b6332e9ff4
* feat(salary): one-click AGI submission with filing state machine and success feedback The AGI panel required users to know that "Ladda ner AGI-fil" was the generate step, then click submit, signing link, and kvittens manually. A nollkorning filing stalled on "AGI-XML saknas" pointing at a UI path that does not exist. - New primary button "Lamna in till Skatteverket" chains the existing endpoints client-side: generate XML if missing, POST underlag, poll kontrollresultat, create signing link, open Mina Sidor in a tab opened synchronously at click (popup-blocker safe). Inline stepper shows each step; the four old buttons become collapsed advanced/recovery actions, auto-expanded in stale-draft and rejected states. XML download stays visible and free for manual filing. - deriveAgiFilingState() + useAgiSubmission() lift the per-period submission record to the run page: the progress rail and salary hero now render the real state machine (generated, underlag inskickat, vantar pa BankID-signatur, inlamnad med kvittensnummer) instead of telling users to "lamna in" an already-submitted declaration. - Success card with kvittensnummer and signature metadata once signed, plus a toast when a poll flips the state while the page is open. - AGI kvittens cron every 15 min instead of every 2 h so filings signed on another device get stamped and emailed promptly. - Advanced submit also auto-generates, and the stale "Lon -> AGI -> Generera" error text now points at the real buttons. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(enable-banking): instant OAuth callback feedback and dead-attempt cleanup The bank redirect landed on a blank page for the several seconds the callback spent exchanging the PSD2 session and mirroring accounts, and every failed connect attempt left a status='error' row that rendered forever as an "Atgard kravs" card next to a successful retry, showing duplicate connections to the same bank. - Stream a branded "Slutfor bankanslutningen" progress page from the callback: the shell flushes before the session exchange starts and a script/meta redirect follows when the work completes, with a 30s slow-work escape hatch. Fast outcomes (denial, bad params, unknown state) keep their plain redirects. - Delete never-activated connection rows (no session_id, no accounts_data) on denial or exchange failure, and sweep leftovers for the same bank on the next connect. Established connections keep their "Atgard krävs" card via the accounts_data guard; FKs are ON DELETE SET NULL so deletion has no dependents. - Show "Banken ar ansluten: hamtar dina konton" while the settings panel loads after the callback instead of an anonymous spinner. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(invoices): reject re-send of issued invoices and gate bookkeeping on the sent flip A direct POST to /api/invoices/[id]/send against an already-issued invoice re-emailed the customer and posted a second revenue verifikat (createInvoiceJournalEntry has no dedup), overwriting journal_entry_id and orphaning the first entry. Only the UI hid the button; the v1 route and the MCP commit executor already rejected non-drafts. - Non-draft invoices now return 409 INVOICE_ALREADY_SENT. - The draft to sent status flip is an optimistic lock (status guard plus row-count check); journal entry, accrual schedules, PDF archival and the invoice.sent event only run for the request that won the flip. - On a flip failure the journal entry is deferred: the row stays draft and a retry re-runs the pipeline, ending with exactly one verifikat. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(invoices): payment links, failure visibility and sandbox guard for recurring auto-send - sendInvoiceFromSchedule now auto-creates an online payment link via applyPaymentLinkToInvoice before rendering and passes the payment link QR to the PDF: parity with the dashboard and v1 send routes, which recurring invoices silently lacked. - The recurring cron persists last_run_warning both when a claimed run throws (hourly retries stay visible on the schedule) and when a stale schedule is rolled forward, so a deterministic failure can no longer skip a month silently. - Auto-send is blocked for sandbox companies at the email chokepoint (freeze-and-retain: the invoice is still generated as a draft), covering both the cron and the run-now route with one guard. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(salary): close the Fortnox payroll API gaps (phases 1-4) Payroll now runs end-to-end through the open API, including onboarding a client from another payroll system, with every write staged for approval. - v1: per-employee payslips (list/detail/PDF), payslip line writes, run roster attach/remove, absence ranges (per-day storage), jamkning fields, cutover opening balances (single + atomic bulk PUT), vacation balance + vacation-year-close. PUT added to the wrapper's idempotency/ test-key set (test keys could otherwise write through PUT). - MCP: 10 new tools (get_employee/get_payslip/list_absence/ get_vacation_balance reads + staged update_payslip_line, register_absence, create_employee, update_employee, set_employee_opening_balances, close_vacation_year), executors, risk tiers, op-type CHECK expansions. create_employee encrypts personnummer at staging: pending_operations never holds plaintext. - Scope-map audit retrofit: 11 formerly unmapped tools now scoped; BREAKING for keys that relied on the 4 default-allow writes. - Cutover: employee_opening_balances (derived lock trigger, self-unlocks on run correction), engine YTD/karens/liability integration, Ingaende saldon section in the employee editor. - Arbetsschema-lite: employees.hours_per_week/workdays_per_week drive the hourly/daily divisors; legacy 173/21 preserved exactly at defaults so existing pay math is byte-identical. - Vacation ledger + semesterberedning/arsavslut: recomputed per-year day balances (synced on book/correct, non-fatal), year-close with the min-20 floor, 5-year sparade-dagar expiry to forced payout, and a 2920/2940 drift adjustment via the bookkeeping engine; Semester dashboard card with preview-then-confirm dialog. - Fix: Zod 4 defaults leak through .partial(), which made every sparse employee PATCH fail validation and reset defaulted columns. Migrations 20260713100000/101000/110000/121000/122000 (applied to staging with version rows; prod via merge). vacation_ledger renamed from 20260713120000 to avoid colliding with vat_declaration_totals_rpc. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * perf: cut dashboard page-load latency (region, round trips, caching, VAT RPC) The dominant cost was infrastructure: Vercel functions ran in iad1 (Washington D.C.) while Supabase (DB + auth) lives in eu-north-1 (Stockholm), so every request paid 4-5 transatlantic round trips of auth + company resolution before doing any real work (measured 530-1900ms for single-query GETs in prod logs). Pin functions to arn1 and cut the redundant work on top: - vercel.json: functions to arn1, same city as the database - getActiveCompanyId: preference + first-membership queries run in parallel; the fallback result doubles as validation in the common single-company case (one round trip instead of two sequential) - withRouteContext: Server-Timing header and authMs/companyMs/handlerMs in the op-completed log, so latency is attributable per phase - dashboard layout: nav badge counts off the critical path; DashboardNav loads them client-side via the new use-worklist-badges SWR hook with debounced realtime revalidation - swr (new dependency, approved): global provider; useCompanySettings shares one cache entry across consumers and renders from cache on back-navigation instead of re-showing skeletons - /pending: realtime refetch debounced; bulk operations previously fired 4 requests per row-change event - VAT declaration: new get_vat_declaration_totals RPC returns per-account totals, settlement-shape detection (#984) and source_type counts in ONE round trip instead of paging every entry+line through PostgREST. Account lists stay TS-side parameters so ACCOUNT_RUTA remains the single source of truth. Shape-exclusion coverage moved to tests/pg/vat-declaration-totals-rpc.pg.test.ts; DDL already applied to staging. - bundle: CommandPalette lazy-mounts on first Ctrl/Cmd+K, AgentChat dynamic-imports the markdown parser, @vercel/speed-insights (new dependency, approved) added for real-user timings The /salary fetch-waterfall fix from the same effort already landed inside 2084a756. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(invoices): settle öre-rounded payments from the mark-paid flow An invoice with öresavrundning shows a rounded "Att betala" on the PDF; the customer pays that amount (up to 50 öre off the stored öre total) and the invoice-page mark-paid flow rejected it with MATCH_AMOUNT_EXCEEDS_REMAINING: a dead end, while the bank-transaction match flow already absorbed the residual to 3740. - PaymentBookingDialog now proposes the rounded bank leg plus the 3740 residual line (credit when rounded up, debit when rounded down), resolved via getDisplayTotal from the per-invoice override and company_settings.ore_rounding. - settleInvoicePayment and the v1 mark-paid route absorb the sub-krona residual, gated by planInvoicePaymentForLines: absorption applies ONLY when the caller lines carry the exact residual on 3740; otherwise the strict plan applies (sub-krona partials stay partial, no-3740 overshoots keep the 400), so the GL can never diverge from the AR sub-ledger. - planInvoicePayment absorb-band boundary tightened to >= 1 kr: an exactly-1-kr overshoot used to slip past both the guard and the absorb branch and silently over-record paid_amount (pre-existing on the bank-match path). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(security): resolve all 7 PR compliance findings - ASVS V3.3: per-request CSP nonce on the enable-banking finalize page (mirrors the mcp-oauth consent page); inline scripts are nonce-bound - ASVS V16: decouple callback finalize work from the response stream (eager promise + next/server after()) so a client disconnect cannot drop session persistence or the consent_granted audit emit - ISO 27001 A.8.15: failed audit-event emits log through the structured logger with a stable message for log-based alerting - ASVS V2.3: recurring-invoice cron and run-now routes resolve isSandboxCompany themselves and pass an explicit suppressAutoSend flag (defence in depth around the email chokepoint, freeze-and-retain kept) - ISO 27001 A.8.11: stagePendingOperation rejects plaintext personnummer-bearing keys in params/preview_data (key-based guard; EF org numbers make value-matching unsafe) - ASVS V4.5: employee PATCH body is truly sparse; cleared number fields are omitted instead of resetting DB values to hardcoded fallbacks - ASVS V8.2.1: route-level tests pin the v1 cross-company deny (404 by convention, not 403) on the payslip PDF endpoint Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat: implement vacation-year basis change validation and error handling - Added tests to block vacation-year basis changes when open balances exist. - Implemented error handling for open-balances guard query failures in the settings route. - Enhanced absence route to reject reversed date ranges with a validation error. - Updated absence handling to use atomic upserts instead of delete+insert for better performance and reliability. - Refactored salary calculation logic to correctly handle age-based avgifter rates according to Skatteverket's rules. - Improved error messaging for vacation year closure adjustments. - Adjusted employee opening balances handling to preserve audit information during upserts. * feat(settings): add validation to block vacation-year basis change with open balances feat(absence): reject reversed date ranges in absence queries fix(absence): update absence handling to use atomic upserts instead of delete+insert fix(employee): improve validation for jamkning dates in employee updates fix(opening-balances): ensure created_by field is preserved during upserts test(absence): enhance tests for absence range and date validations test(calculation): add tests for age-based avgifter rates and edge cases test(semesterberedning): validate vacation year closure adjustments and error handling test(employee-opening-balances): update tests to reflect changes in salary_run_employees schema * fix(migrations): implement NOT VALID constraints for pending_operations and add validation migration --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
943 lines
37 KiB
TypeScript
943 lines
37 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
|
||
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
// Mock: sequential result queue
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
|
||
let resultIdx: number
|
||
let results: Array<{ data?: unknown; error?: unknown }>
|
||
|
||
function makeBuilder() {
|
||
const b: Record<string, unknown> = {}
|
||
for (const m of ['select', 'eq', 'neq', 'in', 'gte', 'lte', 'lt', 'or', 'not', 'order', 'range']) {
|
||
b[m] = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(b)
|
||
}
|
||
b.single = vi.fn().mockImplementation(async () => results[resultIdx++] ?? { data: null, error: null })
|
||
b.maybeSingle = vi.fn().mockImplementation(async () => results[resultIdx++] ?? { data: null, error: null })
