Files
accounted/app/api/salary/employees/__tests__/route.test.ts
T
ca93ef3fb6 fix(salary): surface employee-save failures and a typed 503 for the missing encryption key (#1996) (#2009)
* fix(salary): surface employee-save failures in the dialog and type the missing encryption key (#1996)

Pressing Spara in "Ny anställd" could fail without any feedback: a thrown
fetch or a non-JSON 5xx body escaped handleSubmit before setSaving(false)
ran, leaving the button stuck on "Sparar..." and the dialog silent. Even
when the toast did fire, the Radix modal aria-hides the root-layout
Toaster, so assistive tech (and the E2E driver that found this) heard
nothing, and the requestId support needs was never shown anywhere.

- NewEmployeeDialog: fetch + parse run in a never-throwing helper, saving
  is released in finally, the body is parsed with json().catch(() => null)
  so an HTML/plain-text error page still maps through the HTTP-status map,
  and the failure is rendered inline (role="alert" in the footer) with
  "Ärende-id: <requestId>" next to the single destructive toast.
- personnummer.ts: the production "key missing" throw now carries the
  registry code PERSONNUMMER_ENCRYPTION_NOT_CONFIGURED, and the SALARY
  registry gains a 503 entry naming PERSONNUMMER_ENCRYPTION_KEY with a
  "contact support" message and a remediation hint. withRouteContext
  emits the typed envelope automatically instead of INTERNAL_ERROR 500,
  which read as transient and invited retries that can never succeed.
- Tests for the route (401, 400, 503 with requestId and no insert), the
  key guard, the registry entry, errorResponse dispatch on a coded Error,
  and getErrorMessage locale handling of the new envelope.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015nAd8XJ2RPCmG2eKoLBdna

* fix(salary): address review findings (#1996)

- NewEmployeeDialog: fall back to the X-Request-Id response header when the
  body carries no error.requestId. The route hand-builds its 409 (duplicate
  personnummer) and generic insert-failure 500 bodies as flat strings, so the
  inline "Ärende-id" line was hidden for exactly the DB-failure class the
  issue names; withRouteContext sets the header on every response.
- Route tests pin that the 409 and 500 insert-error arms carry X-Request-Id.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015nAd8XJ2RPCmG2eKoLBdna

---------

Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <311770904+jakobwennberg-oss@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-28 16:57:54 +02:00

