Em dashes (—) and en dashes (–) had spread across comments, docs, tests, and a few UI strings, reading as AI-generated boilerplate rather than house style. Replaced each with punctuation matching its context: colon for explanatory clauses, comma for asides, plain hyphen for numeric/legal ranges (e.g. "21-23§"), "to"/"till" for date ranges, parentheses for paired-dash asides. messages/en.json and messages/sv.json were fixed by hand together to keep sv/en in sync. Left untouched where the dash is the functional subject rather than decorative punctuation: date-range-parser.ts's separator regex, charset-repair.ts's CP1252 byte-mapping table (and its test), the SIE encoding mojibake docs, generic-csv.ts's minus-sign normalizer, the agent system-prompt files that already instruct against em dashes, and a golden iXBRL test fixture compared byte-for-byte. Also fixes two bugs surfaced along the way: an off-by-one in ApiKeysPanel's scope-label split (a leftover from an earlier partial pass), and a charset-repair test that had lost the literal en-dash it exists to verify. Regenerated the agent atom seed migration (skills:generate) since 27 SKILL.md files changed. Added a CLAUDE.md rule against em/en dashes, with an explicit carve-out for the functional-dash cases above. Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
90 lines
3.3 KiB
TypeScript
90 lines
3.3 KiB
TypeScript
import { randomUUID } from 'crypto'
|
|
import { describe, expect, it } from 'vitest'
|
|
import { seedCompany } from '@/tests/pg/fixtures'
|
|
import { getPool, withUserContext } from '@/tests/pg/setup'
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* RLS smoke for salary_absence_days. Sjuklöneperiod / återinsjuknande /
|
|
* högriskskydd derivation already has unit coverage; this test only locks
|
|
* in tenant isolation, which mocked Supabase clients can't exercise.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
async function insertEmployee(params: {
|
|
userId: string
|
|
companyId: string
|
|
}): Promise<string> {
|
|
const id = randomUUID()
|
|
// personnummer must be 12 digits; last4 mirrors the last four chars.
|
|
const pnr = '199001011234'
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.employees
|
|
(id, user_id, company_id, first_name, last_name, personnummer,
|
|
personnummer_last4, employment_start, monthly_salary, tax_table_number)
|
|
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'Test', 'Person', $4, '1234', '2026-01-01', 30000, 32)`,
|
|
[id, params.userId, params.companyId, pnr],
|
|
)
|
|
return id
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function insertAbsenceDay(params: {
|
|
companyId: string
|
|
employeeId: string
|
|
date: string
|
|
type?: string
|
|
}): Promise<string> {
|
|
const id = randomUUID()
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.salary_absence_days
|
|
(id, company_id, employee_id, absence_date, absence_type, hours)
|
|
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, 8)`,
|
|
[id, params.companyId, params.employeeId, params.date, params.type ?? 'sick'],
|
|
)
|
|
return id
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe('salary_absence_days.pg: RLS tenant isolation', () => {
|
|
it('a user only sees absence days for their own company', async () => {
|
|
const a = await seedCompany()
|
|
const b = await seedCompany()
|
|
const empA = await insertEmployee({ userId: a.userId, companyId: a.companyId })
|
|
const empB = await insertEmployee({ userId: b.userId, companyId: b.companyId })
|
|
await insertAbsenceDay({ companyId: a.companyId, employeeId: empA, date: '2026-04-15' })
|
|
await insertAbsenceDay({ companyId: b.companyId, employeeId: empB, date: '2026-04-16' })
|
|
|
|
const rowsA = await withUserContext(a.userId, async (client) => {
|
|
const res = await client.query<{ company_id: string }>(
|
|
`SELECT company_id FROM public.salary_absence_days`,
|
|
)
|
|
return res.rows
|
|
})
|
|
expect(rowsA).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
expect(rowsA[0]!.company_id).toBe(a.companyId)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('blocks INSERT into another tenant via WITH CHECK', async () => {
|
|
const a = await seedCompany()
|
|
const b = await seedCompany()
|
|
const empB = await insertEmployee({ userId: b.userId, companyId: b.companyId })
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
withUserContext(a.userId, async (client) => {
|
|
return client.query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.salary_absence_days
|
|
(company_id, employee_id, absence_date, absence_type, hours)
|
|
VALUES ($1, $2, '2026-04-17', 'sick', 8)`,
|
|
[b.companyId, empB],
|
|
)
|
|
}),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/row-level security/i)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('enforces unique (employee_id, absence_date, absence_type)', async () => {
|
|
const a = await seedCompany()
|
|
const empA = await insertEmployee({ userId: a.userId, companyId: a.companyId })
|
|
await insertAbsenceDay({ companyId: a.companyId, employeeId: empA, date: '2026-04-15' })
|
|
await expect(
|
|
insertAbsenceDay({ companyId: a.companyId, employeeId: empA, date: '2026-04-15' }),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/duplicate key|unique/i)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|