ec27228a8e
Em dashes (—) and en dashes (–) had spread across comments, docs, tests, and a few UI strings, reading as AI-generated boilerplate rather than house style. Replaced each with punctuation matching its context: colon for explanatory clauses, comma for asides, plain hyphen for numeric/legal ranges (e.g. "21-23§"), "to"/"till" for date ranges, parentheses for paired-dash asides. messages/en.json and messages/sv.json were fixed by hand together to keep sv/en in sync. Left untouched where the dash is the functional subject rather than decorative punctuation: date-range-parser.ts's separator regex, charset-repair.ts's CP1252 byte-mapping table (and its test), the SIE encoding mojibake docs, generic-csv.ts's minus-sign normalizer, the agent system-prompt files that already instruct against em dashes, and a golden iXBRL test fixture compared byte-for-byte. Also fixes two bugs surfaced along the way: an off-by-one in ApiKeysPanel's scope-label split (a leftover from an earlier partial pass), and a charset-repair test that had lost the literal en-dash it exists to verify. Regenerated the agent atom seed migration (skills:generate) since 27 SKILL.md files changed. Added a CLAUDE.md rule against em/en dashes, with an explicit carve-out for the functional-dash cases above. Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
333 lines
10 KiB
TypeScript
333 lines
10 KiB
TypeScript
import { randomUUID } from 'node:crypto'
|
|
import { readFileSync } from 'node:fs'
|
|
import { join } from 'node:path'
|
|
import { describe, expect, it } from 'vitest'
|
|
import { seedCompany, insertDraftJournalEntry } from '@/tests/pg/fixtures'
|
|
import { getPool } from '@/tests/pg/setup'
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* pg-real coverage for 20260622121000_invoices_journal_entry_id_backfill.sql.
|
|
*
|
|
* invoices.journal_entry_id means "the registration verifikat that booked the
|
|
* invoice at issuance": payment flows route on it (set → clear 1510; NULL →
|
|
* kontantmetoden cash entry). A wrong link silently double-books revenue +
|
|
* VAT, so the backfill's guards are load-bearing:
|
|
* - only posted invoice_created entries qualify (reversed/draft excluded)
|
|
* - earliest entry wins deterministically on duplicates
|
|
* - rows with an existing link are never overwritten
|
|
* - payment-type links (wrong semantic from an earlier route version) are
|
|
* repaired: nulled, then re-linked from the registration entry if any
|
|
* - kontantmetoden invoices (no registration entry) stay NULL
|
|
* - credit-note rows link their credit_note reversal entry
|
|
* - cross-company isolation
|
|
* - idempotent (re-run is a no-op)
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
// Run the real migration SQL so the test exercises exactly what ships.
|
|
const BACKFILL_SQL = readFileSync(
|
|
join(process.cwd(), 'supabase/migrations/20260622121000_invoices_journal_entry_id_backfill.sql'),
|
|
'utf8',
|
|
)
|
|
async function runBackfill(): Promise<void> {
|
|
await getPool().query(BACKFILL_SQL)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function insertInvoice(params: {
|
|
userId: string
|
|
companyId: string
|
|
status?: string
|
|
creditedInvoiceId?: string | null
|
|
journalEntryId?: string | null
|
|
}): Promise<string> {
|
|
const id = randomUUID()
|
|
const customerId = randomUUID()
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.customers (id, user_id, company_id, name)
|
|
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'Testkund AB')`,
|
|
[customerId, params.userId, params.companyId],
|
|
)
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.invoices
|
|
(id, user_id, company_id, customer_id, invoice_number,
|
|
invoice_date, due_date, currency, subtotal, vat_amount, total,
|
|
vat_treatment, vat_rate, moms_ruta, status, credited_invoice_id,
|
|
journal_entry_id)
|
|
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5,
|
|
'2026-06-01', '2026-06-30', 'SEK', 10000, 2500, 12500,
|
|
'standard_25', 25, '05', $6, $7, $8)`,
|
|
[
|
|
id,
|
|
params.userId,
|
|
params.companyId,
|
|
customerId,
|
|
`F-${randomUUID().slice(0, 8)}`,
|
|
params.status ?? 'sent',
|
|
params.creditedInvoiceId ?? null,
|
|
params.journalEntryId ?? null,
|
|
],
|
|
)
|
|
return id
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function getLink(invoiceId: string): Promise<string | null> {
|
|
const { rows } = await getPool().query(
|
|
`SELECT journal_entry_id FROM public.invoices WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[invoiceId],
