b6332e9ff4
* feat(salary): one-click AGI submission with filing state machine and success feedback The AGI panel required users to know that "Ladda ner AGI-fil" was the generate step, then click submit, signing link, and kvittens manually. A nollkorning filing stalled on "AGI-XML saknas" pointing at a UI path that does not exist. - New primary button "Lamna in till Skatteverket" chains the existing endpoints client-side: generate XML if missing, POST underlag, poll kontrollresultat, create signing link, open Mina Sidor in a tab opened synchronously at click (popup-blocker safe). Inline stepper shows each step; the four old buttons become collapsed advanced/recovery actions, auto-expanded in stale-draft and rejected states. XML download stays visible and free for manual filing. - deriveAgiFilingState() + useAgiSubmission() lift the per-period submission record to the run page: the progress rail and salary hero now render the real state machine (generated, underlag inskickat, vantar pa BankID-signatur, inlamnad med kvittensnummer) instead of telling users to "lamna in" an already-submitted declaration. - Success card with kvittensnummer and signature metadata once signed, plus a toast when a poll flips the state while the page is open. - AGI kvittens cron every 15 min instead of every 2 h so filings signed on another device get stamped and emailed promptly. - Advanced submit also auto-generates, and the stale "Lon -> AGI -> Generera" error text now points at the real buttons. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(enable-banking): instant OAuth callback feedback and dead-attempt cleanup The bank redirect landed on a blank page for the several seconds the callback spent exchanging the PSD2 session and mirroring accounts, and every failed connect attempt left a status='error' row that rendered forever as an "Atgard kravs" card next to a successful retry, showing duplicate connections to the same bank. - Stream a branded "Slutfor bankanslutningen" progress page from the callback: the shell flushes before the session exchange starts and a script/meta redirect follows when the work completes, with a 30s slow-work escape hatch. Fast outcomes (denial, bad params, unknown state) keep their plain redirects. - Delete never-activated connection rows (no session_id, no accounts_data) on denial or exchange failure, and sweep leftovers for the same bank on the next connect. Established connections keep their "Atgard krävs" card via the accounts_data guard; FKs are ON DELETE SET NULL so deletion has no dependents. - Show "Banken ar ansluten: hamtar dina konton" while the settings panel loads after the callback instead of an anonymous spinner. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(invoices): reject re-send of issued invoices and gate bookkeeping on the sent flip A direct POST to /api/invoices/[id]/send against an already-issued invoice re-emailed the customer and posted a second revenue verifikat (createInvoiceJournalEntry has no dedup), overwriting journal_entry_id and orphaning the first entry. Only the UI hid the button; the v1 route and the MCP commit executor already rejected non-drafts. - Non-draft invoices now return 409 INVOICE_ALREADY_SENT. - The draft to sent status flip is an optimistic lock (status guard plus row-count check); journal entry, accrual schedules, PDF archival and the invoice.sent event only run for the request that won the flip. - On a flip failure the journal entry is deferred: the row stays draft and a retry re-runs the pipeline, ending with exactly one verifikat. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(invoices): payment links, failure visibility and sandbox guard for recurring auto-send - sendInvoiceFromSchedule now auto-creates an online payment link via applyPaymentLinkToInvoice before rendering and passes the payment link QR to the PDF: parity with the dashboard and v1 send routes, which recurring invoices silently lacked. - The recurring cron persists last_run_warning both when a claimed run throws (hourly retries stay visible on the schedule) and when a stale schedule is rolled forward, so a deterministic failure can no longer skip a month silently. - Auto-send is blocked for sandbox companies at the email chokepoint (freeze-and-retain: the invoice is still generated as a draft), covering both the cron and the run-now route with one guard. