* fix(underlag): a verifikat a customer invoice points at is backed by it; PS follows the invoice link (#2298) The invoice-to-verifikat link is written on the invoice side only (invoices.journal_entry_id, invoice_payments.journal_entry_id), while the missing-underlag predicate and the periodisk sammanstallning resolved the invoice from the entry's own source columns. A SIE-imported sale matched to its invoice afterwards therefore kept warning "Underlag saknas" and was left out of the EU sales list, although the account-based momsdeklaration showed it and the verifikat page already listed the invoice as its underlag. - verifikat_without_documents / transactions_without_documents: customer- invoice hanvisning arm (BFL 5 kap 7 §), tenant-scoped on the link row; new migration 20260906135702, pinned by a pg-real test. - getInvoiceReferencesForJournalEntries(): one TS mirror of that arm, used by the journal-list filter and bulk exempt, /api/documents/counts (new invoice_references map) and the transactions list; the push cron mirrors it with its global reads. - Journal list: no "Underlag saknas" chip for a covered entry, matching the engine's own invoice rows and the verifikat detail page. - Periodisk sammanstallning: entries fetched by their EU-revenue lines and attributed through every link (engine source_id, invoices.journal_entry_id, invoice_payments.journal_entry_id); kontantmetod invoice_cash_payment entries are filed too, which the old source_type filter dropped. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019SaJfqNi4VmsG8FMKq99G6 * fix(underlag): issued invoices only, blocking mixed-customer settlements in PS, chunk-level degrade (#2298 review) - The customer-invoice hanvisning arms (RPCs, both TS resolvers, push cron) now require an ISSUED invoice: status not in ('draft', 'cancelled'), the schema's own definition (migration 20260427150000). NON_ISSUED_INVOICE_ STATUSES in lib/invoices/matchable-statuses.ts is the shared constant; the pg test pins a draft-linked and a cancelled-payment entry as still missing. - Periodisk sammanstallning: one verifikat linked to invoices of different customers is no longer attributed to the first invoice; it is left out of the accumulators and reported once as a blocking MIXED_CUSTOMER_SETTLEMENT naming the voucher, the customer count and the amount. Same-customer settlements are filed in full. - Transactions list: a failed invoice-reference lookup leaves that chunk's verdict unknown (no badges) and continues with the remaining chunks instead of abandoning them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <311770904+jakobwennberg-oss@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
622 lines
24 KiB
TypeScript
622 lines
24 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
|
|
import {
|
|
createMockRequest,
|
|
parseJsonResponse,
|
|
createQueuedMockSupabase,
|
|
makeJournalEntry,
|
|
} from '@/tests/helpers'
|
|
|
|
// Mock dependencies
|
|
const { supabase: mockSupabase, enqueue, reset, findCalls } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/supabase/server', () => ({
|
|
createClient: () => Promise.resolve(mockSupabase),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/init', () => ({
|
|
ensureInitialized: vi.fn(),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/company/context', () => ({
|
|
requireCompanyId: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue('company-1'),
|
|
getActiveCompanyId: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue('company-1'),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/auth/require-write', () => ({
|
|
requireWritePermission: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ ok: true }),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
const mockCreateJournalEntry = vi.fn()
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/bookkeeping/engine', () => ({
|
|
createJournalEntry: (...args: unknown[]) => mockCreateJournalEntry(...args),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
import { GET, POST } from '../route'
|
|
|
|
describe('GET /api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', () => {
|
|
const mockUser = { id: 'user-1', email: 'test@test.se' }
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
|
reset()
|
|
mockSupabase.auth.getUser.mockResolvedValue({ data: { user: mockUser } })
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns 401 when not authenticated', async () => {
|
|
mockSupabase.auth.getUser.mockResolvedValue({ data: { user: null } })
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries')
|
|
const response = await GET(request)
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(401)
|
|
expect(body).toEqual({ error: 'Unauthorized' })
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns entries list', async () => {
|
|
const entries = [makeJournalEntry(), makeJournalEntry()]
|
|
enqueue({ data: entries, error: null, count: 2 })
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries')
|
|
const response = await GET(request)
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ data: unknown[]; count: number }>(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(body.data).toEqual(entries)
|
|
expect(body.count).toBe(2)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('passes filters to query', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null, count: 0 })
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
searchParams: {
|
|
period_id: 'period-1',
|
|
status: 'posted',
|
|
date_from: '2024-01-01',
|
|
date_to: '2024-12-31',
|
|
limit: '10',
|
|
offset: '5',
|
|
// Strict period filtering: exercises the PostgREST path, not the RPC.
