* feat(mcp): book on custom accounts via account_override; fix kontoplan settings link gnubok_categorize_transaction only spoke a 19-category enum mapping to 21 hardcoded BAS accounts, so company-custom accounts (e.g. VMB) were unreachable from the agent surface even when active in the chart. - add account_override to gnubok_categorize_transaction with v1 REST semantics via a shared helper (lib/bookkeeping/account-override.ts): business-side replacement, class-2 auto-VAT drop with the 2610-2649 moms-line exception, plus a same-account degenerate guard; validated at staging and re-validated at commit - align the gnubok_create_voucher staging gate with the engine's seeding semantics: BAS 2026 accounts merely absent from the chart pass (the engine backfills them at commit) and the preview lists will_activate_accounts with BAS-name fallback; non-BAS unknown and inactive accounts still rejected - stop suggest_categories silently dropping mapping rules whose account is outside the fixed category maps; they surface with the rule's own account and an explanatory match_reason - correct the create_account next-step hint (categorize could never use the new account before; now true via account_override) - point the settings "Kontoplan (BAS)" link at /chart-of-accounts and redirect the orphaned /bookkeeping?tab=accounts URL (tab removed in #850; the deep link never worked after the #854 merge collision) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(mcp): address review findings on account_override - commit executor rejects a present-but-malformed stored account_override loudly instead of degrading to the category default (CodeRabbit major; the approver approved a preview showing the override account); with commitPendingOperation regression tests - accountToCategory returns null for unknown income accounts so custom income accounts get the same diagnostic as expenses (CodeRabbit minor), with income + reason-accumulation tests (CodeRabbit nit) - pin the class-2 VAT-drop balance invariant with a test through buildTransactionEntryLines (Swedish compliance review: gross booking, never an unbalanced net + missing VAT leg) - account_override description asks the agent to state the actual affärshändelse in notes when overriding (BFL 5 kap description concern) - eventBus.clear() in the two new test suites (CodeRabbit minor) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(mcp): never guess a moms leg onto an account_override without explicit VAT intent Round-2 Swedish compliance finding: the class-2 VAT drop did not cover margin-scheme (VMB) accounts in class 3/4, which are the override's flagship use case, so a forgotten vat_treatment attached the category default standard_25 and booked an ingående-moms deduction on a transaction where input VAT is not deductible (ML 2023:200). applyAccountOverride now takes explicit VAT intent (vat_treatment or vat_amount present) and books GROSS with no auto-VAT line without it: forgetting the flag under-deducts (lawful), never over-deducts. Both call sites (MCP staging preview, commit core) derive the flag the same way; the tool description states the enforced behavior. Deliberate divergence from v1 REST recorded in DECISIONS.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore: move stray decision-log entry to the root DECISIONS.md The round-2 entry was appended from the wrong working directory and landed as lib/bookkeeping/__tests__/DECISIONS.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
163 lines
6.5 KiB
TypeScript
163 lines
6.5 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* applyAccountOverride: the shared override semantics behind the v1 REST
|
|
* account_override and the MCP gnubok_categorize_transaction parameter.
|
|
* The override replaces the business side of a category-derived mapping;
|
|
* these tests pin side selection, chart validation, the class-2 VAT drop
|
|
* (with the 2610-2649 moms-line exception), and the degenerate same-account
|
|
* guard.
|
|
*/
|
|
import { describe, it, expect, beforeEach, vi } from 'vitest'
|
|
import { createMockSupabase } from '@/tests/helpers'
|
|
import { eventBus } from '@/lib/events'
|
|
import { applyAccountOverride } from '../account-override'
|
|
import { buildMappingResultFromCategory } from '../category-mapping'
|
|
import { buildTransactionEntryLines } from '../transaction-entries'
|
|
import type { MappingResult, Transaction } from '@/types'
|
|
|
|
const mapping = (over: Partial<MappingResult> = {}): MappingResult =>
|
|
({
|
|
rule: null,
|
|
debit_account: '6991',
|
|
credit_account: '1930',
|
|
risk_level: 'LOW',
|
|
confidence: 1.0,
|
|
requires_review: false,
|
|
default_private: false,
|
|
vat_lines: [
|
|
{ account_number: '2641', debit_amount: 100, credit_amount: 0, description: 'Ingående moms 25%' },
|
|
],
|
|
description: 'Övrig kostnad: test',
|
|
...over,
|
|
}) as MappingResult
|
|
|
|
const chartRow = (over: Record<string, unknown> = {}) => ({
|
|
account_number: '4020',
|
|
account_class: 4,
|
|
is_active: true,
|
|
...over,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
|
eventBus.clear()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('applyAccountOverride', () => {
|
|
it('replaces the DEBIT side when money goes out (amount < 0)', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, mockResult } = createMockSupabase()
|
|
mockResult({ data: chartRow() })
|
|
|
|
const result = await applyAccountOverride(supabase as never, 'company-1', '4020', -479, mapping(), true)
|
|
|
|
expect(result.debit_account).toBe('4020')
