* fix(transactions): retire stale invoice match pointers when an invoice settles potential_invoice_id / potential_supplier_invoice_id are write-once import suggestions: nothing revisited them once written. With recurring same-amount invoices, an earlier suggestion pointed transaction A at invoice X, X was then paid off by transaction B, and A kept pointing at a fully paid invoice. The match dialog computed its amount diff against that invoice's 0 kr remaining_amount and reported a bogus partial payment, and the dead pointer also blocked a fresh suggestion: both re-suggestion scans require the column to be NULL. Add one shared helper, clearSettledInvoiceSuggestions(), that nulls a settled invoice's own suggestion column on every other transaction of the same company, scoped by company_id and by that invoice id only, never widening to the confirmed invoice_id / supplier_invoice_id links. It is best effort by construction: every caller has already booked a payment verifikat, so a failed cleanup logs and returns instead of failing the settle. Wired into every path where an invoice reaches paid through a payment: the dashboard and v1 match-invoice / match-supplier-invoice routes, the dashboard and v1 mark-paid routes, settleInvoicePayment, the batch allocation route (per fully settled allocation), linkInvoiceToVoucher and linkSupplierInvoiceToVoucher, linkTransactionToJournalEntry, and the MCP staged-operation executors for mark_invoice_paid and match_transaction_invoice. Partial payments are deliberately left alone: a partially paid invoice is still matchable. The v1 supplier match route also clears its own row's hint, which it was missing next to its dashboard twin. Read-time revalidation stays as the backstop for the paths not wired up here. countSuggestedMatches now delegates to listSuggestedMatches, which already revalidates candidates, so the worklist badge can no longer claim a number the list refuses to render. A data-only backfill migration retires the pointers already stranded in the database. It touches no journal entry, verifikat or period-locked data, is idempotent, and its status lists mirror lib/invoices/matchable-statuses.ts. Fixes #1259 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(transactions): wire the MCP batch allocation into the settled-pointer cleanup Review follow-up on the #1259 fix. commitMatchBatchAllocate calls the same match_batch_allocate RPC as the dashboard route, and gnubok_match_batch_allocate is a live staged MCP tool, so an agent settling a samlingsbetalning reproduced the issue exactly: the RPC nulls potential_invoice_id / potential_supplier_invoice_id only on the source transaction, leaving every other transaction of the company pointing at an invoice the batch just closed. The per-allocation loop moves into clearSettledBatchAllocationSuggestions() so the HTTP route and the MCP executor run the same code and cannot drift again, with a commit-path test pinning that only the fully settled allocation is retired. The enlarged badge scan is made safe. countSuggestedMatches now feeds up to 200 ids into listSuggestedMatches, past the 150 per .in() that countInboxDocuments already chunks for, so the candidate lookups are chunked at IN_CLAUSE_CHUNK too and their ids deduped. Both lookups now check .error: previously a 414, a 500 or an RLS change produced empty maps, an empty list and a zero badge with nothing logged. Every failure branch here logs companyId, matching the logAndZero convention. Also: restore the anchorSupplierInvoiceDocument doc comment above its own call in the dashboard supplier-invoice mark-paid route (the #1259 block had been inserted between them), and assert the transaction update payload in the v1 match-supplier-invoice test, which now covers the potential_supplier_invoice_id null that the route was missing next to its dashboard twin. Fixes #1259 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
746 lines
24 KiB
TypeScript
746 lines
24 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, it, expect, beforeEach, vi } from 'vitest'
|
|
import {
|
|
validateVoucherForSupplierInvoiceLink,
|
|
linkSupplierInvoiceToVoucher,
|
|
findMatchingVouchersForSupplierInvoice,
|
|
} from '../supplier-voucher-matching'
|
|
import {
|
|
makeSupplierInvoice,
|
|
createQueuedMockSupabase,
|
|
} from '@/tests/helpers'
|
|
import { eventBus } from '@/lib/events/bus'
|
|
|
|
// Issue #1259: settling the invoice retires the suggestion pointers at it.
