c0ecf2fa3bebd46bdfd0169efd73b89653d1dfed
2
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
dc5079a912 |
fix(providers): stop inventing 25% VAT on migrated invoices (#1745)
* fix(providers): stop inventing 25% VAT on migrated invoices An invoice migrated from Fortnox displayed "Momsbehandling: 25 % moms" next to "Moms: 0 kr", with no line items behind it. It was not a display bug: the record really did hold vat_rate 25 and vat_amount 0. Fortnox answers GET /3/invoices with the short form, which carries no Net, no TotalVAT and no InvoiceRows; those live only on the detail form. The migration mapped the list payload alone, so `Net ?? total` made the net equal the gross, VAT derived as gross minus net came out 0, and with no rows to read a rate from, inferVatTreatment/inferVatRate fell through to their `return 'standard_25'` / `return 25` defaults. The result balanced, so nothing downstream noticed. Measured on prod: 8 712 sales invoices across 43 companies assert a rate beside 0 kr of VAT (286 MSEK of subtotal), plus 1 240 supplier invoices. None are booked, but 263 are still open, and the no-items booking fallback in invoice-entries.ts credits the full gross to 30xx and emits no 2611 line at all. Not Fortnox-only. Visma reported its VAT-inclusive TotalAmount as the ex-VAT amount and read rows via `LineTotal`/`VatRatePercent`, neither of which exists in the eAccounting schema (the real names are AmountNoVat and PercentVat), so its lines all landed at 0. Bjorn Lunden reported the gross as the net with no lines at all. Briox and WINT had the same gross-as-net fallback, and Bokio defaulted a missing totalTax to 0. - lib/providers/amounts.ts: readers that return undefined for an absent field, so "the provider says zero" stays distinct from "did not say" - every mapper: populate taxTotal and per-line taxAmount from what the payload actually states; leave the net undefined when it does not - provider-data-fetcher: hydrate the detail endpoint that every config has always declared and nothing ever called, open invoices first, within a time budget, reporting whatever it could not reach - entity-mapper: derive rate and treatment from evidence; when there is none, write vat_rate null and flag vatUnresolved instead of asserting a standard rate Existing rows are untouched; repairing them needs a separate decision. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(providers): keep subtotal + VAT equal to the invoice total Providers state net, VAT and gross independently and they need not agree: Fortnox's Total is the amount to pay after öresavrundning while Net + TotalVAT is the unrounded Gross, so the two differ by up to 50 öre. Passing both through as stated put that gap into the invoice row, where subtotal + vat_amount no longer equalled total. The header booking path in invoice-entries.ts derives the 1510 debit from the sum of its credits, so the receivable would land a few öre away from what the customer owes while the verifikat still balanced: the same silent shape as the bug this branch fixes. resolveVatTriple now always returns a pair summing to the gross, keeping the VAT intact (it reaches the momsdeklaration) and absorbing the rounding into the net. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(providers): address invoice detail by the configured idField Hydration built the detail path from dto.id. Björn Lundén's sales config names invoiceNumber as its idField while its mapper builds dto.id from entityId, so BL sales invoices would have been hydrated from the wrong resource, or from none. Every other provider/resource pair happens to agree on the two, which is what made the mismatch easy to miss. The config's idField is the authority, read off the raw payload, with dto.id only as the fallback. The regression test uses BL with entityId 99001 and invoiceNumber 5 so the two cannot coincide. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(providers): store vat_rate null for migrated mixed-rate invoices resolveInvoiceVat labelled the header with the first line's rate, so an invoice carrying both 25 % and 6 % lines was recorded as a 25 % invoice. buildInvoiceWriteData already stores isMixedRate ? null : theRate for natively created invoices; migrated ones now match. The money was already right and stays right: generatePerRateLines groups per item rate, so a mixed invoice books 25 % and 6 % separately off the per-line vat_rate/vat_amount this branch fixed. Only the header label was overstating what the source said. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(providers): bound hydration against auth failures and the clock Two failure modes that only appear against a real provider. A 401 or 403 fails identically for every remaining invoice, so the pass now stops on the first one instead of issuing hundreds more doomed calls. That matters more than it looks: TokenBucketRateLimiter keys on the literal string 'global', so Fortnox's 4 req/s is a platform-wide budget shared by every company and every concurrent migration, not a per-token one. A 404 is about one invoice and does not stop the pass. The budget was checked before starting a call but never during one. The clients retry 429s and 5xx with backoff (Fortnox: 6 attempts, up to 60 s apart), so a call starting one millisecond inside the budget could still be retrying minutes later, and three concurrent ones could hold the migration past its 300 s function ceiling. Each call is now raced against the deadline; the socket is not cancelled, but control returns and the remaining invoices are reported unhydrated instead of the run dying. Both outcomes are reported as HydrationReport.abortedBy so a partial pass is visible rather than looking complete. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <invoice@arcim.io> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
MattssonandClaude Fable 5
|
93f81f03e8 |
feat(providers): WINT migration provider behind WINT_MIGRATION_ENABLED (#1446)
* feat(providers): WINT migration provider behind WINT_MIGRATION_ENABLED Adds WINT (wint.se) as a sixth migration provider, built against the OpenAPI specs WINT's own API host serves publicly. Tier A scope: only the partner-facing v1 endpoints are used; the general ledger is fetched as vouchers/accounts and rendered as SIE 4E by our own sie-builder, with opening balances for earlier years derived backward from the current-year Ib anchor. Auth is the user's WINT login exchanged once for a JWT pair; the password is never stored. Ships dark: the wizard shows a disabled "Kommer snart" card, and the server-side /connect gate rejects WINT until WINT_MIGRATION_ENABLED=true. Live verification against a real WINT account is still outstanding. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(providers): harden WINT provider per PR #1446 review findings Addresses CodeRabbit and Swedish accounting review feedback in one pass: - Ib anchor selection now uses WINT's unfiltered fiscal-year list, so an active year outside the allowed import window can never silently anchor the wrong year; the voucher chain is extended through the anchor and a per-year fetch failure fails that year loudly instead of sinking the whole migration. - Auth token exchange is strict: only LoginState Success with a complete access+refresh pair mints a consent (a pair without a refresh token is unrefreshable and would break days later). - WintApiError no longer retains full response bodies (bounded 300-char diagnostic; bodies can carry customer data and errors get logged). - sie-builder refuses to render structurally invalid vouchers (missing account number or booking date) and documents deleted-voucher gaps in a #PROSA record per BFL 5 kap 6-7 §. - Account classification: 20xx is equity, 83xx is financial income. - SIE validator accepts EUBAS97 as BAS-based (standard kontoplanstyp; it previously produced a false non-BAS warning on every WINT/Bollbok file). - New tests: resolveConsent WINT refresh flow, credential upsert payload (no mail/password persisted), WINT fetch failure path, EUBAS97 warning regression, builder invalid-data rejection, vi.clearAllMocks hygiene. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(import): pin EUBAS97 acceptance to the exact SIE spec value Review follow-up on PR #1446: match EUBAS97 exactly instead of any EUBAS* prefix, so the non-BAS kontoplan warning stays pinned to the four kontoplanstyp values the SIE 4B spec enumerates (BAS95, BAS96, EUBAS97, NE2007) rather than silently accepting unknown future variants. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |