Files
accounted/lib/invariants
Jakob Wennberg 16fbcefbbc feat(invariants): shared format contracts + upgrade-path CI (#1364)
* feat(invariants): centralise shared format contracts, reconcile the org-number paths

The same format rules were written out independently across the codebase, and
where they disagreed the disagreement was invisible until a filing failed.

Worst case, now fixed: four Skatteverket- and Bolagsverket-bound export paths
each had their own idea of a valid organisationsnummer.

  lib/skatteverket/format.ts      strip '-' only      threw on any input with a space
  lib/salary/ku/ku10-generator.ts replace('-', '')    first hyphen only, spaces survived
  lib/salary/agi/xml-generator.ts strip non-digits    stray letters passed the length check
  lib/bokslut/ixbrl/validate      /^\d{6}-?\d{4}$/    rejected the 12-digit form, no Luhn

A company stored with a space or in 12-digit form could file AGI all year and
then fail at the arsredovisning deadline with a message that did not say why.

lib/invariants/ now owns account number, ISO date, four-digit fiscal year and
org number, each with the rationale recorded next to the rule. normalizeOrgNumber
moves here from lib/company-lookup/ and isSaneDateString from lib/utils.ts; both
old paths re-export, so no caller changes. lib/api/schemas.ts builds its
primitives on the module, so ~100 schemas inherit any correction.

The arsredovisning check-digit verdict is a warn, not an error: a wrong Luhn
digit is almost certainly a typo worth surfacing, but whether every org number
Bolagsverket accepts satisfies Luhn is a Swedish domain question we have not
verified against a primary source, and an error there blocks Skicka in. We do
not block a statutory filing on an unverified assumption.

KU10 still passes a 12-digit stored org number through unfolded. That is
pre-existing, and whether the KU10 schema wants 10 or 12 digits is not covered
by the swedish-payroll skill, so it is pinned by a test rather than changed
silently.

Guard 8 (hand-rolled-invariant) tracks the remaining 114 inline copies as a
ratchet that may only go down, same mechanism as the roundOre guard.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(ci): add an upgrade-path job that applies new migrations against real data

The pg-real job applies all 548 migrations to an EMPTY database. Empty means
zero rows, so a migration that adds a NOT NULL, adds a CHECK, creates a unique
index or backfills passes trivially in CI and can still fail on production,
where the rows exist. CI proved that a fresh install works; nothing proved that
an existing install upgrades.

The new pg-upgrade job: apply the schema as it stands at the merge base, seed a
small real company (three posted verifikat, balanced lines, one ore-level
amount), then apply ONLY the migrations this PR adds, then assert the data
survived (entries still posted, lines intact, ledger still balances, ore
unchanged, voucher numbers sequential). A PR with no migration no-ops.

Verified locally against supabase/postgres:15.8.1.060 rather than assumed, with
three deliberately bad migrations:

  rescale money on posted lines   empty: would pass   seeded: ERROR (immutability trigger)
  CHECK violating the ore row     empty: exit 0       seeded: exit 3
  NOT NULL on a populated column  empty: exit 0       seeded: exit 3

Base migrations are read out of the merge-base git tree, not the working tree,
so a PR that edits an already-shipped migration still gets the original applied
and the edit surfaces as a failure here.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: record the invariants and upgrade-CI decisions

Two entries covering what this PR changes and, more importantly, the calls that
are not obvious from the diff: why the arsredovisning check-digit verdict is a
warning rather than an error, why KU10's 12-digit passthrough is pinned instead
of fixed, and why the ROT/RUT brf org-number schemas stay on their own rule.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs(test): mark the upgrade fixture as CI-only, never a production template

The fixture writes posted journal_entries and their lines directly, bypassing
the engine and the atomic commit RPC. That is the only way to hand a migration
pre-existing posted rows to break, and it is safe against a throwaway CI
database, but it reads like a sanctioned pattern to anyone who finds it later.

Says so explicitly, with the reason it is confined here (no voucher sequence to
keep gapless, no retention obligation on a database destroyed with the job) and
a pointer back to Hard Rule 2 for anything touching a real database.

Raised by the Swedish compliance review bot on #1364.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <311770904+jakobwennberg-oss@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-03 16:30:14 +02:00
..

lib/invariants

Shared product contracts: the formats and bounds that more than one consumer must agree on, with the reason for each rule recorded next to it.

What belongs here

A rule belongs here only when consumers outside the owning module need the identical invariant to validate input or to generate compatible output.

Our consumers are the web app, the public /api/v1 surface, the MCP server, the SIE importer and exporter, and the Skatteverket-bound generators (AGI, KU10, SRU, iXBRL). When two of those disagree about what a valid value looks like, the disagreement is invisible until a customer's filing fails.

What does not belong here

  • Rules specific to one module. They stay in that module.
  • General helpers. lib/utils.ts, lib/money.ts.
  • Database questions. "Is this account in the company's chart?" is lib/bookkeeping/account-validation.ts, not a format rule.
  • Business rules. "Is this fiscal year open?" is a period question.

Naming

The name must make the owning concept explicit. isAccountNumber, not isValidNumber. Two rules in here share a byte-identical regex (account-number and fiscal-year are both /^\d{4}$/) and mean entirely different things: the names are the only thing keeping a call site honest, so they carry the weight.

Layout

File Owns
org-number.ts Swedish organisationsnummer / personnummer: canonical 10-digit form, Luhn, Skatteverket 12-digit conversion
account-number.ts BAS account number format (4 digits, always a string)
iso-date.ts YYYY-MM-DD shape, plus a real-calendar-date check
fiscal-year.ts Four-digit räkenskapsår key
zod.ts Zod primitives built from the rules above, for API schemas

zod.ts is separate so that consumers which do not use Zod (the MCP server, report generators) can import a rule without pulling the dependency in.

Adding a rule

  1. Write the rule and the reason in the docblock. A rule without a recorded reason gets re-litigated or worked around within a quarter.
  2. Export a pure validator (primitives in, boolean or null out).
  3. Add the Zod primitive to zod.ts if an API surface needs it.
  4. Replace the hand-rolled copies. npm run check:guards tracks how many remain and fails if the count goes up.