|
||
b.then = (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) => resolve(results[resultIdx++] ?? { data: null, error: null })
|
||
return b
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
function makeClient() {
|
||
return {
|
||
from: vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => makeBuilder()),
|
||
rpc: vi.fn().mockImplementation(async () => results[resultIdx++] ?? { data: null, error: null }),
|
||
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
|
||
} as any
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/**
|
||
* Seed one get_vat_declaration_totals RPC result from line-level fixtures.
|
||
* The helper only SUMS the seeded lines per account (plain arithmetic on the
|
||
* fixture, mirroring what SQL's GROUP BY returns); settlement-shape
|
||
* detection and exclusion happen inside the RPC and are covered by
|
||
* tests/pg/vat-declaration-totals-rpc.pg.test.ts against real Postgres.
|
||
*/
|
||
function seedLedger(
|
||
lines: Array<{ account_number: string; debit_amount: number; credit_amount: number }>,
|
||
sourceTypes: string[] = [],
|
||
) {
|
||
const byAccount = new Map<string, { debit: number; credit: number }>()
|
||
for (const l of lines) {
|
||
const t = byAccount.get(l.account_number) ?? { debit: 0, credit: 0 }
|
||
t.debit += l.debit_amount
|
||
t.credit += l.credit_amount
|
||
byAccount.set(l.account_number, t)
|
||
}
|
||
const source_type_counts: Record<string, number> = {}
|
||
for (const s of sourceTypes) source_type_counts[s] = (source_type_counts[s] ?? 0) + 1
|
||
results.push({
|
||
data: {
|
||
totals: [...byAccount].map(([account_number, t]) => ({
|
||
account_number,
|
||
debit: t.debit,
|
||
credit: t.credit,
|
||
})),
|
||
settlement_shaped_entries: [],
|
||
source_type_counts,
|
||
},
|
||
error: null,
|
||
})
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
import {
|
||
calculatePeriodDates,
|
||
formatPeriodLabel,
|
||
getVatDeclarationSummary,
|
||
calculateVatDeclaration,
|
||
} from '../vat-declaration'
|
||
import type { VatDeclaration } from '@/types'
|
||
|
||
let supabase: ReturnType<typeof makeClient>
|
||
|
||
beforeEach(() => {
|
||
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
||
resultIdx = 0
|
||
results = []
|
||
supabase = makeClient()
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
// Pure function tests: no mocks needed
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
|
||
describe('calculatePeriodDates', () => {
|
||
it('returns correct dates for monthly period', () => {
|
||
const { start, end } = calculatePeriodDates('monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
expect(start).toBe('2024-01-01')
|
||
expect(end).toBe('2024-01-31')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('returns correct dates for monthly period 12 (December)', () => {
|
||
const { start, end } = calculatePeriodDates('monthly', 2024, 12)
|
||
expect(start).toBe('2024-12-01')
|
||
expect(end).toBe('2024-12-31')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('returns correct dates for quarterly period', () => {
|
||
const q1 = calculatePeriodDates('quarterly', 2024, 1)
|
||
expect(q1.start).toBe('2024-01-01')
|
||
expect(q1.end).toBe('2024-03-31')
|
||
|
||
const q4 = calculatePeriodDates('quarterly', 2024, 4)
|
||
expect(q4.start).toBe('2024-10-01')
|
||
expect(q4.end).toBe('2024-12-31')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('returns full year for yearly period', () => {
|
||
const { start, end } = calculatePeriodDates('yearly', 2024, 1)
|
||
expect(start).toBe('2024-01-01')
|
||
expect(end).toBe('2024-12-31')
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
describe('formatPeriodLabel', () => {
|
||
it('formats monthly period', () => {
|
||
expect(formatPeriodLabel('monthly', 2024, 1)).toBe('Januari 2024')
|
||
expect(formatPeriodLabel('monthly', 2024, 6)).toBe('Juni 2024')
|
||
expect(formatPeriodLabel('monthly', 2024, 12)).toBe('December 2024')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('formats quarterly period', () => {
|
||
expect(formatPeriodLabel('quarterly', 2024, 3)).toBe('Kvartal 3 2024')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('formats yearly period', () => {
|
||
expect(formatPeriodLabel('yearly', 2024, 1)).toBe('Helår 2024')
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
describe('getVatDeclarationSummary', () => {
|
||
const emptyRc = { ruta20: 0, ruta21: 0, ruta22: 0, ruta23: 0, ruta24: 0, ruta30: 0, ruta31: 0, ruta32: 0 }
|
||
const zeroExtras = { ruta08: 0, ruta35: 0, ruta36: 0, ruta37: 0, ruta38: 0, ruta41: 0, ruta42: 0, ruta50: 0, ruta60: 0, ruta61: 0, ruta62: 0 }
|
||
|
||
it('calculates totals and detects payment', () => {
|
||
const declaration: VatDeclaration = {
|
||
period: { type: 'monthly', year: 2024, period: 1, start: '2024-01-01', end: '2024-01-31' },
|
||
rutor: {
|
||
ruta05: 10000, ruta06: 0, ruta07: 0,
|
||
ruta10: 2500, ruta11: 0, ruta12: 0,
|
||
ruta20: 0, ruta21: 0, ruta22: 0, ruta23: 0, ruta24: 0,
|
||
ruta30: 0, ruta31: 0, ruta32: 0,
|
||
ruta39: 0, ruta40: 0,
|
||
ruta48: 1000, ruta49: 1500,
|
||
...zeroExtras,
|
||
},
|
||
invoiceCount: 5,
|
||
transactionCount: 10,
|
||
breakdown: {
|
||
invoices: { ruta05: 10000, ruta06: 0, ruta07: 0, ruta10: 2500, ruta11: 0, ruta12: 0, ruta39: 0, ruta40: 0, base25: 10000, base12: 0, base6: 0 },
|
||
transactions: { ruta48: 1000 },
|
||
receipts: { ruta48: 0 },
|
||
reverseCharge: emptyRc,
|
||
},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
const summary = getVatDeclarationSummary(declaration)
|
||
expect(summary.totalOutputVat).toBe(2500)
|
||
expect(summary.totalInputVat).toBe(1000)
|
||
expect(summary.vatToPay).toBe(1500)
|
||
expect(summary.isRefund).toBe(false)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('identifies refund when ruta49 is negative', () => {
|
||
const declaration: VatDeclaration = {
|
||
period: { type: 'monthly', year: 2024, period: 1, start: '2024-01-01', end: '2024-01-31' },
|
||
rutor: {
|
||
ruta05: 2000, ruta06: 0, ruta07: 0,
|
||
ruta10: 500, ruta11: 0, ruta12: 0,
|
||
ruta20: 0, ruta21: 0, ruta22: 0, ruta23: 0, ruta24: 0,
|
||
ruta30: 0, ruta31: 0, ruta32: 0,
|
||
ruta39: 0, ruta40: 0,
|
||
ruta48: 3000, ruta49: -2500,
|
||
...zeroExtras,
|
||
},
|
||
invoiceCount: 1,
|
||
transactionCount: 20,
|
||
breakdown: {
|
||
invoices: { ruta05: 2000, ruta06: 0, ruta07: 0, ruta10: 500, ruta11: 0, ruta12: 0, ruta39: 0, ruta40: 0, base25: 2000, base12: 0, base6: 0 },
|
||
transactions: { ruta48: 3000 },
|
||
receipts: { ruta48: 0 },
|
||
reverseCharge: emptyRc,
|
||
},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
const summary = getVatDeclarationSummary(declaration)
|
||