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(salary): close the Fortnox payroll API gaps (phases 1-4) Payroll now runs end-to-end through the open API, including onboarding a client from another payroll system, with every write staged for approval. - v1: per-employee payslips (list/detail/PDF), payslip line writes, run roster attach/remove, absence ranges (per-day storage), jamkning fields, cutover opening balances (single + atomic bulk PUT), vacation balance + vacation-year-close. PUT added to the wrapper's idempotency/ test-key set (test keys could otherwise write through PUT). - MCP: 10 new tools (get_employee/get_payslip/list_absence/ get_vacation_balance reads + staged update_payslip_line, register_absence, create_employee, update_employee, set_employee_opening_balances, close_vacation_year), executors, risk tiers, op-type CHECK expansions. create_employee encrypts personnummer at staging: pending_operations never holds plaintext. - Scope-map audit retrofit: 11 formerly unmapped tools now scoped; BREAKING for keys that relied on the 4 default-allow writes. - Cutover: employee_opening_balances (derived lock trigger, self-unlocks on run correction), engine YTD/karens/liability integration, Ingaende saldon section in the employee editor. - Arbetsschema-lite: employees.hours_per_week/workdays_per_week drive the hourly/daily divisors; legacy 173/21 preserved exactly at defaults so existing pay math is byte-identical. - Vacation ledger + semesterberedning/arsavslut: recomputed per-year day balances (synced on book/correct, non-fatal), year-close with the min-20 floor, 5-year sparade-dagar expiry to forced payout, and a 2920/2940 drift adjustment via the bookkeeping engine; Semester dashboard card with preview-then-confirm dialog. - Fix: Zod 4 defaults leak through .partial(), which made every sparse employee PATCH fail validation and reset defaulted columns. Migrations 20260713100000/101000/110000/121000/122000 (applied to staging with version rows; prod via merge). vacation_ledger renamed from 20260713120000 to avoid colliding with vat_declaration_totals_rpc. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * perf: cut dashboard page-load latency (region, round trips, caching, VAT RPC) The dominant cost was infrastructure: Vercel functions ran in iad1 (Washington D.C.) while Supabase (DB + auth) lives in eu-north-1 (Stockholm), so every request paid 4-5 transatlantic round trips of auth + company resolution before doing any real work (measured 530-1900ms for single-query GETs in prod logs). Pin functions to arn1 and cut the redundant work on top: - vercel.json: functions to arn1, same city as the database - getActiveCompanyId: preference + first-membership queries run in parallel; the fallback result doubles as validation in the common single-company case (one round trip instead of two sequential) - withRouteContext: Server-Timing header and authMs/companyMs/handlerMs in the op-completed log, so latency is attributable per phase - dashboard layout: nav badge counts off the critical path; DashboardNav loads them client-side via the new use-worklist-badges SWR hook with debounced realtime revalidation - swr (new dependency, approved): global provider; useCompanySettings shares one cache entry across consumers and renders from cache on back-navigation instead of re-showing skeletons - /pending: realtime refetch debounced; bulk operations previously fired 4 requests per row-change event - VAT declaration: new get_vat_declaration_totals RPC returns per-account totals, settlement-shape detection (#984) and source_type counts in ONE round trip instead of paging every entry+line through PostgREST. Account lists stay TS-side parameters so ACCOUNT_RUTA remains the single source of truth. Shape-exclusion coverage moved to tests/pg/vat-declaration-totals-rpc.pg.test.ts; DDL already applied to staging. - bundle: CommandPalette lazy-mounts on first Ctrl/Cmd+K, AgentChat dynamic-imports the markdown parser, @vercel/speed-insights (new dependency, approved) added for real-user timings The /salary fetch-waterfall fix from the same effort already landed inside 2084a756. