c0818bb2d2
* feat(sales-orders): kundorder with partial delivery and partial invoicing Adds sales orders (kundorder) as their own non-ledger document between agreement and invoice, for companies that deliver or invoice in parts. Schema (20260902130000): sales_orders + sales_order_items with RLS via user_company_ids(), OR-<n> numbering RPC (membership-gated, no anon execute), company_settings.sales_orders_enabled UI gate, and back-links invoices.sales_order_id / invoice_items.sales_order_item_id. The invoiced quantity per order line is DERIVED from the linked invoice lines on non-cancelled, non-credited invoices and enforced by a BEFORE trigger, so no counter can drift and a credited invoice frees its quantity. Header status is draft / confirmed / completed / cancelled; completion is kept by DB triggers from the same derived quantity. Delivery and invoicing progress are derived per line, never stored as status. Service + API: lib/sales-orders (create/update with id-preserving line replace, transitions with compare-and-set, cumulative delivery registration, invoice-from-order through buildInvoiceWriteData so booking stays in the engine, proforma -> order conversion), routes under /api/sales-orders and /api/invoices/[id]/convert-to-order, structured SALES_ORDER_* error codes, archive classification of the new tables. The invoice editor round-trips sales_order_item_id so a draft edit cannot drop the link; GET /api/invoices gains ?sales_order_id=. UI: /sales-orders list, create/edit form reusing the invoice line conventions, detail with deliver and create-invoice dialogs and linked invoices; nav row behind the settings toggle; the webshop row is relabelled webshop_orders; "Skapa order" on proformas. MCP (20260902141000/141001): list/get reads plus four staged writes (create, transition, register delivery, create invoice from order) whose executors call the lib services; op types added to the pending operations CHECK. Tests: route tests for every route (401/400/404/happy), service unit tests, executor and tool tests, and tests/pg/sales-orders.pg.test.ts (16 cases, green on staging) covering RLS, numbering guards, the over-invoice trigger incl. release on cancel/credit and cross-company refusal, the quantity floor, and completion maintenance. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RQW7mXvbAPgjUHq7dSEamr * fix(sales-orders): harden kundorder after skeptic and security review Resolves every finding from the PR #2166 review pass in one batch. Order link integrity: replaceInvoiceItems now refuses a line set that drops an existing sales_order_item_id (INVOICE_UPDATE_DROPS_ORDER_LINK), closing the MCP update_invoice header-only edit and the v1 PATCH path that severed the link and freed the quantity for double invoicing. The update_invoice re-fetch, gnubok_get_invoice and the v1 item projection now carry sales_order_item_id so well-behaved clients round-trip it. Quantity math: derived remaining/invoiced quantities are rounded to six decimals and compared with an epsilon (roundQty, qtyGreater) so a float remainder such as 0.5999999999999996 can neither refuse the final partial invoice nor land as an invoice quantity; duplicate explicit picks are summed before validation. Leveransdatum: per-line last_delivery_date (migration 20260902160000); an invoice takes the latest date over the lines it covers and only when the covered quantity was delivered, never the header date and never for an advance invoice (ML 17 kap 24 p.7, FX anchor per ML 8 kap 21-23). VAT drift: the order stores the customer type and VAT-validation flag its lines were priced under; invoicing refuses with SALES_ORDER_CUSTOMER_VAT_CHANGED when they differ, and re-saving the order re-validates the lines. Customer and currency are frozen once invoices exist. Tenant and role gates: composite FK (sales_order_id, company_id) ties a line to its parent's company (Superagent P2); aa_enforce_company_writer_role on both tables so a viewer cannot write through the browser client. Proforma -> order refuses proformas with ROT/RUT, periodisering or negative-quantity lines instead of dropping those fields. RESTRICT FK errors on delete map to SALES_ORDER_LINE_LOCKED / SALES_ORDER_HAS_INVOICES. Also: schema-guard literal payloads in lib/sales-orders (ceiling +2 with reason), regenerated skills/accounted-api (sales_order_item_id on invoice items), pg tests for the composite FK, the viewer gate and the new columns, unit tests for every changed path. