1930 short of the actual
// bank receipt and break reconciliation. (PR #607 round-1 review.)
const allocated = useMemo(() => {
return Object.values(drafts).reduce((sum, d) => sum + parseAmount(d.amount), 0)
}, [drafts])
const leftover = round2(txAmountAbs - allocated)
// 0.005 SEK matches the RPC's BATCH_AMOUNT_EXCEEDS_TX guard so the
// "balanced ✓" indicator never lies to the user about what the server
// will accept.
const TOLERANCE = 0.005
const overshoot = leftover < -TOLERANCE
const balanced =
Math.abs(leftover) < TOLERANCE && Object.keys(drafts).length > 0
const undershoot = leftover > TOLERANCE
const filteredCandidates = useMemo(() => {
const selectedIds = new Set(Object.keys(drafts))
const sorted = [...candidates].sort((a, b) => {
const aSel = selectedIds.has(a.id)
const bSel = selectedIds.has(b.id)
if (aSel !== bSel) return aSel ? -1 : 1
return a.dueDate.localeCompare(b.dueDate)
})
if (!search.trim()) return sorted
const needle = search.trim().toLowerCase()
return sorted.filter((c) => {
const haystack = `${c.label} ${c.counterpartyName}`.toLowerCase()
return haystack.includes(needle)
})
}, [candidates, drafts, search])
function addAllocation(candidate: AllocationCandidate) {
setDrafts((prev) => {
if (prev[candidate.id]) return prev
const remainingTxBudget = Math.max(0, round2(txAmountAbs - allocated))
const sameCurrency = candidate.currency === txCurrency
// Same-currency: partial allowed, default to min(remaining, budget).
// Cross-currency: full-payment-only, default to booked SEK (rate
// sanity-checked). NOT capped to remainingTxBudget — the cross-
// currency RPC guard requires the amount to be within ±10% of
// booked_sek, so capping a USD invoice's default at the leftover
// budget would silently trigger BATCH_FX_DEVIATION_TOO_LARGE on
// submit. Instead, let the row default to the right amount and
// the user re-balances the other rows to fit. PR #607 review fix.
let defaultAmount: number
if (sameCurrency) {
defaultAmount = Math.min(candidate.remaining, remainingTxBudget)
} else if (isValidExchangeRate(candidate.exchangeRate)) {
defaultAmount = round2(candidate.remaining * candidate.exchangeRate)
} else {
// No (or out-of-range) FX rate. Leave the amount blank rather
// than guessing a misleading default; the user must enter the
// SEK amount the bank converted to manually. Blocked from
// confirm via the per-row warning below.
defaultAmount = 0
}
return {
...prev,
[candidate.id]: {
candidateId: candidate.id,
amount: defaultAmount > 0 ? defaultAmount.toFixed(2).replace('.', ',') : '',
},
}
})
}
function removeAllocation(candidateId: string) {
setDrafts((prev) => {
const next = { ...prev }
delete next[candidateId]
return next
})
}
function setDraftAmount(candidateId: string, amount: string) {
setDrafts((prev) => ({
...prev,
[candidateId]: { candidateId, amount },
}))
}
async function handleConfirm() {
if (!transaction) return
// PR #607 round-1 review: require balanced. Undershoot is no longer
// allowed because it leaves the bank line short of tx_abs and breaks
// reconciliation.
