Files
accounted/lib/invariants/account-number.ts
T
Jakob Wennberg 16fbcefbbc feat(invariants): shared format contracts + upgrade-path CI (#1364)
* feat(invariants): centralise shared format contracts, reconcile the org-number paths

The same format rules were written out independently across the codebase, and
where they disagreed the disagreement was invisible until a filing failed.

Worst case, now fixed: four Skatteverket- and Bolagsverket-bound export paths
each had their own idea of a valid organisationsnummer.

  lib/skatteverket/format.ts      strip '-' only      threw on any input with a space
  lib/salary/ku/ku10-generator.ts replace('-', '')    first hyphen only, spaces survived
  lib/salary/agi/xml-generator.ts strip non-digits    stray letters passed the length check
  lib/bokslut/ixbrl/validate      /^\d{6}-?\d{4}$/    rejected the 12-digit form, no Luhn

A company stored with a space or in 12-digit form could file AGI all year and
then fail at the arsredovisning deadline with a message that did not say why.

lib/invariants/ now owns account number, ISO date, four-digit fiscal year and
org number, each with the rationale recorded next to the rule. normalizeOrgNumber
moves here from lib/company-lookup/ and isSaneDateString from lib/utils.ts; both
old paths re-export, so no caller changes. lib/api/schemas.ts builds its
primitives on the module, so ~100 schemas inherit any correction.

The arsredovisning check-digit verdict is a warn, not an error: a wrong Luhn
digit is almost certainly a typo worth surfacing, but whether every org number
Bolagsverket accepts satisfies Luhn is a Swedish domain question we have not
verified against a primary source, and an error there blocks Skicka in. We do
not block a statutory filing on an unverified assumption.

KU10 still passes a 12-digit stored org number through unfolded. That is
pre-existing, and whether the KU10 schema wants 10 or 12 digits is not covered
by the swedish-payroll skill, so it is pinned by a test rather than changed
silently.

Guard 8 (hand-rolled-invariant) tracks the remaining 114 inline copies as a
ratchet that may only go down, same mechanism as the roundOre guard.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(ci): add an upgrade-path job that applies new migrations against real data

The pg-real job applies all 548 migrations to an EMPTY database. Empty means
zero rows, so a migration that adds a NOT NULL, adds a CHECK, creates a unique
index or backfills passes trivially in CI and can still fail on production,
where the rows exist. CI proved that a fresh install works; nothing proved that
an existing install upgrades.

The new pg-upgrade job: apply the schema as it stands at the merge base, seed a
small real company (three posted verifikat, balanced lines, one ore-level
amount), then apply ONLY the migrations this PR adds, then assert the data
survived (entries still posted, lines intact, ledger still balances, ore
unchanged, voucher numbers sequential). A PR with no migration no-ops.

Verified locally against supabase/postgres:15.8.1.060 rather than assumed, with
three deliberately bad migrations:

  rescale money on posted lines   empty: would pass   seeded: ERROR (immutability trigger)
  CHECK violating the ore row     empty: exit 0       seeded: exit 3
  NOT NULL on a populated column  empty: exit 0       seeded: exit 3

Base migrations are read out of the merge-base git tree, not the working tree,
so a PR that edits an already-shipped migration still gets the original applied
and the edit surfaces as a failure here.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: record the invariants and upgrade-CI decisions

Two entries covering what this PR changes and, more importantly, the calls that
are not obvious from the diff: why the arsredovisning check-digit verdict is a
warning rather than an error, why KU10's 12-digit passthrough is pinned instead
of fixed, and why the ROT/RUT brf org-number schemas stay on their own rule.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs(test): mark the upgrade fixture as CI-only, never a production template

The fixture writes posted journal_entries and their lines directly, bypassing
the engine and the atomic commit RPC. That is the only way to hand a migration
pre-existing posted rows to break, and it is safe against a throwaway CI
database, but it reads like a sanctioned pattern to anyone who finds it later.

Says so explicitly, with the reason it is confined here (no voucher sequence to
keep gapless, no retention obligation on a database destroyed with the job) and
a pointer back to Hard Rule 2 for anything touching a real database.

Raised by the Swedish compliance review bot on #1364.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <311770904+jakobwennberg-oss@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-03 16:30:14 +02:00

47 lines
1.8 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* BAS account number format.
*
* ## The rule
*
* Exactly four digits, carried as a **string**. `'1930'`, never `1930`.
*
* ## Why a string
*
* Account numbers are identifiers, not quantities. Arithmetic on one is always
* a bug, and a numeric type invites it (`1930 + 1` is not an account). The
* string form also keeps leading digits meaningful: the first digit is the BAS
* account class (1 assets, 2 equity and liabilities, 3 revenue, 4-7 costs,
* 8 financial), which reporting code reads positionally.
*
* ## Why the shared constant, not a literal
*
* `/^\d{4}$/` appeared at 20 sites, sometimes as `/^[0-9]{4}$/`, with error
* messages that differed per site. Worse, the identical literal also means
* "a four-digit year" elsewhere in the codebase (see `fiscal-year.ts`), so the
* regex alone does not say what is being validated. Naming the rule makes the
* two impossible to confuse at a call site.
*
* Format only. Whether an account *exists and is active* in a company's chart
* is a database question: see `lib/bookkeeping/account-validation.ts`.
*/
/** Exactly four digits. */
export const ACCOUNT_NUMBER_RE = /^\d{4}$/
/** Canonical validation error message (Swedish: user-facing surface). */
export const ACCOUNT_NUMBER_MESSAGE = 'Kontonummer måste vara 4 siffror'
/** True when the input is a syntactically valid BAS account number. */
export function isAccountNumber(raw: string | null | undefined): boolean {
return typeof raw === 'string' && ACCOUNT_NUMBER_RE.test(raw)
}
/**
* The BAS account class (leading digit) of an account number, or null when the
* input is not a valid account number.
*/
export function accountClass(raw: string | null | undefined): number | null {
if (!isAccountNumber(raw)) return null
return parseInt((raw as string).charAt(0), 10)
}