Em dashes (—) and en dashes (–) had spread across comments, docs, tests, and a few UI strings, reading as AI-generated boilerplate rather than house style. Replaced each with punctuation matching its context: colon for explanatory clauses, comma for asides, plain hyphen for numeric/legal ranges (e.g. "21-23§"), "to"/"till" for date ranges, parentheses for paired-dash asides. messages/en.json and messages/sv.json were fixed by hand together to keep sv/en in sync. Left untouched where the dash is the functional subject rather than decorative punctuation: date-range-parser.ts's separator regex, charset-repair.ts's CP1252 byte-mapping table (and its test), the SIE encoding mojibake docs, generic-csv.ts's minus-sign normalizer, the agent system-prompt files that already instruct against em dashes, and a golden iXBRL test fixture compared byte-for-byte. Also fixes two bugs surfaced along the way: an off-by-one in ApiKeysPanel's scope-label split (a leftover from an earlier partial pass), and a charset-repair test that had lost the literal en-dash it exists to verify. Regenerated the agent atom seed migration (skills:generate) since 27 SKILL.md files changed. Added a CLAUDE.md rule against em/en dashes, with an explicit carve-out for the functional-dash cases above. Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
134 lines
5.1 KiB
TypeScript
134 lines
5.1 KiB
TypeScript
import { randomUUID } from 'node:crypto'
|
|
import { describe, expect, it } from 'vitest'
|
|
import { getPool, withUserContext } from '@/tests/pg/setup'
|
|
import { seedCompany } from '@/tests/pg/fixtures'
|
|
|
|
// Authorization tests for the invoice-number RPCs added in
|
|
// 20260510140000_harden_invoice_number_rpcs.sql. The functions are
|
|
// SECURITY DEFINER, so they bypass caller RLS. The migration added an inline
|
|
// auth.uid() membership check as defense-in-depth; these tests prove it.
|
|
|
|
async function ensureCompanySettings(params: {
|
|
userId: string
|
|
companyId: string
|
|
invoicePrefix?: string
|
|
nextInvoiceNumber?: number
|
|
}): Promise<void> {
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.company_settings
|
|
(user_id, company_id, invoice_prefix, next_invoice_number)
|
|
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4)
|
|
ON CONFLICT (company_id) DO UPDATE
|
|
SET invoice_prefix = EXCLUDED.invoice_prefix,
|
|
next_invoice_number = EXCLUDED.next_invoice_number`,
|
|
[params.userId, params.companyId, params.invoicePrefix ?? 'F', params.nextInvoiceNumber ?? 1],
|
|
)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function insertDraftInvoice(params: {
|
|
userId: string
|
|
companyId: string
|
|
}): Promise<string> {
|
|
const customerId = randomUUID()
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.customers (id, user_id, company_id, name)
|
|
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'Test Customer')`,
|
|
[customerId, params.userId, params.companyId],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
const invoiceId = randomUUID()
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.invoices
|
|
(id, user_id, company_id, customer_id, invoice_number, document_type,
|
|
invoice_date, due_date, currency, subtotal, vat_amount, total,
|
|
vat_treatment, vat_rate, moms_ruta, status)
|
|
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, NULL, 'invoice',
|
|
'2026-04-27', '2026-05-27', 'SEK', 1000, 250, 1250,
|
|
'standard_25', 25, '10', 'draft')`,
|
|
[invoiceId, params.userId, params.companyId, customerId],
|
|
)
|
|
return invoiceId
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe('invoice-number RPCs: authorization (defense in depth)', () => {
|
|
it('peek_next_invoice_number raises when caller is not a member of the target company', async () => {
|
|
const intruder = await seedCompany()
|
|
const target = await seedCompany()
|
|
await ensureCompanySettings({ userId: target.userId, companyId: target.companyId })
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
withUserContext(intruder.userId, async (client) => {
|
|
await client.query('SELECT public.peek_next_invoice_number($1, $2)', [
|
|
target.companyId,
|
|
'invoice',
|
|
])
|
|
}),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/unauthorized/)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('peek_next_invoice_number succeeds for a member of the target company', async () => {
|
|
const { userId, companyId } = await seedCompany()
|
|
await ensureCompanySettings({ userId, companyId, invoicePrefix: 'F', nextInvoiceNumber: 7 })
|
|
|
|
const preview = await withUserContext(userId, async (client) => {
|
|
const { rows } = await client.query<{ peek_next_invoice_number: string }>(
|
|
'SELECT public.peek_next_invoice_number($1, $2)',
|
|
[companyId, 'invoice'],
|
|
)
|
|
return rows[0]!.peek_next_invoice_number
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(preview).toBe('F007')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('generate_invoice_number raises when caller is not a member of the target company', async () => {
|
|
const intruder = await seedCompany()
|
|
const target = await seedCompany()
|
|
await ensureCompanySettings({ userId: target.userId, companyId: target.companyId })
|
|
const invoiceId = await insertDraftInvoice({
|
|
userId: target.userId,
|
|
companyId: target.companyId,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
withUserContext(intruder.userId, async (client) => {
|
|
await client.query('SELECT public.generate_invoice_number($1, $2, $3)', [
|
|
target.companyId,
|
|
invoiceId,
|
|
'invoice',
|
|
])
|
|
}),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/unauthorized/)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('generate_invoice_number succeeds for a member of the target company', async () => {
|
|
const { userId, companyId } = await seedCompany()
|
|
await ensureCompanySettings({ userId, companyId, invoicePrefix: 'G', nextInvoiceNumber: 42 })
|
|
const invoiceId = await insertDraftInvoice({ userId, companyId })
|
|
|
|
const assigned = await withUserContext(userId, async (client) => {
|
|
const { rows } = await client.query<{ generate_invoice_number: string }>(
|
|
'SELECT public.generate_invoice_number($1, $2, $3)',
|
|
[companyId, invoiceId, 'invoice'],
|
|
)
|
|
return rows[0]!.generate_invoice_number
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(assigned).toBe('G042')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('superuser (no JWT context) bypasses the membership check', async () => {
|
|
// Service role / cron / pg-real seed paths run without a JWT. The
|
|
// membership check is intentionally skipped when auth.uid() IS NULL: // calling the RPC directly on the pool (no withUserContext) must still
|
|
// succeed.
|
|
const { userId, companyId } = await seedCompany()
|
|
await ensureCompanySettings({ userId, companyId, invoicePrefix: 'F', nextInvoiceNumber: 1 })
|
|
|
|
const { rows } = await getPool().query<{ peek_next_invoice_number: string }>(
|
|
'SELECT public.peek_next_invoice_number($1, $2)',
|
|
[companyId, 'invoice'],
|
|
)
|
|
expect(rows[0]!.peek_next_invoice_number).toBe('F001')
|
|
})
|
|
})
|