Files
accounted/tests/pg/link-voucher-rpcs-tenant-guard.pg.test.ts
T
Jakob WennbergandClaude Sonnet 5 ec27228a8e style: remove em/en dashes repo-wide, add CLAUDE.md rule against them (#890)
Em dashes (—) and en dashes (–) had spread across comments, docs, tests,
and a few UI strings, reading as AI-generated boilerplate rather than
house style. Replaced each with punctuation matching its context: colon
for explanatory clauses, comma for asides, plain hyphen for numeric/legal
ranges (e.g. "21-23§"), "to"/"till" for date ranges, parentheses for
paired-dash asides. messages/en.json and messages/sv.json were fixed by
hand together to keep sv/en in sync.

Left untouched where the dash is the functional subject rather than
decorative punctuation: date-range-parser.ts's separator regex,
charset-repair.ts's CP1252 byte-mapping table (and its test), the SIE
encoding mojibake docs, generic-csv.ts's minus-sign normalizer, the
agent system-prompt files that already instruct against em dashes, and
a golden iXBRL test fixture compared byte-for-byte.

Also fixes two bugs surfaced along the way: an off-by-one in
ApiKeysPanel's scope-label split (a leftover from an earlier partial
pass), and a charset-repair test that had lost the literal en-dash it
exists to verify.

Regenerated the agent atom seed migration (skills:generate) since 27
SKILL.md files changed. Added a CLAUDE.md rule against em/en dashes,
with an explicit carve-out for the functional-dash cases above.

