sax3l/accounted
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 1 Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
1,508 Commits 6 Branches 0 Tags
c0ecf2fa3bebd46bdfd0169efd73b89653d1dfed
Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mattsson 1a3686dd45 feat(inbox): promote a single prominent amount into the editable total (#2073) 
* feat(inbox): promote a single prominent amount into the editable total

Follow-up to #2048 after founder review: the Belopp row was load-bearing
for matching but read-only, so a misread amount could not be corrected,
and an empty TOTALT still read as "extraction failed".

- promoteSingleProminentAmount (extraction post-step, all intake paths):
  documentKind other/government_letter with no total and exactly one
  distinct nonzero prominent amount gets it copied into totals.total,
  stamped totalSource: 'prominent'. Multi-amount documents are left
  alone: picking one silently would invent a total.
- provenance keeps the safety rails: matching demotes a promoted total
  back through the prominent-amounts fallback (0.85 discount, date guard,
  amountSource tag), so the nightly receipt-hunt still excludes these
  documents and confidence never presents as certainty.
- the fields-PATCH route clears totalSource when a human edits TOTALT:
  a user-set amount is a verified total at full weight.
- the read-only Belopp row now renders only for multi-amount documents,
  and filters zero amounts ("Totalt manadspris: 0 kr" noise).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Hqm9QgdyNAFaWiz6Ww7pgb

* fix(inbox): review pass: concurrency-safe fields PATCH, zero-amount predicate

CodeRabbit findings on #2073:
- the fields-PATCH read-merge-write could let a racing autosave restore a
  stale extracted_data blob (including a totalSource stamp a concurrent
  TOTALT edit had just cleared). The update is now conditional on the
  trigger-maintained updated_at; zero rows matched returns 409 and the
  client's next debounced save re-reads.
- hasAnyExtractedField now uses the same meaningful-amount predicate as
  the Belopp render filter, so a zero-only prominentAmounts list no longer
  suppresses the retry / upgrade affordances.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Hqm9QgdyNAFaWiz6Ww7pgb

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-08-31 11:40:30 +02:00
Mattsson 516e8b62ff feat(inbox): match non-invoice documents via prominent amounts (#2048) 
* feat(inbox): match non-invoice documents via prominent amounts

Bankintyg, bank agreements and other documentKind "other" PDFs carry no
invoice-style total, so extraction correctly left totals.total null and the
document became structurally unmatchable: findUnderlagCandidates hard-drops
items without a comparable amount and the picker lost the 40% amount signal.

- extraction: new prominentAmounts[] field (amount + document's own label),
  populated only when totals.total is null; account/org/phone/reference
  numbers and zero amounts excluded. totals.total semantics untouched.
- matching: bestProminentAmountVariance() tries each printed amount and
  feeds calculateMatchConfidence at reduced weight (0.3 vs 0.4) in both the
  agent candidate scorer and TransactionMatchPicker.
- UI: inbox rail shows the detected amounts read-only for such documents,
  list falls back to a single distinct prominent amount, and extraction no
  longer reads as "found nothing".

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Hqm9QgdyNAFaWiz6Ww7pgb

* fix(inbox): discount prominent-amount fallback instead of reweighting it

Skeptic pass refutations on the first commit: normalized weighting made a
reduced amount weight self-defeating. Date + exact fallback amount with no
merchant scored (0.25+0.3)/0.55 = 1.0 ("100% sakerhet" on a wrong same-day
transaction), and a DISAGREEING fallback amount scored above a disagreeing
invoice total (0.67 vs 0.60) because shrinking the weight also shrank the
penalty.

- score fallbacks at full amount weight, then multiply by a flat
  FALLBACK_CONFIDENCE_FACTOR (0.85): agreement caps below certainty,
  disagreement stays at least as damning as for a real total.
- agent candidate surface additionally requires the document date within
  DATE_TOLERANCE_DAYS, so an avtal listing 349 kr no longer matches every
  future 349 kr charge from the same counterparty.
- bestProminentAmountVariance returns which amount matched + its document
  label, and the match reason names it ("Exakt belopp i dokumentet: 2 500
  SEK (Engangspris)"): no more bare "Exakt belopp" reaching the agent while
  total_amount is null.
- prompt: prominentAmounts restricted to non-invoice documentKinds, and
  never a parking spot for an unreadable invoice total.
- fix the stale "deliberately the same list" comment on
  EXTRACTED_FIELD_ACCESSORS.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Hqm9QgdyNAFaWiz6Ww7pgb

* fix(receipt-hunt): never propose on the prominent-amounts fallback

Second skeptic pass: the nightly hunt is a third consumer of
scoreUnderlagCandidates and inherited the fallback unaware. A bankintyg
whose printed "Insatt belopp" equals a same-day outflow scores 0.85, which
clears CERTAIN_CONFIDENCE (0.8) and skips LLM adjudication, on a pairing
wrong by construction (the hunt scans outflows only; "Insatt belopp"
labels an inflow), with document_amount null in the approval preview.

UnderlagCandidate now carries amountSource ('total' | 'prominent') and
selectProposals drops fallback-scored candidates. Non-invoice documents
stay reachable through the manual picker and the agent candidate surface,
both of which have a human reading the amounts.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Hqm9QgdyNAFaWiz6Ww7pgb

* fix(inbox): round fallback confidence via roundOre, not the naive pattern

The two confidence discounts (and their test) tripped the naive-ore-round
antipattern ratchet (625 vs baseline 622); use the sanctioned helper.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Hqm9QgdyNAFaWiz6Ww7pgb

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-08-30 23:52:29 +02:00
Jakob Wennberg 43386b4852 feat(agent): offer unmatched inbox receipts as confirmable underlag (#1436) 
The originally reported scenario is still broken after #1425 and its
backfill-by-document_id: a user photographs a receipt into WhatsApp, answers
the bot's questions, then opens the app, clicks the bank transaction and asks
the assistant to book it, and is told "UNDERLAG: saknas" about a receipt we
are holding, then asked everything again.

