Files
accounted/lib/customers/__tests__/mask-personal-number.test.ts
T
13b69a2056 fix(customers): personnummer via MCP lands in personal_number, masked everywhere; MCP payment terms follow settings (#1788)
* fix(customers): personnummer on the MCP path lands in personal_number, masked everywhere; MCP payment terms follow settings

Follow-up to #1724 (Discord kalletoxic): the fix reached the web form and
the v1 REST API, but not the MCP path, and the web customer list still
showed a personnummer raw when it sat in org_number.

Personnummer (MCP + every write path):
- gnubok_create_customer gets a personal_number input. Until now it had
  none, so an agent creating a private person either dropped the number
  or put it in org_number, which nothing masks. Encrypted at staging
  (personal_number_encrypted + personal_number_masked; personal_number is
  now a forbidden staging key in staging-pii-guard), the approval preview
  shows ********-1234, commitCreateCustomer stores the ciphertext as-is.
  Idempotency hashes the masked preview (new StageOptions.idempotencyParams)
  because the random-IV ciphertext would make identical retries look like
  payload changes.
- A personnummer-shaped org_number on customer_type=individual is the
  personnummer in the wrong field: it is moved into personal_number
  (encrypted) and org_number cleared, on CreateCustomerSchema (web POST,
  v1 POST, v1 bulk), both PATCH routes, MCP staging, and commitCreateCustomer
  for in-flight ops. Only a DIFFERENT personnummer next to personal_number
  is refused (new CUSTOMER_PERSONAL_NUMBER_CONFLICT). The business-type
  guard from #1724 is unchanged and now also fires at MCP staging, so the
  user never approves an operation that fails at commit.
- Read side: the web customer list and gnubok_list_customers mask a legacy
  individual row's org_number personnummer instead of showing it raw;
  list_customers exposes personal_number_masked and never the ciphertext.
- scripts/repair-customer-personal-number-in-org-number.ts moves the
  existing rows (dry run: 134 rows across 10 companies on prod); run by
  hand with --confirm after deploy.
- customer-onboarding skill: EF customers follow the #1724 decision
  (individual + personal_number); ROT/RUT section names the real field.

Payment terms (MCP):
- gnubok_create_customer staged `payment_terms || 30`, so
  resolveDefaultPaymentTerms at commit always saw 30 and the company's
  invoice_default_days never reached MCP customers. Resolved at staging
  now, so the preview shows the value the row will get.

tools/list payload ceiling 59.75K to 59.85K (descriptions trimmed first,
rationale in payload-size.bench.test.ts). apiskill regenerated; no
migrations.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CbLqn9bgZ9NJ5qnZMeC1Bk

* fix(scripts): literal update payloads in the personnummer repair script

The no-phantom-columns scanner counts a runtime-built update payload as
unresolvable and the ceiling (379) had no headroom; two literal payloads
keep the guard able to resolve both branches.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CbLqn9bgZ9NJ5qnZMeC1Bk

---------

Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <311770904+jakobwennberg-oss@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-21 18:32:17 +02:00

48 lines
2.2 KiB
TypeScript

import { describe, expect, it } from 'vitest'
import {
PERSONAL_NUMBER_PLAINTEXT_RE,
UNDECRYPTABLE_PERSONAL_NUMBER_MASK,
customerListIdentifier,
} from '@/lib/customers/mask-personal-number'
// Synthetic personnummer throughout, never a real one.
describe('customerListIdentifier', () => {
it('shows org_number for business rows', () => {
expect(customerListIdentifier({ customer_type: 'swedish_business', org_number: '556677-8899' })).toBe('556677-8899')
expect(customerListIdentifier({ customer_type: 'swedish_business', org_number: null })).toBe('')
})
it('shows the masked personal_number for individual rows, passing an API mask through', () => {
expect(customerListIdentifier({ customer_type: 'individual', personal_number: '********-1234' })).toBe('********-1234')
expect(customerListIdentifier({ customer_type: 'individual', personal_number: '19900101-1234' })).toBe('********-1234')
expect(
customerListIdentifier({ customer_type: 'individual', personal_number: UNDECRYPTABLE_PERSONAL_NUMBER_MASK }),
).toBe(UNDECRYPTABLE_PERSONAL_NUMBER_MASK)
})
it('masks a legacy individual row that still carries its personnummer in org_number', () => {
expect(customerListIdentifier({ customer_type: 'individual', org_number: '19900101-1234', personal_number: null })).toBe(
'********-1234',
)
})
it('leaves a non-personnummer org_number on an individual visible', () => {
expect(customerListIdentifier({ customer_type: 'individual', org_number: 'CHE-123.456.789' })).toBe('CHE-123.456.789')
expect(customerListIdentifier({ customer_type: 'individual' })).toBe('')
})
})
describe('PERSONAL_NUMBER_PLAINTEXT_RE', () => {
it('accepts the four written forms and nothing else', () => {
for (const value of ['900101-1234', '900101+1234', '19900101-1234', '9001011234', '199001011234']) {
expect(PERSONAL_NUMBER_PLAINTEXT_RE.test(value)).toBe(true)
}
// Shape only: a legal-entity orgnr with a dash has the same digit shape
// and is kept out by looksLikeSwedishPersonalNumber at the call sites,
// not by this regex.
for (const value of ['********-1234', '********-????', '19900101 1234', 'abc', '1234']) {
expect(PERSONAL_NUMBER_PLAINTEXT_RE.test(value)).toBe(false)
}
})
})