Files
accounted/tests/pg/bulk-book-transactions.pg.test.ts
T
MattssonandClaude Fable 5 cd344b6dbb fix(db): enforce balance check on directly inserted posted journal entries (v2) (#1439)
* fix(db): enforce balance check on directly inserted posted journal entries

check_balance_on_post only fires on the draft-to-posted UPDATE transition,
so any code path that INSERTs a row with status 'posted' directly skipped
balance validation entirely. The invariant sum(debit) = sum(credit) on
every posted entry was DB-enforced only for the engine's commit lifecycle.

Add check_balance_on_posted_insert, a deferred constraint trigger on
AFTER INSERT WHEN (NEW.status = 'posted') reusing the existing
check_journal_entry_balance() function, which already handles the
journal_entries INSERT context via NEW.id/NEW.status. Deferred semantics
let an atomic transaction insert header and lines together; zero-line and
unbalanced posted inserts are rejected at constraint evaluation. All
existing checks stay intact; this only adds coverage.

The one first-party posted-INSERT path outside an RPC, the sandbox seed,
now books through the bookkeeping engine (createJournalEntry) instead of
raw inserts. SIE import already inserts header and lines in a single
transaction via its structured RPC and passes unchanged.

pg tests cover the new path (zero-line rejected, unbalanced rejected at
SET CONSTRAINTS IMMEDIATE, balanced same-transaction insert accepted) and
existing posted-entry fixtures move to a transactional
insertPostedJournalEntry helper so they stay valid setup.

Fixes #327

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(tests): insert list-filters pg fixtures in one transaction

The list-filters suite (landed via a sibling merge) inserted posted
headers with getPool().query, where each query autocommits: the deferred
check_balance_on_posted_insert constraint fired at the header's own
commit with zero lines and correctly rejected the fixture. Header and
balanced lines now share one BEGIN/COMMIT so the constraint evaluates
the complete entry, mirroring the insertPostedJournalEntry helper.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(seed): insert journal headers as drafts, post after lines land

check_balance_on_posted_insert (renamed to apply-time version
20260806130000) rejects a posted header whose transaction has no lines.
PostgREST autocommits each request, so every seed path that inserted
posted headers first would die with "has zero total": the sandbox seed
(ledger history, invoice vouchers, salary vouchers), seed-demo-account
and seed-export-data. All now insert draft headers, insert lines, then
flip to posted so check_balance_on_post validates the finished
verifikat. The sandbox seed keeps its documented no-events design.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(db): preserve a preset committed_at on draft-to-posted transition

set_committed_at() stamped now() unconditionally, so the seed flows that
post backdated drafts lost their historical booking timestamps and every
demo verifikat read as booked today (CodeRabbit finding on PR 1439).
Stamp only when committed_at is NULL: the engine path (drafts carry no
committed_at) behaves exactly as before and a posted entry still always
has a committed_at; an explicitly supplied value now survives posting.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(db): preserve preset committed_at only for trusted roles

The IS NULL guard alone (20260806150000, never shipped; replaced by
20260806160000) let any RLS-permitted member backdate committed_at
through PostgREST by presetting it on a draft and posting, which the
Swedish accounting review flagged: committed_at is what the BFL 5 kap
timeliness checks and behandlingshistorik treat as the genuine
transition time. Preset values now survive posting only for
service_role/postgres/supabase_admin; authenticated and anon writers
always get the now() stamp. Consequence: the sandbox seed (runs as the
requesting user) gets committed_at = posting time, accepted and
documented in the route; the demo scripts run as service_role and keep
their backdated history. pg tests cover all four paths, with the upper
timestamp bound CodeRabbit asked for.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(db): restore superseded migration so the preview tracker stays consistent

The preview branch had already applied 20260806150000 when the previous
commit deleted the file, orphaning the preview's migration tracker
("Remote migration versions not found in local migrations directory").
Restored with a header explaining it is superseded in the same deploy by
20260806160000, so the unguarded semantics are never live on their own.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(db): decide committed_at trust by JWT claims, not current_user

