Files
accounted/app/api/transactions/bulk-book/route.ts
T
MattssonandClaude Fable 5 8d56219c31 fix(inbox): booked items no longer strand in Att gora as matched-forever (#1547)
* fix(inbox): booked items no longer strand in Att gora as matched-forever

A matched inbox item only left the active inbox when
created_journal_entry_id was stamped, and only categorizeTransactionCore
stamped it. Booking the matched transaction through any other path (the
/book dialog route, bulk-book, link-to-existing-voucher) or matching a
receipt to an already-booked transaction (receipt hunt approvals,
attach-document, match-transaction) left the item "linked" forever,
pointing at a transaction that had already left the transactions work
list. Todays hunt fix (#1524) turned this July-old gap into a visible
flood of stuck items.

Two-part fix, because stamps alone cannot cover the reported case:
created_journal_entry_id is UNIQUE (20260515090000), so on a bulk-book
samlingsverifikat only one of N matched items can ever carry it.

Write side: lib/transactions/inbox-underlag.ts is the shared
implementation all paths now call. It links matched items' documents to
the anchoring verifikat (BFL 5 kap 6-7 kap: underlag on the
verifikation) and stamps created_journal_entry_id best-effort (CAS on
null, unique_violation tolerated). Wired into categorize-core (replacing
its inline block), /book, bulk-book, linkTransactionToJournalEntry, both
attach paths (REST + pending-operation), and the inbox match-transaction
handler. The attach paths and the doc-conflict guard also resolve
bulk-booked transactions through transaction_voucher_links, which they
previously treated as unbooked.

Read side: GET /items (and /items/:id) enrich matched-but-unstamped
items with matched_transaction_journal_entry_id, and the workspace
derives "booked" from it. This is what clears the stuck rows already in
prod without a status backfill, and what covers the N-1 samlingsverifikat
items the UNIQUE constraint refuses to stamp. Bulk-book selection
filters exclude such items so "Bokfor valda" no longer offers 409 fodder.

scripts/backfill-inbox-booked-underlag.ts (dry-run by default) repairs
the historical document->verifikat links the old paths never made.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(inbox): stamp only settled underlag, and give the backfill behandlingshistorik

Both from the Swedish accounting compliance review.

The consumed-stamp is now conditional on the underlag actually
referencing a verifikat: stamping over a failed document link hid the
item from the .is('created_journal_entry_id', null) query forever,
leaving a posted verifikation without its underlag reference
(BFL 5 kap 6-7 kap) and nothing left to surface or repair it. A failed
link now leaves the item unstamped so re-runs and the backfill can
finish the job; a document preserved on another verifikat still counts
as settled.

The backfill script now appends an InboxUnderlagBackfilled event per
repaired transaction to processing_history (BFNAR 2013:2 kap 8): a mass
repair touching underlag-to-verifikat linkage leaves a changelog trail
distinguishing it from the original booking action.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* refactor(inbox): backfill writes behandlingshistorik through the shared appender

From the Swedish accounting compliance review round 2: a hand-rolled
processing_history insert in the backfill script could drift from the
shared row shape and skip the PII validation. appendProcessingHistory
now delegates to appendProcessingHistoryWithClient, which takes a
caller-supplied service-role client, so standalone scripts write
behandlingshistorik through the exact same code path as the app
(BFNAR 2013:2 kap 8: one reconcilable change log across writers).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(inbox): leave the item unstamped when its document belongs to another verifikat

Swedish accounting review round 3: refusing to steal the document was
right, but stamping the item consumed anyway hid the fact that the
transaction's own verifikat ended up with no underlag reference from it
(BFL 5 kap 6-7 kap). The anchored-elsewhere case now leaves
created_journal_entry_id null so the mismatch keeps surfacing for
reconciliation, same posture as a failed link.

Also documents in the backfill script header why its writes cannot land
in locked periods: linkToJournalEntry's UPDATE is guarded by the
enforce_period_lock DB trigger, which fires for service-role writes too.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-13 00:49:20 +02:00