|
|
expect(result.credit_account).toBe('1930')
|
|
expect(result.vat_lines).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('replaces the CREDIT side when money comes in (amount > 0)', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, mockResult } = createMockSupabase()
|
|
mockResult({ data: chartRow({ account_number: '3021', account_class: 3 }) })
|
|
|
|
const result = await applyAccountOverride(
|
|
supabase as never, 'company-1', '3021', 479,
|
|
mapping({ debit_account: '1930', credit_account: '3001' }), true,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(result.debit_account).toBe('1930')
|
|
expect(result.credit_account).toBe('3021')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('throws with an actionable message when the account is not in the chart', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, mockResult } = createMockSupabase()
|
|
mockResult({ data: null })
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
applyAccountOverride(supabase as never, 'company-1', '4020', -479, mapping(), true),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/finns inte i kontoplanen/)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('throws with an activation hint when the account exists but is inactive', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, mockResult } = createMockSupabase()
|
|
mockResult({ data: chartRow({ is_active: false }) })
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
applyAccountOverride(supabase as never, 'company-1', '4020', -479, mapping(), true),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/inaktivt/)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('drops auto-VAT lines for a class-2 override outside the moms-line range', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, mockResult } = createMockSupabase()
|
|
mockResult({ data: chartRow({ account_number: '2894', account_class: 2 }) })
|
|
|
|
const result = await applyAccountOverride(supabase as never, 'company-1', '2894', -479, mapping(), true)
|
|
|
|
expect(result.debit_account).toBe('2894')
|
|
expect(result.vat_lines).toEqual([])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('keeps auto-VAT lines for a class-2 override inside 2610-2649 (moms-line accounts)', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, mockResult } = createMockSupabase()
|
|
mockResult({ data: chartRow({ account_number: '2641', account_class: 2 }) })
|
|
|
|
const result = await applyAccountOverride(supabase as never, 'company-1', '2641', -479, mapping(), true)
|
|
|
|
expect(result.debit_account).toBe('2641')
|
|
expect(result.vat_lines).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('drops auto-VAT for ANY override without explicit VAT intent (VMB class-3/4 hole)', async () => {
|
|
// Swedish compliance review finding: VMB accounts live in class 3/4, so
|
|
// the class-2 drop alone let a forgotten vat_treatment attach the
|
|
// category-default standard_25 moms leg to a margin-scheme account: an
|
|
// ingående-moms deduction the caller never asked for (ML 2023:200).
|
|
// Without explicit VAT intent the override must book gross: forgetting
|
|
// the flag under-deducts (lawful), never over-deducts.
|
|
const { supabase, mockResult } = createMockSupabase()
|
|
mockResult({ data: chartRow() }) // 4020, class 4
|
|
|
|
const result = await applyAccountOverride(supabase as never, 'company-1', '4020', -479, mapping(), false)
|
|
|
|
expect(result.debit_account).toBe('4020')
|
|
expect(result.vat_lines).toEqual([])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('keeps the entry balanced at GROSS when a class-2 override clears the VAT lines', async () => {
|
|
// The Swedish compliance review asked for this invariant explicitly: the
|
|
// business-line amount is derived from vat_lines inside
|
|
// buildTransactionEntryLines, so clearing them books gross, never an
|
|
// unbalanced net + missing VAT leg (BFL 5 kap balanced-entry requirement).
|
|
const { supabase, mockResult } = createMockSupabase()
|
|
mockResult({ data: chartRow({ account_number: '2894', account_class: 2 }) })
|
|
|
|
const tx = {
|
|
id: 'tx-1',
|
|
company_id: 'company-1',
|
|
date: '2026-07-10',
|
|
amount: -479,
|
|
currency: 'SEK',
|
|
description: 'Second hand',
|
|
} as Transaction
|
|
|
|
let mr = buildMappingResultFromCategory('expense_other', tx, true, 'aktiebolag', 'standard_25')
|
|
expect(mr.vat_lines).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
mr = await applyAccountOverride(supabase as never, 'company-1', '2894', tx.amount, mr, true)
|
|
|
|
const lines = buildTransactionEntryLines(tx, mr)
|
|
const totalDebit = lines.reduce((s, l) => s + (l.debit_amount ?? 0), 0)
|
|
const totalCredit = lines.reduce((s, l) => s + (l.credit_amount ?? 0), 0)
|
|
expect(totalDebit).toBe(479)
|
|
expect(totalCredit).toBe(479)
|
|
expect(lines.find((l) => l.account_number === '2894')?.debit_amount).toBe(479)
|
|
expect(lines.some((l) => l.account_number === '2641')).toBe(false)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('refuses a degenerate entry where both sides land on the same account', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, mockResult } = createMockSupabase()
|
|
mockResult({ data: chartRow({ account_number: '1930', account_class: 1 }) })
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
applyAccountOverride(supabase as never, 'company-1', '1930', -479, mapping(), true),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/samma konto/)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|