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XzFmmH82hCJNmZbPqycDiW * fix(sales-orders): resolve CodeRabbit round on PR #2166 Quick wins from the review, all in one pass: - replaceInvoiceItems fails closed when the invoice_items snapshot cannot be read (it is both the restore source and the input to the kundorder link guard); the guard branch is explicit in both PATCH routes. - Cumulative delivery registration carries an optimistic predicate on the quantity it read, so two concurrent registrations cannot regress each other; DELETE of an order keeps its allowed status in the predicate and answers a conflict when zero rows match. - Business dates (order date, delivery date, invoice date) default to the Europe/Stockholm calendar day (todayIsoStockholm), never UTC: the delivery date is also the Riksbanken rate anchor. - The invoice-from-order executor treats an event emit failure as non-blocking: the draft already exists. - sales_order_items are archived through their parent with the order currency denormalised, like invoice_items. - Proforma "Skapa order" tolerates a 2xx without a parsable body; the settings toggle refreshes the server-rendered nav. - List route doc states that q matches the order number (customer names are matched client-side). Declined (out of scope for this PR): moving header + line writes and the delivery loop into transactional RPCs (same PostgREST pattern as the invoice PATCH path, tracked as a follow-up), the MCP approval handler's error message shape (pre-existing code outside this change), and the docstring-coverage warning (no repo convention). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XzFmmH82hCJNmZbPqycDiW * fix(sales-orders): move hardening migration off a colliding version; archive contract; ceiling - 20260902160000_sales_orders_hardening.sql collided with main's 20260902160000_parties_substrate.sql after the third sync; renamed to 20260902180000 and made idempotent (DROP ... IF EXISTS before each ADD CONSTRAINT) so a preview branch that applied it under the old version replays it cleanly. Staging's schema_migrations row renamed. - sales_order_items goes back to a direct archive dump: the coverage contract (tests/pg/full-archive-coverage.pg.test.ts) requires it for a table with its own company_id; the currency lives on the parent order one file over, joined by sales_order_id. - Scanner ceiling re-baselined after merging main (parties phase 1): 397. - v1 PATCH test queues a real empty invoice_items snapshot now that replaceInvoiceItems fails closed on an unreadable one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XzFmmH82hCJNmZbPqycDiW * fix(sales-orders): drop the composite FK before its unique index on replay The idempotent guard in 20260902180000_sales_orders_hardening.sql dropped the unique (id, company_id) before the FK that depends on its index, so the preview branch replay (which had applied the file under its former version) failed with SQLSTATE 2BP01. Order swapped; replay verified on staging. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XzFmmH82hCJNmZbPqycDiW --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
513 lines
20 KiB
TypeScript
513 lines
20 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* createSalesOrder / updateSalesOrder with the queued Supabase mock.
|
|
*
|
|
* updateSalesOrder queue order: loadSalesOrder (sales_orders select,
|
|
* invoiced rpc), then ONLY when customer_id or currency changes:
|
|
* hasOpenInvoices (invoiced rpc, and an invoices head count when no line
|
|
* carries invoiced quantity), then customers select, sales_orders update,
|
|
* then when lines are given: sales_order_items delete (only if any
|
|
* dropped), one sales_order_items update per kept line, one insert for new
|
|
* lines, and a final loadSalesOrder.
|
|
*
|
|
* The header update is an object literal with every column present (an
|
|
* omitted input leaves undefined, which PostgREST drops), so assertions use
|
|
* toMatchObject and check the untouched keys are undefined explicitly.