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(invoices): settle öre-rounded payments from the mark-paid flow An invoice with öresavrundning shows a rounded "Att betala" on the PDF; the customer pays that amount (up to 50 öre off the stored öre total) and the invoice-page mark-paid flow rejected it with MATCH_AMOUNT_EXCEEDS_REMAINING: a dead end, while the bank-transaction match flow already absorbed the residual to 3740. - PaymentBookingDialog now proposes the rounded bank leg plus the 3740 residual line (credit when rounded up, debit when rounded down), resolved via getDisplayTotal from the per-invoice override and company_settings.ore_rounding. - settleInvoicePayment and the v1 mark-paid route absorb the sub-krona residual, gated by planInvoicePaymentForLines: absorption applies ONLY when the caller lines carry the exact residual on 3740; otherwise the strict plan applies (sub-krona partials stay partial, no-3740 overshoots keep the 400), so the GL can never diverge from the AR sub-ledger. - planInvoicePayment absorb-band boundary tightened to >= 1 kr: an exactly-1-kr overshoot used to slip past both the guard and the absorb branch and silently over-record paid_amount (pre-existing on the bank-match path). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(security): resolve all 7 PR compliance findings - ASVS V3.3: per-request CSP nonce on the enable-banking finalize page (mirrors the mcp-oauth consent page); inline scripts are nonce-bound - ASVS V16: decouple callback finalize work from the response stream (eager promise + next/server after()) so a client disconnect cannot drop session persistence or the consent_granted audit emit - ISO 27001 A.8.15: failed audit-event emits log through the structured logger with a stable message for log-based alerting - ASVS V2.3: recurring-invoice cron and run-now routes resolve isSandboxCompany themselves and pass an explicit suppressAutoSend flag (defence in depth around the email chokepoint, freeze-and-retain kept) - ISO 27001 A.8.11: stagePendingOperation rejects plaintext personnummer-bearing keys in params/preview_data (key-based guard; EF org numbers make value-matching unsafe) - ASVS V4.5: employee PATCH body is truly sparse; cleared number fields are omitted instead of resetting DB values to hardcoded fallbacks - ASVS V8.2.1: route-level tests pin the v1 cross-company deny (404 by convention, not 403) on the payslip PDF endpoint Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat: implement vacation-year basis change validation and error handling - Added tests to block vacation-year basis changes when open balances exist. - Implemented error handling for open-balances guard query failures in the settings route. - Enhanced absence route to reject reversed date ranges with a validation error. - Updated absence handling to use atomic upserts instead of delete+insert for better performance and reliability. - Refactored salary calculation logic to correctly handle age-based avgifter rates according to Skatteverket's rules. - Improved error messaging for vacation year closure adjustments. - Adjusted employee opening balances handling to preserve audit information during upserts. * feat(settings): add validation to block vacation-year basis change with open balances feat(absence): reject reversed date ranges in absence queries fix(absence): update absence handling to use atomic upserts instead of delete+insert fix(employee): improve validation for jamkning dates in employee updates fix(opening-balances): ensure created_by field is preserved during upserts test(absence): enhance tests for absence range and date validations test(calculation): add tests for age-based avgifter rates and edge cases test(semesterberedning): validate vacation year closure adjustments and error handling test(employee-opening-balances): update tests to reflect changes in salary_run_employees schema * fix(migrations): implement NOT VALID constraints for pending_operations and add validation migration --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
307 lines
12 KiB
TypeScript
307 lines
12 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
|
|
import { buildVatSettlementProposal } from '../vat-settlement'
|
|
|
|
// ============================================================
|
|
// Mock: fetchVatAccountTotals now goes through the
|
|
// get_vat_declaration_totals RPC (aggregation + settlement-shape detection
|
|
// in SQL, verified by tests/pg/vat-declaration-totals-rpc.pg.test.ts), so
|
|
// the mock seeds the RPC payload directly: per-account totals as the SQL
|
|
// GROUP BY returns them (already excluding settlement entries) plus the
|
|
// shaped entries the RPC surfaces. The existing-entries lookup and the
|
|
// fiscal-period resolution still go through from().
