Files
accounted/app/api/extensions/enable-banking/callback/__tests__/route.test.ts
T
21c63b8b12 fix(enable-banking): carry dedup scope and cash account across a no-IBAN uid change on reconnect (#1826)
Root cause (issue #1709 residual corner): on an in-place reconnect, the
callback carries each account's external_id dedup scope by matching prior
accounts by IBAN or uid. A no-IBAN account whose ASPSP minted a new uid
matched neither, so it got a fresh scope: every historical external_id
regenerated, Layer-1 dedup missed the re-import, and the whole history
came back as new unbooked rows. The cash_accounts mirror then could not
find the old row either and allocated an overflow 19xx slot plus a NEW
row, which also blocked the content-dedup bridge's account guard.

Fix: pair such accounts by elimination, only when unambiguous (per
currency, exactly one unclaimed prior and exactly one fresh-scope new
account, neither with an IBAN): carry the prior scope and enabled flag,
and reuse the connection's own old cash_accounts row via the existing
explicit reuse_cash_account_id promote path in upsertFromPsd2, so the
row id, ledger, and transaction links survive the uid change. Any
ambiguity keeps the previous fresh-scope behavior. Also count
account-incompatible same-feed orphaned ids in the scope-drift shadow
(log-only) so fleet validation can see this incident class.

IBAN-carrying accounts were already fixed by #1705/#1728; the frozen
external_id format is untouched.


Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SyDuePXxUFowaPBKpAv8SF

Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <311770904+jakobwennberg-oss@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-24 13:11:13 +02:00

1221 lines
48 KiB
TypeScript
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
// Mock dependencies: factory must not reference outer variables
const mockCreateSession = vi.fn()
const mockGetAccountBalance = vi.fn()
vi.mock('@/extensions/general/enable-banking/lib/api-client', () => ({
createSession: (...args: unknown[]) => mockCreateSession(...args),
getAccountBalance: (...args: unknown[]) => mockGetAccountBalance(...args),
}))
// Use hoisted to safely create mock objects referenced in vi.mock factories
const { mockFrom, mockUpsertFromPsd2, mockAllocate, mockSupersede } = vi.hoisted(() => {
const mockFrom = vi.fn()
const mockUpsertFromPsd2 = vi.fn()
const mockAllocate = vi.fn()
const mockSupersede = vi.fn()
return { mockFrom, mockUpsertFromPsd2, mockAllocate, mockSupersede }
})
// The supersede pass has its own unit tests (extensions/general/enable-banking/
// __tests__/supersede.test.ts); here it is mocked so these tests assert the
// callback WIRES it correctly without scripting its internal queries.
vi.mock('@/extensions/general/enable-banking/lib/supersede', () => ({
supersedeSiblingConnections: (...args: unknown[]) => mockSupersede(...args),
}))
vi.mock('@/lib/supabase/server', () => ({
createServiceClient: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
from: mockFrom,
}),
}))
const CURRENCY_DEFAULTS: Record<string, string> = {
SEK: '1930',
EUR: '1932',
USD: '1933',
GBP: '1934',
}
vi.mock('@/lib/cash-accounts/service', () => ({
upsertFromPsd2: (...args: unknown[]) => mockUpsertFromPsd2(...args),
// The route resolves ledgers through resolvePsd2LedgerAccount (IBAN match
// first, allocation second). mockAllocate remains the allocation stand-in;
// the wrapper puts its answer in the resolver's envelope so the existing
// "did we allocate?" assertions keep their meaning. Tests that exercise the
// IBAN path override resolvePsd2LedgerAccount's outcome via mockAllocate's
// own implementation.
resolvePsd2LedgerAccount: async (...args: unknown[]) => {
const ledgerAccount = await mockAllocate(...args)
if (!ledgerAccount) return null
if (typeof ledgerAccount === 'object') return ledgerAccount
return { ledgerAccount, reuseCashAccountId: null, source: 'allocated' }
},
defaultLedgerForCurrency: (currency: string) =>
CURRENCY_DEFAULTS[currency.toUpperCase()] ?? '1930',
// Real (trivial) implementation: the route normalizes IBANs when stamping
// dedup scopes onto accounts_data.
normalizeIban: (iban?: string | null) => {
if (!iban) return null
const normalized = iban.replace(/\s+/g, '').toUpperCase()
return normalized || null
},
}))
vi.stubEnv('NEXT_PUBLIC_APP_URL', 'http://localhost:3000')
import { GET } from '../route'
function makeRequest(params: Record<string, string>) {
const url = new URL('http://localhost:3000/api/extensions/enable-banking/callback')
for (const [k, v] of Object.entries(params)) {
url.searchParams.set(k, v)
}
return new Request(url.toString())
}
function mockChain(result: { data?: unknown; error?: unknown }) {
const chain: Record<string, unknown> = {}
for (const m of ['select', 'eq', 'in', 'is', 'single', 'update', 'delete', 'order', 'limit']) {
chain[m] = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
}
chain.single = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ data: result.data ?? null, error: result.error ?? null })
// For chains ending without .single()
chain.then = (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) => resolve({ data: result.data ?? null, error: result.error ?? null })
return chain
}
describe('GET /api/extensions/enable-banking/callback', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
mockUpsertFromPsd2.mockResolvedValue(undefined)
mockSupersede.mockResolvedValue({ supersededIds: [], dedupScopeByIban: new Map() })
// Allocator stand-in mirroring the real behavior: currency default first,
// then the next free 19311959 slot (skipping other currency defaults).