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-04 15:58:06 +02:00

224 lines
9.1 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* pg-real test for the voucher-link write-RPC tenant guard
* (20260615120000_link_voucher_rpcs_tenant_guard.sql).
*
* link_invoice_to_voucher and link_supplier_invoice_to_voucher are SECURITY
* DEFINER and EXECUTE-able by authenticated, so without the guard any
* authenticated user could call them directly with another company's id and
* mutate that tenant's invoices + payment rows. The guard enforces membership
* for anon/authenticated while leaving service_role and direct/superuser access
* (this harness, migrations) untouched, same pattern as the GL read-RPC guard
* (tests/pg/gl_lines_rpc_tenant_guard.pg.test.ts).
*/
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest'
import { randomUUID } from 'node:crypto'
import { getPool, withUserContext } from './setup'
import { seedCompany } from './fixtures'
let arrivalSeq = 0
async function seedCustomerInvoice(params: {
userId: string
companyId: string
total?: number
}): Promise<string> {
const customerId = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.customers (id, user_id, company_id, name, customer_type)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'Test Kund AB', 'swedish_business')`,
[customerId, params.userId, params.companyId],
)
const id = randomUUID()
const total = params.total ?? 1000
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.invoices
(id, user_id, company_id, customer_id, invoice_number, invoice_date, due_date,
currency, subtotal, vat_amount, total, vat_treatment, vat_rate, status,
paid_amount, remaining_amount)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, '2026-04-01', '2026-05-01', 'SEK',
$6, 0, $6, 'standard_25', 25, 'sent', 0, $6)`,
[id, params.userId, params.companyId, customerId, `F-${id.slice(0, 8)}`, total],
)
return id
}
async function seedSupplierInvoice(params: {
userId: string
companyId: string
total?: number
}): Promise<string> {
const supplierId = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.suppliers
(id, user_id, company_id, name, supplier_type, country, default_payment_terms, default_currency)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'Leverantör AB', 'swedish_business', 'SE', 30, 'SEK')`,
[supplierId, params.userId, params.companyId],
)
const id = randomUUID()
const total = params.total ?? 1000
// Time component for cross-run uniqueness, counter for within-run uniqueness.
const arrivalNumber = (Date.now() % 1_000_000) * 1000 + arrivalSeq++
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.supplier_invoices
(id, user_id, company_id, supplier_id, arrival_number, supplier_invoice_number,
invoice_date, due_date, received_date, status, currency,
subtotal, vat_amount, total, paid_amount, remaining_amount,
vat_treatment, reverse_charge, is_credit_note)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, $6, '2026-04-01', '2026-05-01', '2026-04-01', 'approved', 'SEK',
$7, 0, $7, 0, $7, 'standard_25', false, false)`,
[id, params.userId, params.companyId, supplierId, arrivalNumber, `LF-${arrivalNumber}`, total],
)
return id
}
/** Posted voucher crediting 1510 (AR settle) or debiting 244x (AP settle). */
async function seedPostedVoucher(params: {
userId: string
companyId: string
fiscalPeriodId: string
side: 'ar' | 'ap'
amount?: number
}): Promise<string> {
const id = randomUUID()
const amount = params.amount ?? 1000
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.journal_entries
(id, user_id, company_id, fiscal_period_id, voucher_number, voucher_series,
entry_date, description, source_type, status)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, 'A', '2026-05-05', 'Betalning', 'manual', 'posted')`,
[id, params.userId, params.companyId, params.fiscalPeriodId, Math.floor(Math.random() * 100000)],
)
if (params.side === 'ar') {
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.journal_entry_lines
(journal_entry_id, account_number, debit_amount, credit_amount)
VALUES ($1, '1930', $2, 0),
($1, '1510', 0, $2)`,
[id, amount],
)
} else {
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.journal_entry_lines
(journal_entry_id, account_number, debit_amount, credit_amount)
VALUES ($1, '2440', $2, 0),
($1, '1930', 0, $2)`,
[id, amount],
)
}
return id
}
const LINK_INVOICE = `SELECT public.link_invoice_to_voucher($1, $2, $3, $4, $5) AS result`
const LINK_SUPPLIER = `SELECT public.link_supplier_invoice_to_voucher($1, $2, $3, $4, $5) AS result`
describe('voucher-link write RPCs: tenant-isolation guard', () => {
it('blocks an authenticated non-member from linking another company\'s invoice', async () => {
const a = await seedCompany()
const b = await seedCompany()
const invoiceId = await seedCustomerInvoice({ userId: a.userId, companyId: a.companyId })
const voucherId = await seedPostedVoucher({
userId: a.userId,
companyId: a.companyId,
fiscalPeriodId: a.fiscalPeriodId,
side: 'ar',
})
// Member of company B probing company A: guard fires before any data
// access and answers indistinguishably from a missing invoice.
await withUserContext(b.userId, async (client) => {
const res = await client.query(LINK_INVOICE, [invoiceId, voucherId, b.userId, a.companyId, null])
expect(res.rows[0].result).toMatchObject({ ok: false, code: 'LINK_VOUCHER_INVOICE_NOT_FOUND' })
})
// Nothing was mutated on the cross-tenant attempt.
const inv = await getPool().query(`SELECT status, paid_amount FROM public.invoices WHERE id = $1`, [invoiceId])
expect(inv.rows[0]).toMatchObject({ status: 'sent' })
const payments = await getPool().query(
`SELECT id FROM public.invoice_payments WHERE invoice_id = $1`,
[invoiceId],
)
expect(payments.rows).toHaveLength(0)
// A member of company A still links successfully through the same path:
// the guard must not break legitimate user-session calls. The spoofed
// p_user_id is ignored for user-session callers: the JWT sub is
// authoritative for payment-row attribution (GDPR Art. 32). Asserted
// inside the context: withUserContext rolls its transaction back.
const spoofedUserId = randomUUID()
await withUserContext(a.userId, async (client) => {
const res = await client.query(LINK_INVOICE, [invoiceId, voucherId, spoofedUserId, a.companyId, null])
expect(res.rows[0].result).toMatchObject({ ok: true, invoice_status: 'paid' })
const payment = await client.query(
`SELECT user_id FROM public.invoice_payments WHERE invoice_id = $1`,
[invoiceId],
)
expect(payment.rows).toHaveLength(1)
expect(payment.rows[0].user_id).toBe(a.userId)
})
})
it('blocks an authenticated non-member from linking another company\'s supplier invoice', async () => {
const a = await seedCompany()
const b = await seedCompany()
const supplierInvoiceId = await seedSupplierInvoice({ userId: a.userId, companyId: a.companyId })
const voucherId = await seedPostedVoucher({
userId: a.userId,
companyId: a.companyId,
fiscalPeriodId: a.fiscalPeriodId,
side: 'ap',
})
await withUserContext(b.userId, async (client) => {
const res = await client.query(LINK_SUPPLIER, [supplierInvoiceId, voucherId, b.userId, a.companyId, null])
expect(res.rows[0].result).toMatchObject({ ok: false, code: 'LINK_SI_VOUCHER_INVOICE_NOT_FOUND' })
})
const inv = await getPool().query(
`SELECT status FROM public.supplier_invoices WHERE id = $1`,
[supplierInvoiceId],
)
expect(inv.rows[0]).toMatchObject({ status: 'approved' })
await withUserContext(a.userId, async (client) => {
const res = await client.query(LINK_SUPPLIER, [supplierInvoiceId, voucherId, a.userId, a.companyId, null])
expect(res.rows[0].result).toMatchObject({ ok: true, invoice_status: 'paid' })
})
})
it('direct/superuser access (no JWT role) bypasses the guard', async () => {
const a = await seedCompany()
const invoiceId = await seedCustomerInvoice({ userId: a.userId, companyId: a.companyId })
const voucherId = await seedPostedVoucher({
userId: a.userId,
companyId: a.companyId,
fiscalPeriodId: a.fiscalPeriodId,
side: 'ar',
})
// The bare pool has no request.jwt.claims: the trusted bypass that the
// harness, migrations and service-role API paths rely on.
const res = await getPool().query(LINK_INVOICE, [invoiceId, voucherId, a.userId, a.companyId, null])
expect(res.rows[0].result).toMatchObject({ ok: true, invoice_status: 'paid' })
})
it('rejects notes longer than the 2000-char Zod cap for all callers', async () => {
const a = await seedCompany()
const invoiceId = await seedCustomerInvoice({ userId: a.userId, companyId: a.companyId })
const voucherId = await seedPostedVoucher({
userId: a.userId,
companyId: a.companyId,
fiscalPeriodId: a.fiscalPeriodId,
side: 'ar',
})
const res = await getPool().query(LINK_INVOICE, [
invoiceId,
voucherId,
a.userId,
a.companyId,
'x'.repeat(2001),
])
expect(res.rows[0].result).toMatchObject({ ok: false, code: 'LINK_VOUCHER_NOTES_TOO_LONG' })
})
})