|
|
// Mocked so it consumes no slot in the queued Supabase mock; the helper's own
|
|
// query shape is pinned by ./clear-settled-invoice-suggestions.test.ts.
|
|
const { mockClearSuggestions } = vi.hoisted(() => ({ mockClearSuggestions: vi.fn() }))
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/invoices/clear-settled-invoice-suggestions', () => ({
|
|
clearSettledInvoiceSuggestions: mockClearSuggestions,
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
// ============================================================
|
|
// validateVoucherForSupplierInvoiceLink: happy path + rejects
|
|
// ============================================================
|
|
|
|
describe('validateVoucherForSupplierInvoiceLink', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
function setup(
|
|
invoice = makeSupplierInvoice({ remaining_amount: 1000, total: 1000, currency: 'SEK' }),
|
|
) {
|
|
return invoice
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
it('rejects when the invoice has nothing remaining', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
const invoice = setup(
|
|
makeSupplierInvoice({
|
|
remaining_amount: 0,
|
|
paid_amount: 1000,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
}),
|
|
)
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // unused, short-circuits before any query
|
|
const result = await validateVoucherForSupplierInvoiceLink(
|
|
supabase as never,
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
invoice as never,
|
|
'je-1',
|
|
)
|
|
expect(result.ok).toBe(false)
|
|
if (!result.ok) expect(result.code).toBe('LINK_SI_VOUCHER_INVOICE_FULLY_PAID')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects when the voucher is missing', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
const invoice = setup()
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // journal_entries.maybeSingle → null
|
|
const result = await validateVoucherForSupplierInvoiceLink(
|
|
supabase as never,
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
invoice as never,
|
|
'je-missing',
|
|
)
|
|
expect(result.ok).toBe(false)
|
|
if (!result.ok) expect(result.code).toBe('LINK_SI_VOUCHER_VOUCHER_NOT_FOUND')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects when the voucher is not posted', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
const invoice = setup()
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: {
|
|
id: 'je-1',
|
|
voucher_series: 'B',
|
|
voucher_number: 12,
|
|
entry_date: '2024-06-15',
|
|
description: '',
|
|
status: 'draft',
|
|
source_type: 'manual',
|
|
fiscal_period_id: 'fp-1',
|
|
company_id: 'company-1',
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
const result = await validateVoucherForSupplierInvoiceLink(
|
|
supabase as never,
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
invoice as never,
|
|
'je-1',
|
|
)
|
|
expect(result.ok).toBe(false)
|
|
if (!result.ok) expect(result.code).toBe('LINK_SI_VOUCHER_NOT_POSTED')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects when the voucher has no AP debit on 2440', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
const invoice = setup()
|
|
// journal_entries lookup
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: {
|
|
id: 'je-1',
|
|
voucher_series: 'B',
|
|
voucher_number: 12,
|
|
entry_date: '2024-06-15',
|
|
description: '',
|
|
status: 'posted',
|
|
source_type: 'manual',
|
|
fiscal_period_id: 'fp-1',
|
|
company_id: 'company-1',
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
// journal_entry_lines: no 2440 line
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: [
|
|
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1000, currency: 'SEK' },
|
|
{ account_number: '4010', debit_amount: 1000, credit_amount: 0, currency: 'SEK' },
|
|
],
|
|
})
|
|
const result = await validateVoucherForSupplierInvoiceLink(
|
|
supabase as never,
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
invoice as never,
|
|
'je-1',
|
|
)
|
|
expect(result.ok).toBe(false)
|
|
if (!result.ok) expect(result.code).toBe('LINK_SI_VOUCHER_NO_AP_DEBIT')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects when the AP debit exceeds invoice remaining', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