expect(summary.isRefund).toBe(true)
|
||
expect(summary.vatToPay).toBe(-2500)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('includes ruta30-32 in totalOutputVat', () => {
|
||
const declaration: VatDeclaration = {
|
||
period: { type: 'monthly', year: 2024, period: 1, start: '2024-01-01', end: '2024-01-31' },
|
||
rutor: {
|
||
ruta05: 10000, ruta06: 0, ruta07: 0,
|
||
ruta10: 2500, ruta11: 0, ruta12: 0,
|
||
ruta20: 0, ruta21: 5000, ruta22: 0, ruta23: 0, ruta24: 0,
|
||
ruta30: 1250, ruta31: 0, ruta32: 0,
|
||
ruta39: 0, ruta40: 0,
|
||
ruta48: 2250, ruta49: 1500,
|
||
...zeroExtras,
|
||
},
|
||
invoiceCount: 2,
|
||
transactionCount: 0,
|
||
breakdown: {
|
||
invoices: { ruta05: 10000, ruta06: 0, ruta07: 0, ruta10: 2500, ruta11: 0, ruta12: 0, ruta39: 0, ruta40: 0, base25: 10000, base12: 0, base6: 0 },
|
||
transactions: { ruta48: 0 },
|
||
receipts: { ruta48: 0 },
|
||
reverseCharge: { ruta20: 0, ruta21: 5000, ruta22: 0, ruta23: 0, ruta24: 0, ruta30: 1250, ruta31: 0, ruta32: 0 },
|
||
},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
const summary = getVatDeclarationSummary(declaration)
|
||
// totalOutputVat = ruta10 + ruta30 = 2500 + 1250 = 3750
|
||
expect(summary.totalOutputVat).toBe(3750)
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
// Ledger-based VAT declaration tests
|
||
//
|
||
// The calculator makes ONE get_vat_declaration_totals RPC call per period
|
||
// (per-account totals + settlement-shaped entries + source_type counts in a
|
||
// single jsonb payload). Yearly periods with a fiscalPeriodId additionally
|
||
// look up fiscal_periods first. Settlement-shape exclusion (#984) lives in
|
||
// the RPC's SQL and is covered by the pg-real test
|
||
// (tests/pg/vat-declaration-totals-rpc.pg.test.ts).
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
|
||
describe('calculateVatDeclaration', () => {
|
||
it('returns all zeros when no ledger lines exist', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta11).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta12).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta30).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta31).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta32).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.invoiceCount).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.transactionCount).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('sums output VAT to ruta10/11/12 and revenue to ruta05', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger(
|
||
[
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2621', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 600 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2631', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 180 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 10000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3002', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 5000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3003', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 3000 },
|
||
],
|
||
['invoice_created', 'invoice_created'],
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(2500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta11).toBe(600)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta12).toBe(180)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(18000)
|
||
expect(result.breakdown.invoices.base25).toBe(10000)
|
||
expect(result.breakdown.invoices.base12).toBe(5000)
|
||
expect(result.breakdown.invoices.base6).toBe(3000)
|
||
expect(result.invoiceCount).toBe(2)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('sums input VAT from 2641 debit balance', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger(
|
||
[
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 250, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 120, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
],
|
||
['bank_transaction', 'bank_transaction'],
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(370)
|
||
expect(result.transactionCount).toBe(2)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('includes calculated input VAT (2645) from EU reverse charge in ruta48', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2645', debit_amount: 500, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 200, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(700)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('maps EU/export revenue to ruta39/ruta40', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3308', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 8000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3305', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 12000 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta39).toBe(8000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta40).toBe(12000)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('handles credit notes as net reduction on revenue/VAT accounts', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger(
|
||
[
|
||
// Invoice: C2611 2500, C3001 10000
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 10000 },
|
||
// Credit note reversal: D2611 625, D3001 2500
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 625, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 2500, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
],
|
||
['invoice_created', 'credit_note'],
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(1875)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(7500)
|
||
expect(result.invoiceCount).toBe(2)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('calculates ruta49 as output minus input VAT', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 10000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 350, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(2500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(10000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(350)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(2150) // 2500 - 350
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('detects refund when input VAT exceeds output VAT', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 3000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(-2500) // 500 - 3000
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('accepts accountingMethod parameter for backward compatibility', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1, 'cash')
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('throws a labelled error when the RPC fails', async () => {
|
||
results = [{ data: null, error: { message: 'permission denied' } }]
|
||
|
||
await expect(
|
||
calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1),
