Files
accounted/tests/pg/vat-totals-closing-entry.pg.test.ts
T
MattssonandClaude Fable 5 cd344b6dbb fix(db): enforce balance check on directly inserted posted journal entries (v2) (#1439)
* fix(db): enforce balance check on directly inserted posted journal entries

check_balance_on_post only fires on the draft-to-posted UPDATE transition,
so any code path that INSERTs a row with status 'posted' directly skipped
balance validation entirely. The invariant sum(debit) = sum(credit) on
every posted entry was DB-enforced only for the engine's commit lifecycle.

Add check_balance_on_posted_insert, a deferred constraint trigger on
AFTER INSERT WHEN (NEW.status = 'posted') reusing the existing
check_journal_entry_balance() function, which already handles the
journal_entries INSERT context via NEW.id/NEW.status. Deferred semantics
let an atomic transaction insert header and lines together; zero-line and
unbalanced posted inserts are rejected at constraint evaluation. All
existing checks stay intact; this only adds coverage.

The one first-party posted-INSERT path outside an RPC, the sandbox seed,
now books through the bookkeeping engine (createJournalEntry) instead of
raw inserts. SIE import already inserts header and lines in a single
transaction via its structured RPC and passes unchanged.

pg tests cover the new path (zero-line rejected, unbalanced rejected at
SET CONSTRAINTS IMMEDIATE, balanced same-transaction insert accepted) and
existing posted-entry fixtures move to a transactional
insertPostedJournalEntry helper so they stay valid setup.

Fixes #327

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(tests): insert list-filters pg fixtures in one transaction

The list-filters suite (landed via a sibling merge) inserted posted
headers with getPool().query, where each query autocommits: the deferred
check_balance_on_posted_insert constraint fired at the header's own
commit with zero lines and correctly rejected the fixture. Header and
balanced lines now share one BEGIN/COMMIT so the constraint evaluates
the complete entry, mirroring the insertPostedJournalEntry helper.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(seed): insert journal headers as drafts, post after lines land

check_balance_on_posted_insert (renamed to apply-time version
20260806130000) rejects a posted header whose transaction has no lines.
PostgREST autocommits each request, so every seed path that inserted
posted headers first would die with "has zero total": the sandbox seed
(ledger history, invoice vouchers, salary vouchers), seed-demo-account
and seed-export-data. All now insert draft headers, insert lines, then
flip to posted so check_balance_on_post validates the finished
verifikat. The sandbox seed keeps its documented no-events design.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(db): preserve a preset committed_at on draft-to-posted transition

set_committed_at() stamped now() unconditionally, so the seed flows that
post backdated drafts lost their historical booking timestamps and every
demo verifikat read as booked today (CodeRabbit finding on PR 1439).
Stamp only when committed_at is NULL: the engine path (drafts carry no
committed_at) behaves exactly as before and a posted entry still always
has a committed_at; an explicitly supplied value now survives posting.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(db): preserve preset committed_at only for trusted roles

The IS NULL guard alone (20260806150000, never shipped; replaced by
20260806160000) let any RLS-permitted member backdate committed_at
through PostgREST by presetting it on a draft and posting, which the
Swedish accounting review flagged: committed_at is what the BFL 5 kap
timeliness checks and behandlingshistorik treat as the genuine
transition time. Preset values now survive posting only for
service_role/postgres/supabase_admin; authenticated and anon writers
always get the now() stamp. Consequence: the sandbox seed (runs as the
requesting user) gets committed_at = posting time, accepted and
documented in the route; the demo scripts run as service_role and keep
their backdated history. pg tests cover all four paths, with the upper
timestamp bound CodeRabbit asked for.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(db): restore superseded migration so the preview tracker stays consistent

The preview branch had already applied 20260806150000 when the previous
commit deleted the file, orphaning the preview's migration tracker
("Remote migration versions not found in local migrations directory").
Restored with a header explaining it is superseded in the same deploy by
20260806160000, so the unguarded semantics are never live on their own.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(db): decide committed_at trust by JWT claims, not current_user

The Swedish review found the current_user guard bypassable:
commit_journal_entry is SECURITY DEFINER and granted to authenticated,
so inside it current_user is the function owner and a member could
preset a backdated committed_at on a direct-inserted draft and launder
it through the RPC. The guard now reads the JWT claims role (same
primitive as the RPC's own tenant guard): preset values survive only
for service_role or claim-less backend connections; authenticated and
anon callers are always stamped now(), on both the direct UPDATE and
the RPC path (new pg test). Both migration files now carry the
identical final body so no unguarded intermediate exists as a
standalone applyable unit. Behandlingshistorik logging of trusted
overrides is follow-up #1444.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-06 23:00:05 +02:00