mockAllocate.mockImplementation(
async (
_supabase: unknown,
_companyId: unknown,
_userId: unknown,
input: { currency: string; exclude?: ReadonlySet<string> },
) => {
const preferred = CURRENCY_DEFAULTS[input.currency.toUpperCase()] ?? '1930'
const exclude = input.exclude ?? new Set<string>()
if (!exclude.has(preferred)) return preferred
const reserved = new Set(Object.values(CURRENCY_DEFAULTS))
for (let n = 1931; n <= 1959; n++) {
const candidate = String(n)
if (!reserved.has(candidate) && !exclude.has(candidate)) return candidate
}
return null
},
)
})
it('rejects when state does not match any pending connection', async () => {
mockFrom.mockImplementation(() =>
mockChain({ data: null, error: { message: 'not found' } })
)
const response = await GET(makeRequest({ code: 'auth-code', state: 'unknown-state' }))
expect(response.status).toBe(307)
const location = response.headers.get('location') || ''
expect(location).toContain('/settings/banking?')
expect(location).toContain('bank_error=invalid_state')
})
it('writes pending_selection and streams a finalizing page that redirects to the picker', async () => {
const capturedUpdates: Record<string, unknown>[] = []
let callIndex = 0
mockFrom.mockImplementation(() => {
callIndex++
if (callIndex === 1) {
// Find pending connection by oauth_state
return mockChain({
data: { id: 'conn-1', user_id: 'user-1', company_id: 'company-1', bank_name: 'TestBank', status: 'pending' },
error: null,
})
}
// Update connection: capture the payload, then chain returns the
// updated row via .select().single() for the audit event emission.
const chain: Record<string, unknown> = {}
chain.update = vi.fn((payload: Record<string, unknown>) => {
capturedUpdates.push(payload)
return chain
})
chain.eq = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.select = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.single = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
data: {
id: 'conn-1',
bank_name: 'TestBank',
company_id: 'company-1',
user_id: 'user-1',
},
error: null,
})
// Back-compat fallthrough for chains that aren't terminated by .single()
chain.then = (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) => resolve({ data: null, error: null })
return chain
})
mockCreateSession.mockResolvedValue({
session_id: 'sess-1',
accounts: [
{ uid: 'acc-1', account_id: { iban: 'SE1234' }, name: 'Företagskonto', currency: 'SEK' },
{ uid: 'acc-2', account_id: { iban: 'SE5678' }, name: 'Privatkonto', currency: 'SEK' },
],
access: { valid_until: '2024-12-31T00:00:00Z' },
aspsp: { name: 'TestBank', country: 'SE' },
})
mockGetAccountBalance.mockRejectedValue(new Error('skip balance fetch'))
const response = await GET(makeRequest({ code: 'auth-code', state: 'valid-state' }))
// Success streams an interim page (instant feedback during the session
// exchange) that ends with a client-side redirect to the account picker.
expect(response.status).toBe(200)
expect(response.headers.get('content-type')).toContain('text/html')
expect(response.headers.get('cache-control')).toBe('no-store')
const body = await response.text()
// Shell flushed with the bank name, then the redirect to the picker.
expect(body).toContain('TestBank')
expect(body).toContain('window.location.replace')
expect(body).toContain('select_accounts=conn-1')
expect(body).not.toContain('bank_error')
// ASVS V3.3: inline scripts are nonce-bound. The response-level CSP
// declares the nonce and BOTH chunks (shell watchdog + redirect) carry
// it; no un-nonced inline script may exist on this page.
const csp = response.headers.get('content-security-policy') ?? ''
const nonceMatch = /script-src 'nonce-([^']+)'/.exec(csp)
expect(nonceMatch).not.toBeNull()
const nonce = nonceMatch![1]
expect(body.split(`<script nonce="${nonce}">`).length - 1).toBe(2)
expect(body).not.toContain('<script>')
// Verify the update payload: status=pending_selection, no last_synced_at,
// and every account defaults to enabled=true so the picker can simply
// mirror current state without back-filling.
// Two updates: the connection write, then the accounts_data follow-up
// persisting the allocated ledgers.
expect(capturedUpdates).toHaveLength(2)
const payload = capturedUpdates[0]
expect(payload.status).toBe('pending_selection')
expect(payload).not.toHaveProperty('last_synced_at')
const accountsData = payload.accounts_data as Array<{ uid: string; enabled: boolean }>
expect(accountsData).toHaveLength(2)
expect(accountsData.every(a => a.enabled === true)).toBe(true)
// Two same-currency accounts must NOT collide on the same BAS slot — the
// second SEK account gets the next free 19xx sub-account, and the
// assignment is persisted to accounts_data for the picker to pre-fill.
const persisted = capturedUpdates[1].accounts_data as Array<{
uid: string
ledger_account?: string
}>
expect(persisted.find(a => a.uid === 'acc-1')?.ledger_account).toBe('1930')
expect(persisted.find(a => a.uid === 'acc-2')?.ledger_account).toBe('1931')
// The mirror wrote the same distinct assignments into cash_accounts.
expect(mockUpsertFromPsd2).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2)
const mirrorLedgers = mockUpsertFromPsd2.mock.calls.map(
(c) => (c[2] as { ledger_account: string }).ledger_account,
)
expect(mirrorLedgers).toEqual(['1930', '1931'])
})
it('preserves existing mirrored ledgers on reconnect instead of re-deriving them', async () => {
let callIndex = 0
mockFrom.mockImplementation((table: string) => {
callIndex++
if (callIndex === 1) {
return mockChain({
data: { id: 'conn-1', user_id: 'user-1', company_id: 'company-1', bank_name: 'TestBank', status: 'expired' },
error: null,
})
}
if (table === 'cash_accounts') {
// Already mirrored on a previous connect — acc-1 was remapped to 1935
// by the user; a reconnect must not clobber it back to 1930.
