Every migrated sales invoice whose rows complete_invoice_rows writes, from the migration wizard or the hourly row-completion pass, now leaves one InvoiceRowsCompleted row in processing_history on a new Invoice aggregate: the writer, the provider, the consent, the row count, and the header VAT split before and after when the pass rewrote it (BFL 5 kap 11 §, BFNAR 2013:2 p. 9.16). One run shares one correlation id. lib/invoices/complete-invoice-rows.ts is the one TypeScript call site for the RPC and the one emitter: it appends only on wrote = true, records nothing for already_filled or failed, and keeps the append best-effort (logged, eventId null) like every other processing_history writer. The wizard runs on the user's session client, so MigrationOptions takes a lazy createHistoryClient for the service role. Invoice numbers stay out of the payload (the personnummer guard would drop ten-digit ones). Migration 20260906210100 widens the aggregate_type CHECK with Invoice and registers the event type; pg test covers the catalog row, the aggregate, and that the CHECK still refuses unknown aggregates. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LvMaHcTnwAfxzgYD1fGYX1 Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <311770904+jakobwennberg-oss@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
205 lines
8.1 KiB
TypeScript
205 lines
8.1 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
|
|
import { PROCESSING_EVENT_TYPES } from '@/lib/processing-history/append'
|
|
import {
|
|
completeInvoiceRows,
|
|
INVOICE_ROWS_COMPLETED_EVENT,
|
|
type CompleteInvoiceRowsTrail,
|
|
} from '../complete-invoice-rows'
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* The one call site for complete_invoice_rows and the one emitter of the
|
|
* InvoiceRowsCompleted behandlingshistorik event (#2312). The append runs for
|
|
* real against a spy client: what lands in processing_history is the row
|
|
* shape and the PII guard of appendProcessingHistoryWithClient, not a mock's
|
|
* idea of it. The RPC is a spy.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/supabase/server', () => ({
|
|
createClient: vi.fn(),
|
|
createServiceClient: vi.fn(),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
const COMPANY = '11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111'
|
|
const INVOICE = '22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222'
|
|
const CONSENT = '33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333'
|
|
const RUN = '44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444'
|
|
|
|
const ROWS = [
|
|
{ sort_order: 1, description: 'Konsulttid', quantity: 8, unit: 'h', unit_price: 100, line_total: 800, vat_rate: 25, vat_amount: 200, line_type: 'product' },
|
|
{ sort_order: 2, description: 'Resa', quantity: 1, unit: 'st', unit_price: 200, line_total: 200, vat_rate: 25, vat_amount: 50, line_type: 'product' },
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
const HEADER = {
|
|
subtotal: 1000,
|
|
subtotal_sek: 1000,
|
|
vat_amount: 250,
|
|
vat_amount_sek: 250,
|
|
vat_rate: 25,
|
|
vat_treatment: 'standard_25',
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** The pre-#1745 shape: 25 % label beside 0 kr VAT and subtotal = total. */
|
|
const BEFORE = { subtotal: 1250, vat_amount: 0, vat_rate: 25, vat_treatment: 'standard_25' }
|
|
|
|
const trail: CompleteInvoiceRowsTrail = {
|
|
source: 'complete-invoice-lines',
|
|
provider: 'fortnox',
|
|
consentId: CONSENT,
|
|
correlationId: RUN,
|
|
actor: { type: 'cron', id: 'complete-invoice-lines' },
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function rpcClient(reply: { data?: unknown; error?: { message: string } | null }) {
|
|
const rpc = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ data: reply.data ?? null, error: reply.error ?? null })
|
|
return { client: { rpc } as never, rpc }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function historyClient(error: { message: string } | null = null) {
|
|
const insert = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ error })
|
|
const from = vi.fn().mockReturnValue({ insert })
|
|
return { client: { from } as never, from, insert }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const wrote = (rows: number, headerUpdated: boolean) => ({
|
|
data: { ok: true, wrote: true, rows, header_updated: headerUpdated },
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('completeInvoiceRows', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('names an event type the catalog registers', () => {
|
|
// The union already refuses an unregistered literal at compile time;
|
|
// this pins the runtime list the pg test reads against the migration.
|
|
expect(PROCESSING_EVENT_TYPES).toContain(INVOICE_ROWS_COMPLETED_EVENT)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('writes through the RPC and appends one InvoiceRowsCompleted on the invoice, with the split before and after', async () => {
|
|
const { client: supabase, rpc } = rpcClient(wrote(2, true))
|
|
const history = historyClient()
|
|
|
|
const result = await completeInvoiceRows(supabase, {
|
|
companyId: COMPANY,
|
|
invoiceId: INVOICE,
|
|
rows: ROWS,
|
|
header: HEADER,
|
|
headerBefore: BEFORE,
|
|
trail,
|
|
historyClient: history.client,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(rpc).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
|
|
expect(rpc).toHaveBeenCalledWith('complete_invoice_rows', {
|
|
p_company_id: COMPANY,
|
|
p_invoice_id: INVOICE,
|
|
p_rows: ROWS,
|
|
p_header: HEADER,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(history.from).toHaveBeenCalledWith('processing_history')
|
|
expect(history.insert).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
|
|
const row = history.insert.mock.calls[0][0] as Record<string, unknown>
|
|
expect(row).toMatchObject({
|
|
company_id: COMPANY,
|
|
correlation_id: RUN,
|
|
aggregate_type: 'Invoice',
|
|
aggregate_id: INVOICE,
|
|
event_type: 'InvoiceRowsCompleted',
|
|
actor: { type: 'cron', id: 'complete-invoice-lines' },
|
|
payload_schema_version: 1,
|
|
})
|
|
expect(row.payload).toEqual({
|
|
source: 'complete-invoice-lines',
|
|
provider: 'fortnox',
|
|
consent_id: CONSENT,
|
|
rows: 2,
|
|
header_updated: true,
|
|
header_before: { subtotal: 1250, vat_amount: 0, vat_rate: 25, vat_treatment: 'standard_25' },
|
|
header_after: { subtotal: 1000, vat_amount: 250, vat_rate: 25, vat_treatment: 'standard_25' },
|
|
})
|
|
// The SEK twins are derived, not evidence: the trail leaves them out.
