Files
accounted/tests/pg/ledger-usage-stats-rpc.pg.test.ts
T
e684606b23 fix(supplier-invoices): a credit note is never a payable, so it never waits for attest (#2289)
* fix(supplier-invoices): a credit note is never a payable, so it never waits for attest

A supplier credit note created with Kreditera was inserted at 'registered',
the attest entry state, while the detail page (rightly) offered no attest
for it. The worklist counted every 'registered' row, so Att göra showed
"1 leverantörsfaktura att attestera" that nobody could clear (support case
2026-09-04; 14 such rows on prod plus one MCP-approved credit note).

- One row builder (lib/supplier-invoices/credit-note.ts) for the dashboard
  route, the MCP executor and the v1 API: the credit note rests at
  'credited' from birth, the status the provider importers already use.
- CHECK supplier_invoices_credit_note_not_payable keeps every writer out of
  the payable states; migration backfills the stuck rows (one immutable
  reset-source row skipped, hence NOT VALID).
- The worklist attest count excludes credit notes explicitly.
- GET /api/supplier-invoices/[id] hydrates credited_original with a second
  scoped query: PostgREST cannot pick a direction for a self-referencing
  embed hint and returned the one-to-many side (an empty array), which the
  page rendered as "Krediterar: Ankomst #" with no number.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S62AGZwsMoBc8x8obBDVqE

* test(supplier-invoices): type the GET route response in the credited_original tests

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S62AGZwsMoBc8x8obBDVqE

* fix(migration): NOT EXISTS instead of NOT IN for the reset-source exclusion

A NULL source_company_id in the subquery would make NOT IN never true and
silently skip the whole backfill.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S62AGZwsMoBc8x8obBDVqE

* test(schema): raise the unresolved-payload ceiling by 3 for the credit-note row builder

The three credit-note creation paths now insert the row from one builder,
so the scanner sees three dynamic payloads instead of three literals. The
columns are the literal in lib/supplier-invoices/credit-note.ts, pinned by
its test; the resting status is additionally held by the DB CHECK.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S62AGZwsMoBc8x8obBDVqE

* test(pg): credit-note fixtures in the overdue-cron tests rest at credited

The two fixtures that seeded a credit note on 'registered'/'overdue' now
violate supplier_invoices_credit_note_not_payable. The cron test seeds the
credit note the way the routes create it since 20260904190000; the 20260607
backfill case asserts the scenario it repaired is now unreachable.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S62AGZwsMoBc8x8obBDVqE

* test(pg): ledger-usage-stats seeds its credit note at credited

The fixture defaulted every row to 'registered', which the CHECK
supplier_invoices_credit_note_not_payable now refuses for a credit note.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S62AGZwsMoBc8x8obBDVqE

---------

Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <311770904+jakobwennberg-oss@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-05 09:43:00 +02:00

