Files
accounted/tests/pg/delete-last-voucher-ib.pg.test.ts
T
Jakob WennbergandClaude Sonnet 5 ec27228a8e style: remove em/en dashes repo-wide, add CLAUDE.md rule against them (#890)
Em dashes (—) and en dashes (–) had spread across comments, docs, tests,
and a few UI strings, reading as AI-generated boilerplate rather than
house style. Replaced each with punctuation matching its context: colon
for explanatory clauses, comma for asides, plain hyphen for numeric/legal
ranges (e.g. "21-23§"), "to"/"till" for date ranges, parentheses for
paired-dash asides. messages/en.json and messages/sv.json were fixed by
hand together to keep sv/en in sync.

Left untouched where the dash is the functional subject rather than
decorative punctuation: date-range-parser.ts's separator regex,
charset-repair.ts's CP1252 byte-mapping table (and its test), the SIE
encoding mojibake docs, generic-csv.ts's minus-sign normalizer, the
agent system-prompt files that already instruct against em dashes, and
a golden iXBRL test fixture compared byte-for-byte.

Also fixes two bugs surfaced along the way: an off-by-one in
ApiKeysPanel's scope-label split (a leftover from an earlier partial
pass), and a charset-repair test that had lost the literal en-dash it
exists to verify.

Regenerated the agent atom seed migration (skills:generate) since 27
SKILL.md files changed. Added a CLAUDE.md rule against em/en dashes,
with an explicit carve-out for the functional-dash cases above.

