* feat(reconciliation): match migrated bank history against imported SIE verifikat A first-class Fortnox/SIE migrator path: after SIE import plus bank connect or bank CSV upload, historical bank rows are auto-matched (>= 0.9) or suggestion-matched (0.75-0.89, persisted for review) against the imported verifikat, with a guided review surface, instead of landing as anonymous "Att bokfora" rows. Phase 0: per-cash-account unattended sweep (fixes #1298 cross-account pooling); widen payment_match_log action CHECK with linked_to_existing_voucher (silently unlogged since March). Phase 1: potential_journal_entry_id/method/confidence on transactions with CHECK + invalidation triggers; persistSuggestions in runReconciliation; sweep after bank CSV import with SIE overlap (suppressing auto-categorization); sweep summaries stamped on bank_connections and bank_file_imports; POST /api/reconciliation/bank/confirm-suggestions with per-pair server-side revalidation (voucher consumption + bank-leg amount and direction). Phase 2: "Granska forslag" review tab on Transactions with chunked bulk confirm, per-row fallbacks, "Kor matchning igen" (all_accounts sweep mode, mutually exclusive with dry_run), attn line, pre-migration row marker. Phase 3: ImportResultStep dual CTA (bank connect + CSV), migrator variant of the account-picker #917 nudge, sweep outcome on the onboarding checklist bank step. Non-selection apply runs on /api/reconciliation/bank/run now floor at 0.9 and persist the review band instead of auto-committing fuzzy matches. Migrations already applied to staging under the same versions. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(reconciliation): resolve PR review findings in one pass Swedish accounting review (both previously-deferred holes closed): - runReconciliation's >= 0.9 auto-apply now writes 'matched' to payment_match_log (behandlingshistorik, BFNAR 2013:2 kap 8); the bus event alone lands in the 30-day event_log and is not an audit record. - The three match-route storno-conflict branches detach reconciliation links via unlinkReconciliation instead of storno-reversing the linked verifikat: a reconciliation link points at an independent verifikat that may evidence other affarshandelser, and a wholesale reversal is an over-broad rattelse (BFL 5 kap 5 §). - Historical gap quantified on prod (read-only, recorded in DECISIONS): 762 unlogged manual links across 52 companies since 2026-03-23. CodeRabbit: - confirm-suggestions route: maxDuration 300 for full 500-item batches. - AccountPickerDialog: migrator-nudge buttons set lookbackTouched so the async gap-fill probe cannot override an explicit choice. - enable-banking post-backfill sweep: persistSuggestions so the review band is not dropped. - bank-file execute: sie_sweep stamp errors are logged, not swallowed. - ImportResultStep: sandbox keeps the CSV CTA (file import works there). - payment_match_log CHECK swap: NOT VALID + VALIDATE, no table scan under ACCESS EXCLUSIVE. - logMatchEvent calls awaited (serverless can freeze unawaited work). - DECISIONS.md stale version reference annotated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(reconciliation): defer reconciliation-link detach until the match commits Round-2 review findings: - CodeRabbit: the eager unlinkReconciliation call could orphan a transaction if the match flow failed after it. All three match routes now persist NOTHING up front: the final transaction update overwrites journal_entry_id and clears reconciliation_method in the same write, so any failure in between leaves the existing link intact. The release is logged as 'unmatched' after the commit. - Swedish review: the auto_suggested logMatchEvent in runReconciliation is now awaited like every other audit write. - DECISIONS entry split into compliance/CodeRabbit lines and updated to describe the deferred detach. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(reconciliation): literal reconciliation_method payloads for the phantom-column scanner The conditional spreads introduced with the deferred detach pushed the scanner's unresolvable-expression count past its ceiling (380 > 378). reconciliation_method: null is correct unconditionally on a confirmed invoice/supplier match (null is already the value on every row that was not reconciliation-linked), so the payloads become plain literals the guard can verify. No behavior change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
250 lines
9.2 KiB
TypeScript
250 lines
9.2 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* Tests for the per-cash-account unattended reconciliation sweep (issue #1298).
|
|
*
|
|
* The sweep is the shared entry point for every unattended caller (EB cron,
|
|
* manual EB sync, bank-file import). What matters here is the fan-out contract:
|
|
* one scoped runReconciliation call per enabled cash account, the legacy
|
|
* 1930/SEK fallback for companies with no cash_accounts rows, per-account
|
|
* failure isolation, and honest aggregation.
