fix(mcp): scope VAT close reconciliation account (#1295)
Resolve the VAT close reconciliation scope using the selected cash account, currency, and unassigned-transaction behavior. Add regression coverage for cross-account leakage and fail closed on lookup errors.\n\nCloses #1290
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* gnubok_vat_close_check: cash-account scoping for bank reconciliation.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* getReconciliationStatus only isolates same-currency bank feeds when its
|
||||
* cashAccountId is populated. These tests pin the VAT close check to the same
|
||||
* account resolution used by the standalone reconciliation tool so another
|
||||
* cash account cannot inflate 1930's bank total.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest'
|
||||
|
||||
vi.mock('@/lib/reconciliation/bank-reconciliation', () => ({
|
||||
getReconciliationStatus: vi.fn(async () => ({
|
||||
is_reconciled: true,
|
||||
difference: 0,
|
||||
unmatched_transaction_count: 0,
|
||||
unmatched_gl_line_count: 0,
|
||||
})),
|
||||
}))
|
||||
|
||||
import { getReconciliationStatus } from '@/lib/reconciliation/bank-reconciliation'
|
||||
import { computeVatCloseCheck } from '../server'
|
||||
|
||||
const COMPANY_ID = 'aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa'
|
||||
const PERIOD = { period_type: 'monthly', year: 2026, period: 1 }
|
||||
const getReconciliationStatusMock = vi.mocked(getReconciliationStatus)
|
||||
|
||||
interface CashAccountFixture {
|
||||
id: string
|
||||
currency: string
|
||||
is_primary: boolean
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function mockSupabase(
|
||||
cashAccount: CashAccountFixture | null,
|
||||
cashAccountError: { message: string } | null = null,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
const cashAccountFilters: Array<[string, unknown]> = []
|
||||
|
||||
const makeChain = (
|
||||
rows: unknown[],
|
||||
maybeSingleData: unknown = null,
|
||||
eqCalls?: Array<[string, unknown]>,
|
||||
maybeSingleError: { message: string } | null = null,
|
||||
): Record<string, unknown> => {
|
||||
const chain: Record<string, unknown> = {}
|
||||
const settled = { data: rows, error: null, count: rows.length }
|
||||
chain.range = () => settled
|
||||
chain.single = async () => ({ data: null, error: null })
|
||||
chain.maybeSingle = async () => ({ data: maybeSingleData, error: maybeSingleError })
|
||||
chain.then = (resolve: (value: unknown) => void) => resolve(settled)
|
||||
for (const method of [
|
||||
'order', 'lte', 'gte', 'neq', 'in', 'is', 'select',
|
||||
'limit', 'contains', 'filter', 'not', 'or',
|
||||
]) {
|
||||
chain[method] = () => chain
|
||||
}
|
||||
chain.eq = (column: string, value: unknown) => {
|
||||
eqCalls?.push([column, value])
|
||||
return chain
|
||||
}
|
||||
return chain
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const from = vi.fn((table: string) => {
|
||||
if (table === 'cash_accounts') {
|
||||
return makeChain(
|
||||
cashAccount ? [cashAccount] : [],
|
||||
cashAccount,
|
||||
cashAccountFilters,
|
||||
cashAccountError,
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
return makeChain([])
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
supabase: {
|
||||
from,
|
||||
rpc: (fn: string) =>
|
||||
fn === 'verifikat_without_documents'
|
||||
? Promise.resolve({
|
||||
data: { ok: true, total_count: 0, verifikat: [] },
|
||||
error: null,
|
||||
})
|
||||
: makeChain([]),
|
||||
} as never,
|
||||
cashAccountFilters,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
beforeEach(() => {
|
||||
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
describe('gnubok_vat_close_check: reconciliation scope', () => {
|
||||
it('passes the primary 1930 identity so another SEK cash account cannot leak into its total', async () => {
|
||||
const cashAccount = {
|
||||
id: '11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111',
|
||||
currency: 'SEK',
|
||||
is_primary: true,
|
||||
}
|
||||
const { supabase, cashAccountFilters } = mockSupabase(cashAccount)
|
||||
|
||||
await computeVatCloseCheck(PERIOD, COMPANY_ID, supabase)
|
||||
|
||||
expect(cashAccountFilters).toEqual([
|
||||
['company_id', COMPANY_ID],
|
||||
['ledger_account', '1930'],
|
||||
])
|
||||
expect(getReconciliationStatusMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
supabase,
|
||||
COMPANY_ID,
|
||||
'2026-01-01',
|
||||
'2026-01-31',
|
||||
'1930',
|
||||
'SEK',
|
||||
cashAccount.id,
|
||||
true,
|
||||
)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('does not claim unassigned transactions when 1930 is not the primary cash account', async () => {
|
||||
const cashAccount = {
|
||||
id: '22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222',
|
||||
currency: 'EUR',
|
||||
is_primary: false,
|
||||
}
|
||||
const { supabase } = mockSupabase(cashAccount)
|
||||
|
||||
await computeVatCloseCheck(PERIOD, COMPANY_ID, supabase)
|
||||
|
||||
expect(getReconciliationStatusMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
supabase,
|
||||
COMPANY_ID,
|
||||
'2026-01-01',
|
||||
'2026-01-31',
|
||||
'1930',
|
||||
'EUR',
|
||||
cashAccount.id,
|
||||
false,
|
||||