|
|
*/
|
|
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
|
|
import type { SupabaseClient } from '@supabase/supabase-js'
|
|
import { createQueuedMockSupabase } from '@/tests/helpers'
|
|
import { createSalesOrder, hasOpenInvoices, updateSalesOrder } from '../write'
|
|
import { IDS, invoicedRow, makeOrderCustomer, makeSalesOrder, makeSalesOrderItem } from './fixtures'
|
|
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue, reset, findCall, findCalls } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
const sb = supabase as unknown as SupabaseClient
|
|
|
|
const baseLine = { description: 'Konsulttimme', quantity: 10, unit: 'h', unit_price: 100, vat_rate: 25 }
|
|
|
|
describe('updateSalesOrder', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
|
reset()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns SALES_ORDER_NOT_FOUND for a missing order', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: null })
|
|
const result = await updateSalesOrder(sb, { companyId: IDS.company, orderId: IDS.order, input: { notes: 'x' } })
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({ ok: false, code: 'SALES_ORDER_NOT_FOUND' })
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('refuses edits on a completed order', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeSalesOrder({ status: 'completed', completed_at: '2026-09-02T10:00:00Z' }) })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [invoicedRow(IDS.item1, 10)] })
|
|
|
|
const result = await updateSalesOrder(sb, { companyId: IDS.company, orderId: IDS.order, input: { notes: 'Sen' } })
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({ ok: false, code: 'SALES_ORDER_NOT_EDITABLE', details: { status: 'completed' } })
|
|
expect(findCall('sales_orders', 'update')).toBeUndefined()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('refuses edits on a cancelled order', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeSalesOrder({ status: 'cancelled' }) })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] })
|
|
const result = await updateSalesOrder(sb, { companyId: IDS.company, orderId: IDS.order, input: { notes: 'Sen' } })
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({ ok: false, code: 'SALES_ORDER_NOT_EDITABLE' })
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('refuses dropping a line that has invoiced quantity', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: makeSalesOrder({
|
|
status: 'confirmed',
|
|
items: [
|
|
makeSalesOrderItem({ id: IDS.item1, quantity: 10 }),
|
|
makeSalesOrderItem({ id: IDS.item2, sort_order: 1, description: 'Licens', quantity: 2 }),
|
|
],
|
|
}),
|
|
})
|
|
enqueue({ data: [invoicedRow(IDS.item1, 3)] })
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeOrderCustomer() })
|
|
|
|
// Only item2 comes back: item1 (3 invoiced) would be deleted.
|
|
const result = await updateSalesOrder(sb, {
|
|
companyId: IDS.company,
|
|
orderId: IDS.order,
|
|
input: { items: [{ id: IDS.item2, ...baseLine, description: 'Licens', quantity: 2 }] },
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
code: 'SALES_ORDER_LINE_LOCKED',
|
|
details: { sales_order_item_id: IDS.item1 },
|
|
})
|
|
expect(findCall('sales_orders', 'update')).toBeUndefined()
|
|
expect(findCall('sales_order_items', 'delete')).toBeUndefined()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('refuses dropping a line that has delivered quantity', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: makeSalesOrder({
|
|
status: 'confirmed',
|
|
items: [
|
|
makeSalesOrderItem({ id: IDS.item1, quantity: 10, delivered_qty: 1 }),
|
|
makeSalesOrderItem({ id: IDS.item2, sort_order: 1, quantity: 2 }),
|
|
],
|
|
}),
|
|
})
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] })
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeOrderCustomer() })
|
|
|
|
const result = await updateSalesOrder(sb, {
|
|
companyId: IDS.company,
|
|
orderId: IDS.order,
|
|
input: { items: [{ id: IDS.item2, ...baseLine, quantity: 2 }] },
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({ ok: false, code: 'SALES_ORDER_LINE_LOCKED' })
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('refuses lowering a line below its delivered quantity', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: makeSalesOrder({
|
|
status: 'confirmed',
|
|
items: [makeSalesOrderItem({ id: IDS.item1, quantity: 10, delivered_qty: 5 })],
|
|
}),
|
|
})
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] })
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeOrderCustomer() })
|
|
|
|
const result = await updateSalesOrder(sb, {
|
|
companyId: IDS.company,
|
|
orderId: IDS.order,
|
|
input: { items: [{ id: IDS.item1, ...baseLine, quantity: 3 }] },
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