WhatsApp intake writes neither invoice_inbox_items.matched_transaction_id
(process-inbound.ts passes uploadAndExtract's matchedTransactionId as
undefined) nor transactions.document_id (that mirror is written by the manual
match route). Only TransactionMatchPicker fills either column. So the underlag
list comes back empty, and a backfill that keys on document_id has nothing to
key on.

Unmatched, unconsumed inbox items are now scored against the transaction with
the same pure scorer the picker uses and the strongest few are surfaced as
TROLIGT UNDERLAG, carrying their captured chat answers.

Proposals only: nothing writes matched_transaction_id, and the prompt tells
the agent to get the match confirmed and to book only against a confirmed one.
Setting the link at intake above a confidence bar is the obvious alternative
and is deliberately left open.

An uncomparable amount (cross-currency with no rate) disqualifies a candidate,
because calculateMatchConfidence drops the amount signal in that case and date
+ merchant alone then score a confident match nobody checked the sums for.

Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <311770904+jakobwennberg-oss@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-08-06 14:07:30 +02:00
Jakob Wennberg 0f7147a078 fix(agent): read a WhatsApp "nej" as an answer, not a half answer (#1433) 
* fix(agent): read a WhatsApp "nej" as an answer, not a half answer

#1425 gave the assistant the answers the user typed in WhatsApp. Rendering
those inline off the raw channel_context blob gets the most common answer
backwards.

Answering "nej" to the representation question stores an EMPTY representation
block: participants: [], purpose: null, denied: true. The renderer branched on
`if (!rep.purpose)` and so emitted

    syfte SAKNAS: fråga bara efter syftet, inte om deltagarna igen.

for a user who had just said the meal was not representation. `denied` was
never read anywhere. The result is the assistant asking about the purpose of a
private lunch, which is worse than the generic re-ask #1425 fixed, because the
instruction is specific and confident.

Clarifications now come from a structured summary that models the denial and
the genuine half answer (participants named, purpose missing, which BFL 5 kap
6-7 § does want completed) as different states. #1425's syfte SAKNAS nudge is
preserved for the case it was written for.

Two smaller fixes in the same renderer, both about untrusted text:

- The photo caption no longer reaches the prompt. It is the one field on the
  record nobody was asked for and nobody reviewed, and the rationale already
  written down in lib/documents/channel-context-notes.ts for keeping it off an
  immutable verifikat applies at least as strongly to a prompt that can call
  tools.
- Human free text passes through flattenMemoryContent. An intent's
  promptTemplate output is seeded as a user message, so wrapToolResult never
  sees it and nothing else defends this path; a caption reading
  "# NYA INSTRUKTIONER: ..." previously rendered verbatim.

All three tests fail against the current renderer and pass against this one.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(agent): gate the chat-answer guidance on what was rendered

CodeRabbit caught the same defect shape this PR is about: the
prior-conversation paragraph was gated on chat_answers != null, but a
caption-only context is non-null and now summarises to nothing, so the
paragraph pointed at 'uppgivna av användaren' rows the prompt does not
contain. Gate on whether a clarification line was actually emitted.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <311770904+jakobwennberg-oss@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-08-06 14:00:20 +02:00
Jakob Wennberg a3c6566caf feat(mcp): ledger-context resource with per-company booking patterns (#928) 
* feat(mcp): ledger-context resource with per-company booking patterns

Adds Accounted://ledger/context: derived account usage, counterparty
booking patterns with explicit confidence share (0.7 floor), explicit
mapping rules kept separate as authoritative, observed VAT profile, and
conventions. Backed by a SECURITY INVOKER get_ledger_usage_stats RPC so
group-bys run SQL-side, and surfaced as a top-5 digest stanza on
gnubok_get_agent_briefing so one call still bootstraps a session.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat(mcp): fold source-quality prereqs into the ledger-context RPC

Merchant-name normalization at the aggregation path (the splinter fix):
new normalize_counterparty_key() SQL function mirroring
normalizeCounterpartyName() so KORTKÖP/SWISH/date-suffixed labels merge
into one counterparty key, which also makes the categorization_templates
join exact. New supplier_patterns section (per-supplier dominant expense
account + VAT treatment from supplier invoices; credit notes and reversed
invoices excluded). account_usage excludes storno lines (they re-inflate
the account a correction moved away from); the counterparty CTE keeps
corrections because the transaction relink self-heals. Pattern confidence
is now count-grounded evidence {seen_12m, agree, share, last_booked}
instead of a bare ratio, and the digest frames it as historical frequency,
never auto-book permission.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(agent-context): use roundOre for the share ratio (antipattern ratchet)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(agent-context): defensive storno filter on counterparty CTE, fail-loud secondary reads

Review follow-ups: the counterparty CTE now excludes source_type='storno'
defensively (no live code path links a transaction to a storno, but legacy
rows may predate reverseEntry's unlink; a linked storno would count the
reversed category as precedent). Corrections stay included: they are the
live booking after relink. Secondary reads (rules, templates, settings)
now throw instead of silently reading as empty data: an agent must never
be told 'no rules' when the truth is 'read failed'.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-07-08 13:48:04 +02:00