return mockChain({
data: [{ external_uid: 'acc-1', ledger_account: '1935' }],
error: null,
})
}
const chain: Record<string, unknown> = {}
chain.update = vi.fn(() => chain)
chain.eq = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.select = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.single = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
data: { id: 'conn-1', bank_name: 'TestBank', company_id: 'company-1', user_id: 'user-1' },
error: null,
})
chain.then = (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) => resolve({ data: null, error: null })
return chain
})
mockCreateSession.mockResolvedValue({
session_id: 'sess-2',
accounts: [
{ uid: 'acc-1', account_id: { iban: 'SE1234' }, name: 'Företagskonto', currency: 'SEK' },
],
access: { valid_until: '2024-12-31T00:00:00Z' },
aspsp: { name: 'TestBank', country: 'SE' },
})
const response = await GET(makeRequest({ code: 'auth-code', state: 'valid-state' }))
expect(response.status).toBe(200)
const body = await response.text()
expect(body).toContain('select_accounts=conn-1')
// No allocation for an already-mirrored account; the upsert reuses 1935.
expect(mockAllocate).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(mockUpsertFromPsd2).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
expect(
(mockUpsertFromPsd2.mock.calls[0][2] as { ledger_account: string }).ledger_account,
).toBe('1935')
})
it('reuses the mapping of a known IBAN when the bank returns a new account uid', async () => {
// The reconnect case behind the reported bug: the ASPSP minted a fresh
// account uid, so the (connection, uid) lookup finds nothing and the old
// behavior allocated an overflow slot, silently moving the user's 1930
// mapping. Matching on IBAN has to bring both the ledger and the existing
// row along.
mockFrom.mockImplementation((table: string) => {
if (table === 'cash_accounts') {
// Nothing mirrored under the NEW uid.
return mockChain({ data: [], error: null })
}
const chain: Record<string, unknown> = {}
chain.update = vi.fn(() => chain)
chain.eq = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.select = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.in = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.single = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
data: {
id: 'conn-1',
bank_name: 'TestBank',
company_id: 'company-1',
user_id: 'user-1',
status: 'expired',
},
error: null,
})
chain.then = (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) => resolve({ data: null, error: null })
return chain
})
mockAllocate.mockResolvedValue({
ledgerAccount: '1930',
reuseCashAccountId: 'cash-row-1',
source: 'iban',
})
mockCreateSession.mockResolvedValue({
session_id: 'sess-2',
accounts: [
{ uid: 'acc-new', account_id: { iban: 'SE1234' }, name: 'Företagskonto', currency: 'SEK' },
],
access: { valid_until: '2024-12-31T00:00:00Z' },
aspsp: { name: 'TestBank', country: 'SE' },
})
const response = await GET(makeRequest({ code: 'auth-code', state: 'valid-state' }))
expect(response.status).toBe(200)
// Reading the body drives the stream, which is what awaits the finalize
// work the assertions below inspect.
await response.text()
expect(mockUpsertFromPsd2).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
const mirrored = mockUpsertFromPsd2.mock.calls[0][2] as {
ledger_account: string
reuse_cash_account_id: string | null
external_uid: string
}
expect(mirrored.ledger_account).toBe('1930')
// The existing row is promoted, not duplicated: it keeps its linked
// transactions and picks up the new uid.
expect(mirrored.reuse_cash_account_id).toBe('cash-row-1')
expect(mirrored.external_uid).toBe('acc-new')
})
it('does not let a stale-uid mirrored row block the IBAN reuse of its own ledger on renewal', async () => {
// In-place renewal ("Förnya") of a connection whose ASPSP mints new uids
// on every re-auth. The connection already mirrors 1930/1940 under the OLD
// uids. Those ledgers must NOT be pre-seeded into the resolver's exclude
// set: the IBAN match on the stale row is the mapping to promote, and
// excluding it made every renewal allocate a fresh 19xx sub-account.
let callIndex = 0
mockFrom.mockImplementation((table: string) => {
callIndex++
if (callIndex === 1) {
return mockChain({
data: {
id: 'conn-1', user_id: 'user-1', company_id: 'company-1', bank_name: 'SEB', status: 'expired',
accounts_data: [
{ uid: 'acc-old-1', iban: 'SE1234', name: 'Företagskonto', currency: 'SEK', enabled: true },
{ uid: 'acc-old-2', iban: 'SE5678', name: 'Sparkonto', currency: 'SEK', enabled: true },
],
},
error: null,
})
}
if (table === 'cash_accounts') {
return mockChain({
data: [
{ external_uid: 'acc-old-1', ledger_account: '1930' },
{ external_uid: 'acc-old-2', ledger_account: '1940' },
],
error: null,
})
}
const chain: Record<string, unknown> = {}
chain.update = vi.fn(() => chain)
chain.eq = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.select = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.in = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.single = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
data: { id: 'conn-1', bank_name: 'SEB', company_id: 'company-1', user_id: 'user-1', status: 'expired' },
error: null,
})
chain.then = (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) => resolve({ data: null, error: null })
return chain
})
// Resolver stand-in: answer the IBAN hit only when the caller did NOT
// exclude that ledger (mirrors resolvePsd2LedgerAccount's guard), else
// fall back to the allocator.
const ibanLedgers: Record<string, { ledger: string; rowId: string }> = {
SE1234: { ledger: '1930', rowId: 'row-1' },
SE5678: { ledger: '1940', rowId: 'row-2' },
}
const seenExcludes: string[][] = []
mockAllocate.mockImplementation(
async (_s: unknown, _c: unknown, _u: unknown, input: { iban?: string; currency: string; exclude?: ReadonlySet<string> }) => {
const exclude = input.exclude ?? new Set<string>()
seenExcludes.push([...exclude].sort())
const hit = input.iban ? ibanLedgers[input.iban] : undefined
if (hit && !exclude.has(hit.ledger)) {
return { ledgerAccount: hit.ledger, reuseCashAccountId: hit.rowId, source: 'iban' }
}
for (let n = 1931; n <= 1959; n++) {
const candidate = String(n)
if (!exclude.has(candidate) && !['1932', '1933', '1934'].includes(candidate)) return candidate
}
return null
},
)
mockCreateSession.mockResolvedValue({
session_id: 'sess-3',
accounts: [
{ uid: 'acc-new-1', account_id: { iban: 'SE1234' }, name: 'Företagskonto', currency: 'SEK' },
{ uid: 'acc-new-2', account_id: { iban: 'SE5678' }, name: 'Sparkonto', currency: 'SEK' },
],
access: { valid_until: '2024-12-31T00:00:00Z' },
aspsp: { name: 'SEB', country: 'SE' },
})
const response = await GET(makeRequest({ code: 'auth-code', state: 'valid-state' }))
expect(response.status).toBe(200)
await response.text()
// The first resolver call saw no pre-seeded excludes (no new-session uid
// matched a mirrored row), the second saw only the ledger just claimed.