325 lines
12 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* Regression test for the plaintext-personnummer crash, plus auth wiring.
*
* GET /api/salary/employees decrypts every employee's personnummer on read and
* maps over the whole roster. A row whose personnummer was stored UNENCRYPTED
* (a pre-fix v1 REST create, or a seed) used to throw
* ERR_CRYPTO_INVALID_AUTH_TAG ("Invalid authentication tag length: 6") inside
* the .map(), 500-ing the entire endpoint for the affected company. The decrypt
* helper now passes a raw 12-digit value through unchanged, so a mixed
* encrypted/plaintext table no longer takes the roster down.
*
* The route now runs through the withRouteContext wrapper, so we mock its
* auth/company/write dependencies and inject the Supabase client via requireAuth.
*/
import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest'
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
vi.mock('@/lib/init', () => ({ ensureInitialized: vi.fn() }))
vi.mock('@/lib/auth/require-auth', () => ({ requireAuth: vi.fn() }))
vi.mock('@/lib/company/context', () => ({
getActiveCompanyId: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue('company-1'),
requireCompanyId: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue('company-1'),
getCompanyEntityType: vi.fn(),
}))
vi.mock('@/lib/auth/require-write', () => ({
requireWritePermission: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ ok: true }),
}))
import { GET, POST } from '../route'
import { requireAuth } from '@/lib/auth/require-auth'
import { encryptPersonnummer } from '@/lib/salary/personnummer'
// Synthetic 12-digit values (year 1900 / 1902, zero suffix): obviously not
// real birthdates. ISO A.5.34 / GDPR Art.5(1)(c): fixtures must not look like
// production PII.
const PLAINTEXT_PNR = '190001010000'
const ENCRYPTED_PNR = encryptPersonnummer('190203040000')
function supabaseWithRows(rows: unknown[]) {
const query: Record<string, unknown> = {}
query.select = vi.fn(() => query)
query.eq = vi.fn(() => query)
query.order = vi.fn(() => Promise.resolve({ data: rows, error: null }))
return { from: vi.fn(() => query) }
}
function authed(supabase: unknown) {
vi.mocked(requireAuth).mockResolvedValue({
user: { id: 'user-1' } as never,
supabase: supabase as never,
error: null,
} as never)
}
function req() {
return new Request('https://x.test/api/salary/employees')
}
const params = { params: Promise.resolve({}) } as never
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
})
describe('GET /api/salary/employees', () => {
it('returns 401 when unauthenticated', async () => {
vi.mocked(requireAuth).mockResolvedValue({
user: null,
supabase: null,
error: NextResponse.json({ error: 'Unauthorized' }, { status: 401 }),
} as never)
const res = await GET(req(), params)
expect(res.status).toBe(401)
})
it('does not 500 on a mixed plaintext + encrypted roster; masks both', async () => {
authed(
supabaseWithRows([
{ id: 'e1', last_name: 'A', personnummer: PLAINTEXT_PNR, personnummer_last4: '0000' },
{ id: 'e2', last_name: 'B', personnummer: ENCRYPTED_PNR, personnummer_last4: '0000' },
]),
)
const res = await GET(req(), params)
expect(res.status).toBe(200)
const body = await res.json()
// Both rows masked birthdate-visible, last-4 hidden.
expect(body.data[0].personnummer_masked).toBe('19000101-XXXX')
expect(body.data[1].personnummer_masked).toBe('19020304-XXXX')
// Neither the plaintext nor the stored ciphertext may leak.
expect(JSON.stringify(body)).not.toContain(PLAINTEXT_PNR)
expect(JSON.stringify(body)).not.toContain(ENCRYPTED_PNR)
})
it('never returns the mask under the writable `personnummer` key', async () => {
// The roster feeds edit forms. If the mask came back as `personnummer`, a
// client that reads a row and writes it back would post 'ÅÅÅÅMMDD-XXXX'
// into the encrypt path. The masked value lives under `personnummer_masked`
// so the read key and the write key can never be confused.
authed(supabaseWithRows([{ id: 'e1', last_name: 'A', personnummer: ENCRYPTED_PNR }]))
const res = await GET(req(), params)
const body = await res.json()
expect(body.data[0].personnummer).toBeUndefined()
expect('personnummer' in body.data[0]).toBe(false)
expect(body.data[0].personnummer_masked).toBe('19020304-XXXX')
})
it('strips personnummer_last4 so the mask cannot be reassembled', async () => {
// The mask is YYYYMMDD-XXXX. A response carrying the mask AND the last
// four digits hands the client the full personnummer by concatenation, so
// personnummer_last4 must never ride along with the roster rows.
authed(
supabaseWithRows([
{ id: 'e1', last_name: 'A', personnummer: ENCRYPTED_PNR, personnummer_last4: '0000' },
]),
)
const res = await GET(req(), params)
const body = await res.json()
expect(body.data[0]).not.toHaveProperty('personnummer_last4')
expect(body.data[0]).not.toHaveProperty('personnummer')
expect(body.data[0].personnummer_masked).toBe('19020304-XXXX')
})
})
describe('POST /api/salary/employees', () => {
// Luhn-valid synthetic personnummer (checksum verified in personnummer.test.ts).
const NEW_PNR = '199001019802'
function supabaseWithInsert(returned: Record<string, unknown>) {
const single = vi.fn(() => Promise.resolve({ data: returned, error: null }))
const select = vi.fn(() => ({ single }))
const insert = vi.fn((_payload: Record<string, unknown>) => ({ select }))
return { supabase: { from: vi.fn(() => ({ insert })) }, insert }
}
it('create response carries the mask only: no ciphertext, no last4', async () => {
const inserted = {
id: 'emp-new',
company_id: 'company-1',
first_name: 'Test',
last_name: 'Testsson',
personnummer: encryptPersonnummer(NEW_PNR),
personnummer_last4: '9802',
employment_type: 'employee',
}
const { supabase } = supabaseWithInsert(inserted)
authed(supabase)
const res = await POST(
new Request('https://x.test/api/salary/employees', {
method: 'POST',
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
body: JSON.stringify({
first_name: 'Test',
