* feat(mcp): already-explained voucher guard at stage and commit for match_batch_allocate The dashboard match-batch route refused BATCH_TX_POSSIBLE_DUPLICATE when posted, unlinked vouchers already summed to the bank row (PR #2300), but the MCP door (gnubok_match_batch_allocate staging + commitMatchBatchAllocate) called the RPC with no guard, so an agent could book a Bankgirot aggregate a second time. The detector existed once; the guard lived in one door. One shared decision helper, lib/invoices/already-explained-guard.ts, now sits on top of the existing detectors (no fork) and is called by the dashboard route, the MCP staging tools and the commit executors: - gnubok_match_batch_allocate refuses to stage, coded BATCH_TX_POSSIBLE_DUPLICATE, naming the vouchers, the reconcile_match / link_transaction_to_journal_entry call that resolves the row, and the exact force + expected_journal_entry_ids binding. - commitMatchBatchAllocate runs the same guard before the RPC and re-validates a staged force binding against the set detected at commit, so a stale approval cannot book a duplicate; 409 auto-rejects with the vouchers in result_data. - force + expected_journal_entry_ids on the tool mirror MatchBatchSchema; an honoured override stages with a compliance_warning and, after the booking succeeds, writes BankTransactionDuplicateDismissed to behandlingshistorik (dashboard route included; it only logged before). - gnubok_match_transaction_to_invoice and commitMatchTransactionInvoice get the dashboard's 1:1 soft-duplicate guard (MATCH_INVOICE_POSSIBLE_DUPLICATE / MATCH_INVOICE_FORCE_CANDIDATE_MISMATCH) with force + expected_journal_entry_id; at commit it runs before the storno. - Registry: both duplicate codes gain retryable: false and a remediation. Catalog payload held under the 60K ceiling by trimming the two tools' own descriptions (59 988 measured, ledger entry in payload-size.bench.test.ts). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019SaJfqNi4VmsG8FMKq99G6 * docs(decisions): record the 2026-09-06 ten-issue batch's first-principles choices Carries the DECISIONS.md lines for PRs #2337 #2339 #2340 #2341 #2342 #2343 #2344 #2345 #2346 #2347 in one place so the ten branches do not conflict on this file. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019SaJfqNi4VmsG8FMKq99G6 * fix(mcp): refuse an unverifiable forced override, surface a failed duplicate check, validate the binding (#2294 review) Review round on PR #2346 (CodeRabbit + compliance): - guardAlreadyExplained returned 'clear' when the detector threw even with force=true, so a forced 1:N override could book without re-validating expected_journal_entry_ids and left no behandlingshistorik record. It now returns a distinct 'unverifiable' outcome under force (mirrors guardDuplicatePaymentVoucher); the dashboard route, the MCP staging tool and the commit executor all refuse it with the new registry code BATCH_TX_EXPLAINED_CHECK_FAILED (409, retryable, remediation). Regression tests on every caller. - A detector failure without force still fails open at stage time, but no longer silently: the tools track onDetectError and stage a complianceNote, so preview_data.compliance_warning is set on both match_batch_allocate (GenericPreview renders it) and match_transaction_invoice (MatchTransactionInvoicePreview now renders data.compliance_warning through AttnLine). - expected_journal_entry_ids / expected_journal_entry_id are validated at the MCP boundary (array of 1 to 10 non-empty strings / non-empty string) and refused with VALIDATION_ERROR instead of being silently filtered. No schema description text added: catalog payload unchanged. - RoPA: .compliance/ropa.yaml gains bookkeeping.duplicate_dismissal_history for the BankTransactionDuplicateDismissed record (Art. 6(1)(c), BFNAR 2013:2 p. 9.16, retention per BFL 7 kap, stored in processing_history). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <311770904+jakobwennberg-oss@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
234 lines
8.8 KiB
TypeScript
234 lines
8.8 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* Soft-duplicate guard on the agent/MCP match-transaction-to-invoice commit
|
|
* path (`commitMatchTransactionInvoice` in lib/pending-operations/commit.ts),
|
|
* issue #2294.
|
|
*
|
|
* The dashboard and v1 match-invoice routes refuse with
|
|
* MATCH_INVOICE_POSSIBLE_DUPLICATE when a manual verifikation already books
|
|
* the receipt, and bind force to that candidate. This path bypassed the guard
|
|
* entirely. It now runs the same guard BEFORE the irreversible storno, and
|
|
* re-binds a staged force to the candidate detected at commit.