expect(seenExcludes).toEqual([[], ['1930']])
// Both accounts land back on their own ledgers and promote their rows.
const mirrored = mockUpsertFromPsd2.mock.calls.map(
(c) => c[2] as { ledger_account: string; reuse_cash_account_id: string | null; external_uid: string },
)
expect(mirrored.map((m) => [m.external_uid, m.ledger_account, m.reuse_cash_account_id])).toEqual([
['acc-new-1', '1930', 'row-1'],
['acc-new-2', '1940', 'row-2'],
])
})
it('keeps a previously deselected account deselected on renewal, by IBAN or uid', async () => {
// "SEB Credit" was set to "Synkas ej" (enabled:false) in the old
// connection. On renewal it comes back under a NEW uid (same IBAN) and a
// no-IBAN card comes back under the SAME uid. Both must stay deselected;
// only the genuinely new account defaults to enabled.
const capturedUpdates: Record<string, unknown>[] = []
let callIndex = 0
mockFrom.mockImplementation((table: string) => {
callIndex++
if (callIndex === 1) {
return mockChain({
data: {
id: 'conn-1', user_id: 'user-1', company_id: 'company-1', bank_name: 'SEB', status: 'expired',
accounts_data: [
{ uid: 'acc-old-1', iban: 'SE1234', name: 'Företagskonto', currency: 'SEK', enabled: true },
{ uid: 'card-old', iban: 'SE9999', name: 'SEB Credit', currency: 'SEK', enabled: false },
{ uid: 'card-noiban', name: 'Privatkort', currency: 'SEK', enabled: false },
// Same IBAN listed twice (one resource per balance type): the
// user unticked the duplicate and kept the main one. Exact uid
// identity must win over the IBAN fallback in both directions.
{ uid: 'dup-resource', iban: 'SE7777', name: 'Lönekonto (saldo)', currency: 'SEK', enabled: false },
{ uid: 'main-resource', iban: 'SE7777', name: 'Lönekonto', currency: 'SEK', enabled: true },
],
},
error: null,
})
}
if (table === 'cash_accounts') return mockChain({ data: [], error: null })
const chain: Record<string, unknown> = {}
chain.update = vi.fn((payload: Record<string, unknown>) => {
capturedUpdates.push(payload)
return chain
})
chain.eq = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.select = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.in = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.single = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
data: { id: 'conn-1', bank_name: 'SEB', company_id: 'company-1', user_id: 'user-1', status: 'expired' },
error: null,
})
chain.then = (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) => resolve({ data: null, error: null })
return chain
})
mockCreateSession.mockResolvedValue({
session_id: 'sess-4',
accounts: [
{ uid: 'acc-new-1', account_id: { iban: 'SE1234' }, name: 'Företagskonto', currency: 'SEK' },
{ uid: 'card-new', account_id: { iban: 'SE 9999' }, name: 'SEB Credit', currency: 'SEK' },
{ uid: 'card-noiban', name: 'Privatkort', currency: 'SEK' },
{ uid: 'acc-brand-new', account_id: { iban: 'SE4444' }, name: 'Nytt konto', currency: 'SEK' },
{ uid: 'dup-resource', account_id: { iban: 'SE7777' }, name: 'Lönekonto (saldo)', currency: 'SEK' },
{ uid: 'main-resource', account_id: { iban: 'SE7777' }, name: 'Lönekonto', currency: 'SEK' },
],
access: { valid_until: '2024-12-31T00:00:00Z' },
aspsp: { name: 'SEB', country: 'SE' },
})
const response = await GET(makeRequest({ code: 'auth-code', state: 'valid-state' }))
expect(response.status).toBe(200)
await response.text()
const accountsData = capturedUpdates[0].accounts_data as Array<{ uid: string; enabled: boolean }>
expect(Object.fromEntries(accountsData.map((a) => [a.uid, a.enabled]))).toEqual({
'acc-new-1': true,
'card-new': false,
'card-noiban': false,
'acc-brand-new': true,
'dup-resource': false,
'main-resource': true,
})
// The mirror carries the same flag, so cash_accounts.enabled is not
// flipped back to true by the renewal.
const mirroredEnabled = Object.fromEntries(
mockUpsertFromPsd2.mock.calls.map((c) => {
const input = c[2] as { external_uid: string; enabled: boolean }
return [input.external_uid, input.enabled]
}),
)
expect(mirroredEnabled).toEqual({
'acc-new-1': true,
'card-new': false,
'card-noiban': false,
'acc-brand-new': true,
'dup-resource': false,
'main-resource': true,
})
})
it('runs the same-bank supersede pass with the new session, accounts, and connection identity', async () => {
// Fresh connect while an EXPIRED sibling to the same bank exists: the
// supersede pass (unit-tested separately) must be handed everything it
// needs to park the sibling and re-point its transactions.