|
|
include_related: 'false',
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await GET(request)
|
|
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(mockSupabase.from).toHaveBeenCalledWith('journal_entries')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('uses RPC with include_related when period_id is set', async () => {
|
|
const rpcRows = [
|
|
{
|
|
entry: { ...makeJournalEntry({ id: 'je-1' }), out_of_period: false },
|
|
total_count: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
entry: { ...makeJournalEntry({ id: 'je-2' }), out_of_period: true },
|
|
total_count: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
]
|
|
enqueue({ data: rpcRows, error: null })
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
searchParams: { period_id: 'period-1' },
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await GET(request)
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
|
data: Array<{ id: string; out_of_period?: boolean }>
|
|
count: number
|
|
}>(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(mockSupabase.rpc).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
'list_fiscal_period_entries_with_related',
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
p_company_id: 'company-1',
|
|
p_period_id: 'period-1',
|
|
p_include_related: true,
|
|
})
|
|
)
|
|
expect(body.data).toHaveLength(2)
|
|
expect(body.data[1].out_of_period).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(body.count).toBe(2)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('forwards explicit ?status=cancelled to the RPC', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
searchParams: { period_id: 'period-1', status: 'cancelled' },
|
|
})
|
|
await GET(request)
|
|
|
|
// The RPC itself hides cancelled entries unless p_status='cancelled' is
|
|
// passed explicitly (see migration 20260428153500). The behavior of the
|
|
// hide-by-default logic lives in SQL and is covered by pg-real tests.
|
|
expect(mockSupabase.rpc).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
'list_fiscal_period_entries_with_related',
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ p_status: 'cancelled' })
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('uses the direct query path (not the RPC) when a search term is set', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null, count: 0 })
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
searchParams: { period_id: 'period-1', search: 'luftfyllning' },
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await GET(request)
|
|
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
// Free-text search needs an ILIKE the include_related RPC can't express, so
|
|
// the route must fall through to the direct PostgREST query.
|
|
expect(mockSupabase.from).toHaveBeenCalledWith('journal_entries')
|
|
expect(mockSupabase.rpc).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('matches a voucher label like "A209" on series+number as well as description', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null, count: 0 })
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
searchParams: { period_id: 'period-1', search: 'A209' },
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await GET(request)
|
|
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
const orCalls = findCalls('journal_entries', 'or')
|
|
expect(orCalls).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
expect(orCalls[0][0]).toBe(
|
|
'description.ilike."%A209%",and(voucher_series.eq.A,voucher_number.eq.209)',
|
|
)
|
|
// The plain ilike path must not ALSO run, or the OR would be ANDed away.
|
|
expect(findCalls('journal_entries', 'ilike')).toHaveLength(0)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('accepts "a 209" and "A-209" as voucher labels', async () => {
|
|
for (const needle of ['a 209', 'A-209']) {
|
|
reset()
|
|
mockSupabase.auth.getUser.mockResolvedValue({ data: { user: mockUser } })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null, count: 0 })
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
searchParams: { period_id: 'period-1', search: needle },
|
|
})
|
|
await GET(request)
|
|
const orCalls = findCalls('journal_entries', 'or')
|
|
expect(orCalls, needle).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
expect(String(orCalls[0][0])).toContain('and(voucher_series.eq.A,voucher_number.eq.209)')
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('keeps the plain description ilike for non-label needles', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null, count: 0 })
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
searchParams: { period_id: 'period-1', search: 'hyra, kvartal 1 (50%)' },
|
|
})
|
|
await GET(request)
|
|
|
|
expect(findCalls('journal_entries', 'or')).toHaveLength(0)
|
|
const ilikeCalls = findCalls('journal_entries', 'ilike')
|
|
expect(ilikeCalls).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
expect(ilikeCalls[0][0]).toBe('description')
|
|
expect(ilikeCalls[0][1]).toBe('%hyra, kvartal 1 (50\\%)%')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('orders by the total_amount computed column on amount sort, bypassing the RPC', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null, count: 0 })
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
searchParams: { period_id: 'period-1', sort_by: 'total_desc' },
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await GET(request)
|
|
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
// Amount sort orders by a PostgREST computed column (migration
|
|
// 20260811100000) that the include_related RPC can't express, so the
|
|
// route must fall through to the direct query (strict period view),
|
|
// exactly like voucher sort.