|
|
*/
|
|
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
|
|
|
|
const { runReconciliationMock } = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
runReconciliationMock: vi.fn(),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('../bank-reconciliation', async (importOriginal) => {
|
|
const actual = await importOriginal<typeof import('../bank-reconciliation')>()
|
|
return {
|
|
...actual,
|
|
runReconciliation: runReconciliationMock,
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
import { runUnattendedReconciliationSweep, toSweepSummary } from '../unattended-sweep'
|
|
import { DEFAULT_UNATTENDED_CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD } from '../bank-reconciliation'
|
|
|
|
function emptyRunResult(overrides: Partial<{
|
|
applied: number
|
|
errors: number
|
|
skippedBelowThreshold: number
|
|
suggested: number
|
|
candidates: number
|
|
matches: unknown[]
|
|
}> = {}) {
|
|
return {
|
|
matches: overrides.matches ?? [],
|
|
applied: overrides.applied ?? 0,
|
|
errors: overrides.errors ?? 0,
|
|
skippedBelowThreshold: overrides.skippedBelowThreshold ?? 0,
|
|
suggested: overrides.suggested ?? 0,
|
|
candidates: overrides.candidates ?? 0,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Chainable stub for the cash_accounts lookup: every method returns the chain,
|
|
* awaiting it resolves the configured result. */
|
|
function makeSupabase(result: { data: unknown; error: unknown }) {
|
|
const chain: Record<string, unknown> = {}
|
|
const handler: ProxyHandler<object> = {
|
|
get(_target, prop) {
|
|
if (prop === 'then') {
|
|
return (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) => resolve(result)
|
|
}
|
|
return () => new Proxy(chain, handler)
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
return {
|
|
from: vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => new Proxy(chain, handler)),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const CA_1930 = {
|
|
id: '11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111',
|
|
ledger_account: '1930',
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
is_primary: true,
|
|
}
|
|
const CA_1931 = {
|
|
id: '22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222',
|
|
ledger_account: '1931',
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
is_primary: false,
|
|
}
|
|
const CA_1932_EUR = {
|
|
id: '33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333',
|
|
ledger_account: '1932',
|
|
currency: 'EUR',
|
|
is_primary: false,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe('runUnattendedReconciliationSweep', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('runs once per enabled cash account with that account\'s scope', async () => {
|
|
const supabase = makeSupabase({ data: [CA_1930, CA_1931, CA_1932_EUR], error: null })
|
|
runReconciliationMock.mockResolvedValue(emptyRunResult())
|
|
|
|
const result = await runUnattendedReconciliationSweep(
|
|
supabase as never,
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
'user-1',
|
|
{ dateFrom: '2026-01-01', dateTo: '2026-06-30' },
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(runReconciliationMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(3)
|
|
|
|
// Primary 1930: claims unassigned NULL-cash_account_id rows.
|
|
expect(runReconciliationMock).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(1, supabase, 'company-1', 'user-1', {
|
|
dateFrom: '2026-01-01',
|
|
dateTo: '2026-06-30',
|
|
accountNumber: '1930',
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
cashAccountId: CA_1930.id,
|
|
includeUnassigned: true,
|
|
confidenceThreshold: DEFAULT_UNATTENDED_CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD,
|
|
persistSuggestions: true,
|
|
})
|
|
// Non-primary same-currency 1931: strict scope, never claims NULL rows.
|
|
expect(runReconciliationMock).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(2, supabase, 'company-1', 'user-1', {
|
|
dateFrom: '2026-01-01',
|
|
dateTo: '2026-06-30',
|
|
accountNumber: '1931',
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
cashAccountId: CA_1931.id,
|
|
includeUnassigned: false,
|
|
confidenceThreshold: DEFAULT_UNATTENDED_CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD,
|
|
persistSuggestions: true,
|
|
})
|
|
// Foreign account reconciles in its own currency.