let callIndex = 0
mockFrom.mockImplementation(() => {
callIndex++
if (callIndex === 1) {
return mockChain({
data: { id: 'conn-1', user_id: 'user-1', company_id: 'company-1', bank_name: 'TestBank', status: 'pending' },
error: null,
})
}
const chain: Record<string, unknown> = {}
chain.update = vi.fn(() => chain)
chain.eq = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.select = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.single = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
data: { id: 'conn-1', bank_name: 'TestBank', company_id: 'company-1', user_id: 'user-1' },
error: null,
})
chain.then = (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) => resolve({ data: null, error: null })
return chain
})
mockCreateSession.mockResolvedValue({
session_id: 'sess-1',
accounts: [
{ uid: 'acc-1', account_id: { iban: 'SE1234' }, name: 'Företagskonto', currency: 'SEK' },
],
access: { valid_until: '2024-12-31T00:00:00Z' },
aspsp: { name: 'TestBank', country: 'SE' },
})
const response = await GET(makeRequest({ code: 'auth-code', state: 'valid-state' }))
expect(response.status).toBe(200)
// Reading the body drives the stream, which awaits the finalize work.
await response.text()
expect(mockSupersede).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
const [, input] = mockSupersede.mock.calls[0] as [unknown, {
companyId: string
userId: string
newConnectionId: string
bankName: string | null
newSessionId: string | null
newAccounts: Array<{ uid: string; dedup_scope?: string }>
}]
expect(input.companyId).toBe('company-1')
expect(input.userId).toBe('user-1')
expect(input.newConnectionId).toBe('conn-1')
expect(input.bankName).toBe('TestBank')
expect(input.newSessionId).toBe('sess-1')
expect(input.newAccounts).toHaveLength(1)
// First-connect accounts get their dedup scope pinned to the normalized
// IBAN (byte-identical to what lib/sync.ts derives).
expect(input.newAccounts[0].dedup_scope).toBe('SE1234')
})
it('applies dedup scopes carried from superseded siblings to accounts_data', async () => {
mockSupersede.mockResolvedValue({
supersededIds: ['old-1'],
// The sibling's account was first ingested under its old provider uid.
dedupScopeByIban: new Map([['SE1234', 'legacy-uid']]),
})
const capturedUpdates: Record<string, unknown>[] = []
let callIndex = 0
mockFrom.mockImplementation(() => {
callIndex++
if (callIndex === 1) {
return mockChain({
data: { id: 'conn-1', user_id: 'user-1', company_id: 'company-1', bank_name: 'TestBank', status: 'pending' },
error: null,
})
}
const chain: Record<string, unknown> = {}
chain.update = vi.fn((payload: Record<string, unknown>) => {
capturedUpdates.push(payload)
return chain
})
chain.eq = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.select = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.single = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
data: { id: 'conn-1', bank_name: 'TestBank', company_id: 'company-1', user_id: 'user-1' },
error: null,
})
chain.then = (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) => resolve({ data: null, error: null })
return chain
})
mockCreateSession.mockResolvedValue({
session_id: 'sess-1',
accounts: [
{ uid: 'acc-1', account_id: { iban: 'SE1234' }, name: 'Företagskonto', currency: 'SEK' },
],
access: { valid_until: '2024-12-31T00:00:00Z' },
aspsp: { name: 'TestBank', country: 'SE' },
})
const response = await GET(makeRequest({ code: 'auth-code', state: 'valid-state' }))
expect(response.status).toBe(200)
await response.text()
// The follow-up accounts_data write persists the carried scope so the
// renewal keeps minting the sibling's external_ids.
const followUp = capturedUpdates[capturedUpdates.length - 1]
const persisted = followUp.accounts_data as Array<{ uid: string; dedup_scope?: string }>
expect(persisted.find((a) => a.uid === 'acc-1')?.dedup_scope).toBe('legacy-uid')
})
it('carries the prior accounts_data dedup scope across an in-place reconnect', async () => {
const capturedUpdates: Record<string, unknown>[] = []
let callIndex = 0
mockFrom.mockImplementation(() => {
callIndex++
if (callIndex === 1) {
// The established row being reconnected in place: its account was
// first ingested under the uid the ASPSP has since replaced.
return mockChain({
data: {
id: 'conn-1',
user_id: 'user-1',
company_id: 'company-1',
bank_name: 'TestBank',
status: 'expired',
session_id: null,
accounts_data: [
{ uid: 'uid-old', iban: 'SE1234', currency: 'SEK', dedup_scope: 'uid-first' },
],
},
error: null,
})
}
const chain: Record<string, unknown> = {}
chain.update = vi.fn((payload: Record<string, unknown>) => {
capturedUpdates.push(payload)
return chain
})
chain.eq = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.select = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.single = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
data: { id: 'conn-1', bank_name: 'TestBank', company_id: 'company-1', user_id: 'user-1' },
error: null,
})
chain.then = (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) => resolve({ data: null, error: null })
return chain
})
mockCreateSession.mockResolvedValue({
session_id: 'sess-2',
accounts: [
// Same IBAN, freshly minted uid.
{ uid: 'uid-new', account_id: { iban: 'SE1234' }, name: 'Företagskonto', currency: 'SEK' },
],
access: { valid_until: '2024-12-31T00:00:00Z' },
aspsp: { name: 'TestBank', country: 'SE' },
})
const response = await GET(makeRequest({ code: 'auth-code', state: 'valid-state' }))
expect(response.status).toBe(200)
await response.text()
const connectionWrite = capturedUpdates[0]
const accountsData = connectionWrite.accounts_data as Array<{
uid: string
dedup_scope?: string
}>
expect(accountsData).toHaveLength(1)
expect(accountsData[0].uid).toBe('uid-new')
// The scope pinned at first ingest survives the uid change.