The Swedish review found the current_user guard bypassable:
commit_journal_entry is SECURITY DEFINER and granted to authenticated,
so inside it current_user is the function owner and a member could
preset a backdated committed_at on a direct-inserted draft and launder
it through the RPC. The guard now reads the JWT claims role (same
primitive as the RPC's own tenant guard): preset values survive only
for service_role or claim-less backend connections; authenticated and
anon callers are always stamped now(), on both the direct UPDATE and
the RPC path (new pg test). Both migration files now carry the
identical final body so no unguarded intermediate exists as a
standalone applyable unit. Behandlingshistorik logging of trusted
overrides is follow-up #1444.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-06 23:00:05 +02:00

528 lines
22 KiB
TypeScript
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
import { randomUUID } from 'node:crypto'
import { describe, expect, it } from 'vitest'
import {
insertAuthUser,
insertCompany,
insertCompanyMember,
insertFiscalPeriod,
insertPostedJournalEntry,
} from '@/tests/pg/fixtures'
import { getPool, withUserContext } from '@/tests/pg/setup'
/**
* Covers 20260530120000_bulk_book_transactions:
*
* - Happy path create-new: 3 income txs on the same day → one
* combined verifikat (samlingsverifikation) with the caller-supplied
* lines. transaction_voucher_links populated. Bank net equals tx sum.
*
* - Happy path link-existing: 3 txs linked to an already-posted manual
* day-summary verifikat. Just inserts junction rows.
*
* - Guard codes: date mismatch, direction mismatch, already-booked tx,
* amount mismatch, unbalanced lines, no-bank-line, unauthorized.
*/
async function insertTransaction(params: {
userId: string
companyId: string
amount: number
date?: string
currency?: string
}): Promise<string> {
const id = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.transactions
(id, user_id, company_id, date, description, amount, currency, category)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, 'Bank tx', $5, $6, 'uncategorized')`,
[id, params.userId, params.companyId, params.date ?? '2026-06-05', params.amount, params.currency ?? 'SEK'],
)
return id
}
async function seedTenant() {
const userId = await insertAuthUser()
const companyId = await insertCompany({ createdBy: userId })
await insertCompanyMember({ companyId, userId, role: 'owner' })
const fiscalPeriodId = await insertFiscalPeriod({
userId,
companyId,
periodStart: '2026-01-01',
periodEnd: '2026-12-31',
})
// PR #610 round 2: the RPC now validates every line's account_number
// against the company's active chart_of_accounts. Seed just the
// accounts the tests touch (cheaper than calling
// seed_chart_of_accounts which inserts the full BAS).
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.chart_of_accounts
(user_id, company_id, account_number, account_name, account_class, account_type, normal_balance, is_active)
SELECT $1, $2, n, name, cls, atype, nbal, true
FROM (VALUES
('1510', 'Kundfordringar', 1, 'asset', 'debit'),
('1930', 'Bankkonto', 1, 'asset', 'debit'),
('2440', 'Leverantörsskulder', 2, 'liability', 'credit'),
('2611', 'Utgående moms 25%', 2, 'liability', 'credit'),
('3001', 'Försäljning 25% moms', 3, 'revenue', 'credit'),
('3960', 'Valutakursvinster', 3, 'revenue', 'credit'),
('5800', 'Resekostnader', 5, 'expense', 'debit'),
('7960', 'Valutakursförluster', 7, 'expense', 'debit')
) AS t(n, name, cls, atype, nbal)`,
[userId, companyId],
)
return { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId }
}
interface RpcResult {
ok: boolean
code?: string
details?: Record<string, unknown>
mode?: 'link_existing' | 'create_new'
journal_entry_id?: string
voucher_number?: number
linked_tx_count?: number
tx_sum?: number
}
describe('bulk_book_transactions: create new', () => {
it('builds a single combined verifikat from caller-supplied lines (kiosk samlingsverifikation)', async () => {
const { userId, companyId } = await seedTenant()
// 3 income txs at 100/200/300 SEK on the same day.
const tx1 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: 100 })
const tx2 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: 200 })
const tx3 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: 300 })