388 lines
15 KiB
TypeScript

import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
import { withRouteContext } from '@/lib/api/with-route-context'
import { validateBody } from '@/lib/api/validate'
import { BulkBookSchema } from '@/lib/api/schemas'
import { errorResponseFromCode } from '@/lib/errors/get-structured-error'
import { applyTemplate } from '@/lib/bookkeeping/template-library'
import { mergeDimensionBags } from '@/lib/bookkeeping/dimension-resolver'
import {
applyDimensionRules,
assertMandatoryDimensions,
fetchActiveDimensionRules,
} from '@/lib/bookkeeping/dimension-rules'
import { bookkeepingErrorResponse } from '@/lib/bookkeeping/errors'
import { propagateUnderlagForBookedTransaction } from '@/lib/transactions/inbox-underlag'
import { eventBus } from '@/lib/events/bus'
import { ensureInitialized } from '@/lib/init'
import type { BookingTemplateLibraryLine, Transaction } from '@/types'
import { getErrorMessage as getUserErrorMessage } from '@/lib/errors/get-error-message'
ensureInitialized()
interface RpcOk {
ok: true
mode: 'link_existing' | 'create_new'
journal_entry_id: string
voucher_series: string | null
voucher_number: number | null
linked_tx_count: number
tx_sum: number
docs_linked: number
}
interface RpcErr {
ok: false
code: string
details?: Record<string, unknown>
}
interface ComputedLine {
account_number: string
debit_amount: number
credit_amount: number
currency: string
line_description?: string
sort_order?: number
// Dimensions PR7: bag persisted by the RPC onto journal_entry_lines
// (with cost_center/project mirrors derived server-side).
dimensions?: Record<string, string>
}
function round2(n: number): number {
return Math.round(n * 100) / 100
}
/**
* POST /api/transactions/bulk-book
*
* Bulk-book N bank transactions on the same date into one combined
* verifikat (samlingsverifikation per BFL 5 kap 6§). Two flows:
*
* 1. Link to existing voucher: { tx_ids, existing_journal_entry_id }.
* No new JE; the RPC just inserts N transaction_voucher_links rows.
*
* 2. Create new from template: { tx_ids, template_id, mode,
* entry_description }. The route fetches the template, expands it
* per the chosen mode, and passes the resulting balanced lines to
* the RPC. The RPC then commits the verifikat atomically.
*
* `applyTemplate` lives in TS (ratio / VAT math); the RPC stays focused
* on locking, balance, and link insertion.
*/
export const POST = withRouteContext(
'transaction.bulk_book',
async (request, ctx) => {
const { user, supabase, companyId, log, requestId } = ctx
const validation = await validateBody(request, BulkBookSchema, {
log,
operation: 'transaction.bulk_book',
})
if (!validation.success) return validation.response
const body = validation.data
const opLog = log.child({ txCount: body.tx_ids.length })
// Fetch the selected txs ONCE, up front, for every path. The template
// branch needs the amounts to expand the template; all three branches
// need the currencies for the homogeneity gate below.
const { data: txs, error: txError } = await supabase
.from('transactions')
.select('id, amount, currency, description, date')
.in('id', body.tx_ids)
.eq('company_id', companyId)
if (txError || !txs || txs.length === 0) {
return errorResponseFromCode('BULK_BOOK_TXS_NOT_FOUND', opLog, { requestId })
}
if (txs.length !== body.tx_ids.length) {
return errorResponseFromCode('BULK_BOOK_TXS_NOT_FOUND', opLog, {
requestId,
details: { expected: body.tx_ids.length, found: txs.length },
})
}
const txTyped = txs as Pick<Transaction, 'id' | 'amount' | 'currency' | 'description' | 'date'>[]
// Currency homogeneity, enforced BEFORE the branch split so it covers
// all three paths (template, manual_lines, existing_journal_entry_id).
// BFL 4 kap 6 § requires the bokföring to be presented in one and the
// same redovisningsvaluta. A samlingsverifikation mixing e.g. SEK and
// EUR has no representable single belopp: summing the raw amounts adds
// 100 EUR to 100 SEK as if they were one unit, and the verifikat would
// then state an amount matching no affärshändelse (BFL 5 kap 7 §
// "belopp"). Nothing the caller can pass makes that correct without
// per-tx FX rates, so this refuses instead of warning. Mirrors the MCP
// twin (gnubok_bulk_book_transactions), which guards the same three
// paths; cross-currency batches belong in the FX-aware batch-allocate
// flow (kursdifferens on 7960/3960).
// NULL currency is legacy for the column default 'SEK' (the codebase
// reads it that way everywhere), so it is normalized before comparison:
// a NULL/SEK selection is not a currency mix and must stay bookable.
const currencies = new Set(txTyped.map((t) => t.currency ?? 'SEK'))
if (currencies.size > 1) {
return errorResponseFromCode('BULK_BOOK_MIXED_CURRENCY', opLog, {
requestId,
details: { currencies: Array.from(currencies).sort() },
})
}
const currency = txTyped[0]!.currency ?? 'SEK'
// A HOMOGENEOUS foreign batch is refused too: the RPC writes the line
// amounts into journal_entry_lines.debit_amount/credit_amount, which are
// ALWAYS kronor, and neither the route nor the RPC carries an exchange
// rate here. Two EUR transactions of 100 + 200 would produce a verifikat
// whose 300 is read as kronor by balansräkning, momsdeklaration and SIE
// export. Foreign-currency transactions are booked individually through
// the FX-aware flows, which resolve a rate and book the kursdifferens.
// The RPC enforces the same refusal for callers that bypass this route.
if (currency !== 'SEK') {
return errorResponseFromCode('BULK_BOOK_FOREIGN_CURRENCY', opLog, {
requestId,
details: { currency },
})
}
// Three paths now (PR #608):
// 1. existing_journal_entry_id → null new_entry, RPC links txs to JE.
// 2. template_id → route expands template per mode, builds lines.
// 3. manual_lines → caller-built lines pass straight through.
let newEntryPayload: { description: string; lines: ComputedLine[] } | null = null
if (body.manual_lines && body.entry_description) {
// Manual mode. The Zod schema validated the 4-digit format; the
// RPC's balance + bank-leg + negative-amount + both-sides-nonzero
// guards still run downstream. What's missing is verifying the
// account_numbers exist in this company's chart_of_accounts:
// without it a typo or adversarial caller could post to a BAS
// account that doesn't exist, corrupting the hauptbok and
// breaking SIE export. Single roundtrip allowlist check.
const accountNumbers = Array.from(
new Set(body.manual_lines.map((l) => l.account_number)),
)
const { data: knownAccounts, error: accountsError } = await supabase
.from('chart_of_accounts')
.select('account_number')
.eq('company_id', companyId)
.eq('is_active', true)
.in('account_number', accountNumbers)
if (accountsError) {
opLog.error('chart_of_accounts lookup failed', accountsError)
return errorResponseFromCode('BULK_BOOK_RPC_FAILED', opLog, {
requestId,
details: { message: getUserErrorMessage(accountsError) },
})
}
const validSet = new Set(
(knownAccounts ?? []).map((a: { account_number: string }) => a.account_number),
)
const invalid = accountNumbers.filter((n) => !validSet.has(n))
if (invalid.length > 0) {
return errorResponseFromCode('BULK_BOOK_INVALID_ACCOUNT', opLog, {
requestId,
details: { invalid_accounts: invalid },
})
}
newEntryPayload = {
description: body.entry_description,
lines: body.manual_lines.map((l, i) => ({
account_number: l.account_number,
debit_amount: round2(l.debit_amount),
credit_amount: round2(l.credit_amount),
currency: l.currency,
line_description: l.line_description,
sort_order: i,
// Dimensions PR7: per-line bag wins over the header default.
dimensions: mergeDimensionBags(body.default_dimensions, l.dimensions),
})),
}
} else if (body.template_id && body.mode && body.entry_description) {
// Fetch the template. RLS scopes to user's companies + system templates,
// so we don't need a company_id filter here.
const { data: template, error: templateError } = await supabase
.from('booking_template_library')
.select('id, name, lines, is_active')
.eq('id', body.template_id)
.single()
if (templateError || !template) {
return errorResponseFromCode('BULK_BOOK_TEMPLATE_NOT_FOUND', opLog, { requestId })
}
if (!template.is_active) {
return errorResponseFromCode('BULK_BOOK_TEMPLATE_NOT_FOUND', opLog, {
requestId,
details: { reason: 'template_inactive' },
})
}
const templateLines = (template.lines ?? []) as BookingTemplateLibraryLine[]
// The tx rows (amount + currency) were fetched and currency-gated
// above; the RPC still re-validates date, direction, and
// not-already-booked.
const txAbsAmounts = txTyped.map((t) => Math.abs(t.amount))
const totalAbs = round2(txAbsAmounts.reduce((s, a) => s + a, 0))
const lines: ComputedLine[] = []
let sortOrder = 0
if (body.mode === 'sum_per_account') {
// One application of the template at the summed amount → one line
// per template line. Compact verifikat; per-tx detail recoverable
// via transaction_voucher_links.
const applied = applyTemplate(templateLines, totalAbs)
for (const formLine of applied) {