expect(accountsData[0].dedup_scope).toBe('uid-first')
})
it('pairs a no-IBAN account across a uid change: carries the scope and reuses the cash account row', async () => {
// Issue #1709: an in-place reconnect where the ASPSP minted a NEW uid for
// an account WITHOUT an IBAN. Neither the IBAN nor the uid map can match,
// so before the pairing fallback the scope regenerated (full history
// re-imported unbooked) and the mirror allocated a fresh 19xx slot + a new
// cash_accounts row. With exactly one unclaimed prior and one fresh new
// account in the currency, the pairing must carry the scope, the enabled
// flag, the old ledger, and promote the old row in place.
const capturedUpdates: Record<string, unknown>[] = []
let callIndex = 0
mockFrom.mockImplementation((table: string) => {
callIndex++
if (callIndex === 1) {
return mockChain({
data: {
id: 'conn-1',
user_id: 'user-1',
company_id: 'company-1',
bank_name: 'TestBank',
status: 'expired',
session_id: null,
accounts_data: [
{ uid: 'uid-old', name: 'Sparkonto', currency: 'SEK', dedup_scope: 'scope-first', enabled: false },
],
},
error: null,
})
}
if (table === 'cash_accounts') {
return mockChain({
data: [{ id: 'row-old', external_uid: 'uid-old', ledger_account: '1935' }],
error: null,
})
}
const chain: Record<string, unknown> = {}
chain.update = vi.fn((payload: Record<string, unknown>) => {
capturedUpdates.push(payload)
return chain
})
chain.eq = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.select = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.in = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.single = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
data: { id: 'conn-1', bank_name: 'TestBank', company_id: 'company-1', user_id: 'user-1' },
error: null,
})
chain.then = (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) => resolve({ data: null, error: null })
return chain
})
mockCreateSession.mockResolvedValue({
session_id: 'sess-2',
accounts: [
// Same account, no IBAN, freshly minted uid.
{ uid: 'uid-new', name: 'Sparkonto', currency: 'SEK' },
],
access: { valid_until: '2024-12-31T00:00:00Z' },
aspsp: { name: 'TestBank', country: 'SE' },
})
const response = await GET(makeRequest({ code: 'auth-code', state: 'valid-state' }))
expect(response.status).toBe(200)
await response.text()
// The scope pinned at first ingest survives the uid change, so every
// historical external_id keeps minting byte-identically and Layer-1 dedup
// swallows the re-import. The user's "Synkas ej" choice travels too.
const accountsData = capturedUpdates[0].accounts_data as Array<{
uid: string
dedup_scope?: string
enabled?: boolean
}>
expect(accountsData).toHaveLength(1)
expect(accountsData[0].uid).toBe('uid-new')
expect(accountsData[0].dedup_scope).toBe('scope-first')
expect(accountsData[0].enabled).toBe(false)
// The mirror reuses the connection's own old row instead of allocating a
// new slot: same ledger, promoted in place under the new uid.
expect(mockAllocate).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(mockUpsertFromPsd2).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
const mirrored = mockUpsertFromPsd2.mock.calls[0][2] as {
external_uid: string
ledger_account: string
reuse_cash_account_id: string | null
enabled: boolean
}
expect(mirrored.external_uid).toBe('uid-new')
expect(mirrored.ledger_account).toBe('1935')
expect(mirrored.reuse_cash_account_id).toBe('row-old')
expect(mirrored.enabled).toBe(false)
})
it('keeps fresh scopes when the no-IBAN pairing is ambiguous', async () => {
// Two unclaimed no-IBAN prior accounts and two fresh new uids in the same
// currency: any pairing would be a guess, so none is made. Both new
// accounts keep the pre-fix behavior: scope = own uid, freshly resolved
// ledger, no row reuse.
const capturedUpdates: Record<string, unknown>[] = []
let callIndex = 0
mockFrom.mockImplementation((table: string) => {
callIndex++
if (callIndex === 1) {
return mockChain({
data: {
id: 'conn-1',
user_id: 'user-1',
company_id: 'company-1',
bank_name: 'TestBank',
status: 'expired',
session_id: null,
accounts_data: [
{ uid: 'old-1', name: 'Konto A', currency: 'SEK', dedup_scope: 'scope-a', enabled: true },
{ uid: 'old-2', name: 'Konto B', currency: 'SEK', dedup_scope: 'scope-b', enabled: true },
],
},
error: null,
})
}
if (table === 'cash_accounts') {
return mockChain({
data: [
{ id: 'row-1', external_uid: 'old-1', ledger_account: '1930' },
{ id: 'row-2', external_uid: 'old-2', ledger_account: '1940' },
],
error: null,
})
}
const chain: Record<string, unknown> = {}
chain.update = vi.fn((payload: Record<string, unknown>) => {
capturedUpdates.push(payload)
return chain
})
chain.eq = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.select = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.in = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.single = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
data: { id: 'conn-1', bank_name: 'TestBank', company_id: 'company-1', user_id: 'user-1' },
error: null,
})
chain.then = (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) => resolve({ data: null, error: null })
return chain
})
mockCreateSession.mockResolvedValue({
session_id: 'sess-2',
accounts: [
{ uid: 'new-1', name: 'Konto A', currency: 'SEK' },
{ uid: 'new-2', name: 'Konto B', currency: 'SEK' },
],
access: { valid_until: '2024-12-31T00:00:00Z' },
aspsp: { name: 'TestBank', country: 'SE' },
})
const response = await GET(makeRequest({ code: 'auth-code', state: 'valid-state' }))
expect(response.status).toBe(200)
await response.text()
const accountsData = capturedUpdates[0].accounts_data as Array<{
uid: string
dedup_scope?: string
}>
expect(Object.fromEntries(accountsData.map((a) => [a.uid, a.dedup_scope]))).toEqual({
'new-1': 'new-1',
'new-2': 'new-2',
})
expect(mockAllocate).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2)
for (const call of mockUpsertFromPsd2.mock.calls) {
expect((call[2] as { reuse_cash_account_id: string | null }).reuse_cash_account_id).toBeNull()
}
})
it('does not pair when the unclaimed prior account carries an IBAN', async () => {
// Exactly one unclaimed prior and one fresh new account, but the prior has
// an IBAN: the bank dropping an IBAN it used to report is not the no-IBAN
// uid-mint pattern, so the elimination pairing must stand down.
