Mattsson
a1a816b4a5
* Implement company and account deletion features - Add event types for company and account deletion to CoreEvent. - Enhance Supabase middleware to handle company context resolution and cookie management for archived companies. - Create API routes for deleting accounts and companies, including necessary validations and event emissions. - Implement tests for account and company deletion endpoints to ensure proper functionality and error handling. - Add retention notice component to inform users about bookkeeping data retention during destructive actions. - Create database migrations to support soft deletion of companies and anonymization of user accounts, ensuring compliance with retention laws. * feat: enhance account deletion process and update user notifications * Add service client for onboarding completion check and update escape hatch visibility * Enhance invite flow and email handling for company members * Refactor company context and RLS policies for active company isolation - Update `switchCompany` to remove unnecessary revalidation as client handles navigation. - Revise `getActiveCompanyId` to prioritize `user_preferences` and validate against non-archived memberships. - Modify `setActiveCompany` to ensure `user_preferences` is the authoritative source while maintaining cookie compatibility. - Enhance middleware to resolve active company using `user_preferences` and fallback to first non-archived membership. - Introduce new API route `/api/company/current` to fetch the active company ID for cross-tab synchronization. - Implement `CompanyTabSync` component for real-time active company enforcement across tabs. - Create migration for RLS policies to enforce single-active-company isolation using `current_active_company_id()`. * feat: implement viewer role enforcement for write permissions - Added `useCanWrite` hook to determine if the current user has write permissions based on their role in the active company. - Updated various components (JournalEntryForm, CustomerForm, DeadlineForm, etc.) to disable write actions and show a lock icon with a tooltip for users without write permissions. - Introduced `requireWritePermission` function to enforce write permissions at the API level, returning a 403 response for viewers. - Created tests to verify the behavior of the viewer role and write permissions. - Added database migration to enforce read-only access for viewers at the database level.
73 lines
2.0 KiB
TypeScript
73 lines
2.0 KiB
TypeScript
import { createClient } from '@/lib/supabase/server'
|
|
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
|
|
import { getBestInvoiceMatch } from '@/lib/invoices/invoice-matching'
|
|
import { requireCompanyId } from '@/lib/company/context'
|
|
import { requireWritePermission } from '@/lib/auth/require-write'
|
|
import type { Transaction } from '@/types'
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* POST /api/transactions/batch-match-invoices
|
|
* Run invoice matching for all uncategorized income transactions without potential_invoice_id
|
|
*/
|
|
export async function POST() {
|
|
const supabase = await createClient()
|
|
|
|
const { data: { user } } = await supabase.auth.getUser()
|
|
|
|
if (!user) {
|
|
return NextResponse.json({ error: 'Unauthorized' }, { status: 401 })
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const writeCheck = await requireWritePermission(supabase, user.id)
|
|
if (!writeCheck.ok) return writeCheck.response
|
|
|
|
const companyId = await requireCompanyId(supabase, user.id)
|
|
|
|
// Fetch uncategorized income transactions without a potential match
|
|
const { data: transactions, error: txError } = await supabase
|
|
.from('transactions')
|
|
.select('*')
|
|
.eq('company_id', companyId)
|
|
.is('is_business', null)
|
|
.gt('amount', 0)
|
|
.is('potential_invoice_id', null)
|
|
.is('invoice_id', null)
|
|
.order('date', { ascending: false })
|
|
.limit(50)
|
|
|
|
if (txError || !transactions) {
|
|
return NextResponse.json({ error: 'Failed to fetch transactions' }, { status: 500 })
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let matched = 0
|
|
const matchedInvoiceIds = new Set<string>()
|
|
|
|
for (const tx of transactions) {
|
|
try {
|
|
const bestMatch = await getBestInvoiceMatch(
|
|
supabase,
|
|
user.id,
|
|
tx as Transaction,
|
|
0.50
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
if (bestMatch && !matchedInvoiceIds.has(bestMatch.invoice.id)) {
|
|
await supabase
|
|
.from('transactions')
|
|
.update({ potential_invoice_id: bestMatch.invoice.id })
|
|
.eq('id', tx.id)
|
|
|
|
matchedInvoiceIds.add(bestMatch.invoice.id)
|
|
matched++
|
|
}
|
|
} catch {
|
|
// Continue with other transactions
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return NextResponse.json({
|
|
processed: transactions.length,
|
|
matched,
|
|
})
|
|
}
|