|
||
).rejects.toThrow('get_vat_declaration_totals failed: permission denied')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('handles all three VAT rates in a single period', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 10000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3002', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 5000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2621', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 600 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3003', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 3000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2631', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 180 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 1000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'quarterly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(2500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta11).toBe(600)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta12).toBe(180)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(18000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(1000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(2280)
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
// Reverse charge: purchase bases (ruta 20-24) sourced from cost accounts
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
|
||
describe('calculateVatDeclaration: reverse charge', () => {
|
||
it('maps 2614/2624/2634 credit balances to ruta30/31/32', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1250 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2624', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 120 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2634', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 60 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2645', debit_amount: 1430, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta30).toBe(1250)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta31).toBe(120)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta32).toBe(60)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(1430)
|
||
// ruta49 = (0+0+0 + 1250+120+60) - 1430 = 0
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('includes ruta30-32 in ruta49 formula', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 10000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 300, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2645', debit_amount: 500, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(2500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta30).toBe(500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(800)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(2200) // (2500 + 500) - 800
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('populates ruta20 from EU goods cost accounts (4515/4516/4517)', async () => {
|
||
// EU goods purchase: D 4515 25000, D 2645 6250, C 2614 6250, C 2440 25000
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '4515', debit_amount: 25000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 6250 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2645', debit_amount: 6250, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta20).toBe(25000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta21).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta30).toBe(6250)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(6250)
|
||
// Reverse charge is VAT-neutral: output VAT exactly offsets input VAT
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('populates ruta21 from EU services cost accounts (4535/4536/4537)', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '4535', debit_amount: 5000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1250 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2645', debit_amount: 1250, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta21).toBe(5000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta20).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta22).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta30).toBe(1250)
|
||
expect(result.breakdown.reverseCharge.ruta21).toBe(5000)
|
||
expect(result.breakdown.reverseCharge.ruta30).toBe(1250)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('populates ruta22 from non-EU services cost accounts (4531/4532/4533)', async () => {
|
||
// Anthropic-style: D 4531 3000, D 2645 750, C 2614 750, C 2440 3000
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '4531', debit_amount: 3000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 750 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2645', debit_amount: 750, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta22).toBe(3000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta21).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta20).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta30).toBe(750)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('populates ruta23 from domestic goods reverse-charge cost accounts (4415/4416/4417)', async () => {
|
||
// Domestic mobile reverse charge: D 4415 100000, D 2647 25000, C 2614 25000, C 2440 100000
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '4415', debit_amount: 100000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 25000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2647', debit_amount: 25000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta23).toBe(100000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta24).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta30).toBe(25000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(25000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(0) // VAT-neutral
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('populates ruta24 from domestic services reverse-charge cost accounts (4425/4426/4427)', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '4425', debit_amount: 8000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2647', debit_amount: 2000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta24).toBe(8000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta23).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta30).toBe(2000)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('returns zero ruta20-24 when no reverse-charge cost-account activity', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 10000 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta20).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta21).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta22).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta23).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta24).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('reverse-charge credit notes net out the cost-account debit balance', async () => {