504 lines
20 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* pg-real test for get_ledger_usage_stats + normalize_counterparty_key.
*
* The RPC backs the Accounted://ledger/context MCP resource: one jsonb
* document with windowed account-usage, counterparty-pattern, and
* supplier-pattern aggregates. Verifies: posted-only filtering, the date
* window, dominant category/account derivation (19xx contra exclusion),
* splinter-merging merchant normalization (payment-rail prefixes, dates,
* legal suffixes), storno exclusion from account_usage, supplier-side
* aggregation (credit notes and reversed invoices excluded), and two-company
* isolation (a foreign company id yields empty sections).
*/
import { describe, it, expect, beforeAll } from 'vitest'
import { randomUUID } from 'node:crypto'
import { getPool } from './setup'
import {
seedCompany,
insertDraftJournalEntry,
insertPostedJournalEntry,
} from './fixtures'
async function insertLines(
journalEntryId: string,
lines: Array<{ account: string; debit: number; credit: number }>,
): Promise<void> {
for (const line of lines) {
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.journal_entry_lines
(journal_entry_id, account_number, debit_amount, credit_amount)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4)`,
[journalEntryId, line.account, line.debit, line.credit],
)
}
}
async function insertBookedTransaction(params: {
companyId: string
userId: string
journalEntryId: string
merchantName: string
category: string
date: string
amount?: number
}): Promise<void> {
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.transactions
(id, company_id, user_id, currency, amount, date, description,
journal_entry_id, merchant_name, category)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'SEK', $4, $5, $6, $7, $8, $9)`,
[
randomUUID(),
params.companyId,
params.userId,
params.amount ?? -500,
params.date,
`Payment ${params.merchantName}`,
params.journalEntryId,
params.merchantName,
params.category,
],
)
}
/** ISO date + n days, as a UTC timestamptz string (for committed_at). */
function plusDays(isoDate: string, n: number): string {
const d = new Date(`${isoDate}T00:00:00Z`)
d.setUTCDate(d.getUTCDate() + n)
return d.toISOString()
}
// Posted entry + lines + a booked transaction pointing at it, in one call.
async function bookMerchant(params: {
userId: string
companyId: string
fiscalPeriodId: string
merchantName: string
category: string
date: string
expenseAccount: string
voucherNumber: number
sourceType?: string
}): Promise<string> {
const entryId = await insertPostedJournalEntry({
userId: params.userId,
companyId: params.companyId,
fiscalPeriodId: params.fiscalPeriodId,
entryDate: params.date,
voucherNumber: params.voucherNumber,
sourceType: params.sourceType ?? 'bank_transaction',
// Booked 3 days after the transaction: exercises the committed_at-based
// lag (entry_date == transaction date would give 0).
committedAt: plusDays(params.date, 3),
lines: [
{ accountNumber: params.expenseAccount, debitAmount: 500, creditAmount: 0 },
{ accountNumber: '1930', debitAmount: 0, creditAmount: 500 },
],
})
await insertBookedTransaction({
companyId: params.companyId,
userId: params.userId,
journalEntryId: entryId,
merchantName: params.merchantName,
category: params.category,
date: params.date,
})
return entryId
}
async function insertSupplierWithInvoices(params: {
userId: string
companyId: string
name: string
invoices: Array<{
invoiceDate: string
account: string
vatTreatment?: string
status?: string
isCreditNote?: boolean
extraItemAccounts?: string[]
}>
arrivalStart: number
}): Promise<void> {
const supplierId = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.suppliers (id, user_id, company_id, name)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4)`,
[supplierId, params.userId, params.companyId, params.name],
)
let arrival = params.arrivalStart
for (const inv of params.invoices) {
const invoiceId = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.supplier_invoices
(id, user_id, company_id, supplier_id, arrival_number,
supplier_invoice_number, invoice_date, due_date, status,
vat_treatment, is_credit_note, subtotal, vat_amount, total)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, $6, $7, $7, $8, $9, $10, 1000, 250, 1250)`,
[
invoiceId,
params.userId,
params.companyId,
supplierId,
arrival++,
`SI-${arrival}`,
inv.invoiceDate,
// A credit note rests at 'credited' (never a payable): the CHECK
// supplier_invoices_credit_note_not_payable refuses 'registered'.
inv.status ?? (inv.isCreditNote ? 'credited' : 'registered'),
inv.vatTreatment ?? 'standard_25',
inv.isCreditNote ?? false,
],
)
for (const account of [inv.account, ...(inv.extraItemAccounts ?? [])]) {
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.supplier_invoice_items
(supplier_invoice_id, description, quantity, unit_price, line_total,