const invoice = setup(
|
|
makeSupplierInvoice({
|
|
remaining_amount: 1000,
|
|
paid_amount: 0,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
}),
|
|
)
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: {
|
|
id: 'je-1',
|
|
voucher_series: 'B',
|
|
voucher_number: 12,
|
|
entry_date: '2024-06-15',
|
|
description: '',
|
|
status: 'posted',
|
|
source_type: 'manual',
|
|
fiscal_period_id: 'fp-1',
|
|
company_id: 'company-1',
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
// 5 000 debit on 2440: overshoots a 1 000 invoice
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: [
|
|
{ account_number: '2440', debit_amount: 5000, credit_amount: 0, currency: 'SEK' },
|
|
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 5000, currency: 'SEK' },
|
|
],
|
|
})
|
|
const result = await validateVoucherForSupplierInvoiceLink(
|
|
supabase as never,
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
invoice as never,
|
|
'je-1',
|
|
)
|
|
expect(result.ok).toBe(false)
|
|
if (!result.ok) {
|
|
expect(result.code).toBe('LINK_SI_VOUCHER_AMOUNT_EXCEEDS_REMAINING')
|
|
expect(result.details?.ap_debit).toBe(5000)
|
|
expect(result.details?.remaining).toBe(1000)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('accepts an exact-amount match and reports paymentAmount + isFullyPaid', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
const invoice = setup(
|
|
makeSupplierInvoice({
|
|
remaining_amount: 1000,
|
|
paid_amount: 0,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
}),
|
|
)
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: {
|
|
id: 'je-1',
|
|
voucher_series: 'B',
|
|
voucher_number: 12,
|
|
entry_date: '2024-06-15',
|
|
description: '',
|
|
status: 'posted',
|
|
source_type: 'manual',
|
|
fiscal_period_id: 'fp-1',
|
|
company_id: 'company-1',
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: [
|
|
{ account_number: '2440', debit_amount: 1000, credit_amount: 0, currency: 'SEK' },
|
|
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 1000, currency: 'SEK' },
|
|
],
|
|
})
|
|
// existingLinks lookup: none
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
|
const result = await validateVoucherForSupplierInvoiceLink(
|
|
supabase as never,
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
invoice as never,
|
|
'je-1',
|
|
)
|
|
expect(result.ok).toBe(true)
|
|
if (result.ok) {
|
|
expect(result.apDebitAmount).toBe(1000)
|
|
expect(result.paymentAmount).toBe(1000)
|
|
expect(result.isFullyPaid).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(result.remainingAfter).toBe(0)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('accepts a partial-payment voucher (debit < remaining) and reports partially_paid math', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
const invoice = setup(
|
|
makeSupplierInvoice({
|
|
remaining_amount: 1000,
|
|
paid_amount: 0,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
}),
|
|
)
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: {
|
|
id: 'je-1',
|
|
voucher_series: 'B',
|
|
voucher_number: 12,
|
|
entry_date: '2024-06-15',
|
|
description: '',
|
|
status: 'posted',
|
|
source_type: 'manual',
|
|
fiscal_period_id: 'fp-1',
|
|
company_id: 'company-1',
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: [
|
|
{ account_number: '2440', debit_amount: 400, credit_amount: 0, currency: 'SEK' },
|
|
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 400, currency: 'SEK' },
|
|
],
|
|
})
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
|
const result = await validateVoucherForSupplierInvoiceLink(
|
|
supabase as never,
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
invoice as never,
|
|
'je-1',
|
|
)
|
|
expect(result.ok).toBe(true)
|
|
if (result.ok) {
|
|
expect(result.paymentAmount).toBe(400)
|
|
expect(result.isFullyPaid).toBe(false)
|
|
expect(result.remainingAfter).toBe(600)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects currency mismatch', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
const invoice = setup(
|
|
makeSupplierInvoice({
|
|
remaining_amount: 200,
|
|
paid_amount: 0,
|
|
total: 200,
|
|
currency: 'EUR',