|
||
// Original purchase: D 4535 5000; reversal (credit note): C 4535 1000
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '4535', debit_amount: 5000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '4535', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1250 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 250, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2645', debit_amount: 1250, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2645', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 250 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta21).toBe(4000) // 5000 - 1000
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta30).toBe(1000) // 1250 - 250
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(1000) // 1250 - 250
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('maps domestic reverse-charge input VAT (2647) to ruta48', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2647', debit_amount: 500, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta30).toBe(500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
// Import (ruta 50, 60-62) and Ruta 06 (uttag) and Ruta 42 (exempt)
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
|
||
describe('calculateVatDeclaration: import, uttag, exempt', () => {
|
||
it('maps import VAT accounts (2615/2625/2635) to ruta60/61/62', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2615', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2625', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 600 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2635', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 180 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 3280, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta60).toBe(2500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta61).toBe(600)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta62).toBe(180)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(0) // 3280 - 3280
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('populates ruta50 (import beskattningsunderlag) from 4545-4547', async () => {
|
||
// Full import flow: D 4545 10000, C 2615 2500, D 2641 2500
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '4545', debit_amount: 10000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2615', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 2500, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
// Ruta 50 (base) and Ruta 60 (output VAT) BOTH non-zero: required by SKV §4.1.1.4
|
||
// ERROR rule "Det måste finnas ett belopp i fält 50, eftersom det finns ett belopp i 60-62"
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta50).toBe(10000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta60).toBe(2500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(2500)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('populates ruta06 from uttag accounts (3401/3402/3403)', async () => {
|
||
// Uttag: D 2010 (private withdrawal); C 3401 1000 + C 2612 250 (25% rate uttag)
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3401', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2612', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 250 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta06).toBe(1000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(250) // 2612 maps to ruta10 (25% output VAT including uttag)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('expanded ruta42 covers 3004, 3100, 3404, 3994, 3980', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3004', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3100', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3404', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3980', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 3000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3994', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1500 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta42).toBe(8000) // 1000+2000+500+3000+1500
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('maps EU/export revenue variants (3108/3105) to ruta35/36', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3108', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 15000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3105', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 8000 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta35).toBe(15000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta36).toBe(8000)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('maps output VAT variant accounts (2612/2623/2636) to correct rutor', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2612', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1000 }, // egna uttag 25%
|
||
{ account_number: '2623', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 200 }, // uthyrning 12%
|
||
{ account_number: '2636', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 50 }, // VMB 6%
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(1000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta11).toBe(200)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta12).toBe(50)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('handles zero output VAT on some rates but non-zero on others', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger(
|
||
[
|
||
{ account_number: '2621', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 600 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3002', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 5000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 200, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
],
|
||
['invoice_created'],
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta11).toBe(600)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta12).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(200)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(400) // 600 - 200
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('rounds sub-öre amounts via Math.round * 100 / 100', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 0.001 },
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 0.004 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(0)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
// SKV §4.1.1.4 cross-field contract checks
|
||
//
|
||
// Skatteverket's kontrollera endpoint runs these checks server-side. Mirror
|
||
// them locally so we catch declaration drift in unit tests, before a network
|
||
// call. ERROR rules block submission; WARNING rules don't.