274 lines
9.5 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* pg-real test for get_vat_declaration_totals: the resultatavslut must not
* reach a momsdeklaration.
*
* The closing verifikat posts the mirror image of every P&L account into 2099
* inside the same fiscal period. Revenue accounts drive rutor 05, 39 and 40, so
* before migration 20260729110000 any VAT period containing the fiscal-year end
* reported NEGATED turnover once the year was closed. On a production ledger
* that produced ruta 39 = -794 734 kr for the December period of a closed year.
*
* Pinned here:
* - a POSTED closing entry linked from fiscal_periods.closing_entry_id is
* dropped, so the closing month reports nothing;
* - the month with the real sale is untouched;
* - a REVERSED closing entry is RETAINED together with its storno, so the
* pair still nets to zero (same predicate as closingEntry: 'exclude-final'
* in lib/reports/trial-balance.ts). Dropping only the reversed original
* would leave the storno behind and negate turnover a second time;
* - an ordinary year_end entry that is NOT the linked closing entry stays,
* because avskrivningar, periodiseringsfond and skatt share that
* source_type;
* - the pre-existing vat_settlement exclusion still holds.
*/
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest'
import { randomUUID } from 'node:crypto'
import { getPool } from './setup'
import {
insertAuthUser,
insertCompany,
insertCompanyMember,
insertFiscalPeriod,
} from './fixtures'
// Mirrors the arrays lib/reports/vat-declaration.ts passes in.
//
// p_ruta_accounts is the fixed ACCOUNT_RUTA key set, which holds revenue AND
// VAT accounts. p_net_accounts is VAT_SETTLEMENT_NET_ACCOUNTS, the
// momsredovisning settlement pair 2650/1650, and it is NOT the output-VAT
// accounts: an entry carrying a line in p_ruta_accounts AND one in
// p_net_accounts is classified a momsredovisning by SHAPE and dropped from the
// totals entirely. An earlier draft put 2611 in p_net_accounts, which made an
// ordinary sale-with-VAT look like a settlement and silently vanish.
const RUTA_ACCOUNTS = ['3001', '3308', '2611', '2641']
const NET_ACCOUNTS = ['2650', '1650']
const ALL_ACCOUNTS = [...RUTA_ACCOUNTS, ...NET_ACCOUNTS]
interface Totals {
totals: Array<{ account_number: string; debit: number; credit: number }>
source_type_counts: Record<string, number>
}
async function callRpc(companyId: string, start: string, end: string): Promise<Totals> {
const { rows } = await getPool().query(
`SELECT public.get_vat_declaration_totals($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, $6) AS payload`,
[companyId, start, end, ALL_ACCOUNTS, RUTA_ACCOUNTS, NET_ACCOUNTS],
)
return rows[0].payload as Totals
}
/** Net credit on an account, the orientation a revenue ruta reports. */
function netCredit(payload: Totals, account: string): number {
const row = payload.totals.find((t) => t.account_number === account)
if (!row) return 0
return Number(row.credit) - Number(row.debit)
}
async function insertEntry(params: {
userId: string
companyId: string
fiscalPeriodId: string
voucherNumber: number
entryDate: string
status?: 'posted' | 'reversed'
sourceType?: string
reversesId?: string | null
lines: Array<{ account: string; debit: number; credit: number }>
}): Promise<string> {
const id = randomUUID()
const status = params.status ?? 'posted'
const client = await getPool().connect()
// Inserted directly, bypassing commit_journal_entry's voucher sequencing:
// this is a read-side aggregate that only reads lines and account numbers.
try {
await client.query('BEGIN')
await client.query(
`INSERT INTO public.journal_entries
(id, user_id, company_id, fiscal_period_id, voucher_number, voucher_series,
entry_date, description, source_type, status, reverses_id)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, 'A', $6, 'VAT closing-entry test', $7, $8, $9)`,
[
id,
params.userId,
params.companyId,
params.fiscalPeriodId,
params.voucherNumber,
params.entryDate,
params.sourceType ?? 'manual',
status,
params.reversesId ?? null,
],
)
for (const line of params.lines) {
await client.query(
`INSERT INTO public.journal_entry_lines
(journal_entry_id, account_number, debit_amount, credit_amount)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4)`,
[id, line.account, line.debit, line.credit],
)
}
if (status === 'posted') {
await client.query('SET CONSTRAINTS check_balance_on_posted_insert IMMEDIATE')
}
await client.query('COMMIT')
return id
} catch (error) {
await client.query('ROLLBACK').catch(() => {})
throw error
} finally {
client.release()
}
}
