* fix(auth): provision invitees server-side when signups are disabled Self-hosted installations with GoTrue disable_signup broke the invite flow silently: invitees without an account were routed to /register, where supabase.auth.signUp fails with "Signups not allowed for this instance", surfaced only as a generic toast. New server-only env flag AUTH_SIGNUPS_DISABLED (documented in .env.example) mirrors the GoTrue setting. When true, POST /api/company/members/invite checks check_email_exists and, for invitees without an account, provisions one via auth.admin.inviteUserByEmail with a redirect back to /invite/<token>, before the Resend email and before the invitation row is written so a provisioning failure leaves nothing half-created and the admin can retry. The response now carries user_provisioned alongside email_sent, and a provisioning failure returns 502 with a Swedish message mapped through getErrorMessage instead of a silently-successful invite. /auth/callback now routes type=invite verifications to /reset-password (the existing set-password surface) instead of dropping the passwordless user on the dashboard, and preserves the invite token from next=/invite/<token> as the pre-auth invite cookie so the existing reset-password invite handoff accepts the membership right after the password is saved. getErrorMessage learns two GoTrue patterns: "Signups not allowed" (account creation closed on this installation, contact your inviter or administrator) so the /register dead end is explained even for flows that bypass provisioning, and "Error sending ... email" (GoTrue SMTP not configured) so the 502 above is actionable. Hosted is untouched: the flag is unset there and every new code path is gated on it. Fixes #1335 Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(auth): restore check_email_exists RPC and harden self-host invite config Adversarial review of #1404 found that the check_email_exists function the invite flow depends on does not exist anywhere: it shipped in PR #229 and was lost in the #244 migration consolidation before ever reaching prod (verified missing on the hosted production database directly). Today app/api/team/accept destructures only { data } from the RPC call, so alreadyHasAccount is silently null on every deployment and the invite page routes even existing-account invitees toward /register. - New migration 20260804140000 restores the function exactly as originally shipped: SECURITY DEFINER over auth.users, EXECUTE revoked from PUBLIC, anon and authenticated, granted to service_role only (prevents email enumeration). Fixes hosted prod behavior too once applied. - New tests/pg/check-email-exists.pg.test.ts locks in existence, case-insensitive matching, false-for-unknown, and the role grants. - .env.docker.example gains the AUTH_SIGNUPS_DISABLED block self-hosters actually use; both env templates now note that the GoTrue redirect URI allow-list must include /invite/* or the invite email redirect silently falls back to SITE_URL. - Invite route test for the existsError branch: RPC failure logs a warning and provisioning proceeds anyway (GoTrue is authoritative). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(auth): mask invitee email in provisioning-failure log (#1335) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <311770904+jakobwennberg-oss@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
313 lines
12 KiB
TypeScript
313 lines
12 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* Tests for POST /api/company/members/invite.
|
|
*/
|
|
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach, afterEach } from 'vitest'
|
|
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
|
|
import { createQueuedMockSupabase, createMockRequest, parseJsonResponse } from '@/tests/helpers'
|
|
|
|
const { supabase: serviceSupabase, enqueue, reset } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
|
|
// The queued mock's auth object only carries getUser; the provisioning path
|
|
// (AUTH_SIGNUPS_DISABLED=true) also calls auth.admin.inviteUserByEmail.
|
|
const inviteUserByEmailMock = vi.fn()
|
|
Object.assign(serviceSupabase.auth, {
|
|
admin: { inviteUserByEmail: inviteUserByEmailMock },
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const requireAuthMock = vi.fn()
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/auth/require-auth', () => ({
|
|
requireAuth: (...args: unknown[]) => requireAuthMock(...args),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/company/context', () => ({
|
|
getActiveCompanyId: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue('company-1'),
|
|
requireCompanyId: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue('company-1'),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
const requireWriteMock = vi.fn()
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/auth/require-write', () => ({
|
|
requireWritePermission: (...args: unknown[]) => requireWriteMock(...args),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/supabase/server', () => ({
|
|
createServiceClient: () => serviceSupabase,
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/init', () => ({ ensureInitialized: vi.fn() }))
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/auth/invite-tokens', () => ({
|
|
generateInviteToken: () => ({ token: 'tok-plain', hash: 'tok-hash' }),
|
|
getInviteExpiry: () => new Date('2026-08-01T00:00:00Z'),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
const sendEmailMock = vi.fn()
|
|
const isConfiguredMock = vi.fn()
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/email/service', () => ({
|
|
getEmailService: () => ({ isConfigured: isConfiguredMock, sendEmail: sendEmailMock }),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/email/invite-templates', () => ({
|
|
generateInviteEmailSubject: () => 'subject',
|
|
generateInviteEmailHtml: () => '<p>html</p>',
|
|
generateInviteEmailText: () => 'text',
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
import { POST } from '../route'
|
|
|
|
const routeParams = { params: Promise.resolve({}) }
|
|
|
|
function post(body: unknown) {
|
|
return POST(
|
|
createMockRequest('/api/company/members/invite', { method: 'POST', body }),
|
|
routeParams,
|
|
)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
|
reset()
|
|
delete process.env.AUTH_SIGNUPS_DISABLED
|
|
requireAuthMock.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
user: { id: 'user-1', email: 'owner@example.com' },
|
|
supabase: {},
|
|
error: null,
|
|
})
|
|
requireWriteMock.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true })
|
|
isConfiguredMock.mockReturnValue(true)
|
|