// Pre-computed lines (route-side template expansion in TS).
// Total: 600 SEK. 25% VAT split: 480 net + 120 VAT.
const newEntry = {
description: 'Samlingsverifikation kiosk 2026-06-05',
lines: [
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 600, credit_amount: 0, currency: 'SEK', line_description: 'Inbetalningar Swish' },
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 480, currency: 'SEK', line_description: 'Försäljning' },
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 120, currency: 'SEK', line_description: 'Utgående moms 25%' },
],
}
await withUserContext(userId, async (client) => {
const r = await client.query<{ bulk_book_transactions: RpcResult }>(
`SELECT bulk_book_transactions($1::uuid[], $2, $3::jsonb, $4)`,
[[tx1, tx2, tx3], null, JSON.stringify(newEntry), companyId],
)
const result = r.rows[0]!.bulk_book_transactions
expect(result.ok).toBe(true)
expect(result.mode).toBe('create_new')
expect(result.journal_entry_id).toBeTruthy()
expect(result.linked_tx_count).toBe(3)
expect(result.tx_sum).toBe(600)
// Verify lines on the new verifikat.
const lines = await client.query<{ account_number: string; debit_amount: string; credit_amount: string }>(
`SELECT account_number, debit_amount, credit_amount FROM public.journal_entry_lines
WHERE journal_entry_id = $1 ORDER BY sort_order`,
[result.journal_entry_id],
)
expect(lines.rows).toHaveLength(3)
const bankLine = lines.rows.find((l) => l.account_number === '1930')
expect(Number(bankLine!.debit_amount)).toBe(600)
// Verify 3 transaction_voucher_links rows pointing at the same JE.
const links = await client.query<{ allocated_amount: string; transaction_id: string }>(
`SELECT allocated_amount, transaction_id FROM public.transaction_voucher_links
WHERE journal_entry_id = $1`,
[result.journal_entry_id],
)
expect(links.rows).toHaveLength(3)
const linkedTxIds = new Set(links.rows.map((l) => l.transaction_id))
expect(linkedTxIds).toEqual(new Set([tx1, tx2, tx3]))
// For N>1, transactions.journal_entry_id is NOT set on the individual rows.
const txRow1 = await client.query<{ journal_entry_id: string | null; is_business: boolean }>(
`SELECT journal_entry_id, is_business FROM public.transactions WHERE id = $1`,
[tx1],
)
expect(txRow1.rows[0]!.journal_entry_id).toBeNull()
expect(txRow1.rows[0]!.is_business).toBe(true)
})
})
it('rejects BULK_BOOK_DATE_MISMATCH when txs span multiple dates', async () => {
const { userId, companyId } = await seedTenant()
const tx1 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: 100, date: '2026-06-05' })
const tx2 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: 100, date: '2026-06-06' })
const newEntry = {
description: 'Test',
lines: [
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 200, credit_amount: 0, currency: 'SEK' },
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 200, currency: 'SEK' },
],
}
await withUserContext(userId, async (client) => {
const r = await client.query<{ bulk_book_transactions: RpcResult }>(
`SELECT bulk_book_transactions($1::uuid[], $2, $3::jsonb, $4)`,
[[tx1, tx2], null, JSON.stringify(newEntry), companyId],
)
const result = r.rows[0]!.bulk_book_transactions
expect(result.ok).toBe(false)
expect(result.code).toBe('BULK_BOOK_DATE_MISMATCH')
})
})
it('rejects BULK_BOOK_DIRECTION_MISMATCH when income + expense txs are mixed', async () => {
const { userId, companyId } = await seedTenant()
const tx1 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: 100 })
const tx2 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: -100 })
const newEntry = {
description: 'Test',
lines: [
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 0, currency: 'SEK' },
],
}
await withUserContext(userId, async (client) => {
const r = await client.query<{ bulk_book_transactions: RpcResult }>(
`SELECT bulk_book_transactions($1::uuid[], $2, $3::jsonb, $4)`,
[[tx1, tx2], null, JSON.stringify(newEntry), companyId],
)
const result = r.rows[0]!.bulk_book_transactions
expect(result.ok).toBe(false)
expect(result.code).toBe('BULK_BOOK_DIRECTION_MISMATCH')
})
})
it('rejects BULK_BOOK_AMOUNT_MISMATCH when bank-line net does not equal tx sum', async () => {
const { userId, companyId } = await seedTenant()
const tx1 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: 100 })