|
|
*/
|
|
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
|
|
import { eventBus } from '@/lib/events/bus'
|
|
import { createQueuedMockSupabase } from '@/tests/helpers'
|
|
import type { PendingOperation } from '@/types'
|
|
|
|
const mockReverseEntry = vi.fn()
|
|
const mockFindFiscalPeriod = vi.fn()
|
|
const mockCreateJournalEntry = vi.fn()
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/bookkeeping/engine', async () => {
|
|
const actual = await vi.importActual<typeof import('@/lib/bookkeeping/engine')>('@/lib/bookkeeping/engine')
|
|
return {
|
|
...actual,
|
|
reverseEntry: (...args: unknown[]) => mockReverseEntry(...args),
|
|
findFiscalPeriod: (...args: unknown[]) => mockFindFiscalPeriod(...args),
|
|
createJournalEntry: (...args: unknown[]) => mockCreateJournalEntry(...args),
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const { mockDetectCandidate, mockAppendProcessingHistory } = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
mockDetectCandidate: vi.fn(),
|
|
mockAppendProcessingHistory: vi.fn(),
|
|
}))
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/invoices/duplicate-payment-detection', () => ({
|
|
detectDuplicatePaymentVoucher: mockDetectCandidate,
|
|
detectExplainingVoucherSetForTransaction: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
}))
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/processing-history/append', () => ({
|
|
appendProcessingHistory: mockAppendProcessingHistory,
|
|
}))
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/invoices/clear-settled-invoice-suggestions', () => ({
|
|
clearSettledInvoiceSuggestions: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
import { commitPendingOperation } from '../commit'
|
|
|
|
const JE_MANUAL = '55555555-5555-4555-8555-555555555555'
|
|
const JE_OTHER = '66666666-6666-4666-8666-666666666666'
|
|
|
|
function makePendingOp(params: Record<string, unknown>): PendingOperation {
|
|
return {
|
|
id: 'op-1',
|
|
user_id: 'user-1',
|
|
company_id: 'company-1',
|
|
operation_type: 'match_transaction_invoice',
|
|
status: 'pending',
|
|
title: 'test',
|
|
params,
|
|
preview_data: {},
|
|
result_data: null,
|
|
actor_type: 'user',
|
|
actor_id: null,
|
|
actor_label: null,
|
|
risk_level: 'medium',
|
|
created_at: '2026-05-03T00:00:00Z',
|
|
resolved_at: null,
|
|
updated_at: '2026-05-03T00:00:00Z',
|
|
} as PendingOperation
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const transaction = {
|
|
id: 'tx-1',
|
|
company_id: 'company-1',
|
|
amount: 1000,
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
amount_sek: null,
|
|
exchange_rate: null,
|
|
date: '2026-05-15',
|
|
invoice_id: null,
|
|
// A prior categorization: the storno must never run before the guard.
|
|
journal_entry_id: 'je-old',
|
|
cash_account_id: null,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const invoice = {
|
|
id: 'inv-1',
|
|
invoice_number: 'F-2026001',
|
|
status: 'sent',
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
remaining_amount: 1000,
|
|
paid_amount: 0,
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
exchange_rate: null,
|
|
journal_entry_id: null,
|
|
credited_invoice_id: null,
|
|
customer: { name: 'Kund AB' },
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const candidate = {
|
|
journal_entry_id: JE_MANUAL,
|
|
voucher_label: 'A12',
|
|
entry_date: '2026-05-15',
|
|
description: 'Inbetalning faktura',
|
|
amount: 1000,
|
|
bank_account_number: '1930',
|
|
reason: 'exact_amount_same_date',
|
|
amount_verified: true,
|
|
unverified_reason: null,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** CAS claim + the two reads that precede the guard. */
|
|
function enqueuePreGuard(enqueue: (r: { data?: unknown; error?: unknown }) => void) {
|
|
enqueue({ data: { id: 'op-1' }, error: null }) // CAS claim
|
|
enqueue({ data: transaction, error: null }) // transaction fetch
|
|
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null }) // invoice fetch
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
|
eventBus.clear()
|
|
mockDetectCandidate.mockResolvedValue(null)
|
|
mockAppendProcessingHistory.mockResolvedValue('evt-1')
|
|
mockReverseEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-storno' })
|
|
mockFindFiscalPeriod.mockResolvedValue('fp-1')
|
|
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-pay' })
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('commitPendingOperation: match_transaction_invoice soft-duplicate guard', () => {
|
|
it('auto-rejects (409) with the candidate before the storno when a manual voucher already books the receipt', async () => {
|
|
mockDetectCandidate.mockResolvedValue(candidate)
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
enqueuePreGuard(enqueue)
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // dispatcher rejection update
|
|
|
|
const result = await commitPendingOperation(
|
|
supabase as never,
|
|
'user-1',
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
makePendingOp({ transaction_id: 'tx-1', invoice_id: 'inv-1' }),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(result.status).toBe('rejected')
|
|
expect(result.http_status).toBe(409)
|
|
expect(result.code).toBe('MATCH_INVOICE_POSSIBLE_DUPLICATE')
|
|
expect(result.error).toContain('A12')
|
|
expect((result.data as { candidate: { journal_entry_id: string } }).candidate.journal_entry_id).toBe(JE_MANUAL)
|
|
// Nothing irreversible happened: no storno, no payment voucher.