sendEmailMock.mockResolvedValue({ success: true, messageId: 'msg-1' })
|
|
inviteUserByEmailMock.mockResolvedValue({ data: { user: { id: 'new-user' } }, error: null })
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
afterEach(() => {
|
|
delete process.env.AUTH_SIGNUPS_DISABLED
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('POST /api/company/members/invite', () => {
|
|
it('returns 401 when not authenticated', async () => {
|
|
requireAuthMock.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
user: null,
|
|
supabase: {},
|
|
error: NextResponse.json({ error: 'Unauthorized' }, { status: 401 }),
|
|
})
|
|
const res = await post({ email: 'x@y.se' })
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(401)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('refuses non-admin members with 403', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: { role: 'member' } }) // caller membership
|
|
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(
|
|
await post({ email: 'x@y.se' })
|
|
)
|
|
expect(status).toBe(403)
|
|
expect(body.error).toBe('Behörighet saknas.')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects an invalid email with 400', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: { role: 'owner' } })
|
|
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(await post({ email: 'not-an-email' }))
|
|
expect(status).toBe(400)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects an unknown role with 400', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: { role: 'owner' } })
|
|
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(
|
|
await post({ email: 'x@y.se', role: 'superuser' })
|
|
)
|
|
expect(status).toBe(400)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('creates the invitation and reports email_sent', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: { role: 'owner' } }) // caller membership
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] }) // existing members
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // existing invite
|
|
enqueue({ data: { name: 'Acme AB' } }) // company name
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // insert invitation
|
|
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
|
data: { email: string; email_sent: boolean }
|
|
}>(await post({ email: 'Client@Example.com', role: 'viewer' }))
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(body.data.email).toBe('client@example.com') // normalized
|
|
expect(body.data.email_sent).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(sendEmailMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ to: 'client@example.com' })
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('reports email_sent=false when the send fails (invite still created)', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: { role: 'owner' } })
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] })
|
|
enqueue({ data: null })
|
|
enqueue({ data: { name: 'Acme AB' } })
|
|
enqueue({ data: null })
|
|
sendEmailMock.mockResolvedValue({ success: false, error: 'smtp down' })
|
|
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
|
data: { email_sent: boolean; status: string }
|
|
}>(await post({ email: 'client@example.com' }))
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(body.data.status).toBe('pending')
|
|
expect(body.data.email_sent).toBe(false)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('POST /api/company/members/invite: AUTH_SIGNUPS_DISABLED provisioning', () => {
|
|
it('leaves behavior unchanged when the flag is unset: no existence check, no admin call', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: { role: 'owner' } }) // caller membership
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] }) // existing members
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // existing invite
|
|
enqueue({ data: { name: 'Acme AB' } }) // company name
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // insert invitation
|
|
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
|
data: { email_sent: boolean; user_provisioned: boolean }
|
|
}>(await post({ email: 'client@example.com' }))
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(body.data.email_sent).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(body.data.user_provisioned).toBe(false)
|
|
expect(serviceSupabase.rpc).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
expect(inviteUserByEmailMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('flag on + account exists: skips provisioning, invite proceeds normally', async () => {
|
|
process.env.AUTH_SIGNUPS_DISABLED = 'true'
|
|
enqueue({ data: { role: 'owner' } }) // caller membership
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] }) // existing members
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // existing invite
|
|
enqueue({ data: { name: 'Acme AB' } }) // company name
|
|
enqueue({ data: true }) // rpc check_email_exists -> account exists
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // insert invitation
|
|
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
|
data: { email_sent: boolean; user_provisioned: boolean }
|
|
}>(await post({ email: 'client@example.com' }))
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(serviceSupabase.rpc).toHaveBeenCalledWith('check_email_exists', {
|
|
email_to_check: 'client@example.com',
|
|
})
|
|
expect(inviteUserByEmailMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
expect(body.data.email_sent).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(body.data.user_provisioned).toBe(false)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('flag on + no account: provisions via admin invite with the invite redirect', async () => {
|
|
process.env.AUTH_SIGNUPS_DISABLED = 'true'
|
|
enqueue({ data: { role: 'owner' } }) // caller membership
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] }) // existing members
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // existing invite
|
|
enqueue({ data: { name: 'Acme AB' } }) // company name
|
|
enqueue({ data: false }) // rpc check_email_exists -> no account
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // insert invitation
|
|
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
|
data: { email_sent: boolean; user_provisioned: boolean }
|
|
}>(await post({ email: 'Client@Example.com' }))
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(inviteUserByEmailMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
|
|
// Provision with the lowercased email (the invitation row and GoTrue
|
|
// both lowercase; /api/team/accept enforces exact email match) and a
|
|
// redirect that lands back on this invitation.