|
|
}),
|
|
)
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: {
|
|
id: 'je-1',
|
|
voucher_series: 'B',
|
|
voucher_number: 12,
|
|
entry_date: '2024-06-15',
|
|
description: '',
|
|
status: 'posted',
|
|
source_type: 'manual',
|
|
fiscal_period_id: 'fp-1',
|
|
company_id: 'company-1',
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: [
|
|
{ account_number: '2440', debit_amount: 200, credit_amount: 0, currency: 'SEK' },
|
|
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 200, currency: 'SEK' },
|
|
],
|
|
})
|
|
const result = await validateVoucherForSupplierInvoiceLink(
|
|
supabase as never,
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
invoice as never,
|
|
'je-1',
|
|
)
|
|
expect(result.ok).toBe(false)
|
|
if (!result.ok) expect(result.code).toBe('LINK_SI_VOUCHER_CURRENCY_MISMATCH')
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// ============================================================
|
|
// linkSupplierInvoiceToVoucher: end-to-end advancement
|
|
// ============================================================
|
|
|
|
describe('linkSupplierInvoiceToVoucher', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// The implementation now delegates the lock + validate + UPDATE + INSERT
|
|
// sequence to the link_supplier_invoice_to_voucher PL/pgSQL RPC (PR #602
|
|
// review fix). The TS wrapper only translates the RPC's structured jsonb
|
|
// return into the lib's typed Result type and emits the paid event. These
|
|
// tests mock the RPC response directly.
|
|
|
|
it('rejects with INVOICE_NOT_FOUND when the RPC reports the invoice is missing', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: { ok: false, code: 'LINK_SI_VOUCHER_INVOICE_NOT_FOUND' },
|
|
error: null,
|
|
})
|
|
const result = await linkSupplierInvoiceToVoucher(supabase as never, 'user-1', 'company-1', {
|
|
supplierInvoiceId: 'si-missing',
|
|
journalEntryId: 'je-1',
|
|
})
|
|
expect(result.ok).toBe(false)
|
|
if (!result.ok) expect(result.code).toBe('LINK_SI_VOUCHER_INVOICE_NOT_FOUND')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects with INVOICE_FULLY_PAID when the RPC reports the invoice is already paid', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: {
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
code: 'LINK_SI_VOUCHER_INVOICE_FULLY_PAID',
|
|
details: { status: 'paid' },
|
|
},
|
|
error: null,
|
|
})
|
|
const result = await linkSupplierInvoiceToVoucher(supabase as never, 'user-1', 'company-1', {
|
|
supplierInvoiceId: 'si-1',
|
|
journalEntryId: 'je-1',
|
|
})
|
|
expect(result.ok).toBe(false)
|
|
if (!result.ok) {
|
|
expect(result.code).toBe('LINK_SI_VOUCHER_INVOICE_FULLY_PAID')
|
|
expect(result.details?.status).toBe('paid')
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns LINK_SI_VOUCHER_DB_ERROR when the RPC raises an error', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, error: { message: 'connection lost' } })
|
|
const result = await linkSupplierInvoiceToVoucher(supabase as never, 'user-1', 'company-1', {
|
|
supplierInvoiceId: 'si-1',
|
|
journalEntryId: 'je-1',
|
|
})
|
|
expect(result.ok).toBe(false)
|
|
if (!result.ok) {
|
|
expect(result.code).toBe('LINK_SI_VOUCHER_DB_ERROR')
|
|
expect(result.details?.reason).toBe('connection lost')
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns success + emits supplier_invoice.paid on the happy path (full payment)', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
const invoice = makeSupplierInvoice({
|
|
status: 'paid',
|
|
paid_amount: 1000,
|
|
remaining_amount: 0,
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// 1. RPC returns the happy path
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: {
|
|
ok: true,
|
|
payment_id: 'sip-1',
|
|
invoice_status: 'paid',
|
|
paid_amount: 1000,
|
|
remaining_amount: 0,
|
|
payment_amount: 1000,
|
|
journal_entry_id: 'je-1',
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
},
|
|
error: null,
|
|
})
|
|
// 2. Lightweight invoice re-fetch for the event payload
|
|
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
|
|
|
|
const emitSpy = vi.spyOn(eventBus, 'emit').mockResolvedValue(undefined)
|
|
|
|