|
|
// ============================================================
|
|
|
|
interface MockData {
|
|
/** Per-account totals as returned by the RPC (post settlement-exclusion). */
|
|
totals?: Array<{ account_number: string; debit: number; credit: number }>
|
|
/** Settlement-shaped entries surfaced by the RPC. */
|
|
shaped?: Array<Record<string, unknown>>
|
|
/** Existing vat_settlement entries in the period. */
|
|
existing?: Array<Record<string, unknown>>
|
|
/** Error returned by the existing-settlement lookup. */
|
|
existingError?: { message: string }
|
|
/** fiscal_periods row for yearly (helårsmoms) bounds. */
|
|
fiscalPeriod?: { period_start: string; period_end: string } | null
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let rpcCalls: Array<{ fn: string; params: Record<string, unknown> }>
|
|
|
|
function makeClient(data: MockData) {
|
|
rpcCalls = []
|
|
return {
|
|
rpc: vi.fn().mockImplementation(async (fn: string, params: Record<string, unknown>) => {
|
|
rpcCalls.push({ fn, params })
|
|
return {
|
|
data: {
|
|
totals: data.totals ?? [],
|
|
settlement_shaped_entries: data.shaped ?? [],
|
|
source_type_counts: {},
|
|
},
|
|
error: null,
|
|
}
|
|
}),
|
|
from: vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => {
|
|
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
|
|
const b: Record<string, any> = {}
|
|
for (const m of ['select', 'eq', 'neq', 'in', 'gte', 'lte', 'order', 'range', 'limit']) {
|
|
b[m] = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(b)
|
|
}
|
|
b.maybeSingle = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ data: data.fiscalPeriod ?? null, error: null })
|
|
// The only awaited from() query left in the proposal builder is the
|
|
// tagged existing-settlement lookup.
|
|
b.then = (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) =>
|
|
resolve(
|
|
data.existingError
|
|
? { data: null, error: data.existingError }
|
|
: { data: data.existing ?? [], error: null },
|
|
)
|
|
return b
|
|
}),
|
|
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
|
|
} as any
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function total(account_number: string, debit: number, credit: number) {
|
|
return { account_number, debit, credit }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('buildVatSettlementProposal', () => {
|
|
it('clears the 26xx accounts, books the filed whole-krona net on 2650 and the öre gap on 3740', async () => {
|
|
const supabase = makeClient({
|
|
totals: [
|
|
total('2611', 0, 2500.75),
|
|
total('2641', 1000.5, 0),
|
|
// Revenue feeds ruta05 but is never part of the settlement entry.
|
|
total('3001', 0, 10003.0),
|
|
],
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const proposal = await buildVatSettlementProposal(supabase, 'company-1', 'quarterly', 2026, 1)
|
|
|
|
expect(proposal.period).toEqual({
|
|
type: 'quarterly', year: 2026, period: 1, start: '2026-01-01', end: '2026-03-31',
|
|
})
|
|
expect(proposal.entry_date).toBe('2026-03-31')
|
|
expect(proposal.description).toBe('Momsredovisning Kvartal 1 2026')
|
|
expect(proposal.is_empty).toBe(false)
|
|
// Filed net = trunc(2500.75) - trunc(1000.50) = 1500 (öretal faller bort)
|
|
expect(proposal.filed_net).toBe(1500)
|
|
expect(proposal.rounding_amount).toBe(0.25)
|
|
expect(proposal.lines).toEqual([
|
|
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 2500.75, credit_amount: 0 },
|
|
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1000.5 },
|
|
{
|
|
account_number: '2650', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1500,
|
|
line_description: 'Moms att betala',
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
account_number: '3740', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 0.25,
|
|
line_description: 'Öres- och kronutjämning',
|
|
},
|
|
])
|
|
|
|
// The proposed entry always balances.