|
|
expect(mockReverseEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
expect(mockAppendProcessingHistory).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('books when the staged force echoes the candidate detected now, and records the override after the booking', async () => {
|
|
mockDetectCandidate.mockResolvedValue(candidate)
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
enqueuePreGuard(enqueue)
|
|
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual', entity_type: 'aktiebolag' }, error: null }) // settings
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // resolveSettlementAccount: no enabled cash accounts -> 1930
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // transactions unlink after storno
|
|
enqueue({ data: [{ id: 'inv-1' }], error: null }) // invoice CAS update
|
|
enqueue({ data: { id: 'ip-1' }, error: null }) // invoice_payments insert
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // transactions update (link)
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // dispatcher finalize update
|
|
|
|
const result = await commitPendingOperation(
|
|
supabase as never,
|
|
'user-1',
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
makePendingOp({ transaction_id: 'tx-1', invoice_id: 'inv-1', force: true, expected_journal_entry_id: JE_MANUAL }),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(result.status).toBe('committed')
|
|
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
|
|
expect(mockAppendProcessingHistory).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
|
|
expect(mockAppendProcessingHistory.mock.calls[0][0]).toMatchObject({
|
|
companyId: 'company-1',
|
|
aggregateType: 'BankTransaction',
|
|
aggregateId: 'tx-1',
|
|
eventType: 'BankTransactionDuplicateDismissed',
|
|
actor: { type: 'user', id: 'user-1' },
|
|
payload: {
|
|
transaction_id: 'tx-1',
|
|
dismissed_journal_entry_id: JE_MANUAL,
|
|
dismissed_voucher_label: 'A12',
|
|
via: 'pending_operation_force',
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('refuses a stale force id as MATCH_INVOICE_FORCE_CANDIDATE_MISMATCH, still before the storno', async () => {
|
|
mockDetectCandidate.mockResolvedValue(candidate)
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
enqueuePreGuard(enqueue)
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // dispatcher rejection update
|
|
|
|
const result = await commitPendingOperation(
|
|
supabase as never,
|
|
'user-1',
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
makePendingOp({ transaction_id: 'tx-1', invoice_id: 'inv-1', force: true, expected_journal_entry_id: JE_OTHER }),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(result.status).toBe('rejected')
|
|
expect(result.http_status).toBe(409)
|
|
expect(result.code).toBe('MATCH_INVOICE_FORCE_CANDIDATE_MISMATCH')
|
|
expect(result.data).toEqual({ expected_journal_entry_id: JE_OTHER, detected_journal_entry_id: JE_MANUAL })
|
|
expect(mockReverseEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('fails open when the detector throws without force: the match proceeds', async () => {
|
|
mockDetectCandidate.mockRejectedValue(new Error('scan failed'))
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
enqueuePreGuard(enqueue)
|
|
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual', entity_type: 'aktiebolag' }, error: null }) // settings
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // resolveSettlementAccount
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // transactions unlink after storno
|
|
enqueue({ data: [{ id: 'inv-1' }], error: null }) // invoice CAS update
|
|
enqueue({ data: { id: 'ip-1' }, error: null }) // invoice_payments insert
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // transactions update (link)
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // dispatcher finalize update
|
|
|
|
const result = await commitPendingOperation(
|
|
supabase as never,
|
|
'user-1',
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
makePendingOp({ transaction_id: 'tx-1', invoice_id: 'inv-1' }),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(result.status).toBe('committed')
|
|
expect(mockAppendProcessingHistory).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
})
|
|
})
|