Files
accounted/tests/pg/sandbox-cleanup.pg.test.ts
T
Jakob Wennberg 2c46d69d21 fix(sandbox): complete the teardown for the four FK and guard blockers added since August (#2112)
cleanup_sandbox_user deletes supplier_invoices and journal_entries without
first clearing four blockers added or missed since it was last fixed:
supplier_payment_batch_items (RESTRICT FK, that table was created 2026-08-10),
fiscal_periods.opening_balance_entry_id (NO ACTION FK whose NULLing is itself
blocked by enforce_opening_balance_immutability), terminal webhook_deliveries
rows, and payment_match_log rows whose company_id IS NULL, which fail the
shared audit bypass because it requires a non-null company.

Prod: 9 stale sandbox users, oldest 2026-07-22, retried nightly and failing
forever, so anonymous demo tenants accumulate indefinitely.

The bypass stays scoped to sandbox teardown. The audit-log immutability and the
webhook terminal-delete guard are not weakened for normal tenants, and the pg
test asserts they still bite for a non-sandbox tenant.


Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016ifKg6Ec67A39oxfGPU1yc

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-01 14:14:45 +02:00

764 lines
31 KiB
TypeScript

import { randomUUID } from 'node:crypto'
import type { PoolClient } from 'pg'
import { describe, expect, it } from 'vitest'
import { getClient, getPool } from './setup'
import { insertPostedJournalEntry, insertTransaction, seedCompany } from './fixtures'
/**
* Sandbox cleanup RPCs (migration 20260807130000):
*
* The nightly cron was a silent no-op for months: cleanup_sandbox_user
* deleted journal_entry_lines without setting the gnubok.allow_delete
* bypass, so the BFL immutability trigger rejected the delete and the outer
* loop swallowed the error as a WARNING. These tests pin the fixed behavior:
* a sandbox company with posted vouchers and a booked salary run actually
* deletes, non-sandbox users stay refused, immutability outside the RPC is
* untouched, and the expired sweep also removes orphaned anonymous users
* that never got a company_settings row.
*
* Extended by 20260901120000 with the four blockers that stalled nine
* sandboxes on prod (oldest 2026-07-22): a betalfil batch holding a supplier
* invoice through ON DELETE RESTRICT, a fiscal period pointing at its IB and
* bokslut vouchers through NO ACTION FKs, a terminal webhook delivery, and a
* payment_match_log row with company_id NULL. The seed now carries all four,
* and each relaxed guard gets a paired test proving it still refuses a
* NON-sandbox tenant even when the teardown flag is set: that, not the happy
* path, is the regression that matters.
*/
async function seedSandboxUser(settingsCreatedAt?: string): Promise<{
userId: string
companyId: string
fiscalPeriodId: string
entryId: string
batchId: string
supplierInvoiceId: string
deliveryId: string
matchLogId: string
}> {
const { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedCompany()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.company_settings (user_id, company_id, is_sandbox, created_at)
VALUES ($1, $2, true, COALESCE($3::timestamptz, now()))`,
[userId, companyId, settingsCreatedAt ?? null],
)
const entryId = await insertPostedJournalEntry({
userId,
companyId,
fiscalPeriodId,
})
// The seed links a booked salary run to its vouchers with plain NO ACTION
// FKs; recreate that so the test fails if the RPC forgets to clear them.
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.salary_runs
(company_id, user_id, period_year, period_month, payment_date, salary_entry_id)
VALUES ($1, $2, 2026, 1, '2026-01-25', $3)`,
[companyId, userId, entryId],
)
// System dimensions (undeletable outside teardown) and a terminal-state
// pending operation (delete-protected per BFL 7 kap.): both exist in every
// modern sandbox and both blocked the auth.users cascade before the
// gnubok.sandbox_cleanup bypass.
await getPool().query(`SELECT public.ensure_company_dimensions($1)`, [companyId])
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.pending_operations
(user_id, company_id, operation_type, title, status)
VALUES ($1, $2, 'categorize_transaction', 'Sandbox cleanup test op', 'rejected')`,
[userId, companyId],
)
// processing_history references companies with a plain NO ACTION FK and no
// cascade; without the explicit delete (migration 20260807160000) a
// sandbox that produced telemetry cannot be torn down.