last_name: 'Testsson',
personnummer: NEW_PNR,
employment_start: '2026-01-01',
monthly_salary: 30000,
tax_table_number: 34,
tax_municipality: 'Stockholm',
}),
}),
params,
)
expect(res.status).toBe(201)
const body = await res.json()
expect(body.data.personnummer_masked).toBe('19900101-XXXX')
expect(body.data).not.toHaveProperty('personnummer')
expect(body.data).not.toHaveProperty('personnummer_last4')
// Neither the full personnummer nor its suffix may appear anywhere in the
// serialized response: mask + last4 would reassemble the identity.
expect(JSON.stringify(body)).not.toContain(NEW_PNR)
expect(JSON.stringify(body)).not.toContain('9802')
})
// #1913: the NewEmployeeDialog sends the jämkning beslut on create; pin that
// the insert carries it, and that omitting it inserts nulls (no beslut).
const CREATE_BASE = {
first_name: 'Test',
last_name: 'Testsson',
personnummer: NEW_PNR,
employment_start: '2026-01-01',
monthly_salary: 30000,
tax_table_number: 34,
tax_municipality: 'Stockholm',
}
function postRequest(body: Record<string, unknown>) {
return new Request('https://x.test/api/salary/employees', {
method: 'POST',
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
body: JSON.stringify(body),
})
}
it('inserts the jämkning percentage and validity when provided', async () => {
const { supabase, insert } = supabaseWithInsert({ id: 'emp-new', personnummer: encryptPersonnummer(NEW_PNR) })
authed(supabase)
const res = await POST(
postRequest({
...CREATE_BASE,
jamkning_percentage: 12.5,
jamkning_valid_from: '2026-01-01',
jamkning_valid_to: '2026-12-31',
}),
params,
)
expect(res.status).toBe(201)
expect(insert).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
expect(insert.mock.calls[0][0]).toMatchObject({
jamkning_percentage: 12.5,
jamkning_valid_from: '2026-01-01',
jamkning_valid_to: '2026-12-31',
})
})
it('inserts null jämkning fields when the body omits them', async () => {
const { supabase, insert } = supabaseWithInsert({ id: 'emp-new', personnummer: encryptPersonnummer(NEW_PNR) })
authed(supabase)
const res = await POST(postRequest(CREATE_BASE), params)
expect(res.status).toBe(201)
expect(insert.mock.calls[0][0]).toMatchObject({
jamkning_percentage: null,
jamkning_valid_from: null,
jamkning_valid_to: null,
})
})
it('returns 401 when unauthenticated', async () => {
vi.mocked(requireAuth).mockResolvedValue({
user: null,
supabase: null,
error: NextResponse.json({ error: 'Unauthorized' }, { status: 401 }),
} as never)
const res = await POST(postRequest(CREATE_BASE), params)
expect(res.status).toBe(401)
})
it('returns 400 on a personnummer that fails the checksum, without inserting', async () => {
const { supabase, insert } = supabaseWithInsert({ id: 'emp-new' })
authed(supabase)
const res = await POST(postRequest({ ...CREATE_BASE, personnummer: '199001019803' }), params)
expect(res.status).toBe(400)
expect(insert).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
// #1996: the route hand-builds the 409 and generic insert-failure 500 bodies
// as flat strings (no error.requestId), so the dialog falls back to the
// X-Request-Id header for its "Ärende-id" line. Pin that the header is there.
describe('insert failures carry X-Request-Id for support correlation', () => {
function supabaseWithInsertError(error: { code: string; message: string }) {
const single = vi.fn(() => Promise.resolve({ data: null, error }))
const select = vi.fn(() => ({ single }))
const insert = vi.fn(() => ({ select }))
return { from: vi.fn(() => ({ insert })) }
}
it('409 duplicate personnummer: flat error body plus X-Request-Id header', async () => {
authed(supabaseWithInsertError({ code: '23505', message: 'duplicate key value' }))
const res = await POST(postRequest(CREATE_BASE), params)
expect(res.status).toBe(409)
const body = await res.json()
expect(body.error).toBe('En anställd med detta personnummer finns redan')
expect(res.headers.get('X-Request-Id')).toMatch(/^req_/)
})
it('500 generic insert error: flat error body plus X-Request-Id header', async () => {
authed(supabaseWithInsertError({ code: '57014', message: 'canceling statement due to statement timeout' }))
const res = await POST(postRequest(CREATE_BASE), params)
expect(res.status).toBe(500)
const body = await res.json()
expect(typeof body.error).toBe('string')
expect(res.headers.get('X-Request-Id')).toMatch(/^req_/)
})
})
// #1996: the deployment that filed the issue had no PERSONNUMMER_ENCRYPTION_KEY.
// The encrypt helper used to throw a bare Error, which the wrapper answered
// with the generic INTERNAL_ERROR 500 ("try again later") even though no
// retry can ever succeed. It now carries a registry code, so the envelope
// names the configuration gap, points at support, and keeps the requestId.
describe('missing PERSONNUMMER_ENCRYPTION_KEY in production', () => {
afterEach(() => {
vi.unstubAllEnvs()
})
it('answers 503 PERSONNUMMER_ENCRYPTION_NOT_CONFIGURED with a requestId and no insert', async () => {
vi.stubEnv('NODE_ENV', 'production')
vi.stubEnv('PERSONNUMMER_ENCRYPTION_KEY', '')
const { supabase, insert } = supabaseWithInsert({ id: 'emp-new' })
authed(supabase)
const res = await POST(postRequest(CREATE_BASE), params)
expect(res.status).toBe(503)
const body = await res.json()
expect(body.error.code).toBe('PERSONNUMMER_ENCRYPTION_NOT_CONFIGURED')
expect(body.error.message).toContain('PERSONNUMMER_ENCRYPTION_KEY')
expect(body.error.message).toMatch(/Kontakta supporten/)
expect(body.error.message_en).toContain('PERSONNUMMER_ENCRYPTION_KEY')
expect(body.error.requestId).toMatch(/^req_/)
expect(res.headers.get('X-Request-Id')).toBe(body.error.requestId)
// The failure happens before the database is touched: nothing to clean up.
expect(supabase.from).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(insert).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
// The personnummer itself must never leak into the error envelope.
expect(JSON.stringify(body)).not.toContain(NEW_PNR)
})
})
})