|
|
expect(row.payload).not.toHaveProperty('header_after.subtotal_sek')
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toEqual({ status: 'written', rows: 2, headerUpdated: true, eventId: row.event_id })
|
|
expect(typeof result.status === 'string' && 'eventId' in result && result.eventId).toMatch(/^[0-9a-f-]{36}$/)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('records no split when the header was left alone (the wizard path, or evidence already there)', async () => {
|
|
const { client: supabase, rpc } = rpcClient(wrote(2, false))
|
|
const history = historyClient()
|
|
|
|
const result = await completeInvoiceRows(supabase, {
|
|
companyId: COMPANY,
|
|
invoiceId: INVOICE,
|
|
rows: ROWS,
|
|
trail: { ...trail, source: 'migration-wizard', actor: { type: 'user', id: '55555555-5555-4555-8555-555555555555' } },
|
|
historyClient: history.client,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// No header means an explicit null to the RPC, never a dropped argument.
|
|
expect(rpc.mock.calls[0][1]).toMatchObject({ p_header: null })
|
|
const row = history.insert.mock.calls[0][0] as Record<string, unknown>
|
|
expect(row.payload).toEqual({
|
|
source: 'migration-wizard',
|
|
provider: 'fortnox',
|
|
consent_id: CONSENT,
|
|
rows: 2,
|
|
header_updated: false,
|
|
header_before: null,
|
|
header_after: null,
|
|
})
|
|
expect(row.actor).toEqual({ type: 'user', id: '55555555-5555-4555-8555-555555555555' })
|
|
expect(result).toMatchObject({ status: 'written', rows: 2, headerUpdated: false })
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('records nothing when another writer filled the invoice first', async () => {
|
|
const { client: supabase } = rpcClient({ data: { ok: true, wrote: false, rows: 0, header_updated: false } })
|
|
const history = historyClient()
|
|
|
|
const result = await completeInvoiceRows(supabase, {
|
|
companyId: COMPANY, invoiceId: INVOICE, rows: ROWS, header: HEADER, headerBefore: BEFORE, trail,
|
|
historyClient: history.client,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toEqual({ status: 'already_filled' })
|
|
expect(history.insert).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('records nothing when the RPC errors or refuses', async () => {
|
|
const history = historyClient()
|
|
|
|
const errored = rpcClient({ data: null, error: { message: 'check violation' } })
|
|
await expect(completeInvoiceRows(errored.client, {
|
|
companyId: COMPANY, invoiceId: INVOICE, rows: ROWS, trail, historyClient: history.client,
|
|
})).resolves.toEqual({ status: 'failed', reason: 'check violation' })
|
|
|
|
const refused = rpcClient({ data: { ok: false, code: 'MISSING_REQUIRED', details: { column: 'vat_rate' } } })
|
|
await expect(completeInvoiceRows(refused.client, {
|
|
companyId: COMPANY, invoiceId: INVOICE, rows: ROWS, trail, historyClient: history.client,
|
|
})).resolves.toEqual({ status: 'failed', reason: 'MISSING_REQUIRED' })
|
|
|
|
const empty = rpcClient({ data: null })
|
|
await expect(completeInvoiceRows(empty.client, {
|
|
companyId: COMPANY, invoiceId: INVOICE, rows: ROWS, trail, historyClient: history.client,
|
|
})).resolves.toEqual({ status: 'failed', reason: 'empty RPC response' })
|
|
|
|
expect(history.insert).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('reports a write whose trail append failed as written, with no event id', async () => {
|
|
// The rows are committed by then. Failing the invoice would make the
|
|
// next run try again and find it full; the gap is logged instead.
|
|
const { client: supabase } = rpcClient(wrote(2, true))
|
|
const history = historyClient({ message: 'insert or update on table "processing_history" violates foreign key constraint' })
|
|
|
|
const result = await completeInvoiceRows(supabase, {
|
|
companyId: COMPANY, invoiceId: INVOICE, rows: ROWS, header: HEADER, headerBefore: BEFORE, trail,
|
|
historyClient: history.client,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(history.insert).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
|
|
expect(result).toEqual({ status: 'written', rows: 2, headerUpdated: true, eventId: null })
|
|
})
|
|
})
|