account_number, vat_rate, vat_amount)
VALUES ($1, 'Line', 1, 1000, 1000, $2, 0.25, 250)`,
[invoiceId, account],
)
}
}
}
type LedgerStats = {
account_usage: Array<{
account_number: string
account_name: string | null
postings: number
last_used: string
}>
counterparty_patterns: Array<{
counterparty: string
counterparty_key: string
occurrences: number
last_booked: string
dominant_category: string | null
dominant_category_count: number
dominant_account_number: string | null
}>
supplier_patterns: Array<{
supplier: string
invoices: number
last_invoice: string
vat_treatment: string | null
dominant_account_number: string | null
dominant_account_count: number
}>
vat_treatments_used: string[]
median_booking_lag_days: number | null
}
async function callRpc(companyId: string, fromDate: string): Promise<LedgerStats> {
const res = await getPool().query(
`SELECT public.get_ledger_usage_stats($1, $2) AS stats`,
[companyId, fromDate],
)
return res.rows[0].stats as LedgerStats
}
describe('normalize_counterparty_key', () => {
async function normalize(raw: string): Promise<string> {
const res = await getPool().query(
`SELECT public.normalize_counterparty_key($1) AS key`,
[raw],
)
return res.rows[0].key as string
}
it('mirrors normalizeCounterpartyName for the splinter cases', async () => {
// Payment-rail prefix + trailing date.
expect(await normalize('KLARNA AB 2026-07-01')).toBe('klarna')
expect(await normalize('KLARNA AB')).toBe('klarna')
expect(await normalize('SWISH KLARNA AB')).toBe('klarna')
expect(await normalize('KORTKÖP KLARNA AB')).toBe('klarna')
// Faithful-mirror check: bare KORT is NOT a stripped prefix in
// normalizeCounterpartyName() either (only KORTKÖP). Hardening the prefix
// list is Layer B of bank_transaction_ai_normalization.md and must change
// the TS + SQL pair together, or the categorization_templates join drifts.
expect(await normalize('KORT KLARNA AB')).toBe('kort klarna')
// Legal suffix + casing.
expect(await normalize('Telia Sverige AB')).toBe('telia sverige')
// Trailing initials and month tokens (the ngrok bug).
expect(await normalize('ngrok JW')).toBe('ngrok')
expect(await normalize('Ngrok Mars')).toBe('ngrok')
// Invoice references.
expect(await normalize('Acme INV-123')).toBe('acme')
// Card-network descriptors: merchant segment before the star, per-charge
// product/ref/city tail dropped (the Anthropic splinter bug). Processor
// prefixes keep the merchant AFTER the star instead.
expect(await normalize('ANTHROPIC* CLAUDE SUB SAN FRANCISCO')).toBe('anthropic')
expect(await normalize('ANTHROPIC*CLAUDE SUB +14155551234')).toBe('anthropic')
expect(await normalize('PAYPAL *SPOTIFY')).toBe('spotify')
expect(await normalize('SQ *BLUE BOTTLE COFFEE')).toBe('blue bottle coffee')
expect(await normalize('AMZN MKTP SE*A12B34CD5')).toBe('amzn mktp')
// Never strips to empty: keeps the last token.
expect(await normalize('SEB')).toBe('seb')
// NULL-safe.
const res = await getPool().query(
`SELECT public.normalize_counterparty_key(NULL) AS key`,
)
expect(res.rows[0].key).toBe('')
})
})
describe('get_ledger_usage_stats', () => {
let userId: string
let companyId: string
let fiscalPeriodId: string
beforeAll(async () => {
const seeded = await seedCompany()
userId = seeded.userId
companyId = seeded.companyId
fiscalPeriodId = seeded.fiscalPeriodId
// 3x Klarna to 6570 under splintered labels (prefix/date/casing variants
// that must merge), 1x Klarna miscategorized, 2x SL to 5810, plus a draft
// that must not count and an old entry outside the window.
await bookMerchant({ userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId, merchantName: 'KLARNA AB', category: 'expense_bank_fees', date: '2026-05-01', expenseAccount: '6570', voucherNumber: 1 })
await bookMerchant({ userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId, merchantName: 'KORTKÖP KLARNA AB 2026-05-15', category: 'expense_bank_fees', date: '2026-05-15', expenseAccount: '6570', voucherNumber: 2 })
await bookMerchant({ userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId, merchantName: 'Klarna AB', category: 'expense_bank_fees', date: '2026-06-01', expenseAccount: '6570', voucherNumber: 3 })
await bookMerchant({ userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId, merchantName: 'SWISH KLARNA AB', category: 'expense_other', date: '2026-06-10', expenseAccount: '6570', voucherNumber: 4 })
await bookMerchant({ userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId, merchantName: 'SL', category: 'expense_travel', date: '2026-06-05', expenseAccount: '5810', voucherNumber: 5 })
await bookMerchant({ userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId, merchantName: 'SL', category: 'expense_travel', date: '2026-06-20', expenseAccount: '5810', voucherNumber: 6 })
// A storno pair: original already excluded via status='reversed'; the