if (!balanced || overshoot) return
setSubmitting(true)
try {
const allocations = Object.values(drafts)
.map((d) => {
const cand = candidates.find((c) => c.id === d.candidateId)
if (!cand) return null
const amount = parseAmount(d.amount)
if (amount <= 0) return null
return cand.kind === 'customer_invoice'
? { kind: 'customer_invoice' as const, invoice_id: cand.id, amount }
: { kind: 'supplier_invoice' as const, supplier_invoice_id: cand.id, amount }
})
.filter((a): a is NonNullable<typeof a> => a !== null)
if (allocations.length === 0) {
toast({
title: t('error_no_allocations_title'),
description: t('error_no_allocations_description'),
variant: 'destructive',
})
setSubmitting(false)
return
}
const response = await fetch(`/api/transactions/${transaction.id}/match-batch`, {
method: 'POST',
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
body: JSON.stringify({ allocations }),
})
if (!response.ok) {
const body = await response.json().catch(() => null)
toast({
title: t('error_submit_title'),
description: getErrorMessage(body, {
context: kind === 'customer_invoice' ? 'invoice' : 'supplier_invoice',
statusCode: response.status,
}),
variant: 'destructive',
})
return
}
toast({
title: t('success_title'),
description: t('success_description', { count: allocations.length }),
variant: 'success',
})
onSuccess()
onOpenChange(false)
} catch (err) {
toast({
title: t('error_submit_title'),
description: getErrorMessage(err, {
context: kind === 'customer_invoice' ? 'invoice' : 'supplier_invoice',
}),
variant: 'destructive',
})
} finally {
setSubmitting(false)
}
}
if (!transaction) return null
return (
<Dialog open={open} onOpenChange={onOpenChange}>
<DialogContent className="sm:max-w-[640px]">
<DialogHeader>
<DialogTitle>{t('title')}</DialogTitle>
<DialogDescription>
{kind === 'customer_invoice' ? t('description_customer') : t('description_supplier')}
</DialogDescription>
</DialogHeader>
<div className="space-y-4">
{/* Transaction summary */}
<div className="rounded-lg border bg-card p-3">
<p className="text-xs uppercase tracking-wider text-muted-foreground">
{t('transaction_label')}
</p>
<p className="mt-1 text-sm font-medium">{transaction.description}</p>
<div className="mt-1 flex items-center justify-between text-sm">
<span className="tabular-nums text-muted-foreground">
{formatDate(transaction.date)}
</span>
<span
className={cn(
'font-medium tabular-nums',
transaction.amount > 0 && 'text-success',
)}
>
{transaction.amount > 0 ? '+' : ''}
{formatCurrency(transaction.amount, transaction.currency)}
</span>
</div>
</div>
{/* Search */}
<div className="relative">
<Search className="absolute left-3 top-1/2 h-4 w-4 -translate-y-1/2 text-muted-foreground" />
<Input
value={search}
onChange={(e) => setSearch(e.target.value)}
placeholder={t('search_placeholder')}
className="pl-9"
/>
</div>
{/* Candidate list */}
{loading ? (
<div className="space-y-2">
<Skeleton className="h-16 w-full" />
<Skeleton className="h-16 w-full" />
<Skeleton className="h-16 w-full" />
</div>
) : filteredCandidates.length === 0 ? (
<div className="rounded-lg border border-dashed bg-muted/30 p-6 text-center">
<p className="text-sm font-medium">{t('empty_title')}</p>
<p className="mt-1 text-xs text-muted-foreground">{t('empty_description')}</p>
</div>
) : (
<ul className="space-y-2 max-h-[320px] overflow-y-auto">
{filteredCandidates.map((c) => {
const draft = drafts[c.id]
const isSelected = !!draft
return (
<li
key={c.id}
className={cn(
'rounded-lg border bg-card p-3 transition-colors',
isSelected ? 'border-foreground' : 'border-border',
)}
>
<div className="flex items-start justify-between gap-3">
<div className="min-w-0 flex-1 space-y-1">
<div className="flex items-center gap-2">
<span className="text-sm font-medium tabular-nums">{c.label}</span>
{isSelected && (
<Badge variant="secondary" className="gap-1">
<Check className="h-3 w-3" />
{t('selected_badge')}
</Badge>
)}
</div>
<p className="truncate text-xs text-muted-foreground">
{c.counterpartyName}
</p>
<p className="text-xs text-muted-foreground tabular-nums">
{t('remaining_label', {
amount: formatCurrency(c.remaining, c.currency),
})}
</p>
</div>
{isSelected ? (
<div className="flex flex-col items-end gap-1">
<div className="flex items-center gap-2">
<Input
type="text"
inputMode="decimal"
value={draft.amount}
onChange={(e) => setDraftAmount(c.id, e.target.value)}
className="h-9 w-28 font-mono text-right tabular-nums"
aria-label={t('amount_input_aria', { label: c.label })}
/>
<Button
type="button"
size="icon"
variant="ghost"
onClick={() => removeAllocation(c.id)}
aria-label={t('remove_aria', { label: c.label })}
>
<X className="h-4 w-4" />
</Button>
</div>
{/* FX hint — appears only for cross-currency rows
so the user can see what their tx-currency
input translates to in invoice currency.
