Files
accounted/supabase/migrations/20260904020000_rot_rut_payout_transaction_match.sql
Mattsson 50b6299699 feat(rot-rut): match Skatteverket's payout against the begäran from the bank row (#2271)
* feat(rot-rut): match Skatteverket's payout against the begäran from the bank row

A ROT/RUT invoice is stored with remaining_amount net of the deduction, so
once the customer pays it flips to paid and drops out of the matchable set.
Skatteverket's payout for the 1513 share then lands as an income row with no
candidate: the only clearing path was a headless settle endpoint that never
linked the bank row.

The candidate is the payout request (one lump sum per begäran, possibly
covering several invoices), modelled exactly like the supplier-invoice hint:

- migration 20260904020000: transactions.potential_rot_rut_payout_request_id
- pure matcher (exact amount vs decided_total ?? requested_total, boosted
  when Skatteverket is named, ambiguous when two requests share the amount)
- hint written at bank ingest and by batch-match-invoices; cleared by the
  link and reconciliation paths and by clearSettledInvoiceSuggestions
- shared settle service (lib/invoices/rot-rut-settle.ts) used by the existing
  settle route and the new POST /api/transactions/[id]/match-rot-rut-payout,
  which books debit 19xx / credit 1513 and links the row in one call
- transactions inbox pill, own confirm dialog listing the covered invoices,
  manual fallback section in the invoice picker, worklist and Att göra rows

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HmEpYNMHycUPzSwBECEzZ5
Signed-off-by: Emil <emilmattsson14@gmail.com>

* fix(rot-rut): cap the payout at the begäran, CAS on the request and on stale pointers

Skeptic findings on 6aa7b2e5c:
- a bank row larger than the begäran was booked in full, driving 1513 into
  a credit balance and rewriting decided_total to the bank amount: refuse
  amount > decided_total ?? requested_total in the service and block the
  dialog's confirm with the reason
- two concurrent settles could both attach and credit 1513 twice: the
  request update now locks on settlement_journal_entry_id IS NULL and the
  loser returns ROT_RUT_SETTLE_RACE (409) with its orphan voucher id
- a row with a stale (reversed) journal_entry_id passed the route guard but
  always lost the null-only link CAS: the route forwards the pointer it read
  and the service locks on that value, as link-journal-entry does
- the pinned underlag on the bank row now propagates onto the voucher

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HmEpYNMHycUPzSwBECEzZ5
Signed-off-by: Emil <emilmattsson14@gmail.com>

* fix(rot-rut): review round: SEK gate, voucher-less paid matchable, hint-write errors, one live voucher per begäran

CodeRabbit findings on a93dc46b8, one batch:
- picker and dialog only offer a begäran to SEK rows (the route refuses
  other currencies, so the manual flow no longer dead-ends)
- a voucher-less `paid` request (beslut recorded via PATCH, money not yet
  booked) is matchable; settled means a settlement voucher exists
- ingest and batch-match check the hint update's error before draining the
  pool or counting the match
- the invoice.match_confirmed payload clears the payout hint like the row
- migration 20260904021000: partial unique index on journal_entries
  (company_id, source_id) for live rot_rut_payout entries, so two racing
  settles cannot both book a voucher; pg test included

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HmEpYNMHycUPzSwBECEzZ5
Signed-off-by: Emil <emilmattsson14@gmail.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Emil <emilmattsson14@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 14:33:41 +02:00

18 lines
891 B
SQL

-- Migration: rot_rut_payout_transaction_match
-- Adds potential_rot_rut_payout_request_id to transactions: a match SUGGESTION
-- (never a hard link) pointing at the open ROT/RUT begäran whose payout the
-- bank row appears to be. Mirrors potential_supplier_invoice_id
-- (20260225100248). The confirmed link is transactions.journal_entry_id =
-- rot_rut_payout_requests.settlement_journal_entry_id, written by the
-- match-rot-rut-payout route; this column only carries the hint until then.
ALTER TABLE public.transactions
ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS potential_rot_rut_payout_request_id UUID
REFERENCES public.rot_rut_payout_requests(id) ON DELETE SET NULL;
CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_transactions_potential_rot_rut_payout_request
ON public.transactions(potential_rot_rut_payout_request_id)
WHERE potential_rot_rut_payout_request_id IS NOT NULL;
NOTIFY pgrst, 'reload schema';