|
|
const debits = proposal.lines.reduce((s, l) => s + l.debit_amount, 0)
|
|
const credits = proposal.lines.reduce((s, l) => s + l.credit_amount, 0)
|
|
expect(debits).toBeCloseTo(credits, 2)
|
|
|
|
// The projection must ignore already-booked settlements, or booking once
|
|
// would change the next proposal: the RPC receives the settlement net
|
|
// accounts so it can shape-detect and exclude them.
|
|
expect(rpcCalls).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
expect(rpcCalls[0].fn).toBe('get_vat_declaration_totals')
|
|
expect(rpcCalls[0].params.p_net_accounts).toEqual(['2650', '1650'])
|
|
expect(rpcCalls[0].params.p_company_id).toBe('company-1')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('books a refund period as a 1650 (Momsfordran) debit', async () => {
|
|
const supabase = makeClient({
|
|
totals: [
|
|
total('2611', 0, 100),
|
|
total('2641', 400, 0),
|
|
],
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const proposal = await buildVatSettlementProposal(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2026, 6)
|
|
|
|
expect(proposal.filed_net).toBe(-300)
|
|
expect(proposal.rounding_amount).toBe(0)
|
|
expect(proposal.lines).toEqual([
|
|
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 100, credit_amount: 0 },
|
|
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 400 },
|
|
{
|
|
account_number: '1650', debit_amount: 300, credit_amount: 0,
|
|
line_description: 'Moms att återfå',
|
|
},
|
|
])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('clears an account sitting on the wrong side (credit-note-heavy period)', async () => {
|
|
const supabase = makeClient({
|
|
// Output VAT with a net DEBIT balance: credit notes exceeded sales.
|
|
totals: [total('2611', 50, 0)],
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const proposal = await buildVatSettlementProposal(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2026, 2)
|
|
|
|
expect(proposal.filed_net).toBe(-50)
|
|
expect(proposal.lines).toEqual([
|
|
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 50 },
|
|
{
|
|
account_number: '1650', debit_amount: 50, credit_amount: 0,
|
|
line_description: 'Moms att återfå',
|
|
},
|
|
])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('is empty when the period has no VAT-account activity (revenue alone does not settle)', async () => {
|
|
const supabase = makeClient({
|
|
totals: [total('3001', 0, 1000)],
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const proposal = await buildVatSettlementProposal(supabase, 'company-1', 'quarterly', 2026, 2)
|
|
|
|
expect(proposal.is_empty).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(proposal.lines).toEqual([])
|
|
expect(proposal.filed_net).toBe(0)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('uses the räkenskapsår bounds for yearly VAT when a fiscal period is supplied', async () => {
|
|
const supabase = makeClient({
|
|
totals: [total('2611', 0, 100), total('2641', 25, 0)],
|
|
fiscalPeriod: { period_start: '2025-07-01', period_end: '2026-06-30' },
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const proposal = await buildVatSettlementProposal(
|
|
supabase, 'company-1', 'yearly', 2026, 1, { fiscalPeriodId: 'fp-1' },
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(proposal.period.start).toBe('2025-07-01')
|
|
expect(proposal.period.end).toBe('2026-06-30')
|
|
expect(proposal.entry_date).toBe('2026-06-30')
|
|
expect(proposal.description).toBe('Momsredovisning Helår 2026')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('surfaces existing vat_settlement entries in the period', async () => {
|
|
const existing = [{
|
|
id: 'je-1', status: 'posted', entry_date: '2026-03-31',
|
|
voucher_series: 'M', voucher_number: 3,
|
|
}]
|
|
const supabase = makeClient({
|
|
totals: [total('2611', 0, 100)],
|
|
existing,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const proposal = await buildVatSettlementProposal(supabase, 'company-1', 'quarterly', 2026, 1)
|
|
|
|
expect(proposal.existing_entries).toEqual(existing)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('gates on a manual settlement-shaped entry and still proposes the full-period clear (#984)', async () => {
|
|
const manualSettlement = {
|
|
id: 'e2', status: 'posted', entry_date: '2026-03-31',
|
|
source_type: 'manual', voucher_series: 'A', voucher_number: 9,
|
|
}
|
|
const supabase = makeClient({
|
|
// The RPC already excluded the manual momsomföring from the totals
|
|
// (that exclusion is pg-tested); what reaches JS is the business
|
|
// activity plus the shaped entry to gate on.
