* fix(inbox): booked items no longer strand in Att gora as matched-forever
A matched inbox item only left the active inbox when
created_journal_entry_id was stamped, and only categorizeTransactionCore
stamped it. Booking the matched transaction through any other path (the
/book dialog route, bulk-book, link-to-existing-voucher) or matching a
receipt to an already-booked transaction (receipt hunt approvals,
attach-document, match-transaction) left the item "linked" forever,
pointing at a transaction that had already left the transactions work
list. Todays hunt fix (#1524) turned this July-old gap into a visible
flood of stuck items.
Two-part fix, because stamps alone cannot cover the reported case:
created_journal_entry_id is UNIQUE (20260515090000), so on a bulk-book
samlingsverifikat only one of N matched items can ever carry it.
Write side: lib/transactions/inbox-underlag.ts is the shared
implementation all paths now call. It links matched items' documents to
the anchoring verifikat (BFL 5 kap 6-7 kap: underlag on the
verifikation) and stamps created_journal_entry_id best-effort (CAS on
null, unique_violation tolerated). Wired into categorize-core (replacing
its inline block), /book, bulk-book, linkTransactionToJournalEntry, both
attach paths (REST + pending-operation), and the inbox match-transaction
handler. The attach paths and the doc-conflict guard also resolve
bulk-booked transactions through transaction_voucher_links, which they
previously treated as unbooked.
Read side: GET /items (and /items/:id) enrich matched-but-unstamped
items with matched_transaction_journal_entry_id, and the workspace
derives "booked" from it. This is what clears the stuck rows already in
prod without a status backfill, and what covers the N-1 samlingsverifikat
items the UNIQUE constraint refuses to stamp. Bulk-book selection
filters exclude such items so "Bokfor valda" no longer offers 409 fodder.
scripts/backfill-inbox-booked-underlag.ts (dry-run by default) repairs
the historical document->verifikat links the old paths never made.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(inbox): stamp only settled underlag, and give the backfill behandlingshistorik
Both from the Swedish accounting compliance review.
The consumed-stamp is now conditional on the underlag actually
referencing a verifikat: stamping over a failed document link hid the
item from the .is('created_journal_entry_id', null) query forever,
leaving a posted verifikation without its underlag reference
(BFL 5 kap 6-7 kap) and nothing left to surface or repair it. A failed
link now leaves the item unstamped so re-runs and the backfill can
finish the job; a document preserved on another verifikat still counts
as settled.
The backfill script now appends an InboxUnderlagBackfilled event per
repaired transaction to processing_history (BFNAR 2013:2 kap 8): a mass
repair touching underlag-to-verifikat linkage leaves a changelog trail
distinguishing it from the original booking action.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* refactor(inbox): backfill writes behandlingshistorik through the shared appender
From the Swedish accounting compliance review round 2: a hand-rolled
processing_history insert in the backfill script could drift from the
shared row shape and skip the PII validation. appendProcessingHistory
now delegates to appendProcessingHistoryWithClient, which takes a
caller-supplied service-role client, so standalone scripts write
behandlingshistorik through the exact same code path as the app
(BFNAR 2013:2 kap 8: one reconcilable change log across writers).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(inbox): leave the item unstamped when its document belongs to another verifikat
Swedish accounting review round 3: refusing to steal the document was
right, but stamping the item consumed anyway hid the fact that the
transaction's own verifikat ended up with no underlag reference from it
(BFL 5 kap 6-7 kap). The anchored-elsewhere case now leaves
created_journal_entry_id null so the mismatch keeps surfacing for
reconciliation, same posture as a failed link.
Also documents in the backfill script header why its writes cannot land
in locked periods: linkToJournalEntry's UPDATE is guarded by the
enforce_period_lock DB trigger, which fires for service-role writes too.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Mattsson
8d56219c31