const tx2 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: 200 })
// Caller claims 500 SEK net on 1930 but txs sum to 300.
const newEntry = {
description: 'Test',
lines: [
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 500, credit_amount: 0, currency: 'SEK' },
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500, currency: 'SEK' },
],
}
await withUserContext(userId, async (client) => {
const r = await client.query<{ bulk_book_transactions: RpcResult }>(
`SELECT bulk_book_transactions($1::uuid[], $2, $3::jsonb, $4)`,
[[tx1, tx2], null, JSON.stringify(newEntry), companyId],
)
const result = r.rows[0]!.bulk_book_transactions
expect(result.ok).toBe(false)
expect(result.code).toBe('BULK_BOOK_AMOUNT_MISMATCH')
})
})
it('rejects BULK_BOOK_UNBALANCED when debits do not equal credits', async () => {
const { userId, companyId } = await seedTenant()
const tx1 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: 100 })
const newEntry = {
description: 'Test',
lines: [
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 100, credit_amount: 0, currency: 'SEK' },
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 90, currency: 'SEK' },
],
}
await withUserContext(userId, async (client) => {
const r = await client.query<{ bulk_book_transactions: RpcResult }>(
`SELECT bulk_book_transactions($1::uuid[], $2, $3::jsonb, $4)`,
[[tx1], null, JSON.stringify(newEntry), companyId],
)
const result = r.rows[0]!.bulk_book_transactions
expect(result.ok).toBe(false)
expect(result.code).toBe('BULK_BOOK_UNBALANCED')
})
})
})
describe('bulk_book_transactions: link existing', () => {
it('links N txs to an already-posted day-summary verifikat', async () => {
const { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedTenant()
const tx1 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: 100 })
const tx2 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: 200 })
// Pre-create a posted manual verifikat with the right bank net (+300).
const jeId = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.journal_entries
(id, user_id, company_id, fiscal_period_id, voucher_number, voucher_series,
entry_date, description, source_type, status)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, 1, 'A', '2026-06-05', 'Manual dagssumma', 'manual', 'draft')`,
[jeId, userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId],
)
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.journal_entry_lines (journal_entry_id, account_number, debit_amount, credit_amount)
VALUES ($1, '1930', 300, 0), ($1, '3001', 0, 240), ($1, '2611', 0, 60)`,
[jeId],
)
await getPool().query(`UPDATE public.journal_entries SET status = 'posted' WHERE id = $1`, [jeId])
await withUserContext(userId, async (client) => {
const r = await client.query<{ bulk_book_transactions: RpcResult }>(
`SELECT bulk_book_transactions($1::uuid[], $2, $3, $4)`,
[[tx1, tx2], jeId, null, companyId],
)
const result = r.rows[0]!.bulk_book_transactions
expect(result.ok).toBe(true)
expect(result.mode).toBe('link_existing')
expect(result.journal_entry_id).toBe(jeId)
expect(result.linked_tx_count).toBe(2)
// No new JE was created: only junction rows.
const links = await client.query<{ transaction_id: string }>(
`SELECT transaction_id FROM public.transaction_voucher_links
WHERE journal_entry_id = $1`,
[jeId],
)
expect(links.rows).toHaveLength(2)
})
})
it('rejects link with BULK_BOOK_AMOUNT_MISMATCH when bank net does not equal tx sum', async () => {
const { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedTenant()
const tx1 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: 100 })
const tx2 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: 200 })
// JE bank net = +400 but txs sum to 300.
const jeId = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.journal_entries
(id, user_id, company_id, fiscal_period_id, voucher_number, voucher_series,
entry_date, description, source_type, status)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, 1, 'A', '2026-06-05', 'Manual', 'manual', 'draft')`,
[jeId, userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId],
)
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.journal_entry_lines (journal_entry_id, account_number, debit_amount, credit_amount)