|
|
totals: [
|
|
total('2611', 0, 100),
|
|
total('2641', 25, 0),
|
|
],
|
|
shaped: [manualSettlement],
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const proposal = await buildVatSettlementProposal(supabase, 'company-1', 'quarterly', 2026, 1)
|
|
|
|
// The manual settlement is excluded from the projection: the proposal
|
|
// shows the same full-period clear the report shows, and the posted
|
|
// shaped entry gates the booking button via existing_entries.
|
|
expect(proposal.is_empty).toBe(false)
|
|
expect(proposal.filed_net).toBe(75)
|
|
expect(proposal.lines).toEqual([
|
|
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 100, credit_amount: 0 },
|
|
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 25 },
|
|
{
|
|
account_number: '2650', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 75,
|
|
line_description: 'Moms att betala',
|
|
},
|
|
])
|
|
expect(proposal.existing_entries).toEqual([manualSettlement])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('does not gate on a storno of a settlement (annullera must re-enable booking)', async () => {
|
|
const supabase = makeClient({
|
|
// Settlement + storno cancel out of the totals inside the RPC; both
|
|
// still come back as shaped entries. Neither may gate: the reversed
|
|
// manual settlement has no balance effect and the storno is the
|
|
// cancellation itself.
|
|
totals: [total('2611', 0, 100)],
|
|
shaped: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: 'e2', status: 'reversed', entry_date: '2026-03-31',
|
|
source_type: 'manual', voucher_series: 'A', voucher_number: 9,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
id: 'e3', status: 'posted', entry_date: '2026-03-31',
|
|
source_type: 'storno', voucher_series: 'A', voucher_number: 10,
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const proposal = await buildVatSettlementProposal(supabase, 'company-1', 'quarterly', 2026, 1)
|
|
|
|
expect(proposal.existing_entries).toEqual([])
|
|
expect(proposal.filed_net).toBe(100)
|
|
expect(proposal.lines).toEqual([
|
|
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 100, credit_amount: 0 },
|
|
{
|
|
account_number: '2650', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 100,
|
|
line_description: 'Moms att betala',
|
|
},
|
|
])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('ignores a plain VAT payment on 2650 (no declaration accounts touched)', async () => {
|
|
const supabase = makeClient({
|
|
// Paying last period's VAT debt: 2650 against the bank account. The
|
|
// entry touches a settlement net account but no declaration account,
|
|
// so the RPC does NOT shape it: its 2650 total comes back as-is and
|
|
// must neither gate nor shift the rutor / clearing lines.
|
|
totals: [
|
|
total('2611', 0, 100),
|
|
total('2650', 75, 0),
|
|
],
|
|
shaped: [],
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const proposal = await buildVatSettlementProposal(supabase, 'company-1', 'quarterly', 2026, 1)
|
|
|
|
expect(proposal.existing_entries).toEqual([])
|
|
expect(proposal.filed_net).toBe(100)
|
|
expect(proposal.lines).toEqual([
|
|
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 100, credit_amount: 0 },
|
|
{
|
|
account_number: '2650', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 100,
|
|
line_description: 'Moms att betala',
|
|
},
|
|
])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('throws when the existing-settlement lookup fails (the UI gate depends on it)', async () => {
|
|
const supabase = makeClient({
|
|
totals: [total('2611', 0, 100)],
|
|
existingError: { message: 'boom' },
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
buildVatSettlementProposal(supabase, 'company-1', 'quarterly', 2026, 1),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow('existing vat_settlement lookup failed: boom')
|
|
})
|
|
})
|