|
|
)
|
|
return rows[0]?.journal_entry_id ?? null
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe('invoices.journal_entry_id backfill: Pass 1 (registration entries)', () => {
|
|
it('links the posted invoice_created entry to its invoice', async () => {
|
|
const { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedCompany()
|
|
const invoiceId = await insertInvoice({ userId, companyId })
|
|
const jeId = await insertDraftJournalEntry({
|
|
userId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
status: 'posted',
|
|
sourceType: 'invoice_created',
|
|
sourceId: invoiceId,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
await runBackfill()
|
|
|
|
expect(await getLink(invoiceId)).toBe(jeId)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('picks the earliest posted entry when duplicates exist', async () => {
|
|
const { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedCompany()
|
|
const invoiceId = await insertInvoice({ userId, companyId })
|
|
const early = await insertDraftJournalEntry({
|
|
userId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
status: 'posted',
|
|
sourceType: 'invoice_created',
|
|
sourceId: invoiceId,
|
|
createdAt: '2026-06-01T08:00:00Z',
|
|
})
|
|
await insertDraftJournalEntry({
|
|
userId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
status: 'posted',
|
|
sourceType: 'invoice_created',
|
|
sourceId: invoiceId,
|
|
createdAt: '2026-06-02T08:00:00Z',
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
await runBackfill()
|
|
|
|
expect(await getLink(invoiceId)).toBe(early)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('skips reversed and draft registration entries (invoice stays NULL)', async () => {
|
|
const { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedCompany()
|
|
const invoiceId = await insertInvoice({ userId, companyId })
|
|
await insertDraftJournalEntry({
|
|
userId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
status: 'reversed',
|
|
sourceType: 'invoice_created',
|
|
sourceId: invoiceId,
|
|
})
|
|
await insertDraftJournalEntry({
|
|
userId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
status: 'draft',
|
|
sourceType: 'invoice_created',
|
|
sourceId: invoiceId,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
await runBackfill()
|
|
|
|
// A stornoed registration must not mark the invoice as booked: the
|
|
// payment flow should recognise revenue via the cash path instead.
|
|
expect(await getLink(invoiceId)).toBeNull()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('never overwrites an existing link', async () => {
|
|
const { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedCompany()
|
|
// Existing link points at a manual entry (e.g. user-curated): backfill
|
|
// must leave it alone even though a registration entry also exists.
|
|
const manual = await insertDraftJournalEntry({
|
|
userId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
status: 'posted',
|
|
})
|
|
const invoiceId = await insertInvoice({ userId, companyId, journalEntryId: manual })
|
|
await insertDraftJournalEntry({
|
|
userId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
status: 'posted',
|
|
sourceType: 'invoice_created',
|
|
sourceId: invoiceId,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
await runBackfill()
|
|
|
|
expect(await getLink(invoiceId)).toBe(manual)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('leaves kontantmetoden invoices NULL (only a cash payment entry exists)', async () => {
|
|
const { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedCompany()
|
|
const invoiceId = await insertInvoice({ userId, companyId, status: 'paid' })
|
|
await insertDraftJournalEntry({
|
|
userId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
status: 'posted',
|
|
sourceType: 'invoice_cash_payment',
|
|
sourceId: invoiceId,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
await runBackfill()
|
|
|
|
// NULL is the CORRECT value here: revenue was recognised at payment.
|
|
expect(await getLink(invoiceId)).toBeNull()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('does not cross-link between companies', async () => {
|
|
const a = await seedCompany()
|
|
const b = await seedCompany()
|
|
const invoiceA = await insertInvoice({ userId: a.userId, companyId: a.companyId })
|
|
// Company B has a posted registration entry whose source_id happens to
|
|
// reference company A's invoice (corrupt/cross-tenant data): the
|
|
// company_id guard must refuse the link.