// storno entry itself is posted and must be excluded from account_usage
// by the source_type filter. 4010 must NOT gain postings from either.
const stornoOriginalId = await insertDraftJournalEntry({
userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId,
entryDate: '2026-06-15', status: 'reversed', voucherNumber: 8,
sourceType: 'bank_transaction',
})
await insertLines(stornoOriginalId, [
{ account: '4010', debit: 300, credit: 0 },
{ account: '1930', debit: 0, credit: 300 },
])
const stornoId = await insertPostedJournalEntry({
userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId,
entryDate: '2026-06-15', voucherNumber: 9,
sourceType: 'storno',
lines: [
{ accountNumber: '1930', debitAmount: 300, creditAmount: 0 },
{ accountNumber: '4010', debitAmount: 0, creditAmount: 300 },
],
})
// Legacy shape: a transaction still linked to the storno entry (predates
// reverseEntry() unlinking). Must not create a counterparty pattern.
await insertBookedTransaction({
companyId, userId,
journalEntryId: stornoId,
merchantName: 'STORNO VENDOR',
category: 'expense_other',
date: '2026-06-15',
})
// Draft entry: must not appear in account_usage.
const draftId = await insertDraftJournalEntry({
userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId,
entryDate: '2026-06-25', status: 'draft', voucherNumber: 0,
})
await insertLines(draftId, [
{ account: '9999', debit: 100, credit: 0 },
{ account: '1930', debit: 0, credit: 100 },
])
// Outside the window: must not count.
await bookMerchant({ userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId, merchantName: 'OLD VENDOR', category: 'expense_other', date: '2026-01-05', expenseAccount: '4010', voucherNumber: 7 })
// Reverse-charge EU purchase (foreign SaaS): lines are expense (5420) +
// calc input VAT (2645) + calc output VAT (2614) + bank (1930), tying at
// equal counts. The dominant contra must be the expense 5420, NOT the low
// VAT number 2614 that the account_number tiebreak would otherwise pick
// (regression for 20260708110000; observed on prod as 2614).
let rcVoucher = 20
for (const d of ['2026-05-20', '2026-06-18']) {
const rcEntry = await insertPostedJournalEntry({
userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId,
entryDate: d,
voucherNumber: rcVoucher++, sourceType: 'bank_transaction',
committedAt: plusDays(d, 3),
lines: [
{ accountNumber: '5420', debitAmount: 500, creditAmount: 0 },
{ accountNumber: '2645', debitAmount: 125, creditAmount: 0 },
{ accountNumber: '2614', debitAmount: 0, creditAmount: 125 },
{ accountNumber: '1930', debitAmount: 0, creditAmount: 500 },
],
})
await insertBookedTransaction({
companyId, userId, journalEntryId: rcEntry,
merchantName: 'GOOGLE WO', category: 'expense_software', date: d,
})
}
// Suppliers: Telia with 3 consistent invoices (one of them multi-line,
// which must not outvote), one credit note and one reversed invoice that
// must both be excluded; Blandat with a 1/2 split staying below any
// dominance and one invoice outside the window.
await insertSupplierWithInvoices({
userId, companyId, name: 'Telia Sverige AB', arrivalStart: 1,
invoices: [
{ invoiceDate: '2026-05-05', account: '6212' },
{ invoiceDate: '2026-06-05', account: '6212', extraItemAccounts: ['6212', '6212'] },
{ invoiceDate: '2026-06-25', account: '6212' },
{ invoiceDate: '2026-06-26', account: '6212', isCreditNote: true },
{ invoiceDate: '2026-06-27', account: '6212', status: 'reversed' },
],
})
await insertSupplierWithInvoices({
userId, companyId, name: 'Blandat AB', arrivalStart: 10,
invoices: [
{ invoiceDate: '2026-06-01', account: '4010' },
{ invoiceDate: '2026-06-02', account: '5460' },
{ invoiceDate: '2026-01-02', account: '4010' },
],
})
// Invoices carrying VAT treatments: one in-window, one before the window.
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.invoices
(company_id, user_id, invoice_number, invoice_date, due_date, vat_treatment)
VALUES ($1, $2, 'INV-1', '2026-06-01', '2026-06-30', 'standard_25'),
($1, $2, 'INV-2', '2026-01-02', '2026-01-31', 'reverse_charge_eu')`,
[companyId, userId],
)
})
it('aggregates posted account usage within the window, excluding stornos', async () => {
const stats = await callRpc(companyId, '2026-04-01')
const byAccount = Object.fromEntries(
stats.account_usage.map((a) => [a.account_number, a]),
)
// 8 posted in-window bank entries each carry a 1930 line (6 simple + 2
// reverse-charge); the storno's 1930 line is excluded by source_type.
expect(byAccount['1930'].postings).toBe(8)
expect(byAccount['6570'].postings).toBe(4)
expect(byAccount['5810'].postings).toBe(2)
expect(byAccount['5810'].last_used).toBe('2026-06-20')
// The reverse-charge fixture's expense and VAT lines all appear in
// account_usage (which does not exclude 26xx: it answers "what accounts
// are used", not "what characterizes a counterparty").
expect(byAccount['5420'].postings).toBe(2)
