MattssonandClaude Fable 5
e113e9c099
Two user reports (Anders, 2026-08-25 + 2026-08-29): 1. The seeded standardmallar "Inkop EU-varor/-tjanster, omvand moms 25%" booked the cost on 4010/6540, which no momsdeklaration ruta reads, so the fiktiv moms filled ruta 30/48 while ruta 20/21 (inkopsvarde) stayed 0; Skatteverket rejects that (FK004, ML 13 kap). The packs now book directly on the basis accounts 4515/4535 (ACCOUNT_RUTA -> ruta 20/21); the transaction-picker path already skips its own basis emission for basis debit accounts, so no double counting. Regression test pins every reverse-charge pack to a 44xx/45xx business debit. Prod rows update via the existing pack sync cron (upsert on pack_slug). 2. A kontantmetod payment verifikat stayed "Underlag saknas" although the invoice PDF was attached and eligible on every static condition: the inline anchorSupplierInvoiceDocument silently did nothing (prod case 2026-08-28, verified in audit_log: no document_attachments update between the payment booking and the user's manual re-upload). The helper now verifies the guarded update actually matched a row instead of claiming success on zero rows, logs its silent bail branches, and a new daily cron (/api/documents/reanchor/cron) re-runs the anchor for any floating retained document with a posted verifikat, replacing the pattern of one-off repair migrations (20260727180000, 20260824150000). The sweep names the FK in its embed and is idempotent; locked/closed periods are skipped as before. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jj6Rg1ViyFRej55gbxLVgj Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
71 lines
2.7 KiB
TypeScript
71 lines
2.7 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest'
|
|
import path from 'node:path'
|
|
import { loadPacks } from '@/lib/packs/load'
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* A reverse-charge pack must book its cost on a basbelopp account.
|
|
*
|
|
* Momsdeklaration rutor 20-24 are driven purely by BAS account number
|
|
* (ACCOUNT_RUTA in lib/reports/vat-declaration.ts): the fiktiv-moms pair
|
|
* (2614/2624/2634 + 2645/2647) fills ruta 30-32 and 48, but the purchase
|
|
* value itself only reaches ruta 20-24 when the expense sits on the 44xx/45xx
|
|
* basis series. A reverse-charge pack that books its cost elsewhere (the
|
|
* pre-fix 4010/6540) produces a declaration with VAT but no inköpsvärde,
|
|
* which Skatteverket rejects (felkod FK004; ML 13 kap requires both sides).
|
|
* User report: Anders, 2026-08-25.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
const ROOT = path.resolve(__dirname, '../../..')
|
|
|
|
// Fictitious output-VAT accounts that mark a purchase-side reverse-charge pack.
|
|
const FIKTIV_OUTPUT_VAT = new Set(['2614', '2624', '2634'])
|
|
|
|
// Same range isBasisAccount() in lib/bookkeeping/booking-templates.ts guards:
|
|
// 44xx/45xx, the ruta 20-24 inputs.
|
|
const BASIS_ACCOUNT_RE = /^4[45]\d{2}$/
|
|
|
|
describe('reverse-charge packs feed momsdeklaration ruta 20-24', () => {
|
|
const { packs, errors } = loadPacks(ROOT)
|
|
|
|
it('catalogue loads', () => {
|
|
expect(errors).toEqual([])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const reverseChargePacks = packs.filter((p) =>
|
|
p.pack.lines.some((l) => FIKTIV_OUTPUT_VAT.has(l.account)),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
it('the catalogue actually contains reverse-charge purchase packs', () => {
|
|
// Guards the filter above: if the fiktiv accounts are ever renumbered,
|
|
// this suite must be updated rather than silently asserting nothing.
|
|
expect(reverseChargePacks.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(2)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it.each([
|
|
['inkop-eu-varor-omvand-moms-25', '4515'],
|
|
['inkop-eu-tjanster-omvand-moms-25', '4535'],
|
|
])('%s books its cost on basis account %s', (slug, account) => {
|
|
const pack = packs.find((p) => p.pack.meta.slug === slug)
|
|
expect(pack).toBeDefined()
|
|
const business = pack!.pack.lines.filter((l) => l.type === 'business')
|
|
expect(business).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
expect(business[0].account).toBe(account)
|
|
expect(business[0].side).toBe('debit')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('every reverse-charge purchase pack books its business debit on a 44xx/45xx basis account', () => {
|
|
for (const p of reverseChargePacks) {
|
|
const businessDebits = p.pack.lines.filter(
|
|
(l) => l.type === 'business' && l.side === 'debit',
|
|
)
|
|
for (const line of businessDebits) {
|
|
expect(
|
|
BASIS_ACCOUNT_RE.test(line.account),
|
|
`${p.pack.meta.slug}: business debit on ${line.account} never reaches ruta 20-24; ` +
|
|
`book reverse-charge cost on the 44xx/45xx basis series`,
|
|
).toBe(true)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
})
|