|
|
expect(mockSupabase.from).toHaveBeenCalledWith('journal_entries')
|
|
expect(mockSupabase.rpc).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
expect(findCalls('journal_entries', 'order')[0]).toEqual([
|
|
'total_amount',
|
|
{ ascending: false },
|
|
])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('orders by description on description sort, bypassing the RPC', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null, count: 0 })
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
searchParams: { period_id: 'period-1', sort_by: 'description_asc' },
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await GET(request)
|
|
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(mockSupabase.rpc).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
expect(findCalls('journal_entries', 'order')[0]).toEqual([
|
|
'description',
|
|
{ ascending: true },
|
|
])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('chains stacked sort keys in priority order and bypasses the RPC', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null, count: 0 })
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
searchParams: { period_id: 'period-1', sort_by: 'total_desc,description_asc' },
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await GET(request)
|
|
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(mockSupabase.rpc).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
// Priority order preserved, then the voucher tiebreak in the LAST key's
|
|
// direction (ascending here), then the globally unique id tiebreak:
|
|
// series+number repeat across fiscal years, so equal keys need a total
|
|
// order for stable pagination.
|
|
expect(findCalls('journal_entries', 'order')).toEqual([
|
|
['total_amount', { ascending: false }],
|
|
['description', { ascending: true }],
|
|
['voucher_series', { ascending: true }],
|
|
['voucher_number', { ascending: true }],
|
|
['id', { ascending: true }],
|
|
])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('dedupes repeated sort columns and caps the stack at three keys', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null, count: 0 })
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
searchParams: {
|
|
include_related: 'false',
|
|
sort_by: 'date_desc,date_asc,nonsense,voucher_desc,total_asc,description_asc',
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await GET(request)
|
|
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
// date deduped (first token wins), the unknown token is ignored, and the
|
|
// stack caps at three keys (date, voucher, total): description never
|
|
// makes it in. Voucher is in the stack, so no series+number tiebreak is
|
|
// appended; the id tiebreak always is (duplicate series+number across
|
|
// fiscal years on the all-years scope).
|
|
expect(findCalls('journal_entries', 'order')).toEqual([
|
|
['entry_date', { ascending: false }],
|
|
['voucher_series', { ascending: false }],
|
|
['voucher_number', { ascending: false }],
|
|
['total_amount', { ascending: true }],
|
|
['id', { ascending: true }],
|
|
])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('appends the id tiebreak on the all-years scope where voucher identifiers repeat', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null, count: 0 })
|
|
|
|
// No period_id: the "Alla räkenskapsår" scope, where A-1 exists once per
|
|
// fiscal year. Without a globally unique final key, rows with equal
|
|
// (entry_date, series, number) can swap between page requests and be
|
|
// duplicated or dropped at page boundaries.
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
searchParams: { include_related: 'false', sort_by: 'date_desc' },
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await GET(request)
|
|
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
const orderCalls = findCalls('journal_entries', 'order')
|
|
expect(orderCalls[orderCalls.length - 1]).toEqual(['id', { ascending: false }])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('still serves a single date sort key through the include_related RPC', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
searchParams: { period_id: 'period-1', sort_by: 'date_asc' },
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await GET(request)
|
|
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(mockSupabase.rpc).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
'list_fiscal_period_entries_with_related',
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ p_sort_date: 'asc' }),
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('accepts a large limit (the "Alla" page size) and a negative offset without erroring', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null, count: 0 })
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
// 'Alla' sends a large limit; the route clamps it to MAX_LIMIT. A negative
|
|
// offset is floored to 0. Both are bounded server-side (ASVS V1.2.5).
|
|
searchParams: { limit: '999999', offset: '-5', include_related: 'false' },
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await GET(request)
|
|
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(mockSupabase.from).toHaveBeenCalledWith('journal_entries')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns 500 on database error', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, error: { message: 'DB error' } })
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries')
|
|
const response = await GET(request)
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(500)
|
|
// Raw Supabase messages never reach the response field (issue #337).