VALUES ($1, '1930', 400, 0), ($1, '3001', 0, 400)`,
[jeId],
)
await getPool().query(`UPDATE public.journal_entries SET status = 'posted' WHERE id = $1`, [jeId])
await withUserContext(userId, async (client) => {
const r = await client.query<{ bulk_book_transactions: RpcResult }>(
`SELECT bulk_book_transactions($1::uuid[], $2, $3, $4)`,
[[tx1, tx2], jeId, null, companyId],
)
const result = r.rows[0]!.bulk_book_transactions
expect(result.ok).toBe(false)
expect(result.code).toBe('BULK_BOOK_AMOUNT_MISMATCH')
})
})
it('rejects BULK_BOOK_UNAUTHORIZED when caller is not a company member', async () => {
const { userId, companyId } = await seedTenant()
const tx1 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: 100 })
const outsiderId = await insertAuthUser()
const newEntry = {
description: 'Test',
lines: [
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 100, credit_amount: 0, currency: 'SEK' },
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 100, currency: 'SEK' },
],
}
await withUserContext(outsiderId, async (client) => {
const r = await client.query<{ bulk_book_transactions: RpcResult }>(
`SELECT bulk_book_transactions($1::uuid[], $2, $3::jsonb, $4)`,
[[tx1], null, JSON.stringify(newEntry), companyId],
)
const result = r.rows[0]!.bulk_book_transactions
expect(result.ok).toBe(false)
expect(result.code).toBe('BULK_BOOK_UNAUTHORIZED')
})
})
})
// PR #608: document inheritance + manual lines path.
async function insertDocumentForTx(params: {
userId: string
companyId: string
txId: string
fileName?: string
}): Promise<string> {
const docId = randomUUID()
await getPool().query(
`INSERT INTO public.document_attachments
(id, user_id, company_id, storage_path, file_name, sha256_hash)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, $6)`,
[
docId,
params.userId,
params.companyId,
`test/${docId}.pdf`,
params.fileName ?? 'receipt.pdf',
// 64-char hex string: sha256 placeholder for the test.
docId.replace(/-/g, '').padEnd(64, '0'),
],
)
await getPool().query(
`UPDATE public.transactions SET document_id = $1 WHERE id = $2`,
[docId, params.txId],
)
return docId
}
describe('bulk_book_transactions: document inheritance (PR #608)', () => {
it('copies each constituent tx document onto the combined new verifikat', async () => {
const { userId, companyId } = await seedTenant()
const tx1 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: 100 })
const tx2 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: 200 })
const tx3 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: 300 })
const doc1 = await insertDocumentForTx({ userId, companyId, txId: tx1, fileName: 'kvitto-1.pdf' })
const doc2 = await insertDocumentForTx({ userId, companyId, txId: tx2, fileName: 'kvitto-2.pdf' })
// tx3 intentionally without a doc: the RPC should not break and
// should report docs_linked = 2 (not 3).
const newEntry = {
description: 'Samlingsverifikation kiosk 2026-06-05',
lines: [
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 600, credit_amount: 0, currency: 'SEK' },
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 480, currency: 'SEK' },
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 120, currency: 'SEK' },
],
}
await withUserContext(userId, async (client) => {
const r = await client.query<{ bulk_book_transactions: RpcResult & { docs_linked?: number } }>(
`SELECT bulk_book_transactions($1::uuid[], $2, $3::jsonb, $4)`,
[[tx1, tx2, tx3], null, JSON.stringify(newEntry), companyId],
)
const result = r.rows[0]!.bulk_book_transactions
expect(result.ok).toBe(true)
expect(result.docs_linked).toBe(2)
const docs = await client.query<{ id: string; journal_entry_id: string | null }>(
`SELECT id, journal_entry_id FROM public.document_attachments
WHERE id = ANY($1) ORDER BY id`,
[[doc1, doc2]],
)
expect(docs.rows).toHaveLength(2)
// Both docs now point at the new verifikat: verifikationsunderlag
// per BFL 5 kap 6§ + BFNAR 2013:2 kap 4.
for (const row of docs.rows) {
expect(row.journal_entry_id).toBe(result.journal_entry_id)
}
})
})
it('copies docs onto an existing posted verifikat (link-existing branch)', async () => {
const { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedTenant()
const tx1 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: 100 })
const tx2 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: 200 })