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.processing_history
(company_id, correlation_id, aggregate_type, aggregate_id, event_type, actor, occurred_at)
VALUES ($1, $2, 'Document', $3, 'DocumentIngested', '{"type":"system"}', now())`,
[companyId, randomUUID(), randomUUID()],
)
// invoice_deliveries has the same NO ACTION company FK AND a delete guard
// that silently swallows deletes (RETURN NULL) outside the teardown
// bypass; a marked_sent manual delivery is the minimal terminal row.
const invoiceId = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.invoices (id, user_id, company_id, invoice_date, due_date)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, '2026-01-10', '2026-02-10')`,
[invoiceId, userId, companyId],
)
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.invoice_deliveries
(company_id, user_id, invoice_id, channel, status, sent_at, retention_expires_at)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'manual', 'marked_sent', now(), '2033-12-31')`,
[companyId, userId, invoiceId],
)
// An API key with the SoD acknowledgement set: sod_acknowledged_by is a
// plain NO ACTION FK to auth.users that blocked teardown for every keyed
// sandbox until 20260807170000 deletes the keys explicitly.
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.api_keys
(user_id, company_id, key_hash, key_prefix, sod_acknowledged_by, sod_acknowledged_at)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'gnubok_sk_pgtest', $1, now())`,
[userId, companyId, randomUUID()],
)
// A WORM retag-log row (dimension_retag_log_immutable raises on DELETE
// outside the teardown bypass).
const { rows: lineRows } = await getPool().query<{ id: string }>(
`SELECT id FROM public.journal_entry_lines WHERE journal_entry_id = $1 LIMIT 1`,
[entryId],
)
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.dimension_retag_log
(company_id, journal_entry_id, line_id, old_dimensions, new_dimensions, reason)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, '{}', '{"1":"BUTIK"}', 'Sandbox cleanup test retag')`,
[companyId, entryId, lineRows[0]!.id],
)
// A betalfil batch: supplier_payment_batch_items references the supplier
// invoice with a composite ON DELETE RESTRICT FK, so the batch header must
// be purged before the supplier_invoices delete (20260901120000).
const supplierId = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.suppliers (id, user_id, company_id, name, bankgiro)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'Derome Bygg AB', '5050-1055')`,
[supplierId, userId, companyId],
)
const supplierInvoiceId = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.supplier_invoices
(id, user_id, company_id, supplier_id, arrival_number,
supplier_invoice_number, invoice_date, due_date,
subtotal, vat_amount, total, remaining_amount, status)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, floor(random() * 1000000)::int,
$5, '2026-06-23', '2026-07-07',
590, 147.5, 737.5, 737.5, 'approved')`,
[supplierInvoiceId, userId, companyId, supplierId, `CD-${supplierInvoiceId.slice(0, 8)}`],
)
const batchId = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.supplier_payment_batches
(id, company_id, user_id, format, total_amount, item_count, msg_id, debtor_snapshot)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'pain001', 737.5, 1, $4,
'{"name":"Sandbox AB","org_number":"556677-8899","iban":"SE3550000000054910000003","bic":"ESSESESS"}')`,
[batchId, companyId, userId, `ACCOUNTED-5566778899-B${batchId.slice(0, 8)}`],
)
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.supplier_payment_batch_items
(batch_id, company_id, supplier_invoice_id, amount, payment_date,
payee_type, payee_bankgiro, payee_name, reference_type, reference)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 737.5, '2026-08-15',
'bankgiro', '50501055', 'Derome Bygg AB', 'invoice_number', 'CD3014794407')`,
[batchId, companyId, supplierInvoiceId],
)
// A period that has both an IB link (write-once once opening_balances_set)
// and a bokslut link: fiscal_periods_opening_balance_entry_id_fkey and
// fiscal_periods_closing_entry_id_fkey are both NO ACTION, so the journal
// delete fails until the teardown clears them, and clearing them is itself
// blocked by enforce_opening_balance_immutability outside the bypass.