expect(byAccount['2614'].postings).toBe(2)
// Neither the reversed original nor its storno may credit 4010 postings,
// and the draft line and out-of-window account are absent.
expect(byAccount['4010']).toBeUndefined()
expect(byAccount['9999']).toBeUndefined()
})
it('merges splintered merchant labels into one normalized counterparty', async () => {
const stats = await callRpc(companyId, '2026-04-01')
const klarna = stats.counterparty_patterns.find(
(p) => p.counterparty_key === 'klarna',
)
expect(klarna).toBeDefined()
// KLARNA AB / KORTKÖP ... 2026-05-15 / Klarna AB / SWISH KLARNA AB: one key.
expect(klarna!.occurrences).toBe(4)
expect(klarna!.dominant_category).toBe('expense_bank_fees')
expect(klarna!.dominant_category_count).toBe(3)
// 1930 excluded, so the expense side wins.
expect(klarna!.dominant_account_number).toBe('6570')
expect(klarna!.last_booked).toBe('2026-06-10')
// No second Klarna-ish row survives the merge.
expect(
stats.counterparty_patterns.filter((p) => p.counterparty_key.includes('klarna')),
).toHaveLength(1)
const sl = stats.counterparty_patterns.find((p) => p.counterparty_key === 'sl')
expect(sl!.occurrences).toBe(2)
expect(sl!.dominant_account_number).toBe('5810')
// Out-of-window merchant absent.
expect(
stats.counterparty_patterns.find((p) => p.counterparty === 'OLD VENDOR'),
).toBeUndefined()
// A transaction still linked to a storno entry (legacy rows predating the
// reverseEntry unlink) must not surface as a pattern.
expect(
stats.counterparty_patterns.find((p) => p.counterparty === 'STORNO VENDOR'),
).toBeUndefined()
})
it('picks the expense over a VAT contra for reverse-charge bookings', async () => {
const stats = await callRpc(companyId, '2026-04-01')
const google = stats.counterparty_patterns.find((p) => p.counterparty_key === 'google')
expect(google).toBeDefined()
expect(google!.occurrences).toBe(2)
// 5420/2645/2614 tie at equal counts; excluding 26xx leaves the expense.
// Without the fix the account_number tiebreak would return 2614.
expect(google!.dominant_account_number).toBe('5420')
})
it('orders counterparties by occurrences descending', async () => {
const stats = await callRpc(companyId, '2026-04-01')
const occurrences = stats.counterparty_patterns.map((p) => p.occurrences)
expect(occurrences).toEqual([...occurrences].sort((a, b) => b - a))
})
it('aggregates supplier patterns excluding credit notes and reversed invoices', async () => {
const stats = await callRpc(companyId, '2026-04-01')
const telia = stats.supplier_patterns.find((s) => s.supplier === 'Telia Sverige AB')
expect(telia).toBeDefined()
// 3 live invoices; the credit note and the reversed one are excluded.
expect(telia!.invoices).toBe(3)
expect(telia!.last_invoice).toBe('2026-06-25')
expect(telia!.vat_treatment).toBe('standard_25')
expect(telia!.dominant_account_number).toBe('6212')
// Counted per invoice, not per line: the multi-line invoice adds 1.
expect(telia!.dominant_account_count).toBe(3)
const blandat = stats.supplier_patterns.find((s) => s.supplier === 'Blandat AB')
// Only the two in-window invoices; 1/2 agree on the dominant account.
expect(blandat!.invoices).toBe(2)
expect(blandat!.dominant_account_count).toBe(1)
})
it('reports window-scoped VAT treatments and median booking lag', async () => {
const stats = await callRpc(companyId, '2026-04-01')
expect(stats.vat_treatments_used).toContain('standard_25')
expect(stats.vat_treatments_used).not.toContain('reverse_charge_eu')
// Every booked fixture sets committed_at = transaction date + 3 days, so
// the lag is measured from committed_at (not entry_date, which == the
// transaction date and would give a misleading 0).
expect(stats.median_booking_lag_days).toBe(3)
})
it('returns empty sections for a company with no data (isolation)', async () => {
const other = await seedCompany()
const stats = await callRpc(other.companyId, '2026-04-01')
expect(stats.account_usage).toEqual([])
expect(stats.counterparty_patterns).toEqual([])
expect(stats.supplier_patterns).toEqual([])
expect(stats.vat_treatments_used).toEqual([])
expect(stats.median_booking_lag_days).toBeNull()
})
it('does not leak data across companies with identical merchants', async () => {
const other = await seedCompany()
await bookMerchant({
userId: other.userId,
companyId: other.companyId,
fiscalPeriodId: other.fiscalPeriodId,
merchantName: 'KLARNA AB',
category: 'expense_card_fees',
date: '2026-06-01',
expenseAccount: '6580',
voucherNumber: 1,
})
const stats = await callRpc(other.companyId, '2026-04-01')
const klarna = stats.counterparty_patterns.find(
(p) => p.counterparty_key === 'klarna',
)
// Only its own single booking; the first company's 4 do not bleed in.
expect(klarna!.occurrences).toBe(1)
expect(klarna!.dominant_category).toBe('expense_card_fees')
expect(klarna!.dominant_account_number).toBe('6580')
})
})