code: 'SALES_ORDER_OVER_DELIVERED',
|
|
details: { sales_order_item_id: IDS.item1, delivered_qty: 5 },
|
|
})
|
|
expect(findCall('sales_orders', 'update')).toBeUndefined()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('refuses lowering a line below its invoiced quantity', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeSalesOrder({ status: 'confirmed', items: [makeSalesOrderItem({ id: IDS.item1, quantity: 10 })] }) })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [invoicedRow(IDS.item1, 4)] })
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeOrderCustomer() })
|
|
|
|
const result = await updateSalesOrder(sb, {
|
|
companyId: IDS.company,
|
|
orderId: IDS.order,
|
|
input: { items: [{ id: IDS.item1, ...baseLine, quantity: 3 }] },
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
code: 'SALES_ORDER_QUANTITY_BELOW_INVOICED',
|
|
details: { sales_order_item_id: IDS.item1, invoiced_qty: 4 },
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('refuses a line id that does not belong to the order', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeSalesOrder({ status: 'draft' }) })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] })
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeOrderCustomer() })
|
|
|
|
const result = await updateSalesOrder(sb, {
|
|
companyId: IDS.company,
|
|
orderId: IDS.order,
|
|
input: { items: [{ id: IDS.unknownItem, ...baseLine }] },
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({ ok: false, code: 'SALES_ORDER_LINE_NOT_FOUND' })
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns CUSTOMER_NOT_FOUND when the new customer is not in the company', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeSalesOrder({ status: 'draft' }) })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] })
|
|
enqueue({ data: null })
|
|
|
|
const result = await updateSalesOrder(sb, {
|
|
companyId: IDS.company,
|
|
orderId: IDS.order,
|
|
input: { customer_id: IDS.otherCustomer },
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({ ok: false, code: 'CUSTOMER_NOT_FOUND' })
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('re-validates stored lines when only the customer changes (25 % line to a validated EU business)', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeSalesOrder({ status: 'draft', items: [makeSalesOrderItem({ vat_rate: 25 })] }) })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] }) // hasOpenInvoices: invoiced rpc (nothing invoiced)
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, count: 0 }) // hasOpenInvoices: no header-linked invoice
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: makeOrderCustomer({
|
|
id: IDS.otherCustomer,
|
|
customer_type: 'eu_business',
|
|
vat_number: 'DE123456789',
|
|
vat_number_validated: true,
|
|
}),
|
|
})
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // header update
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeSalesOrder({ status: 'draft', customer_id: IDS.otherCustomer }) })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] })
|
|
|
|
const result = await updateSalesOrder(sb, {
|
|
companyId: IDS.company,
|
|
orderId: IDS.order,
|
|
input: { customer_id: IDS.otherCustomer },
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// 25 % is permitted for a validated EU business (taxed where performed),
|
|
// so the customer change goes through and only the header is written,
|
|
// with the snapshot refreshed to the NEW customer's VAT facts.
|
|
expect(result.ok).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(findCall('sales_orders', 'update')![0]).toMatchObject({
|
|
customer_id: IDS.otherCustomer,
|
|
customer_type_snapshot: 'eu_business',
|
|
customer_vat_validated_snapshot: true,
|
|
})
|
|
expect(findCall('sales_order_items', 'update')).toBeUndefined()
|
|
expect(findCalls('invoices', 'eq')).toContainEqual(['sales_order_id', IDS.order])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('refuses a customer change with SALES_ORDER_HAS_INVOICES once a line has invoiced quantity', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeSalesOrder({ status: 'confirmed', items: [makeSalesOrderItem({ id: IDS.item1 })] }) })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [invoicedRow(IDS.item1, 2)] }) // loadSalesOrder
|
|
enqueue({ data: [invoicedRow(IDS.item1, 2)] }) // hasOpenInvoices rpc
|
|
|
|
const result = await updateSalesOrder(sb, {
|
|
companyId: IDS.company,
|
|
orderId: IDS.order,
|
|
input: { customer_id: IDS.otherCustomer, notes: 'Byt kund' },
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({ ok: false, code: 'SALES_ORDER_HAS_INVOICES', details: { field: 'customer_id' } })
|
|
// The check runs before the customer is even loaded and nothing is written.