|
|
expect(runReconciliationMock).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(3, supabase, 'company-1', 'user-1', {
|
|
dateFrom: '2026-01-01',
|
|
dateTo: '2026-06-30',
|
|
accountNumber: '1932',
|
|
currency: 'EUR',
|
|
cashAccountId: CA_1932_EUR.id,
|
|
includeUnassigned: false,
|
|
confidenceThreshold: DEFAULT_UNATTENDED_CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD,
|
|
persistSuggestions: true,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result.accounts).toHaveLength(3)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('falls back to a single legacy 1930/SEK run when the company has no cash_accounts rows', async () => {
|
|
const supabase = makeSupabase({ data: [], error: null })
|
|
runReconciliationMock.mockResolvedValue(emptyRunResult({ applied: 2 }))
|
|
|
|
const result = await runUnattendedReconciliationSweep(supabase as never, 'company-1', 'user-1')
|
|
|
|
expect(runReconciliationMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
|
|
expect(runReconciliationMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(supabase, 'company-1', 'user-1', {
|
|
dateFrom: undefined,
|
|
dateTo: undefined,
|
|
accountNumber: '1930',
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
cashAccountId: undefined,
|
|
includeUnassigned: true,
|
|
confidenceThreshold: DEFAULT_UNATTENDED_CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD,
|
|
persistSuggestions: true,
|
|
})
|
|
expect(result.applied).toBe(2)
|
|
expect(result.accounts[0].cashAccountId).toBeNull()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('aggregates per-account results into sweep totals', async () => {
|
|
const supabase = makeSupabase({ data: [CA_1930, CA_1931], error: null })
|
|
runReconciliationMock
|
|
.mockResolvedValueOnce(
|
|
emptyRunResult({ applied: 3, skippedBelowThreshold: 2, matches: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] }),
|
|
)
|
|
.mockResolvedValueOnce(emptyRunResult({ applied: 1, errors: 1, matches: [1, 2] }))
|
|
|
|
const result = await runUnattendedReconciliationSweep(supabase as never, 'company-1', 'user-1')
|
|
|
|
expect(result.applied).toBe(4)
|
|
expect(result.errors).toBe(1)
|
|
expect(result.skippedBelowThreshold).toBe(2)
|
|
expect(result.accounts[0]).toMatchObject({ accountNumber: '1930', applied: 3, proposed: 5 })
|
|
expect(result.accounts[1]).toMatchObject({ accountNumber: '1931', applied: 1, proposed: 2 })
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('aggregates suggested and derives unmatched from the candidate pool', async () => {
|
|
const supabase = makeSupabase({ data: [CA_1930, CA_1931], error: null })
|
|
runReconciliationMock
|
|
.mockResolvedValueOnce(
|
|
emptyRunResult({ applied: 5, suggested: 2, candidates: 10, matches: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] }),
|
|
)
|
|
.mockResolvedValueOnce(emptyRunResult({ applied: 1, suggested: 0, candidates: 3, matches: [1] }))
|
|
|
|
const result = await runUnattendedReconciliationSweep(supabase as never, 'company-1', 'user-1')
|
|
|
|
expect(result.applied).toBe(6)
|
|
expect(result.suggested).toBe(2)
|
|
// 13 candidates, 6 auto-linked, 2 suggested: 5 rows left for the backstop.
|
|
expect(result.unmatched).toBe(5)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('one account failing does not abort the others; the failure counts as one error', async () => {
|
|
const supabase = makeSupabase({ data: [CA_1930, CA_1931], error: null })
|
|
runReconciliationMock
|
|
.mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error('transient'))
|
|
.mockResolvedValueOnce(emptyRunResult({ applied: 2, matches: [1, 2] }))
|
|
|
|
const result = await runUnattendedReconciliationSweep(supabase as never, 'company-1', 'user-1')
|
|
|
|
expect(runReconciliationMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2)
|
|
expect(result.errors).toBe(1)
|
|
expect(result.applied).toBe(2)
|
|
expect(result.accounts[0]).toMatchObject({ accountNumber: '1930', applied: 0, errors: 1 })
|
|
expect(result.accounts[1]).toMatchObject({ accountNumber: '1931', applied: 2, errors: 0 })
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('throws when the cash_accounts lookup fails (never degrades to the pooled run)', async () => {
|
|
const supabase = makeSupabase({ data: null, error: { message: 'rls denied' } })
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
runUnattendedReconciliationSweep(supabase as never, 'company-1', 'user-1'),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow('Kunde inte hämta kassakonton')
|
|
expect(runReconciliationMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('carries errors into the stamped summary so a crashed account never reads as "all done"', async () => {
|
|
const supabase = makeSupabase({ data: [CA_1930, CA_1931], error: null })
|
|
runReconciliationMock
|
|
.mockResolvedValueOnce(emptyRunResult({ applied: 5, candidates: 5, matches: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] }))
|
|
// 1931 throws: its candidates never enter the pool, so unmatched: 0
|
|
// would be a lie without the errors field.
|
|
.mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error('transient'))
|
|
|
|
const result = await runUnattendedReconciliationSweep(supabase as never, 'company-1', 'user-1', {
|
|
dateFrom: '2026-01-01',
|
|
dateTo: '2026-06-30',
|
|
})
|
|
const summary = toSweepSummary(result, { dateFrom: '2026-01-01', dateTo: '2026-06-30' })
|
|
|
|
expect(summary.auto_linked).toBe(5)
|
|
expect(summary.unmatched).toBe(0)
|
|
expect(summary.errors).toBe(1)
|
|
expect(summary.date_from).toBe('2026-01-01')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('honors an explicit confidenceThreshold override', async () => {
|
|
const supabase = makeSupabase({ data: [CA_1930], error: null })
|
|
runReconciliationMock.mockResolvedValue(emptyRunResult())
|
|
|
|
await runUnattendedReconciliationSweep(supabase as never, 'company-1', 'user-1', {
|
|
confidenceThreshold: 0.95,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(runReconciliationMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
supabase,
|
|
'company-1',
|
|
'user-1',
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ confidenceThreshold: 0.95 }),
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|