const capturedUpdates: Record<string, unknown>[] = []
let callIndex = 0
mockFrom.mockImplementation((table: string) => {
callIndex++
if (callIndex === 1) {
return mockChain({
data: {
id: 'conn-1',
user_id: 'user-1',
company_id: 'company-1',
bank_name: 'TestBank',
status: 'expired',
session_id: null,
accounts_data: [
{ uid: 'old-1', iban: 'SE1111', name: 'Konto A', currency: 'SEK', dedup_scope: 'SE1111', enabled: true },
],
},
error: null,
})
}
if (table === 'cash_accounts') {
return mockChain({
data: [{ id: 'row-1', external_uid: 'old-1', ledger_account: '1930' }],
error: null,
})
}
const chain: Record<string, unknown> = {}
chain.update = vi.fn((payload: Record<string, unknown>) => {
capturedUpdates.push(payload)
return chain
})
chain.eq = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.select = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.in = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.single = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
data: { id: 'conn-1', bank_name: 'TestBank', company_id: 'company-1', user_id: 'user-1' },
error: null,
})
chain.then = (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) => resolve({ data: null, error: null })
return chain
})
mockCreateSession.mockResolvedValue({
session_id: 'sess-2',
accounts: [{ uid: 'new-1', name: 'Konto A', currency: 'SEK' }],
access: { valid_until: '2024-12-31T00:00:00Z' },
aspsp: { name: 'TestBank', country: 'SE' },
})
const response = await GET(makeRequest({ code: 'auth-code', state: 'valid-state' }))
expect(response.status).toBe(200)
await response.text()
const accountsData = capturedUpdates[0].accounts_data as Array<{
uid: string
dedup_scope?: string
}>
expect(accountsData[0].dedup_scope).toBe('new-1')
expect(mockAllocate).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
expect(
(mockUpsertFromPsd2.mock.calls[0][2] as { reuse_cash_account_id: string | null })
.reuse_cash_account_id,
).toBeNull()
})
it('prefers the survivor account explicit dedup scope over a carried sibling scope', async () => {
// A superseded sibling shares the IBAN but was ingested under a different
// scope. The survivor's own row already pinned an explicit scope for this
// account: that is what its external_ids were minted under, so the
// sibling's scope must NOT clobber it.
mockSupersede.mockResolvedValue({
supersededIds: ['old-1'],
dedupScopeByIban: new Map([['SE1234', 'sibling-scope']]),
})
const capturedUpdates: Record<string, unknown>[] = []
let callIndex = 0
mockFrom.mockImplementation(() => {
callIndex++
if (callIndex === 1) {
return mockChain({
data: {
id: 'conn-1',
user_id: 'user-1',
company_id: 'company-1',
bank_name: 'TestBank',
status: 'expired',
session_id: null,
accounts_data: [
{ uid: 'uid-old', iban: 'SE1234', currency: 'SEK', dedup_scope: 'survivor-scope' },
],
},
error: null,
})
}
const chain: Record<string, unknown> = {}
chain.update = vi.fn((payload: Record<string, unknown>) => {
capturedUpdates.push(payload)
return chain
})
chain.eq = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.select = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(chain)
chain.single = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
data: { id: 'conn-1', bank_name: 'TestBank', company_id: 'company-1', user_id: 'user-1' },
error: null,
})
chain.then = (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) => resolve({ data: null, error: null })
return chain
})
mockCreateSession.mockResolvedValue({
session_id: 'sess-2',
accounts: [
{ uid: 'uid-new', account_id: { iban: 'SE1234' }, name: 'Företagskonto', currency: 'SEK' },
],
access: { valid_until: '2024-12-31T00:00:00Z' },
aspsp: { name: 'TestBank', country: 'SE' },
})
const response = await GET(makeRequest({ code: 'auth-code', state: 'valid-state' }))
expect(response.status).toBe(200)
await response.text()
// Every accounts_data write keeps the survivor's explicit scope: neither
// the connection write nor any carried-scope follow-up flips it.
const accountsWrites = capturedUpdates.filter((u) => Array.isArray(u.accounts_data))
expect(accountsWrites.length).toBeGreaterThan(0)
for (const write of accountsWrites) {
const accountsData = write.accounts_data as Array<{ uid: string; dedup_scope?: string }>
expect(accountsData.find((a) => a.uid === 'uid-new')?.dedup_scope).toBe('survivor-scope')
}
})
it('deletes the fresh row and streams an error redirect when the session exchange fails', async () => {
const deleteCalls: unknown[] = []
const updateCalls: unknown[] = []
mockFrom.mockImplementation(() => {
const chain = mockChain({
data: { id: 'conn-1', user_id: 'user-1', company_id: 'company-1', bank_name: 'TestBank', status: 'pending' },
error: null,
})
chain.delete = vi.fn(() => {
deleteCalls.push('delete')
return chain
})
chain.update = vi.fn((payload: unknown) => {
updateCalls.push(payload)
return chain
})
return chain
})
mockCreateSession.mockRejectedValue(new Error('upstream timeout'))
const response = await GET(makeRequest({ code: 'auth-code', state: 'valid-state' }))
expect(response.status).toBe(200)
const body = await response.text()
// The streamed redirect carries the failure to the settings banner.
expect(body).toContain('window.location.replace')
expect(body).toContain('bank_error=')
expect(body).not.toContain('select_accounts=')
// A never-activated attempt is deleted, not parked as a zombie 'error'
// row that would render next to a successful retry as a duplicate.