const debit = parseFloat(formLine.debit_amount || '0') || 0
const credit = parseFloat(formLine.credit_amount || '0') || 0
if (debit === 0 && credit === 0) continue
lines.push({
account_number: formLine.account_number,
debit_amount: round2(debit),
credit_amount: round2(credit),
currency,
line_description: formLine.line_description || undefined,
sort_order: sortOrder++,
// Dimensions PR7: header default applies to all template lines.
dimensions: body.default_dimensions,
})
}
} else {
// one_line_per_tx: apply template per tx, prefix description with
// a short tx reference so the verifikat preserves per-row audit
// detail (BFL 5 kap 7§ motpart identification).
for (const tx of txTyped) {
const applied = applyTemplate(templateLines, Math.abs(tx.amount))
for (const formLine of applied) {
const debit = parseFloat(formLine.debit_amount || '0') || 0
const credit = parseFloat(formLine.credit_amount || '0') || 0
if (debit === 0 && credit === 0) continue
const txTag = (tx.description || '').slice(0, 40).trim()
lines.push({
account_number: formLine.account_number,
debit_amount: round2(debit),
credit_amount: round2(credit),
currency,
line_description: txTag
? `${formLine.line_description ?? ''}: ${txTag}`.trim()
: formLine.line_description || undefined,
sort_order: sortOrder++,
// Dimensions PR7: header default applies to all template lines.
dimensions: body.default_dimensions,
})
}
}
}
newEntryPayload = {
description: body.entry_description,
lines,
}
}
// Account dimension rules (dimensions PR10): the bulk-book RPC bypasses
// the TS engine, so the policy layer runs here — defaults/fixed applied
// to the computed lines, then 'required' asserted. Zero rules (the
// default) or a failed fetch changes nothing (fail-open, same posture as
// the engine).
if (newEntryPayload) {
const rules = await fetchActiveDimensionRules(supabase, companyId!)
if (rules === null) {
opLog.warn('dimension rule fetch failed — policy skipped (fail-open)')
}
if (rules && rules.length > 0) {
newEntryPayload.lines = applyDimensionRules(newEntryPayload.lines, rules)
try {
assertMandatoryDimensions(newEntryPayload.lines, rules)
} catch (err) {
const mapped = bookkeepingErrorResponse(err)
if (mapped) return mapped
throw err
}
}
}
// p_user_id removed in PR #608 (round-3 hardening pattern applied
// consistently). RPC resolves the caller via auth.uid().
const { data, error } = await supabase.rpc('bulk_book_transactions', {
p_tx_ids: body.tx_ids,
p_existing_journal_entry_id: body.existing_journal_entry_id ?? null,
p_new_entry: newEntryPayload,
p_company_id: companyId,
})
if (error) {
opLog.error('bulk_book_transactions RPC error', error)
return errorResponseFromCode('BULK_BOOK_RPC_FAILED', opLog, {
requestId,
details: { message: getUserErrorMessage(error) },
})
}
const result = data as RpcOk | RpcErr | null
if (!result || !result.ok) {
const code = (result as RpcErr | null)?.code ?? 'BULK_BOOK_RPC_FAILED'
const details = (result as RpcErr | null)?.details
return errorResponseFromCode(code, opLog, { requestId, details })
}
// Complete any matched inbox items against the samlingsverifikat: link
// their underlag and stamp them consumed so they leave the active inbox.
// Best-effort, logged inside; created_journal_entry_id is UNIQUE so at
// most one item can carry the stamp; the inbox list derives "booked"
// from the voucher links for the rest.
for (const txId of body.tx_ids) {
await propagateUnderlagForBookedTransaction(
supabase,
companyId!,
txId,
result.journal_entry_id,
)
}
// Emit one transaction.reconciled event per tx so existing subscribers
// (reminder cancellation, automation, processing-history) keep working.
// Best-effort; a failure here does not roll back the booking.
const { data: linkedTxs } = await supabase
.from('transactions')
.select('*')
.in('id', body.tx_ids)
.eq('company_id', companyId)
if (linkedTxs) {
for (const tx of linkedTxs as Transaction[]) {
try {
await eventBus.emit({
type: 'transaction.reconciled',
payload: {
transaction: tx,
journalEntryId: result.journal_entry_id,
method: 'manual',
userId: user.id,
companyId,
},
})
} catch (err) {
opLog.warn('bulk_book transaction.reconciled emission failed', {
err,
txId: tx.id,
journalEntryId: result.journal_entry_id,
})
}
}
}
return NextResponse.json({
data: {
mode: result.mode,
journal_entry_id: result.journal_entry_id,
voucher_series: result.voucher_series,
voucher_number: result.voucher_number,
linked_tx_count: result.linked_tx_count,
tx_sum: result.tx_sum,
docs_linked: result.docs_linked,
},
})
},
{ requireWrite: true },
)