|
|
expect(inviteUserByEmailMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('client@example.com', {
|
|
redirectTo: expect.stringContaining('/invite/tok-plain'),
|
|
})
|
|
expect(body.data.user_provisioned).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(body.data.email_sent).toBe(true)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('flag on + provisioning fails: surfaces a Swedish error, sends nothing, logs a masked address', async () => {
|
|
process.env.AUTH_SIGNUPS_DISABLED = 'true'
|
|
enqueue({ data: { role: 'owner' } }) // caller membership
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] }) // existing members
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // existing invite
|
|
enqueue({ data: { name: 'Acme AB' } }) // company name
|
|
enqueue({ data: false }) // rpc check_email_exists -> no account
|
|
// Mimic a real GoTrue failure (AuthApiError is an Error instance):
|
|
// SMTP not configured is the typical self-hosted cause.
|
|
const authError = Object.assign(new Error('Error sending invite email'), {
|
|
code: 'unexpected_failure',
|
|
status: 500,
|
|
})
|
|
inviteUserByEmailMock.mockResolvedValue({ data: { user: null }, error: authError })
|
|
const consoleErrorSpy = vi.spyOn(console, 'error').mockImplementation(() => {})
|
|
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(
|
|
await post({ email: 'client@example.com' })
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(502)
|
|
expect(body.error).toContain('SMTP')
|
|
expect(sendEmailMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
// The failure log carries only a masked invitee address (PII stays out
|
|
// of the log record; the mask survives the logger's own redaction).
|
|
const logged = consoleErrorSpy.mock.calls
|
|
.flat()
|
|
.map((arg) => (typeof arg === 'string' ? arg : JSON.stringify(arg)))
|
|
.join(' ')
|
|
expect(logged).toContain('c***@example.com')
|
|
expect(logged).not.toContain('client@example.com')
|
|
consoleErrorSpy.mockRestore()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('flag on + existence check errors (RPC missing): warns and provisions anyway', async () => {
|
|
process.env.AUTH_SIGNUPS_DISABLED = 'true'
|
|
enqueue({ data: { role: 'owner' } }) // caller membership
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] }) // existing members
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // existing invite
|
|
enqueue({ data: { name: 'Acme AB' } }) // company name
|
|
// The exact failure shape a deployment without migration
|
|
// 20260804140000 produces: PostgREST cannot find the function.
|
|
enqueue({
|
|
data: null,
|
|
error: {
|
|
message: 'Could not find the function public.check_email_exists(email_to_check) in the schema cache',
|
|
code: 'PGRST202',
|
|
},
|
|
}) // rpc check_email_exists -> error
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // insert invitation
|
|
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
|
data: { email_sent: boolean; user_provisioned: boolean }
|
|
}>(await post({ email: 'client@example.com' }))
|
|
|
|
// The route logs a warning and treats GoTrue as the authority: it
|
|
// attempts provisioning anyway rather than silently skipping the
|
|
// invitee, and a duplicate would surface from GoTrue itself.
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(serviceSupabase.rpc).toHaveBeenCalledWith('check_email_exists', {
|
|
email_to_check: 'client@example.com',
|
|
})
|
|
expect(inviteUserByEmailMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
|
|
expect(body.data.user_provisioned).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(body.data.email_sent).toBe(true)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('flag on + admin reports the email already registered: treated as existing account', async () => {
|
|
process.env.AUTH_SIGNUPS_DISABLED = 'true'
|
|
enqueue({ data: { role: 'owner' } }) // caller membership
|
|
enqueue({ data: [] }) // existing members
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // existing invite
|
|
enqueue({ data: { name: 'Acme AB' } }) // company name
|
|
enqueue({ data: false }) // rpc check_email_exists -> stale answer
|
|
enqueue({ data: null }) // insert invitation
|
|
const authError = Object.assign(
|
|
new Error('A user with this email address has already been registered'),
|
|
{ code: 'email_exists', status: 422 },
|
|
)
|
|
inviteUserByEmailMock.mockResolvedValue({ data: { user: null }, error: authError })
|
|
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
|
data: { email_sent: boolean; user_provisioned: boolean }
|
|
}>(await post({ email: 'client@example.com' }))
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(body.data.user_provisioned).toBe(false)
|
|
expect(body.data.email_sent).toBe(true)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|