|
|
expect(body.error).toBe('Verifikationerna kunde inte hämtas. Försök igen.')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('missing_underlag=true (the dashboard deep-link filter)', () => {
|
|
// Candidate ids must be UUID-shaped: the resolver interpolates them into
|
|
// the supplier-invoice .or() filter behind a UUID guard.
|
|
const E1 = '11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111'
|
|
const E2 = '22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222'
|
|
const E3 = '33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333'
|
|
const candidate = (id: string, voucherNumber: number) => ({
|
|
id,
|
|
entry_date: '2026-06-08',
|
|
voucher_series: 'A',
|
|
voucher_number: voucherNumber,
|
|
description: 'test',
|
|
total_amount: 100,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns only entries without documents, exemption-aware, with the full-set count', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: [candidate(E1, 1), candidate(E2, 2), candidate(E3, 3)], error: null }) // candidates
|
|
enqueue({ data: [{ journal_entry_id: E1 }], error: null }) // E1 has a document
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no SI references
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no SI payment-row references
|
|
enqueue({ data: [{ journal_entry_id: E3 }], error: null }) // E3 exempt
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no invoices pointing at the entries
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no invoice payment rows
|
|
const fullRow = makeJournalEntry({ id: E2 })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [fullRow], error: null }) // page rows
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
searchParams: { missing_underlag: 'true', exclude_draft: 'true' },
|
|
})
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ data: { id: string }[]; count: number }>(
|
|
await GET(request)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(body.data.map((e) => e.id)).toEqual([E2])
|
|
expect(body.count).toBe(1)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('takes this path instead of the include_related RPC when a period is selected', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // candidates: none
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
searchParams: { missing_underlag: 'true', period_id: 'period-1', exclude_draft: 'true' },
|
|
})
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ data: unknown[]; count: number }>(
|
|
await GET(request)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(body.data).toEqual([])
|
|
expect(body.count).toBe(0)
|
|
expect(mockSupabase.rpc).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('paginates over the missing set with count spanning all pages', async () => {
|
|
// Out of voucher order on purpose: default sort is series+number asc.
|
|
enqueue({ data: [candidate(E3, 3), candidate(E1, 1), candidate(E2, 2)], error: null })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no documents
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no SI references
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no SI payment-row references
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no exemptions
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no invoices pointing at the entries
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no invoice payment rows
|
|
enqueue({ data: [makeJournalEntry({ id: E2 })], error: null }) // page rows
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
searchParams: {
|
|
missing_underlag: 'true',
|
|
exclude_draft: 'true',
|
|
limit: '1',
|
|
offset: '1',
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ data: { id: string }[]; count: number }>(
|
|
await GET(request)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
// Page 2 of size 1 under voucher-asc = A2.
|
|
expect(body.data.map((e) => e.id)).toEqual([E2])
|
|
expect(body.count).toBe(3)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('treats an anchored supplier-invoice reference as underlag (BFL 5 kap 7 §)', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: [candidate(E1, 1), candidate(E2, 2)], error: null })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no direct documents
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: [
|
|
{
|
|
registration_journal_entry_id: E1,
|
|
payment_journal_entry_id: null,
|
|
document: { journal_entry_id: E1 }, // anchored → counts as underlag
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
error: null,
|
|
})
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no SI payment-row references
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no exemptions
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no invoices pointing at the entries
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no invoice payment rows
|
|
enqueue({ data: [makeJournalEntry({ id: E2 })], error: null }) // page rows
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
searchParams: { missing_underlag: 'true', exclude_draft: 'true' },
|
|
})
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ data: { id: string }[]; count: number }>(
|
|
await GET(request)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(body.data.map((e) => e.id)).toEqual([E2])
|
|
expect(body.count).toBe(1)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('treats a customer invoice pointing at the entry as underlag (#2298)', async () => {
|
|
// E1: a SIE-imported voucher the user matched to an invoice created in
|
|
// Accounted (invoice_payments row). E2: nothing points at it.