const result = await linkSupplierInvoiceToVoucher(supabase as never, 'user-1', 'company-1', {
|
|
supplierInvoiceId: invoice.id,
|
|
journalEntryId: 'je-1',
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result.ok).toBe(true)
|
|
if (result.ok) {
|
|
expect(result.result.invoiceStatus).toBe('paid')
|
|
expect(result.result.paidAmount).toBe(1000)
|
|
expect(result.result.remainingAmount).toBe(0)
|
|
expect(result.result.paymentAmount).toBe(1000)
|
|
expect(result.result.journalEntryId).toBe('je-1')
|
|
expect(result.result.paymentId).toBe('sip-1')
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(emitSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
type: 'supplier_invoice.paid',
|
|
payload: expect.objectContaining({ paymentAmount: 1000, userId: 'user-1' }),
|
|
}),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// Issue #1259: the invoice is settled, so no transaction may keep pointing
|
|
// at it as a match suggestion.
|
|
expect(mockClearSuggestions).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
|
|
expect(mockClearSuggestions).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
supabase,
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
'supplier_invoice',
|
|
invoice.id,
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('still returns success even if the post-link invoice re-fetch is empty (event is best-effort)', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: {
|
|
ok: true,
|
|
payment_id: 'sip-2',
|
|
invoice_status: 'partially_paid',
|
|
paid_amount: 400,
|
|
remaining_amount: 600,
|
|
payment_amount: 400,
|
|
journal_entry_id: 'je-1',
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
},
|
|
error: null,
|
|
})
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
|
|
|
const emitSpy = vi.spyOn(eventBus, 'emit').mockResolvedValue(undefined)
|
|
|
|
const result = await linkSupplierInvoiceToVoucher(supabase as never, 'user-1', 'company-1', {
|
|
supplierInvoiceId: 'si-2',
|
|
journalEntryId: 'je-1',
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result.ok).toBe(true)
|
|
if (result.ok) {
|
|
expect(result.result.invoiceStatus).toBe('partially_paid')
|
|
expect(result.result.remainingAmount).toBe(600)
|
|
}
|
|
// Event NOT emitted when re-fetch found nothing
|
|
expect(emitSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
// Issue #1259: a partially paid invoice is still matchable, so the
|
|
// suggestions pointing at it must survive.
|
|
expect(mockClearSuggestions).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// ============================================================
|
|
// findMatchingVouchersForSupplierInvoice: candidate search
|
|
// ============================================================
|
|
|
|
describe('findMatchingVouchersForSupplierInvoice', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Enqueue the two pages the two-step entry-lines fetch reads
|
|
* (lib/bookkeeping/entry-lines.ts): the parent entries first, then the bare
|
|
* lines keyed by journal_entry_id. Fixtures stay embed-shaped; the helper
|
|
* reattaches the parent under `journal_entries`, which is exactly what the
|
|
* old `journal_entries!inner(...)` embed produced.
|
|
*/
|
|
function enqueueApLines(
|
|
enqueue: (result: { data?: unknown; error?: unknown }) => void,
|
|
rows: Array<{
|
|
id: string
|
|
account_number: string
|
|
debit_amount: number
|
|
currency: string | null
|
|
entry: {
|
|
id: string
|
|
voucher_series: string
|
|
voucher_number: number
|
|
entry_date: string
|
|
description: string
|
|
status: string
|
|
source_type: string | null
|
|
fiscal_period_id: string
|
|
}
|
|
}>,
|
|
) {
|
|
const entries = [...new Map(rows.map((r) => [r.entry.id, r.entry])).values()]
|
|
enqueue({ data: entries, error: null })
|
|
if (entries.length === 0) return
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: rows.map((r) => ({
|
|
id: r.id,
|
|
journal_entry_id: r.entry.id,
|
|
account_number: r.account_number,
|
|
debit_amount: r.debit_amount,
|
|
credit_amount: 0,
|
|
currency: r.currency,
|
|
})),
|
|
error: null,
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Record the column list handed to `.select()` per table.
