* feat(transactions): "Ta bort underlag" detach action on a transaction (#2132) Wrong receipt pinned, no way back: the DELETE /api/transactions/[id]/attach-document route and its tests already existed, but nothing in the UI called it. This wires it up, frontend only. - Inbox card and history list: "Ta bort underlag" in the row menu, shown only for writers on unbooked rows that carry a pin (canDetachDocument helper). - Attach dialog: a small "Ta bort underlag" link beside the already-attached hint, the one place the app previously admitted a doc was pinned. - Page: handleDetachDocument confirms (useDestructiveConfirm, warning), then DELETEs; 200 clears document_id in local state (list, dialog snapshot, and the inbox card's optimistic override via a -unlinked window event) and toasts; 409 renders the route's Swedish BFL message verbatim; other errors map through get-error-message. - Strings under tx_detach in sv.json and en.json. - Tests: gate hidden when booked / read-only / no pin / no handler; 409 rendered unchanged; wiring and locale assertions. Out of scope, follow-up: MCP detach tool (new pending-op type + CHECK migration), detaching from the inbox for non-email docs, and clearing invoice_inbox_items.matched_transaction_id on detach so the doc is offered again by inbox-available. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YRXN5CqHrfuuDw5LLcSgTg * fix(transactions): clear the inbox back-link when detaching underlag (#2132) Skeptic finding on PR #2144: DELETE attach-document nulled only transactions.document_id and left invoice_inbox_items.matched_transaction_id pointing at the transaction. propagateUnderlagForBookedTransaction selects on exactly that column at categorize / book / bulk-book time, so the detached receipt would have been re-anchored onto the new verifikation as immutable underlag (BFL 5 kap 7 §), and the doc never reappeared in inbox-available for re-matching. The route now clears the back-link for the detached document, scoped to items not yet consumed by a verifikat (created_journal_entry_id null), mirroring the invoice-inbox extension's unmatch. Best-effort like the POST side: the pin removal is the primary effect. Three DELETE tests cover the filters, the no-pin case, and a failing unlink. DECISIONS.md and the PR body record the accepted bulk-booked-row limitation in the history list. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YRXN5CqHrfuuDw5LLcSgTg * fix(transactions): detach reports a failed inbox unlink instead of success (#2132) Swedish compliance review on PR #2144: the inbox back-link cleanup was fire-and-forget, so a failed UPDATE returned 200 while leaving exactly the stale matched_transaction_id that re-anchors a detached document onto the next verifikation (BFL 5 kap 6-7 §). The unlink is now scoped by transaction only (the unique index on matched_transaction_id means at most one item points here, and a stale item from the replace path would re-anchor just the same), runs even when nothing was pinned so a retry is idempotent, and a failure answers 500 with an honest Swedish partial-failure message, mirroring the POST side's propagation failure. Tests updated accordingly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YRXN5CqHrfuuDw5LLcSgTg * fix(transactions): release inbox back-link before a compare-and-set pin clear (#2132) Review findings on PR #2144, one pass: - CodeRabbit (major): DELETE cleared the pin and then released the inbox back-link scoped by transaction, so a POST landing in between could end up as "new doc pinned, its inbox item unlinked". The release now runs FIRST, and the pin clear is a compare-and-set on the document that was read (.eq document_id, or .is null when nothing was pinned). Zero rows answers 409 "ändrades samtidigt" and keeps the newer pin. A failed release returns 500 before anything changed, so a retry is trivially idempotent. - Compliance swarm (A.8.15): the unlink failure log carried the raw driver error; it now logs errorCauseTag() only. - CodeRabbit docstring check: JSDoc on handleDetachDocument. Tests: order of the two writes, CAS filters for both pinned and empty states, 409 on concurrent re-attach, coded-cause logging. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YRXN5CqHrfuuDw5LLcSgTg --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
29 lines
1.2 KiB
TypeScript
29 lines
1.2 KiB
TypeScript
import { getErrorMessage } from '@/lib/errors/get-error-message'
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Gate for the "Ta bort underlag" affordance on a transaction row (#2132).
|
|
*
|
|
* Mirrors DELETE /api/transactions/[id]/attach-document: once the document has
|
|
* propagated onto a verifikation the route answers 409 (BFL 5 kap 6 §), so the
|
|
* UI only offers the action to writers, on unbooked rows that carry a pin.
|
|
*/
|
|
export function canDetachDocument(input: {
|
|
isBooked: boolean
|
|
canWrite: boolean
|
|
documentId: string | null | undefined
|
|
hasHandler: boolean
|
|
}): boolean {
|
|
return !input.isBooked && input.canWrite && !!input.documentId && input.hasHandler
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Toast description for a failed detach. A 409 carries the route's own
|
|
* Swedish explanation (the doc is already räkenskapsinformation): surface it
|
|
* verbatim. Everything else maps through the shared error translator.
|
|
*/
|
|
export function resolveDetachErrorMessage(status: number, body: unknown): string {
|
|
const error = (body as { error?: unknown } | null | undefined)?.error
|
|
if (status === 409 && typeof error === 'string' && error.trim()) return error
|
|
return getErrorMessage(body, { context: 'transaction', statusCode: status })
|
|
}
|