const closingEntryId = await insertPostedJournalEntry({
userId,
companyId,
fiscalPeriodId,
voucherNumber: 1,
sourceType: 'year_end',
description: 'Sandbox bokslut',
})
await getPool().query(
`UPDATE public.fiscal_periods
SET opening_balance_entry_id = $2, opening_balances_set = true, closing_entry_id = $3
WHERE id = $1`,
[fiscalPeriodId, entryId, closingEntryId],
)
// A delivered webhook delivery: block_webhook_delivery_terminal_delete
// raises on the auth.users -> companies cascade outside the bypass.
const webhookId = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.webhooks (id, company_id, event_type, webhook_url, secret)
VALUES ($1, $2, 'journal_entry.committed', 'https://example.invalid/hook', $3)`,
[webhookId, companyId, randomUUID()],
)
const deliveryId = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.webhook_deliveries
(id, webhook_id, company_id, event_type, payload, api_version, status, delivered_at)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'journal_entry.committed', '{"id":"demo"}', '2026-05-12',
'delivered', now())`,
[deliveryId, webhookId, companyId],
)
// A match-log row WITHOUT company_id: the shape lib/invoices/match-log.ts
// has always written, and the one the shared audit_log_immutable() bypass
// could not recognise as a sandbox row. It points at the supplier invoice
// above on purpose: payment_match_log_supplier_invoice_id_fkey is ON DELETE
// SET NULL, so a teardown that purges the match log after the supplier
// invoices turns this row into an UPDATE, which the guard refuses even
// during teardown. The order of the two deletes is what this row pins.
const transactionId = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.transactions
(id, company_id, user_id, currency, amount, date, description, category)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'SEK', -737.5, '2026-06-24', 'Sandbox betalning', 'uncategorized')`,
[transactionId, companyId, userId],
)
const { rows: matchRows } = await getPool().query<{ id: string }>(
`INSERT INTO public.payment_match_log
(user_id, transaction_id, supplier_invoice_id, action)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'matched') RETURNING id`,
[userId, transactionId, supplierInvoiceId],
)
return {
userId,
companyId,
fiscalPeriodId,
entryId,
batchId,
supplierInvoiceId,
deliveryId,
matchLogId: matchRows[0]!.id,
}
}
async function countById(table: string, id: string): Promise<number> {
const { rows } = await getPool().query<{ n: number }>(
`SELECT count(*)::int AS n FROM ${table} WHERE id = $1`,
[id],
)
return rows[0]!.n
}
async function insertAnonymousAuthUser(createdAt: string): Promise<string> {
const id = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO auth.users (id, email, instance_id, is_anonymous, created_at)
VALUES ($1, NULL, '00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000'::uuid, true, $2::timestamptz)`,
[id, createdAt],
)
return id
}
// auth.users.is_anonymous arrived with GoTrue anonymous sign-ins; the CI
// supabase/postgres image predates it. The RPC skips the orphan sweep on such
// stacks, so the test skips the matching assertions rather than fabricating a
// schema hosted Supabase would not have.