|
|
enqueue({ data: [candidate(E1, 1), candidate(E2, 2)], error: null })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no direct documents
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no SI references
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no SI payment-row references
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no exemptions
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no direct invoice links
|
|
enqueue({ data: [{ id: 'pay-1', invoice_id: 'inv-1', journal_entry_id: E1 }], error: null })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [makeJournalEntry({ id: E2 })], error: null }) // page rows
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
searchParams: { missing_underlag: 'true', exclude_draft: 'true' },
|
|
})
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ data: { id: string }[]; count: number }>(
|
|
await GET(request, { params: Promise.resolve({}) })
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(body.data.map((e) => e.id)).toEqual([E2])
|
|
expect(body.count).toBe(1)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('matches a voucher-label search against series+number, like the direct path', async () => {
|
|
// A voucher-shaped needle fans out to TWO candidate queries (description
|
|
// ilike, then series+number), unioned by id: a runtime-built .or()
|
|
// would count against the phantom-column scanner's ceiling.
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // candidates by description: none
|
|
enqueue({ data: [candidate(E1, 209)], error: null }) // candidates by voucher label
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no documents
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no SI references
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no SI payment-row references
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no exemptions
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no invoices pointing at the entries
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // no invoice payment rows
|
|
enqueue({ data: [makeJournalEntry({ id: E1 })], error: null }) // page rows
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
searchParams: { missing_underlag: 'true', exclude_draft: 'true', search: 'A209' },
|
|
})
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ data: { id: string }[]; count: number }>(
|
|
await GET(request)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
// Searching "A209" with the filter on must find verifikat A209 even
|
|
// when its description never mentions it.
|
|
expect(body.data.map((e) => e.id)).toEqual([E1])
|
|
expect(body.count).toBe(1)
|
|
const eqCalls = findCalls('journal_entries', 'eq')
|
|
expect(eqCalls).toContainEqual(['voucher_series', 'A'])
|
|
expect(eqCalls).toContainEqual(['voucher_number', 209])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('is ignored for the drafts view', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null, count: 0 })
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
searchParams: { missing_underlag: 'true', status: 'draft' },
|
|
})
|
|
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(await GET(request))
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
// The drafts view goes through the normal direct query, not the
|
|
// resolver: no lookup-table queries.
|
|
expect(mockSupabase.from).toHaveBeenCalledWith('journal_entries')
|
|
expect(mockSupabase.from).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('document_attachments')
|
|
expect(mockSupabase.from).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('journal_entry_no_doc_required')
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const VALID_UUID = '550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440000'
|
|
|
|
describe('POST /api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', () => {
|
|
const mockUser = { id: 'user-1', email: 'test@test.se' }
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
|
reset()
|
|
mockSupabase.auth.getUser.mockResolvedValue({ data: { user: mockUser } })
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns 401 when not authenticated', async () => {
|
|
mockSupabase.auth.getUser.mockResolvedValue({ data: { user: null } })
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
method: 'POST',
|
|
body: {},
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await POST(request)
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(401)
|
|
expect(body).toEqual({ error: 'Unauthorized' })
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('creates journal entry and returns it', async () => {
|
|
const entry = makeJournalEntry()
|
|
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue(entry)
|
|
|
|
const input = {
|
|
fiscal_period_id: VALID_UUID,
|
|
entry_date: '2024-06-15',
|
|
description: 'Test entry',
|
|
source_type: 'manual',
|
|
lines: [
|
|
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 1000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
|
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1000 },
|
|
],
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
method: 'POST',
|
|
body: input,
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await POST(request)
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ data: unknown }>(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(body.data).toEqual(entry)
|
|
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.anything(), 'company-1', 'user-1', input)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns 400 when engine throws', async () => {
|
|
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockRejectedValue(new Error('Unbalanced entry'))
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/bookkeeping/journal-entries', {
|
|
method: 'POST',
|
|
body: {
|
|
fiscal_period_id: VALID_UUID,
|
|
entry_date: '2024-06-15',
|
|
description: 'Bad entry',
|
|
source_type: 'manual',
|
|
lines: [
|
|
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 1000, credit_amount: 0 },
|
|
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await POST(request)
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(400)
|
|
// Untyped engine errors map to the Swedish context fallback (issue #337).
|
|
expect(body.error).toBe('Kunde inte hantera verifikationen. Försök igen.')
|
|
})
|
|
})
|