|
|
*
|
|
* The queued mock's proxy chain accepts any column string and still returns
|
|
* the enqueued rows, so a phantom column passes every mocked assertion while
|
|
* PostgREST answers 42703 in production. `fiscal_periods.status` was exactly
|
|
* that: the lock lookup returned null and the advisory flag never fired.
|
|
* Asserting the select string is the only guard available at this layer.
|
|
*/
|
|
function recordSelects(supabase: ReturnType<typeof createQueuedMockSupabase>['supabase']) {
|
|
const selects: Array<{ table: string; columns: string }> = []
|
|
const inner = supabase.from
|
|
supabase.from = vi.fn((table: string) => {
|
|
const chain = inner(table) as object
|
|
return new Proxy(chain, {
|
|
get(target, prop, receiver) {
|
|
const value = Reflect.get(target, prop, receiver)
|
|
if (prop !== 'select') return value
|
|
return (...args: unknown[]) => {
|
|
selects.push({ table, columns: String(args[0] ?? '') })
|
|
return (value as (...a: unknown[]) => unknown)(...args)
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
}) as typeof supabase.from
|
|
return selects
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const entryFixture = (over: Partial<{ id: string; description: string; entry_date: string; source_type: string | null }> = {}) => ({
|
|
id: over.id ?? 'je-ap-1',
|
|
voucher_series: 'A',
|
|
voucher_number: 42,
|
|
entry_date: over.entry_date ?? '2026-03-10',
|
|
description: over.description ?? 'Betalning leverantor',
|
|
status: 'posted',
|
|
source_type: over.source_type ?? 'bank_transaction',
|
|
fiscal_period_id: 'period-1',
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const invoice = () =>
|
|
makeSupplierInvoice({
|
|
id: 'si-find-1',
|
|
total: 1000,
|
|
paid_amount: 0,
|
|
remaining_amount: 1000,
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
due_date: '2026-03-12',
|
|
supplier_invoice_number: 'F-9001',
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns a scored candidate built from the reattached parent entry', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
enqueueApLines(enqueue, [
|
|
{
|
|
id: 'line-1',
|
|
account_number: '2440',
|
|
debit_amount: 1000,
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
entry: entryFixture({ description: 'Betalning faktura F-9001' }),
|
|
},
|
|
])
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // supplier_invoice_payments links
|
|
// fiscal_periods: real shape, open period (not closed, never locked)
|
|
enqueue({ data: [{ id: 'period-1', is_closed: false, locked_at: null }], error: null })
|
|
|
|
const result = await findMatchingVouchersForSupplierInvoice(
|
|
supabase as never,
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
invoice() as never,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// The entry side is queried first: no query starts on journal_entry_lines
|
|
// with the tenant scope buried in an embed.