const doc1 = await insertDocumentForTx({ userId, companyId, txId: tx1 })
const doc2 = await insertDocumentForTx({ userId, companyId, txId: tx2 })
// Manually pre-post a day-summary verifikat the user wants the txs
// linked to. Bank net must equal sum(tx.amount) = 300.
const jeId = await insertPostedJournalEntry({
userId,
companyId,
fiscalPeriodId,
voucherNumber: 1,
entryDate: '2026-06-05',
description: 'Manual day summary',
sourceType: 'manual',
lines: [
{ accountNumber: '1930', debitAmount: 300, creditAmount: 0, currency: 'SEK', sortOrder: 0 },
{ accountNumber: '3001', debitAmount: 0, creditAmount: 240, currency: 'SEK', sortOrder: 1 },
{ accountNumber: '2611', debitAmount: 0, creditAmount: 60, currency: 'SEK', sortOrder: 2 },
],
})
await withUserContext(userId, async (client) => {
const r = await client.query<{ bulk_book_transactions: RpcResult & { docs_linked?: number } }>(
`SELECT bulk_book_transactions($1::uuid[], $2, $3::jsonb, $4)`,
[[tx1, tx2], jeId, null, companyId],
)
const result = r.rows[0]!.bulk_book_transactions
expect(result.ok).toBe(true)
expect(result.mode).toBe('link_existing')
expect(result.docs_linked).toBe(2)
const docs = await client.query<{ journal_entry_id: string | null }>(
`SELECT journal_entry_id FROM public.document_attachments WHERE id = ANY($1)`,
[[doc1, doc2]],
)
for (const row of docs.rows) expect(row.journal_entry_id).toBe(jeId)
})
})
})
describe('bulk_book_transactions: manual lines path (PR #608)', () => {
it('accepts user-built lines (no template expansion) and commits the combined verifikat', async () => {
const { userId, companyId } = await seedTenant()
// 2 expense txs of −400 each. Manual booking: 800 to a kostnadskonto
// (e.g. 5800 Resekostnader) + 800 from 1930.
const tx1 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: -400 })
const tx2 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: -400 })
const manualEntry = {
description: 'Resekostnader 2026-06-05 (manuell)',
lines: [
{ account_number: '5800', debit_amount: 800, credit_amount: 0, currency: 'SEK', line_description: 'Tåg + taxi' },
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 800, currency: 'SEK', line_description: 'Företagskontot' },
],
}
await withUserContext(userId, async (client) => {
const r = await client.query<{ bulk_book_transactions: RpcResult }>(
`SELECT bulk_book_transactions($1::uuid[], $2, $3::jsonb, $4)`,
[[tx1, tx2], null, JSON.stringify(manualEntry), companyId],
)
const result = r.rows[0]!.bulk_book_transactions
expect(result.ok).toBe(true)
expect(result.mode).toBe('create_new')
expect(result.linked_tx_count).toBe(2)
expect(result.tx_sum).toBe(-800)
// Verify the verifikat has exactly the 2 user-supplied lines
// (no template expansion artifacts).
const lines = await client.query<{ account_number: string; debit_amount: string; credit_amount: string }>(
`SELECT account_number, debit_amount, credit_amount FROM public.journal_entry_lines
WHERE journal_entry_id = $1 ORDER BY sort_order`,
[result.journal_entry_id],
)
expect(lines.rows).toHaveLength(2)
expect(lines.rows[0]!.account_number).toBe('5800')
expect(Number(lines.rows[0]!.debit_amount)).toBe(800)
expect(lines.rows[1]!.account_number).toBe('1930')
expect(Number(lines.rows[1]!.credit_amount)).toBe(800)
})
})
it('rejects unbalanced manual lines (BFL 5 kap 6§ verifikat balance)', async () => {
const { userId, companyId } = await seedTenant()
const tx1 = await insertTransaction({ userId, companyId, amount: -400 })
// Debit ≠ credit on purpose. The RPC's existing BULK_BOOK_UNBALANCED
// guard catches this regardless of whether the lines came from the
// template path or the manual path.
const manualEntry = {
description: 'Test',
lines: [
{ account_number: '5800', debit_amount: 500, credit_amount: 0, currency: 'SEK' },
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 400, currency: 'SEK' },
],
}
await withUserContext(userId, async (client) => {
const r = await client.query<{ bulk_book_transactions: RpcResult }>(
`SELECT bulk_book_transactions($1::uuid[], $2, $3::jsonb, $4)`,
[[tx1], null, JSON.stringify(manualEntry), companyId],
)
const result = r.rows[0]!.bulk_book_transactions
expect(result.ok).toBe(false)
expect(result.code).toBe('BULK_BOOK_UNBALANCED')
})
})
})