)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('keeps the legacy 1930 fallback when the company has no cash_accounts row', async () => {
|
||||
const { supabase } = mockSupabase(null)
|
||||
|
||||
await computeVatCloseCheck(PERIOD, COMPANY_ID, supabase)
|
||||
|
||||
expect(getReconciliationStatusMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
supabase,
|
||||
COMPANY_ID,
|
||||
'2026-01-01',
|
||||
'2026-01-31',
|
||||
'1930',
|
||||
'SEK',
|
||||
undefined,
|
||||
true,
|
||||
)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('fails closed when the cash-account lookup errors instead of reconciling every SEK account', async () => {
|
||||
const { supabase } = mockSupabase(null, { message: 'connection failed' })
|
||||
|
||||
await expect(computeVatCloseCheck(PERIOD, COMPANY_ID, supabase)).rejects.toThrow(
|
||||
'Kunde inte hämta kassakonto 1930',
|
||||
)
|
||||
expect(getReconciliationStatusMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
@@ -1760,6 +1760,55 @@ async function countMissingUnderlagInPeriod(
|
||||
return Math.max(0, fromStart - afterEnd)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Resolve the cash-account identity before comparing its bank feed with the
|
||||
* ledger. The cashAccountId is what prevents another same-currency account
|
||||
* from being included in the transaction total.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
async function getScopedReconciliationStatus(
|
||||
supabase: SupabaseClient,
|
||||
companyId: string,
|
||||
dateFrom: string | undefined,
|
||||
dateTo: string | undefined,
|
||||
accountNumber: string,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
const { data: cashAccount, error: cashAccountError } = await supabase
|
||||
.from('cash_accounts')
|
||||
.select('id, currency, is_primary')
|
||||
.eq('company_id', companyId)
|
||||
.eq('ledger_account', accountNumber)
|
||||
.maybeSingle()
|
||||
|
||||
if (cashAccountError) {
|
||||
log.error('Cash account lookup failed during reconciliation', {
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
accountNumber,
|
||||
errorCode: cashAccountError.code,
|
||||
errorMessage: cashAccountError.message,
|
||||
})
|
||||
throw new Error(`Kunde inte hämta kassakonto ${accountNumber}`)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!cashAccount && accountNumber !== '1930') {
|
||||
throw new Error(`Okänt kassakonto ${accountNumber} för det här företaget`)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const currency = (cashAccount?.currency as string | undefined) ?? 'SEK'
|
||||
const cashAccountId = cashAccount?.id as string | undefined
|
||||
const includeUnassigned = cashAccount ? Boolean(cashAccount.is_primary) : true
|
||||
|
||||
return getReconciliationStatus(
|
||||
supabase,
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
dateFrom,
|
||||
dateTo,
|
||||
accountNumber,
|
||||
currency,
|
||||
cashAccountId,
|
||||
includeUnassigned,
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export async function computeVatCloseCheck(
|
||||
args: Record<string, unknown>,
|
||||
companyId: string,
|
||||
@@ -1804,7 +1853,7 @@ export async function computeVatCloseCheck(
|
||||
.eq('company_id', companyId)
|
||||
.eq('status', 'registered')
|
||||
.gte('invoice_date', start).lte('invoice_date', end),
|
||||
getReconciliationStatus(supabase, companyId, start, end),
|
||||
getScopedReconciliationStatus(supabase, companyId, start, end, '1930'),
|
||||
// Verifikat in the period that genuinely lack an underlag (BFL 5 kap
|
||||
// 6-7 §), counted over the SHARED SQL predicate. Never re-derive this
|
||||
// locally: countMissingUnderlagInPeriod documents what the hand-rolled
|
||||
@@ -8975,34 +9024,12 @@ export const tools: McpTool[] = [
|
||||
const dateTo = args.date_to as string | undefined
|
||||
const accountNumber = (args.account_number as string | undefined) || '1930'
|
||||
|
||||
// Pair the bank account with its currency + cash_account_id so EUR GL
|
||||
// movements aren't compared against SEK transactions, and so a secondary
|
||||
// same-currency account doesn't pool the primary's unassigned rows. Mirrors
|
||||
// app/api/reconciliation/bank/status/route.ts.
|
||||
const { data: cashAccount } = await supabase
|
||||
.from('cash_accounts')
|
||||
.select('id, currency, is_primary')
|
||||
.eq('company_id', companyId)
|
||||
.eq('ledger_account', accountNumber)
|
||||
.maybeSingle()
|
||||
|
||||
if (!cashAccount && accountNumber !== '1930') {
|
||||
throw new Error(`Okänt kassakonto ${accountNumber} för det här företaget`)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const currency = (cashAccount?.currency as string | undefined) ?? 'SEK'
|
||||
const cashAccountId = cashAccount?.id as string | undefined
|
||||
const includeUnassigned = cashAccount ? Boolean(cashAccount.is_primary) : true
|
||||
|
||||
return await getReconciliationStatus(
|
||||
return await getScopedReconciliationStatus(
|
||||
supabase,
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
dateFrom,
|
||||
dateTo,
|
||||
accountNumber,
|
||||
currency,
|
||||
cashAccountId,
|
||||
includeUnassigned,
|
||||
)
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user