async function hasIsAnonymousColumn(): Promise<boolean> {
const { rows } = await getPool().query<{ has: boolean }>(
`SELECT EXISTS (
SELECT 1 FROM information_schema.columns
WHERE table_schema = 'auth' AND table_name = 'users'
AND column_name = 'is_anonymous'
) AS has`,
)
return rows[0]!.has
}
async function authUserExists(id: string): Promise<boolean> {
const { rows } = await getPool().query<{ n: number }>(
`SELECT count(*)::int AS n FROM auth.users WHERE id = $1`,
[id],
)
return rows[0]!.n > 0
}
describe('sandbox cleanup RPCs (pg)', () => {
it('deletes a sandbox user whose books contain posted vouchers and a booked salary run', async () => {
const { userId, entryId } = await seedSandboxUser()
await getPool().query(`SELECT public.cleanup_sandbox_user($1)`, [userId])
expect(await authUserExists(userId)).toBe(false)
const { rows: entries } = await getPool().query<{ n: number }>(
`SELECT count(*)::int AS n FROM public.journal_entries WHERE id = $1`,
[entryId],
)
expect(entries[0]!.n).toBe(0)
const { rows: lines } = await getPool().query<{ n: number }>(
`SELECT count(*)::int AS n FROM public.journal_entry_lines WHERE journal_entry_id = $1`,
[entryId],
)
expect(lines[0]!.n).toBe(0)
})
it('clears the batch, IB/bokslut, webhook and match-log blockers and leaves no tenant rows', async () => {
const seed = await seedSandboxUser()
await getPool().query(`SELECT public.cleanup_sandbox_user($1)`, [seed.userId])
expect(await authUserExists(seed.userId)).toBe(false)
// Each of these is one of the four blockers: before 20260901120000 the
// RPC raised on the first of them and the whole teardown rolled back.
expect(await countById('public.supplier_payment_batches', seed.batchId)).toBe(0)
expect(await countById('public.supplier_invoices', seed.supplierInvoiceId)).toBe(0)
expect(await countById('public.fiscal_periods', seed.fiscalPeriodId)).toBe(0)
expect(await countById('public.webhook_deliveries', seed.deliveryId)).toBe(0)
expect(await countById('public.payment_match_log', seed.matchLogId)).toBe(0)
const { rows: items } = await getPool().query<{ n: number }>(
`SELECT count(*)::int AS n FROM public.supplier_payment_batch_items WHERE batch_id = $1`,
[seed.batchId],
)
expect(items[0]!.n).toBe(0)
const { rows: leftovers } = await getPool().query<{ n: number }>(
`SELECT count(*)::int AS n FROM public.company_settings WHERE company_id = $1`,
[seed.companyId],
)
expect(leftovers[0]!.n).toBe(0)
})
it('refuses a user with no company_settings rows at all', async () => {
const { userId } = await seedCompany()
await expect(
getPool().query(`SELECT public.cleanup_sandbox_user($1)`, [userId]),
).rejects.toThrow(/is not a sandbox user/i)
expect(await authUserExists(userId)).toBe(true)
})
it('refuses a user whose company is not a sandbox', async () => {
const { userId, companyId } = await seedCompany()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.company_settings (user_id, company_id, is_sandbox)
VALUES ($1, $2, false)`,
[userId, companyId],
)
await expect(
getPool().query(`SELECT public.cleanup_sandbox_user($1)`, [userId]),
).rejects.toThrow(/is not a sandbox user/i)
expect(await authUserExists(userId)).toBe(true)
})
it('does not loosen posted-entry immutability outside the RPC', async () => {
const { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedCompany()
const entryId = await insertPostedJournalEntry({ userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId })
const client = await getClient()
try {
await client.query('BEGIN')
await expect(
client.query(`DELETE FROM public.journal_entry_lines WHERE journal_entry_id = $1`, [
entryId,
]),
).rejects.toThrow(/posted journal entry/i)
} finally {
await client.query('ROLLBACK').catch(() => {})
client.release()
}
})
it('the bypass flags are cleared before cleanup_sandbox_user returns', async () => {
const { userId } = await seedSandboxUser()
const client = await getClient()
try {
// Explicit transaction: a bare statement would end its own implicit
// transaction and discard transaction-local GUCs regardless, which is
// exactly the blind spot the old version of this test had.
await client.query('BEGIN')
await client.query(`SELECT public.cleanup_sandbox_user($1)`, [userId])
const { rows } = await client.query<{ del: string | null; sc: string | null }>(
`SELECT current_setting('gnubok.allow_delete', true) AS del,
current_setting('gnubok.sandbox_cleanup', true) AS sc`,
)
expect(rows[0]!.del ?? '').not.toBe('true')
expect(rows[0]!.sc ?? '').not.toBe('true')
await client.query('COMMIT')
} catch (err) {
await client.query('ROLLBACK').catch(() => {})
throw err
} finally {
client.release()
}
})
it('refuses a user who has both a sandbox and a non-sandbox company', async () => {
const sandbox = await seedSandboxUser()
const otherCompanyId = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.companies (id, name, entity_type, created_by)
VALUES ($1, 'Second Real Company', 'enskild_firma', $2)`,
[otherCompanyId, sandbox.userId],
)
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.company_settings (user_id, company_id, is_sandbox)
VALUES ($1, $2, false)`,
[sandbox.userId, otherCompanyId],
)
await expect(
getPool().query(`SELECT public.cleanup_sandbox_user($1)`, [sandbox.userId]),
).rejects.toThrow(/is not a sandbox user/i)
expect(await authUserExists(sandbox.userId)).toBe(true)
// Clean up: replace the non-sandbox settings row with a sandbox one
// (a direct DB session may insert is_sandbox = true), then the
// sanctioned teardown removes everything.
await getPool().query(
`DELETE FROM public.company_settings WHERE company_id = $1`,
[otherCompanyId],
)
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.company_settings (user_id, company_id, is_sandbox)
VALUES ($1, $2, true)`,
[sandbox.userId, otherCompanyId],
)
await getPool().query(`SELECT public.cleanup_sandbox_user($1)`, [sandbox.userId])
expect(await authUserExists(sandbox.userId)).toBe(false)
})
it('sweeps expired sandbox users and orphaned anonymous users, keeps fresh ones, reports counts', async () => {
const anonSupported = await hasIsAnonymousColumn()
// Ancient timestamps put our rows first in the ORDER BY created_at loops,
// so a bounded p_limit still covers them even on a shared database that
// has its own stale sandbox rows.
const expired = await seedSandboxUser('2000-01-02T00:00:00Z')
const fresh = await seedSandboxUser()
const expiredOrphan = anonSupported
? await insertAnonymousAuthUser('2000-01-01T00:00:00Z')
: null
const freshOrphan = anonSupported
? await insertAnonymousAuthUser(new Date().toISOString())
: null
const { rows } = await getPool().query<{
summary: { cleaned: number; failed: number; orphans_removed: number }
}>(`SELECT public.cleanup_expired_sandbox_users(24, 25) AS summary`)
const summary = rows[0]!.summary
expect(await authUserExists(expired.userId)).toBe(false)
expect(await authUserExists(fresh.userId)).toBe(true)
expect(summary.cleaned).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(1)
expect(summary.failed).toBe(0)
if (anonSupported && expiredOrphan && freshOrphan) {
expect(await authUserExists(expiredOrphan)).toBe(false)
expect(await authUserExists(freshOrphan)).toBe(true)
expect(summary.orphans_removed).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(1)
} else {
expect(summary.orphans_removed).toBe(0)
}
// Leave nothing behind on a shared database.
await getPool().query(`SELECT public.cleanup_sandbox_user($1)`, [fresh.userId])
if (freshOrphan) {
await getPool().query(`DELETE FROM auth.users WHERE id = $1`, [freshOrphan])
}
})
it('company_settings.is_sandbox is write-once in both directions', async () => {
const real = await seedCompany()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.company_settings (user_id, company_id, is_sandbox)
VALUES ($1, $2, false)`,
[real.userId, real.companyId],
)
await expect(
getPool().query(
`UPDATE public.company_settings SET is_sandbox = true WHERE company_id = $1`,
[real.companyId],
),
).rejects.toThrow(/write-once/i)
const sandbox = await seedSandboxUser()
await expect(
getPool().query(
`UPDATE public.company_settings SET is_sandbox = false WHERE company_id = $1`,
[sandbox.companyId],
),
).rejects.toThrow(/write-once/i)
// Other columns stay updatable.