|
|
expect(findCall('customers', 'select')).toBeUndefined()
|
|
expect(findCall('sales_orders', 'update')).toBeUndefined()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('refuses a currency change when a header-linked invoice exists even with zero invoiced quantity', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeSalesOrder({ status: 'confirmed' }) })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] }) // hasOpenInvoices rpc: nothing invoiced
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, count: 1 }) // but an invoice still points at the order
|
|
|
|
const result = await updateSalesOrder(sb, {
|
|
companyId: IDS.company,
|
|
orderId: IDS.order,
|
|
input: { currency: 'EUR' },
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({ ok: false, code: 'SALES_ORDER_HAS_INVOICES', details: { field: 'currency' } })
|
|
expect(findCall('customers', 'select')).toBeUndefined()
|
|
expect(findCall('sales_orders', 'update')).toBeUndefined()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('skips the open-invoice check when customer_id and currency are unchanged', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeSalesOrder({ status: 'confirmed' }) })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [invoicedRow(IDS.item1, 2)] })
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeOrderCustomer() })
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // header update
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeSalesOrder({ status: 'confirmed', notes: 'Samma kund' }) })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [invoicedRow(IDS.item1, 2)] })
|
|
|
|
const result = await updateSalesOrder(sb, {
|
|
companyId: IDS.company,
|
|
orderId: IDS.order,
|
|
input: { customer_id: IDS.customer, currency: 'SEK', notes: 'Samma kund' },
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result.ok).toBe(true)
|
|
// Two rpc calls: the two loadSalesOrder calls, no hasOpenInvoices in between.
|
|
expect(supabase.rpc).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2)
|
|
expect(findCall('invoices', 'select')).toBeUndefined()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('updates header only when no lines are given, keeping stored totals', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeSalesOrder({ status: 'draft', subtotal: 1000, vat_amount: 250, total: 1250 }) })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] })
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeOrderCustomer() })
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // header update
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeSalesOrder({ status: 'draft', notes: 'Leverans till lagret' }) })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] })
|
|
|
|
const result = await updateSalesOrder(sb, {
|
|
companyId: IDS.company,
|
|
orderId: IDS.order,
|
|
input: { notes: 'Leverans till lagret', requested_delivery_date: '2026-09-15' },
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result.ok).toBe(true)
|
|
if (!result.ok) return
|
|
expect(result.order.notes).toBe('Leverans till lagret')
|
|
const headerUpdate = findCall('sales_orders', 'update')![0] as Record<string, unknown>
|
|
expect(headerUpdate).toMatchObject({
|
|
subtotal: 1000,
|
|
vat_amount: 250,
|
|
total: 1250,
|
|
notes: 'Leverans till lagret',
|
|
requested_delivery_date: '2026-09-15',
|
|
customer_type_snapshot: 'swedish_business',
|
|
customer_vat_validated_snapshot: false,
|
|
})
|
|
// Omitted inputs stay undefined so PostgREST leaves the columns alone.