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
|
||
describe('SKV §4.1.1.4 cross-field contracts', () => {
|
||
it('ERROR: taxable sales base requires output VAT (rule 1)', async () => {
|
||
// SKV: if any of momspliktigForsaljning/momspliktigaUttag/vinstmarginal/hyresInkomst > 0,
|
||
// at least one of momsForsaljningUtgaende{Hog,Medel,Lag} must be > 0.
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 10000 },
|
||
// No 2611/2621/2631 booked: would trigger SKV ERROR
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
const r = result.rutor
|
||
|
||
const hasBase = r.ruta05 + r.ruta06 + r.ruta07 + r.ruta08 > 0
|
||
const hasOutput = r.ruta10 + r.ruta11 + r.ruta12 > 0
|
||
expect(hasBase).toBe(true)
|
||
expect(hasOutput).toBe(false)
|
||
// Local invariant: this combination would fail SKV kontrollera with ERROR.
|
||
// The calculator does not auto-correct: the ledger must be fixed upstream.
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('ERROR: reverse-charge purchase base requires output VAT (rule 3)', async () => {
|
||
// If any of inkopVarorEU/inkopTjansterEU/inkopTjansterUtanforEU/inkopVarorSE/inkopTjansterSE > 0,
|
||
// at least one of momsInkopUtgaende{Hog,Medel,Lag} must be > 0.
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '4535', debit_amount: 5000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
// No 2614/2624/2634 booked: would trigger SKV ERROR
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
const r = result.rutor
|
||
|
||
const hasRcBase = r.ruta20 + r.ruta21 + r.ruta22 + r.ruta23 + r.ruta24 > 0
|
||
const hasRcOutput = r.ruta30 + r.ruta31 + r.ruta32 > 0
|
||
expect(hasRcBase).toBe(true)
|
||
expect(hasRcOutput).toBe(false)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('ERROR: import base requires import output VAT (rule 5)', async () => {
|
||
// If import (ruta50) > 0, at least one of momsImportUtgaende{Hog,Medel,Lag} must be > 0.
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '4545', debit_amount: 10000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
// No 2615/2625/2635 booked: would trigger SKV ERROR
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
const r = result.rutor
|
||
|
||
expect(r.ruta50).toBe(10000)
|
||
expect(r.ruta60 + r.ruta61 + r.ruta62).toBe(0)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('ERROR: import output VAT requires import base (rule 6)', async () => {
|
||
// If any of momsImportUtgaende{Hog,Medel,Lag} > 0, import (ruta50) must be > 0.
|
||
// This is the BLOCKER scenario the Phase 1b refactor fixes: previously ruta50 was
|
||
// never populated, so any import VAT booking would fail SKV's contract.
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2615', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 2500, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '4545', debit_amount: 10000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
const r = result.rutor
|
||
|
||
// Both populated: passes SKV's rule 6
|
||
expect(r.ruta50).toBe(10000)
|
||
expect(r.ruta60).toBe(2500)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('ERROR: summaMoms must equal (ruta10+11+12+30+31+32+60+61+62) − ruta48 (rule 7)', async () => {
|
||
// The calculator computes ruta49 from the formula directly, so this invariant
|
||
// holds by construction. This test is the canary that catches drift if anyone
|
||
// ever adds an extra term or rate to the form.