|
|
const tables = (supabase.from as ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>).mock.calls.map((c) => c[0])
|
|
expect(tables[0]).toBe('journal_entries')
|
|
expect(tables[1]).toBe('journal_entry_lines')
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
expect(result[0].journal_entry_id).toBe('je-ap-1')
|
|
expect(result[0].voucher_series).toBe('A')
|
|
expect(result[0].voucher_number).toBe(42)
|
|
expect(result[0].entry_date).toBe('2026-03-10')
|
|
expect(result[0].ap_debit_amount).toBe(1000)
|
|
expect(result[0].ap_line_currency).toBe('SEK')
|
|
expect(result[0].period_locked).toBe(false)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('sums several 244x debits on the same samlingsverifikat into one candidate', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
enqueueApLines(enqueue, [
|
|
{ id: 'line-1', account_number: '2440', debit_amount: 600, currency: 'SEK', entry: entryFixture() },
|
|
{ id: 'line-2', account_number: '2441', debit_amount: 400, currency: 'SEK', entry: entryFixture() },
|
|
])
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: [{ id: 'period-1', is_closed: false, locked_at: '2026-04-01T00:00:00Z' }],
|
|
error: null,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const result = await findMatchingVouchersForSupplierInvoice(
|
|
supabase as never,
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
invoice() as never,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
expect(result[0].ap_debit_amount).toBe(1000)
|
|
expect(result[0].period_locked).toBe(true)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('drops storno and opening_balance vouchers', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
enqueueApLines(enqueue, [
|
|
{
|
|
id: 'line-1',
|
|
account_number: '2440',
|
|
debit_amount: 1000,
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
entry: entryFixture({ id: 'je-storno', source_type: 'storno' }),
|
|
},
|
|
])
|
|
|
|
const result = await findMatchingVouchersForSupplierInvoice(
|
|
supabase as never,
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
invoice() as never,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toEqual([])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('reads the fiscal_periods columns that actually exist (is_closed, locked_at)', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
const selects = recordSelects(supabase)
|
|
enqueueApLines(enqueue, [
|
|
{
|
|
id: 'line-1',
|
|
account_number: '2440',
|
|
debit_amount: 1000,
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
entry: entryFixture(),
|
|
},
|
|
])
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [{ id: 'period-1', is_closed: false, locked_at: null }], error: null })
|
|
|
|
await findMatchingVouchersForSupplierInvoice(
|
|
supabase as never,
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
invoice() as never,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
const periodSelect = selects.find((s) => s.table === 'fiscal_periods')
|
|
expect(periodSelect).toBeDefined()
|
|
const columns = (periodSelect?.columns ?? '').split(',').map((c) => c.trim())
|
|
expect(columns).toContain('id')
|
|
expect(columns).toContain('is_closed')
|
|
expect(columns).toContain('locked_at')
|
|
// fiscal_periods has no `status` column: asking for it is a 42703.
|
|
expect(columns).not.toContain('status')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('flags a candidate whose period is closed (is_closed)', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
enqueueApLines(enqueue, [
|
|
{
|
|
id: 'line-1',
|
|
account_number: '2440',
|
|
debit_amount: 1000,
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
entry: entryFixture(),
|
|
},
|
|
])
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [{ id: 'period-1', is_closed: true, locked_at: null }], error: null })
|
|
|
|
const result = await findMatchingVouchersForSupplierInvoice(
|
|
supabase as never,
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
invoice() as never,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
expect(result[0].period_locked).toBe(true)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('does not claim the period is open when the lock lookup fails', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
enqueueApLines(enqueue, [
|
|
{
|
|
id: 'line-1',
|
|
account_number: '2440',
|
|
debit_amount: 1000,
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
entry: entryFixture(),
|
|
},
|
|
])
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, error: { message: 'column does not exist' } })
|
|
|
|
const result = await findMatchingVouchersForSupplierInvoice(
|
|
supabase as never,
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
invoice() as never,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// The candidate still surfaces (linking mutates no journal entry), but the
|
|
// advisory flag stays conservative instead of promising an open period.
|
|
expect(result).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
expect(result[0].period_locked).toBe(true)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns [] without a line query when no entry matches the window', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // entry page, empty
|
|
|
|
const result = await findMatchingVouchersForSupplierInvoice(
|
|
supabase as never,
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
invoice() as never,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toEqual([])
|
|
const tables = (supabase.from as ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>).mock.calls.map((c) => c[0])
|
|
expect(tables).not.toContain('journal_entry_lines')
|
|
})
|
|
})
|