await getPool().query(
`UPDATE public.company_settings SET is_sandbox = is_sandbox, company_name = 'Still Updatable'
WHERE company_id = $1`,
[real.companyId],
)
await getPool().query(`SELECT public.cleanup_sandbox_user($1)`, [sandbox.userId])
})
it('the orphan sweep never reaches an anonymous user who has a company but no settings row', async () => {
if (!(await hasIsAnonymousColumn())) return
const userId = await insertAnonymousAuthUser('2000-01-03T00:00:00Z')
const companyId = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.companies (id, name, entity_type, created_by)
VALUES ($1, 'Orphan With Books', 'enskild_firma', $2)`,
[companyId, userId],
)
const { rows: fpRows } = await getPool().query<{ id: string }>(
`INSERT INTO public.fiscal_periods (user_id, company_id, name, period_start, period_end)
VALUES ($1, $2, 'Orphan 2026', '2026-01-01', '2026-12-31') RETURNING id`,
[userId, companyId],
)
await insertPostedJournalEntry({
userId,
companyId,
fiscalPeriodId: fpRows[0]!.id,
})
await getPool().query(`SELECT public.cleanup_expired_sandbox_users(24, 25)`)
// Excluded from the sweep by the explicit companies/company_members
// guards, not by an incidental downstream trigger failure.
expect(await authUserExists(userId)).toBe(true)
// Clean up via the sanctioned teardown: give the company a sandbox
// settings row (a direct DB session may insert is_sandbox = true; only
// flips and PostgREST-authenticated inserts are blocked).
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.company_settings (user_id, company_id, is_sandbox)
VALUES ($1, $2, true)`,
[userId, companyId],
)
await getPool().query(`SELECT public.cleanup_sandbox_user($1)`, [userId])
expect(await authUserExists(userId)).toBe(false)
})
it('is_sandbox = true cannot be inserted by a regular authenticated user, but can by an anonymous one', async () => {
const { userId, companyId } = await seedCompany()
const client = await getClient()
try {
await client.query('BEGIN')
await client.query(`SELECT set_config('request.jwt.claims', $1, true)`, [
JSON.stringify({ sub: userId, role: 'authenticated' }),
])
await client.query(`SELECT set_config('request.jwt.claim.sub', $1, true)`, [userId])
await client.query(`SELECT set_config('request.jwt.claim.role', 'authenticated', true)`)
await client.query(`SET LOCAL ROLE authenticated`)
await expect(
client.query(
`INSERT INTO public.company_settings (user_id, company_id, is_sandbox)
VALUES ($1, $2, true)`,
[userId, companyId],
),
).rejects.toThrow(/anonymous sandbox users/i)
} finally {
await client.query('ROLLBACK').catch(() => {})
client.release()
}
const anonClient = await getClient()
try {
await anonClient.query('BEGIN')
await anonClient.query(`SELECT set_config('request.jwt.claims', $1, true)`, [
JSON.stringify({ sub: userId, role: 'authenticated', is_anonymous: true }),
])
await anonClient.query(`SELECT set_config('request.jwt.claim.sub', $1, true)`, [userId])
await anonClient.query(
`SELECT set_config('request.jwt.claim.role', 'authenticated', true)`,
)
await anonClient.query(`SET LOCAL ROLE authenticated`)
await anonClient.query(
`INSERT INTO public.company_settings (user_id, company_id, is_sandbox)
VALUES ($1, $2, true)`,
[userId, companyId],
)
// Rolled back below: this test only proves the guard's allow path.