When the rate is missing or out of range, we
warn instead of silently defaulting to a
misleading number. PR #607 round-1 review. */}
{c.currency !== txCurrency && (
isValidExchangeRate(c.exchangeRate) ? (
<p className="text-[11px] tabular-nums text-muted-foreground">
{formatCurrency(parseAmount(draft.amount) / c.exchangeRate, c.currency)}
</p>
) : (
<p className="text-[11px] tabular-nums text-warning-foreground">
{t('fx_rate_missing_warning', { currency: c.currency })}
</p>
)
)}
</div>
) : (
<Button
type="button"
size="sm"
variant="outline"
onClick={() => addAllocation(c)}
>
<Plus className="mr-1 h-3.5 w-3.5" />
{t('add_button')}
</Button>
)}
</div>
</li>
)
})}
</ul>
)}
{/* Tally */}
<div className="space-y-2 border-t pt-3">
<div className="flex items-center justify-between text-sm">
<span className="text-muted-foreground">{t('allocated_label')}</span>
<span
className={cn(
'font-mono tabular-nums',
overshoot && 'text-destructive',
balanced && 'text-success',
)}
>
{formatCurrency(allocated, transaction.currency)} /{' '}
{formatCurrency(txAmountAbs, transaction.currency)}
</span>
</div>
{overshoot ? (
<div className="flex items-center gap-2 rounded-lg bg-destructive/10 p-3 text-sm text-destructive">
<AlertTriangle className="h-4 w-4 flex-shrink-0" />
<p>
{t('overshoot_warning', {
excess: formatCurrency(Math.abs(leftover), transaction.currency),
})}
</p>
</div>
) : balanced ? (
<div className="flex items-center gap-2 rounded-lg bg-success/10 p-3 text-sm text-success">
<Check className="h-4 w-4 flex-shrink-0" />
<p>{t('balanced_message')}</p>
</div>
) : undershoot && Object.keys(drafts).length > 0 ? (
// Undershoot is now a blocking state — the JE's 1930 line
// must equal the bank's actual receipt or reconciliation
// breaks. The user must allocate the full amount or remove
// selections. PR #607 round-1 review fix.
<div className="flex items-start gap-2 rounded-lg bg-warning/10 p-3 text-sm text-warning-foreground">
<AlertTriangle className="h-4 w-4 flex-shrink-0 mt-0.5" />
<p>
{t('undershoot_warning', {
amount: formatCurrency(leftover, transaction.currency),
})}
</p>
</div>
) : null}
</div>
</div>
<DialogFooter>
<Button variant="outline" onClick={() => onOpenChange(false)} disabled={submitting}>
{t('cancel')}
</Button>
<Button
onClick={handleConfirm}
// Confirm requires sum == tx_abs exactly (within rounding).
// Anything else lets the JE diverge from the bank line and
// breaks reconciliation. PR #607 round-1 review fix.
disabled={submitting || !balanced || overshoot}
>
{submitting && <Loader2 className="mr-2 h-4 w-4 animate-spin" />}
{t('confirm')}
</Button>
</DialogFooter>
</DialogContent>
</Dialog>
)
}