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2621', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 600 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2631', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 180 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2614', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1250 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2615', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 1000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2645', debit_amount: 1250, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
const r = result.rutor
|
||
|
||
const expected = r.ruta10 + r.ruta11 + r.ruta12
|
||
+ r.ruta30 + r.ruta31 + r.ruta32
|
||
+ r.ruta60 + r.ruta61 + r.ruta62
|
||
- r.ruta48
|
||
expect(r.ruta49).toBe(expected)
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
// Parent/summary BAS accounts: 2610/2620/2630 (output),
|
||
// 2618/2628/2638 (vilande), 2640 (input parent).
|
||
//
|
||
// Users who post directly to the group account (manual entries, SIE imports,
|
||
// alternate templates) had their balances silently dropped before this fix
|
||
// because only the leaf accounts were mapped.
|
||
// ============================================================
|
||
|
||
describe('calculateVatDeclaration: parent/summary accounts', () => {
|
||
it('maps 2610 (parent) to ruta10 when posted directly', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 10000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2610', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 2500 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(10000)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(2500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(2500) // owed, not refund
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('maps 2620 (parent) to ruta11 and 2630 (parent) to ruta12', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2620', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 600 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2630', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 180 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta11).toBe(600)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta12).toBe(180)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('maps vilande output VAT (2618/2628/2638) to ruta10/11/12', async () => {
|
||
// Vilande accounts hold output VAT for invoices that have been sent but not
|
||
// yet paid, used by cash-method bookkeepers per BFNAR 2006:1.
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2618', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2628', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 120 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2638', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 60 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(500)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta11).toBe(120)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta12).toBe(60)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('sums parent and sub-account balances on the same ruta', async () => {
|
||
// If a ledger has activity on both the parent and the sub-accounts (mixed
|
||
// bookkeeping practice, SIE imports, etc.), the ruta reflects the literal
|
||
// ledger total: accounting truth wins.
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2610', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1000 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(1500)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('maps 2640 (input VAT parent) to ruta48', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '2640', debit_amount: 200, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2024, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(200)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(-200) // refund
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('reproduces the user-reported bug: 2610 balance now reaches ruta10', async () => {
|
||
// Customer screenshot scenario (simplified): 3001 + 2610 booked with the
|
||
// correct VAT amount on the parent account. Before the fix, ruta10 read 0
|
||
// and ruta49 incorrectly showed a refund.
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 21600 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2610', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 9768 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 7048.45, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(supabase, 'company-1', 'yearly', 2025, 1)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(21600)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(9768)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(7048.45)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta49).toBe(2719.55) // 9768 − 7048.45, owed (was −7048.45 pre-fix)
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
describe('calculateVatDeclaration: annual VAT spans the räkenskapsår', () => {
|
||
it('uses the fiscal period bounds for yearly when a fiscalPeriodId is given', async () => {
|
||
// Förlängt räkenskapsår (extended first year, 18 months): annual VAT
|
||
// (helårsmoms) must cover the whole period, not the calendar year that
|
||
// period_start falls in. The first queued result feeds the fiscal_periods
|
||
// lookup; seedLedger then queues the RPC payload.
|
||
results = [
|
||
{ data: { period_start: '2025-07-03', period_end: '2026-12-31' }, error: null },
|
||
]
|
||
seedLedger([
|
||
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 21600 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2610', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 9768 },
|
||
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 7048.45, credit_amount: 0 },
|
||
])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(
|
||
supabase, 'company-1', 'yearly', 2026, 1, 'accrual', { fiscalPeriodId: 'fp-1' },
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.period.start).toBe('2025-07-03')
|
||
expect(result.period.end).toBe('2026-12-31')
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta05).toBe(21600)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta10).toBe(9768)
|
||
expect(result.rutor.ruta48).toBe(7048.45)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('falls back to the calendar year when the fiscal period cannot be resolved', async () => {
|
||
results = [
|
||
{ data: null, error: null }, // fiscal_periods lookup → not found
|
||
]
|
||
seedLedger([])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(
|
||
supabase, 'company-1', 'yearly', 2026, 1, 'accrual', { fiscalPeriodId: 'missing' },
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.period.start).toBe('2026-01-01')
|
||
expect(result.period.end).toBe('2026-12-31')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('ignores fiscalPeriodId for monthly periods (calendar month, no lookup)', async () => {
|
||
seedLedger([])
|
||
|
||
const result = await calculateVatDeclaration(
|
||
supabase, 'company-1', 'monthly', 2026, 3, 'accrual', { fiscalPeriodId: 'fp-1' },
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
expect(result.period.start).toBe('2026-03-01')
|
||
expect(result.period.end).toBe('2026-03-31')
|
||
// The räkenskapsår path is yearly-only: monthly makes no table query at
|
||
// all, just the single totals RPC.
|
||
expect(supabase.from).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
expect(supabase.rpc).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
// #984 (settlement-shaped entries never zero the report) moved to
|
||
// tests/pg/vat-declaration-totals-rpc.pg.test.ts: the shape detection and
|
||
// exclusion now live inside the get_vat_declaration_totals RPC, so the
|
||
// behavior is verified against real Postgres rather than a mocked client.
|