/**
* One EU-services sale in January, then a December resultatavslut that debits
* the same revenue account: the shape that produced the production bug.
*/
async function seedClosedYear(closingStatus: 'posted' | 'reversed') {
const userId = await insertAuthUser()
const companyId = await insertCompany({ createdBy: userId })
await insertCompanyMember({ companyId, userId, role: 'owner' })
// Left OPEN deliberately. enforce_period_lock (migration 017, legally
// required) refuses any write into a closed period, so seeding entries into
// one is impossible by design and must not be worked around. The RPC's
// predicate keys on fiscal_periods.closing_entry_id and never reads
// is_closed, so linking the closing entry below exercises the exact path
// that matters without fighting a compliance trigger.
const fiscalPeriodId = await insertFiscalPeriod({
userId,
companyId,
periodStart: '2026-01-01',
periodEnd: '2026-12-31',
isClosed: false,
})
const ctx = { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId }
await insertEntry({
...ctx,
voucherNumber: 1,
entryDate: '2026-01-16',
sourceType: 'bank_transaction',
lines: [
{ account: '1930', debit: 800_000, credit: 0 },
{ account: '3308', debit: 0, credit: 800_000 },
],
})
const closingEntryId = await insertEntry({
...ctx,
voucherNumber: 2,
entryDate: '2026-12-31',
sourceType: 'year_end',
status: closingStatus,
lines: [
{ account: '3308', debit: 800_000, credit: 0 },
{ account: '2099', debit: 0, credit: 800_000 },
],
})
await getPool().query(
`UPDATE public.fiscal_periods SET closing_entry_id = $1 WHERE id = $2`,
[closingEntryId, fiscalPeriodId],
)
return { ...ctx, closingEntryId }
}
describe('get_vat_declaration_totals: year-end closing entry', () => {
it('drops a posted resultatavslut from the closing month', async () => {
const { companyId } = await seedClosedYear('posted')
const december = await callRpc(companyId, '2026-12-01', '2026-12-31')
// The regression: this reported -800 000 before the fix.
expect(netCredit(december, '3308')).toBe(0)
})
it('leaves the month with the real sale untouched', async () => {
const { companyId } = await seedClosedYear('posted')
const january = await callRpc(companyId, '2026-01-01', '2026-01-31')
expect(netCredit(january, '3308')).toBe(800_000)
})
it('reports the full year once, not zero, across the whole period', async () => {
const { companyId } = await seedClosedYear('posted')
const wholeYear = await callRpc(companyId, '2026-01-01', '2026-12-31')
// With the closing entry in, sale and reversal cancelled to 0.
expect(netCredit(wholeYear, '3308')).toBe(800_000)
})
it('keeps a reversed closing entry so it still nets against its storno', async () => {
const { companyId, fiscalPeriodId, closingEntryId, userId } =
await seedClosedYear('reversed')
// Undo year-end: the closing entry is reversed and a posted storno mirrors
// it. Both must be counted, or the storno alone negates turnover again.
await insertEntry({
userId,
companyId,
fiscalPeriodId,
voucherNumber: 3,
entryDate: '2026-12-31',
sourceType: 'storno',
reversesId: closingEntryId,
lines: [
{ account: '3308', debit: 0, credit: 800_000 },
{ account: '2099', debit: 800_000, credit: 0 },
],
})
const december = await callRpc(companyId, '2026-12-01', '2026-12-31')
// Reversed original (-800 000) + storno (+800 000) = 0.
expect(netCredit(december, '3308')).toBe(0)
})
it('keeps year_end entries that are not the linked closing entry', async () => {
const { companyId, userId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedClosedYear('posted')
// A bokslut entry sharing source_type 'year_end' but carrying real VAT.
await insertEntry({
userId,
companyId,
fiscalPeriodId,
voucherNumber: 4,
entryDate: '2026-12-30',
sourceType: 'year_end',
lines: [
{ account: '3001', debit: 0, credit: 10_000 },
{ account: '2611', debit: 0, credit: 2_500 },
{ account: '1930', debit: 12_500, credit: 0 },
],
})
const december = await callRpc(companyId, '2026-12-01', '2026-12-31')
expect(netCredit(december, '3001')).toBe(10_000)
expect(netCredit(december, '2611')).toBe(2_500)
})
it('still excludes vat_settlement entries', async () => {
const { companyId, userId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedClosedYear('posted')
await insertEntry({
userId,
companyId,
fiscalPeriodId,
voucherNumber: 5,
entryDate: '2026-01-20',
sourceType: 'vat_settlement',
lines: [
{ account: '2611', debit: 5_000, credit: 0 },
{ account: '1930', debit: 0, credit: 5_000 },
],
})
const january = await callRpc(companyId, '2026-01-01', '2026-01-31')
expect(netCredit(january, '2611')).toBe(0)
})
})