|
|
for (const key of ['customer_id', 'currency', 'order_date', 'your_reference', 'our_reference', 'default_dimensions']) {
|
|
expect(headerUpdate).toHaveProperty(key)
|
|
expect(headerUpdate[key]).toBeUndefined()
|
|
}
|
|
expect(findCall('sales_order_items', 'update')).toBeUndefined()
|
|
expect(findCall('sales_order_items', 'insert')).toBeUndefined()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('replaces lines: updates kept lines by id, inserts new ones, deletes omitted ones, recomputes totals', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: makeSalesOrder({
|
|
status: 'confirmed',
|
|
items: [
|
|
makeSalesOrderItem({ id: IDS.item1, quantity: 10, delivered_qty: 2 }),
|
|
makeSalesOrderItem({ id: IDS.item2, sort_order: 1, description: 'Bortplockad', quantity: 1 }),
|
|
],
|
|
}),
|
|
})
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] })
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeOrderCustomer() })
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // header update
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // delete item2
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // update item1
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // insert new line
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeSalesOrder({ status: 'confirmed' }) })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] })
|
|
|
|
const result = await updateSalesOrder(sb, {
|
|
companyId: IDS.company,
|
|
orderId: IDS.order,
|
|
input: {
|
|
items: [
|
|
{ id: IDS.item1, ...baseLine, quantity: 12 },
|
|
{ description: 'Resa', quantity: 1, unit: 'st', unit_price: 500, vat_rate: 6 },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result.ok).toBe(true)
|
|
// 12 x 100 @ 25 % + 500 @ 6 %
|
|
const headerUpdate = findCall('sales_orders', 'update')![0] as Record<string, unknown>
|
|
expect(headerUpdate).toMatchObject({
|
|
subtotal: 1700,
|
|
vat_amount: 330,
|
|
total: 2030,
|
|
customer_type_snapshot: 'swedish_business',
|
|
customer_vat_validated_snapshot: false,
|
|
})
|
|
expect(headerUpdate.customer_id).toBeUndefined()
|
|
expect(headerUpdate.notes).toBeUndefined()
|
|
expect(findCall('sales_order_items', 'in')).toEqual(['id', [IDS.item2]])
|
|
const lineUpdate = findCall('sales_order_items', 'update')![0] as Record<string, unknown>
|
|
expect(lineUpdate).toMatchObject({ quantity: 12, sort_order: 0, line_total: 1200 })
|
|
expect(lineUpdate).not.toHaveProperty('id')
|
|
const inserted = findCall('sales_order_items', 'insert')![0] as Record<string, unknown>[]
|
|
expect(inserted).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
expect(inserted[0]).toMatchObject({
|
|
description: 'Resa',
|
|
sort_order: 1,
|
|
vat_rate: 6,
|
|
line_total: 500,
|
|
company_id: IDS.company,
|
|
sales_order_id: IDS.order,
|
|
})
|
|
expect(inserted[0]).not.toHaveProperty('id')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('maps the quantity-below-invoiced trigger onto SALES_ORDER_QUANTITY_BELOW_INVOICED (race)', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeSalesOrder({ status: 'confirmed' }) })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] }) // pre-check sees nothing invoiced
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeOrderCustomer() })
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // header update
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, error: { message: 'SALES_ORDER_QUANTITY_BELOW_INVOICED: line d1 has 4 invoiced' } })
|
|
|
|
const result = await updateSalesOrder(sb, {
|
|
companyId: IDS.company,
|
|
orderId: IDS.order,
|
|
input: { items: [{ id: IDS.item1, ...baseLine, quantity: 3 }] },
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({ ok: false, code: 'SALES_ORDER_QUANTITY_BELOW_INVOICED' })
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('createSalesOrder', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
|
reset()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns CUSTOMER_NOT_FOUND when the customer is not in the company', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: null })
|
|
const result = await createSalesOrder(sb, {
|
|
companyId: IDS.company,
|
|
userId: IDS.user,
|
|
input: { customer_id: IDS.customer, items: [baseLine] },
|
|
})
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({ ok: false, code: 'CUSTOMER_NOT_FOUND', details: { customerId: IDS.customer } })
|
|
expect(findCall('sales_orders', 'insert')).toBeUndefined()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('propagates the VAT gate before any insert', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeOrderCustomer({ customer_type: 'non_eu_business' }) })
|
|
const result = await createSalesOrder(sb, {
|
|
companyId: IDS.company,
|
|
userId: IDS.user,
|
|
input: { customer_id: IDS.customer, items: [{ ...baseLine, vat_rate: 20 }] },
|
|
})
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({ ok: false, code: 'INVOICE_CREATE_VAT_RULE_VIOLATION' })
|
|
expect(findCall('sales_orders', 'insert')).toBeUndefined()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('inserts header + lines, numbers the order and reloads it', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeOrderCustomer() })
|
|
enqueue({ data: { id: IDS.order } }) // header insert
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // items insert
|
|
enqueue({ data: 'OR-1' }) // generate_sales_order_number
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeSalesOrder({ status: 'draft', order_number: 'OR-1' }) })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] })
|
|
|
|
const result = await createSalesOrder(sb, {
|
|
companyId: IDS.company,
|
|
userId: IDS.user,
|
|
input: {
|
|
customer_id: IDS.customer,
|
|
order_date: '2026-09-01',
|
|
items: [baseLine, { line_type: 'text', description: 'Tack för din order', quantity: 0, unit: '', unit_price: 0 }],
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result.ok).toBe(true)
|
|
if (!result.ok) return
|
|
expect(result.order.order_number).toBe('OR-1')
|
|
expect(findCall('sales_orders', 'insert')![0]).toMatchObject({
|
|
company_id: IDS.company,
|
|
user_id: IDS.user,
|
|
customer_id: IDS.customer,
|
|
status: 'draft',
|
|
source_invoice_id: null,
|
|
order_date: '2026-09-01',
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
subtotal: 1000,
|
|
vat_amount: 250,
|
|
total: 1250,
|
|
// The customer facts the lines were VAT-validated under travel with the order.