} finally {
await anonClient.query('ROLLBACK').catch(() => {})
anonClient.release()
}
})
it('cleanup_expired_sandbox_users carries its own statement_timeout', async () => {
// PostgREST sessions inherit authenticator's 8s statement_timeout while
// one sandbox teardown costs ~3s, so without a function-local override
// the nightly batch times out and rolls back wholesale (migration
// 20260807150000, same pattern as undo_sie_import).
const { rows } = await getPool().query<{ proconfig: string[] | null }>(
`SELECT p.proconfig
FROM pg_proc p
JOIN pg_namespace n ON n.oid = p.pronamespace
WHERE n.nspname = 'public' AND p.proname = 'cleanup_expired_sandbox_users'`,
)
expect(rows).toHaveLength(1)
expect(rows[0]!.proconfig ?? []).toContain('statement_timeout=290s')
})
it('is executable by service_role only', async () => {
const { rows } = await getPool().query<{
svc_user: boolean
svc_expired: boolean
anon_user: boolean
anon_expired: boolean
authed_expired: boolean
}>(
`SELECT
has_function_privilege('service_role', 'public.cleanup_sandbox_user(uuid)', 'EXECUTE') AS svc_user,
has_function_privilege('service_role', 'public.cleanup_expired_sandbox_users(int, int)', 'EXECUTE') AS svc_expired,
has_function_privilege('anon', 'public.cleanup_sandbox_user(uuid)', 'EXECUTE') AS anon_user,
has_function_privilege('anon', 'public.cleanup_expired_sandbox_users(int, int)', 'EXECUTE') AS anon_expired,
has_function_privilege('authenticated', 'public.cleanup_expired_sandbox_users(int, int)', 'EXECUTE') AS authed_expired`,
)
expect(rows[0]!.svc_user).toBe(true)
expect(rows[0]!.svc_expired).toBe(true)
expect(rows[0]!.anon_user).toBe(false)
expect(rows[0]!.anon_expired).toBe(false)
expect(rows[0]!.authed_expired).toBe(false)
})
})
/**
* The regression half of 20260901120000: three guards were relaxed for
* sandbox teardown, and each one still has to refuse a real tenant. Every
* case runs twice, once plain and once with gnubok.sandbox_cleanup set by
* hand, because a flag-only bypass would pass the first and fail the second.
*/
describe('sandbox teardown bypasses never reach a real tenant (pg)', () => {
async function withTeardownFlag<T>(fn: (client: PoolClient) => Promise<T>): Promise<T> {
const client = await getClient()
try {
await client.query('BEGIN')
await client.query(`SELECT set_config('gnubok.sandbox_cleanup', 'true', true)`)
return await fn(client)
} finally {
await client.query('ROLLBACK').catch(() => {})
client.release()
}
}
async function seedRealCompany(): Promise<{
userId: string
companyId: string
fiscalPeriodId: string
}> {
const ctx = await seedCompany()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.company_settings (user_id, company_id, is_sandbox)
VALUES ($1, $2, false)`,
[ctx.userId, ctx.companyId],
)
return ctx
}
it('enforce_opening_balance_immutability still refuses to unlink a real IB voucher', async () => {
const { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedRealCompany()
const entryId = await insertPostedJournalEntry({ userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId })
await getPool().query(
`UPDATE public.fiscal_periods
SET opening_balance_entry_id = $2, opening_balances_set = true
WHERE id = $1`,
[fiscalPeriodId, entryId],
)
await expect(
getPool().query(
`UPDATE public.fiscal_periods SET opening_balance_entry_id = NULL WHERE id = $1`,
[fiscalPeriodId],
),
).rejects.toThrow(/opening balances are immutable once set/i)
await withTeardownFlag(async (client) => {
await expect(
client.query(
`UPDATE public.fiscal_periods SET opening_balance_entry_id = NULL WHERE id = $1`,
[fiscalPeriodId],
),
).rejects.toThrow(/opening balances are immutable once set/i)
})
})
it('enforce_opening_balance_immutability still refuses to detach a real bokslut voucher', async () => {
const { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedRealCompany()
const closingEntryId = await insertPostedJournalEntry({
userId,
companyId,
fiscalPeriodId,
sourceType: 'year_end',
description: 'Bokslut 2026',
})
await getPool().query(
`UPDATE public.fiscal_periods SET closing_entry_id = $2 WHERE id = $1`,
[fiscalPeriodId, closingEntryId],
)
await withTeardownFlag(async (client) => {
await expect(
client.query(
`UPDATE public.fiscal_periods SET closing_entry_id = NULL WHERE id = $1`,
[fiscalPeriodId],
),
).rejects.toThrow(/year-end closing is immutable/i)
})
})
it('block_webhook_delivery_terminal_delete still refuses a real tenant terminal delivery', async () => {
const { companyId } = await seedRealCompany()
const deliveryId = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.webhook_deliveries
(id, company_id, event_type, payload, api_version, status, delivered_at)
VALUES ($1, $2, 'journal_entry.committed', '{"id":"real"}', '2026-05-12',
'delivered', now())`,
[deliveryId, companyId],
)
await expect(
getPool().query(`DELETE FROM public.webhook_deliveries WHERE id = $1`, [deliveryId]),
).rejects.toThrow(/terminal status/i)
await withTeardownFlag(async (client) => {
await expect(
client.query(`DELETE FROM public.webhook_deliveries WHERE id = $1`, [deliveryId]),
).rejects.toThrow(/terminal status/i)
})
// Non-terminal rows stay deletable, flag or no flag: the guard's
// predicate is unchanged for everyone outside a sandbox.
const pendingId = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.webhook_deliveries
(id, company_id, event_type, payload, api_version, status)
VALUES ($1, $2, 'journal_entry.committed', '{"id":"real"}', '2026-05-12', 'pending')`,
[pendingId, companyId],
)
await getPool().query(`DELETE FROM public.webhook_deliveries WHERE id = $1`, [pendingId])
})
it('payment_match_log stays append-only for a real tenant, company_id set or NULL', async () => {
const { userId, companyId } = await seedRealCompany()
const transactionId = await insertTransaction({ companyId, userId })
const { rows } = await getPool().query<{ id: string }>(
`INSERT INTO public.payment_match_log (user_id, company_id, transaction_id, action)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'matched') RETURNING id`,
[userId, companyId, transactionId],
)
const tenantedId = rows[0]!.id
const { rows: untenanted } = await getPool().query<{ id: string }>(
`INSERT INTO public.payment_match_log (user_id, transaction_id, action)
VALUES ($1, $2, 'unmatched') RETURNING id`,
[userId, transactionId],
)
const untenantedId = untenanted[0]!.id
for (const id of [tenantedId, untenantedId]) {
await expect(
getPool().query(`DELETE FROM public.payment_match_log WHERE id = $1`, [id]),
).rejects.toThrow(/cannot be modified or deleted/i)
// The company_id IS NULL branch is the one 20260901120000 added; it
// must resolve through company_settings.user_id, not through the flag.
await withTeardownFlag(async (client) => {
await expect(
client.query(`DELETE FROM public.payment_match_log WHERE id = $1`, [id]),
).rejects.toThrow(/cannot be modified or deleted/i)
})
}
await expect(
getPool().query(
`UPDATE public.payment_match_log SET action = 'unmatched' WHERE id = $1`,
[tenantedId],
),
).rejects.toThrow(/cannot be modified or deleted/i)
})
it('payment_match_log UPDATE stays forbidden even inside a sandbox teardown', async () => {
const seed = await seedSandboxUser()
await withTeardownFlag(async (client) => {
await expect(
client.query(
`UPDATE public.payment_match_log SET action = 'unmatched' WHERE id = $1`,
[seed.matchLogId],
),
).rejects.toThrow(/cannot be modified or deleted/i)
})
await getPool().query(`SELECT public.cleanup_sandbox_user($1)`, [seed.userId])
expect(await authUserExists(seed.userId)).toBe(false)
})
})