|
|
await insertDraftJournalEntry({
|
|
userId: b.userId,
|
|
companyId: b.companyId,
|
|
fiscalPeriodId: b.fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
status: 'posted',
|
|
sourceType: 'invoice_created',
|
|
sourceId: invoiceA,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
await runBackfill()
|
|
|
|
expect(await getLink(invoiceA)).toBeNull()
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('invoices.journal_entry_id backfill: Pass 0 (payment-link repair)', () => {
|
|
it('nulls a payment-type link, then re-links the registration entry', async () => {
|
|
const { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedCompany()
|
|
const invoiceId = await insertInvoice({ userId, companyId, status: 'paid' })
|
|
const registration = await insertDraftJournalEntry({
|
|
userId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
status: 'posted',
|
|
sourceType: 'invoice_created',
|
|
sourceId: invoiceId,
|
|
})
|
|
const payment = await insertDraftJournalEntry({
|
|
userId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
status: 'posted',
|
|
sourceType: 'invoice_paid',
|
|
sourceId: invoiceId,
|
|
})
|
|
// Simulate the old v1 mark-paid write-back: payment entry id in the column.
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`UPDATE public.invoices SET journal_entry_id = $1 WHERE id = $2`,
|
|
[payment, invoiceId],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
await runBackfill()
|
|
|
|
expect(await getLink(invoiceId)).toBe(registration)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('nulls a cash-payment link with no registration entry (stays NULL)', async () => {
|
|
const { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedCompany()
|
|
const invoiceId = await insertInvoice({ userId, companyId, status: 'paid' })
|
|
const cash = await insertDraftJournalEntry({
|
|
userId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
status: 'posted',
|
|
sourceType: 'invoice_cash_payment',
|
|
sourceId: invoiceId,
|
|
})
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`UPDATE public.invoices SET journal_entry_id = $1 WHERE id = $2`,
|
|
[cash, invoiceId],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
await runBackfill()
|
|
|
|
expect(await getLink(invoiceId)).toBeNull()
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('invoices.journal_entry_id backfill: Pass 2 (credit notes)', () => {
|
|
it('links the credit_note reversal entry to the credit-note row', async () => {
|
|
const { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedCompany()
|
|
const original = await insertInvoice({ userId, companyId })
|
|
const creditNote = await insertInvoice({
|
|
userId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
creditedInvoiceId: original,
|
|
})
|
|
const reversal = await insertDraftJournalEntry({
|
|
userId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
status: 'posted',
|
|
sourceType: 'credit_note',
|
|
sourceId: creditNote,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
await runBackfill()
|
|
|
|
expect(await getLink(creditNote)).toBe(reversal)
|
|
expect(await getLink(original)).toBeNull()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('ignores credit_note entries pointing at non-credit-note rows', async () => {
|
|
const { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedCompany()
|
|
const invoiceId = await insertInvoice({ userId, companyId })
|
|
await insertDraftJournalEntry({
|
|
userId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
status: 'posted',
|
|
sourceType: 'credit_note',
|
|
sourceId: invoiceId,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
await runBackfill()
|
|
|
|
// credited_invoice_id IS NULL → Pass 2 must not touch the row.
|
|
expect(await getLink(invoiceId)).toBeNull()
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('invoices.journal_entry_id backfill: idempotency', () => {
|
|
it('re-running the backfill changes nothing', async () => {
|
|
const { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedCompany()
|
|
const invoiceId = await insertInvoice({ userId, companyId })
|
|
const jeId = await insertDraftJournalEntry({
|
|
userId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
fiscalPeriodId,
|
|
status: 'posted',
|
|
sourceType: 'invoice_created',
|
|
sourceId: invoiceId,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
await runBackfill()
|
|
expect(await getLink(invoiceId)).toBe(jeId)
|
|
|
|
await runBackfill()
|
|
expect(await getLink(invoiceId)).toBe(jeId)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|