|
|
customer_type_snapshot: 'swedish_business',
|
|
customer_vat_validated_snapshot: false,
|
|
})
|
|
const lines = findCall('sales_order_items', 'insert')![0] as Record<string, unknown>[]
|
|
expect(lines).toHaveLength(2)
|
|
expect(lines[0]).toMatchObject({ sales_order_id: IDS.order, company_id: IDS.company, line_type: 'product' })
|
|
expect(lines[1]).toMatchObject({ line_type: 'text', quantity: 0, line_total: 0 })
|
|
expect(supabase.rpc).toHaveBeenCalledWith('generate_sales_order_number', {
|
|
p_company_id: IDS.company,
|
|
p_order_id: IDS.order,
|
|
})
|
|
expect(findCalls('sales_orders', 'eq')).toContainEqual(['id', IDS.order])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rolls the header back when the line insert fails', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeOrderCustomer() })
|
|
enqueue({ data: { id: IDS.order } })
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, error: { message: 'insert failed', code: '23502' } })
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // header delete
|
|
|
|
const result = await createSalesOrder(sb, {
|
|
companyId: IDS.company,
|
|
userId: IDS.user,
|
|
input: { customer_id: IDS.customer, items: [baseLine] },
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result.ok).toBe(false)
|
|
expect('dbError' in result).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(findCall('sales_orders', 'delete')).toBeDefined()
|
|
expect(supabase.rpc).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('still returns the order when numbering fails (number assigned on the next write)', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeOrderCustomer() })
|
|
enqueue({ data: { id: IDS.order } })
|
|
enqueue({ data: null })
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, error: { message: 'counter locked' } }) // rpc fails
|
|
enqueue({ data: makeSalesOrder({ status: 'draft', order_number: null }) })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] })
|
|
|
|
const result = await createSalesOrder(sb, {
|
|
companyId: IDS.company,
|
|
userId: IDS.user,
|
|
input: { customer_id: IDS.customer, items: [baseLine] },
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result.ok).toBe(true)
|
|
if (!result.ok) return
|
|
expect(result.order.order_number).toBeNull()
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('hasOpenInvoices', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
|
reset()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('is open as soon as any line carries invoiced quantity (no header count needed)', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: [invoicedRow(IDS.item1, '1')] })
|
|
const result = await hasOpenInvoices(sb, IDS.company, IDS.order)
|
|
expect(result).toEqual({ ok: true, open: true })
|
|
expect(supabase.from).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('falls back to a header count when no line is invoiced', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] })
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, count: 0 })
|
|
const result = await hasOpenInvoices(sb, IDS.company, IDS.order)
|
|
expect(result).toEqual({ ok: true, open: false })
|
|
expect(findCalls('invoices', 'eq')).toContainEqual(['sales_order_id', IDS.order])
|
|
})
|
|
})
|