expect(deleteCalls).toHaveLength(1)
expect(updateCalls).toHaveLength(0)
})
it('marks a reconnect row as error (not deleted) when the session exchange fails', async () => {
const deleteCalls: unknown[] = []
const updateCalls: Record<string, unknown>[] = []
mockFrom.mockImplementation(() => {
const chain = mockChain({
data: { id: 'conn-1', user_id: 'user-1', company_id: 'company-1', bank_name: 'TestBank', status: 'expired' },
error: null,
})
chain.delete = vi.fn(() => {
deleteCalls.push('delete')
return chain
})
chain.update = vi.fn((payload: Record<string, unknown>) => {
updateCalls.push(payload)
return chain
})
return chain
})
mockCreateSession.mockRejectedValue(new Error('upstream timeout'))
const response = await GET(makeRequest({ code: 'auth-code', state: 'valid-state' }))
expect(response.status).toBe(200)
const body = await response.text()
expect(body).toContain('bank_error=')
// An established connection keeps its row (history, accounts) and gets
// the error surfaced on it instead.
expect(deleteCalls).toHaveLength(0)
expect(updateCalls).toHaveLength(1)
expect(updateCalls[0].status).toBe('error')
expect(updateCalls[0].oauth_state).toBeNull()
})
it('redirects with error when bank returns error param (no state)', async () => {
const response = await GET(makeRequest({ error: 'access_denied', error_description: 'User cancelled' }))
expect(response.status).toBe(307)
const location = response.headers.get('location') || ''
expect(location).toContain('/settings/banking?')
expect(location).toContain('bank_error=User%20cancelled')
// No state → no DB cleanup attempted
expect(mockFrom).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('cleans up pending connection when bank returns error with state', async () => {
mockFrom.mockImplementation(() =>
mockChain({ data: null, error: null })
)
const response = await GET(makeRequest({
error: 'access_denied',
error_description: 'Denied data sharing consent',
state: 'pending-state',
}))
expect(response.status).toBe(307)
const location = response.headers.get('location') || ''
expect(location).toContain('/settings/banking?')
expect(location).toContain('bank_error=Denied%20data%20sharing%20consent')
// Should clean up the pending row
expect(mockFrom).toHaveBeenCalledWith('bank_connections')
})
it('deletes a fresh pending row on bank denial instead of parking it in error', async () => {
const deleteCalls: unknown[] = []
const updateCalls: unknown[] = []
mockFrom.mockImplementation(() => {
const chain = mockChain({
data: { id: 'conn-1', user_id: 'user-1', bank_name: 'TestBank', psu_type: 'business', status: 'pending' },
error: null,
})
chain.delete = vi.fn(() => {
deleteCalls.push('delete')
return chain
})
chain.update = vi.fn((payload: unknown) => {
updateCalls.push(payload)
return chain
})
return chain
})
const response = await GET(makeRequest({
error: 'access_denied',
error_description: 'User cancelled',
state: 'pending-state',
}))
expect(response.status).toBe(307)
const location = response.headers.get('location') || ''
// URLSearchParams encodes spaces as '+', unlike the encodeURIComponent
// fallback used when no matching row exists.
expect(location).toContain('bank_error=User+cancelled')
expect(deleteCalls).toHaveLength(1)
expect(updateCalls).toHaveLength(0)
})
it('keeps a reconnect row on bank denial and marks it expired on session-expiry errors', async () => {
const deleteCalls: unknown[] = []
const updateCalls: Record<string, unknown>[] = []
mockFrom.mockImplementation(() => {
const chain = mockChain({
data: { id: 'conn-1', user_id: 'user-1', bank_name: 'TestBank', psu_type: 'business', status: 'expired' },
error: null,
})
chain.delete = vi.fn(() => {
deleteCalls.push('delete')
return chain
})
chain.update = vi.fn((payload: Record<string, unknown>) => {
updateCalls.push(payload)
return chain
})
return chain
})
const response = await GET(makeRequest({
error: 'server_error',
error_description: 'Session expired at ASPSP',
state: 'pending-state',
}))
expect(response.status).toBe(307)
expect(deleteCalls).toHaveLength(0)
expect(updateCalls).toHaveLength(1)
expect(updateCalls[0].status).toBe('expired')
})
it('forwards bank_error_code and psu_type when the denied state matches a pending connection', async () => {
mockFrom.mockImplementation(() =>
mockChain({
data: { id: 'conn-1', user_id: 'user-1', bank_name: 'Handelsbanken', psu_type: 'business', status: 'pending' },
error: null,
})
)
const response = await GET(makeRequest({
error: 'server_error',
state: 'pending-state',
}))
expect(response.status).toBe(307)
const location = response.headers.get('location') || ''
expect(location).toContain('/settings/banking?')
// error_description is null for server_error, so the code doubles as message
expect(location).toContain('bank_error=server_error')
expect(location).toContain('bank_name=Handelsbanken')
// The code is forwarded for every error, not just access_denied, together
// with the connection's psu_type — the settings page keys the Handelsbanken
// corporate fullmakt guidance off this exact combination.
expect(location).toContain('bank_error_code=server_error')
expect(location).toContain('psu_type=business')
})
it('redirects with error when code or state is missing', async () => {
const response = await GET(makeRequest({ code: 'auth-code' }))
expect(response.status).toBe(307)
const location = response.headers.get('location') || ''
expect(location).toContain('/settings/banking?')
expect(location).toContain('bank_error=missing_parameters')
})
it('redirects with error when code fails format validation', async () => {
const response = await GET(makeRequest({ code: '!!bad!!', state: 'some-state' }))
expect(response.status).toBe(307)
const location = response.headers.get('location') || ''
expect(location).toContain('/settings/banking?')
expect(location).toContain('bank_error=invalid_code_format')
})
})