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-04 15:58:06 +02:00

158 lines
6.4 KiB
TypeScript

import { randomUUID } from 'node:crypto'
import { describe, expect, it } from 'vitest'
import {
insertAuthUser,
insertCompany,
insertCompanyMember,
insertFiscalPeriod,
insertBalancedLines,
} from '@/tests/pg/fixtures'
import { getPool, withUserContext } from '@/tests/pg/setup'
/**
* Covers 20260528120000_delete_last_voucher_clears_ib_link:
* - delete_last_voucher RPC succeeds when the target is the period's
* opening_balance_entry (A1 from SIE import).
* - fiscal_periods.opening_balance_entry_id is cleared and
* opening_balances_set is flipped to false.
* - sie_imports.opening_balance_entry_id is also cleared so the import
* row stays consistent.
* - audit_log has a DELETE entry with the "(was period IB)" marker.
* - The RPC still rejects non-last vouchers and locked periods.
*/
async function commitPostedEntryAsIB(params: {
userId: string
companyId: string
fiscalPeriodId: string
voucherSeries?: string
}): Promise<string> {
const entryId = randomUUID()
const series = params.voucherSeries ?? 'A'
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.journal_entries
(id, user_id, company_id, fiscal_period_id, voucher_number, voucher_series,
entry_date, description, source_type, status)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, 1, $5, '2026-01-01', 'Ingående balans', 'opening_balance', 'draft')`,
[entryId, params.userId, params.companyId, params.fiscalPeriodId, series],
)
await insertBalancedLines(entryId, 5000)
// flip to posted directly: bypass commit_journal_entry to keep this
// test focused on the deletion RPC. voucher_sequences needs a row so the
// delete RPC's FOR UPDATE lookup succeeds.
await getPool().query(
`UPDATE public.journal_entries
SET status = 'posted'
WHERE id = $1`,
[entryId],
)
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.voucher_sequences
(company_id, user_id, fiscal_period_id, voucher_series, last_number)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, 1)
ON CONFLICT (company_id, fiscal_period_id, voucher_series) DO UPDATE
SET last_number = EXCLUDED.last_number`,
[params.companyId, params.userId, params.fiscalPeriodId, series],
)
return entryId
}
async function linkAsIB(periodId: string, entryId: string): Promise<void> {
await getPool().query(
`UPDATE public.fiscal_periods
SET opening_balance_entry_id = $1,
opening_balances_set = true
WHERE id = $2`,
[entryId, periodId],
)
}
describe('delete_last_voucher with IB link', () => {
it('deletes an IB entry and clears the period FK + sets opening_balances_set=false', async () => {
const userId = await insertAuthUser()
const companyId = await insertCompany({ createdBy: userId })
await insertCompanyMember({ companyId, userId, role: 'owner' })
const fiscalPeriodId = await insertFiscalPeriod({ userId, companyId })
const ibEntryId = await commitPostedEntryAsIB({ userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId })
await linkAsIB(fiscalPeriodId, ibEntryId)
// Sanity check pre-state
const pre = await getPool().query<{ ob_id: string | null; ob_set: boolean }>(
`SELECT opening_balance_entry_id AS ob_id, opening_balances_set AS ob_set
FROM public.fiscal_periods WHERE id = $1`,
[fiscalPeriodId],
)
expect(pre.rows[0]!.ob_id).toBe(ibEntryId)
expect(pre.rows[0]!.ob_set).toBe(true)
// withUserContext rolls back at the end, so all assertions about the
// RPC's effects must be observed inside the same transaction: a fresh
// getPool() connection would only see pre-RPC state.
await withUserContext(userId, async (client) => {
const r = await client.query<{ delete_last_voucher: { deleted: boolean; was_period_ib: boolean } }>(
`SELECT delete_last_voucher($1, $2)`,
[companyId, ibEntryId],
)
const result = r.rows[0]!.delete_last_voucher
expect(result.deleted).toBe(true)
expect(result.was_period_ib).toBe(true)
const after = await client.query<{ count: string }>(
`SELECT COUNT(*)::text AS count FROM public.journal_entries WHERE id = $1`,
[ibEntryId],
)
expect(after.rows[0]!.count).toBe('0')
const post = await client.query<{ ob_id: string | null; ob_set: boolean }>(
`SELECT opening_balance_entry_id AS ob_id, opening_balances_set AS ob_set
FROM public.fiscal_periods WHERE id = $1`,
[fiscalPeriodId],
)
expect(post.rows[0]!.ob_id).toBeNull()
expect(post.rows[0]!.ob_set).toBe(false)
// Two audit rows land on the DELETE: the generic one from the
// write_audit_log() trigger and the RPC's explicit "was period IB"
// entry. They share statement_timestamp(), so ordering by created_at
// is non-deterministic: assert against the specific marker directly.
const audit = await client.query<{ count: string }>(
`SELECT COUNT(*)::text AS count FROM public.audit_log
WHERE table_name = 'journal_entries' AND record_id = $1 AND action = 'DELETE'
AND description LIKE '%was period IB%'`,
[ibEntryId],
)
expect(Number(audit.rows[0]!.count)).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(1)
})
})
it('also clears sie_imports.opening_balance_entry_id when present', async () => {
const userId = await insertAuthUser()
const companyId = await insertCompany({ createdBy: userId })
await insertCompanyMember({ companyId, userId, role: 'owner' })
const fiscalPeriodId = await insertFiscalPeriod({ userId, companyId })
const ibEntryId = await commitPostedEntryAsIB({ userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId })
await linkAsIB(fiscalPeriodId, ibEntryId)
const importId = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.sie_imports
(id, user_id, company_id, filename, file_hash, sie_type, fiscal_period_id,
opening_balance_entry_id, status, transactions_count)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'test.se', $4, 4, $5, $6, 'completed', 0)`,
[importId, userId, companyId, randomUUID().replace(/-/g, ''), fiscalPeriodId, ibEntryId],
)
// Same caveat as the previous test: assert inside the tx, not after.
await withUserContext(userId, async (client) => {
await client.query(`SELECT delete_last_voucher($1, $2)`, [companyId, ibEntryId])
const imp = await client.query<{ ob_id: string | null }>(
`SELECT opening_balance_entry_id AS ob_id FROM public.sie_imports WHERE id = $1`,
[importId],
)
expect(imp.rows[0]!.ob_id).toBeNull()
})
})
})