Files
accounted/app/api/reconciliation/bank/run/__tests__/route.test.ts
T
MattssonandClaude Fable 5 08440fed94 feat(reconciliation): match migrated bank history against imported SIE verifikat (#1598)
* feat(reconciliation): match migrated bank history against imported SIE verifikat

A first-class Fortnox/SIE migrator path: after SIE import plus bank connect
or bank CSV upload, historical bank rows are auto-matched (>= 0.9) or
suggestion-matched (0.75-0.89, persisted for review) against the imported
verifikat, with a guided review surface, instead of landing as anonymous
"Att bokfora" rows.

Phase 0: per-cash-account unattended sweep (fixes #1298 cross-account
pooling); widen payment_match_log action CHECK with
linked_to_existing_voucher (silently unlogged since March).
Phase 1: potential_journal_entry_id/method/confidence on transactions with
CHECK + invalidation triggers; persistSuggestions in runReconciliation;
sweep after bank CSV import with SIE overlap (suppressing
auto-categorization); sweep summaries stamped on bank_connections and
bank_file_imports; POST /api/reconciliation/bank/confirm-suggestions with
per-pair server-side revalidation (voucher consumption + bank-leg amount
and direction).
Phase 2: "Granska forslag" review tab on Transactions with chunked bulk
confirm, per-row fallbacks, "Kor matchning igen" (all_accounts sweep mode,
mutually exclusive with dry_run), attn line, pre-migration row marker.
Phase 3: ImportResultStep dual CTA (bank connect + CSV), migrator variant
of the account-picker #917 nudge, sweep outcome on the onboarding
checklist bank step.

Non-selection apply runs on /api/reconciliation/bank/run now floor at 0.9
and persist the review band instead of auto-committing fuzzy matches.
Migrations already applied to staging under the same versions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(reconciliation): resolve PR review findings in one pass

Swedish accounting review (both previously-deferred holes closed):
- runReconciliation's >= 0.9 auto-apply now writes 'matched' to
  payment_match_log (behandlingshistorik, BFNAR 2013:2 kap 8); the bus
  event alone lands in the 30-day event_log and is not an audit record.
- The three match-route storno-conflict branches detach reconciliation
  links via unlinkReconciliation instead of storno-reversing the linked
  verifikat: a reconciliation link points at an independent verifikat
  that may evidence other affarshandelser, and a wholesale reversal is
  an over-broad rattelse (BFL 5 kap 5 §).
- Historical gap quantified on prod (read-only, recorded in DECISIONS):
  762 unlogged manual links across 52 companies since 2026-03-23.

CodeRabbit:
- confirm-suggestions route: maxDuration 300 for full 500-item batches.
- AccountPickerDialog: migrator-nudge buttons set lookbackTouched so the
  async gap-fill probe cannot override an explicit choice.
- enable-banking post-backfill sweep: persistSuggestions so the review
  band is not dropped.
- bank-file execute: sie_sweep stamp errors are logged, not swallowed.
- ImportResultStep: sandbox keeps the CSV CTA (file import works there).
- payment_match_log CHECK swap: NOT VALID + VALIDATE, no table scan
  under ACCESS EXCLUSIVE.
- logMatchEvent calls awaited (serverless can freeze unawaited work).
- DECISIONS.md stale version reference annotated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(reconciliation): defer reconciliation-link detach until the match commits

Round-2 review findings:
- CodeRabbit: the eager unlinkReconciliation call could orphan a
  transaction if the match flow failed after it. All three match routes
  now persist NOTHING up front: the final transaction update overwrites
  journal_entry_id and clears reconciliation_method in the same write,
  so any failure in between leaves the existing link intact. The release
  is logged as 'unmatched' after the commit.
- Swedish review: the auto_suggested logMatchEvent in runReconciliation
  is now awaited like every other audit write.
- DECISIONS entry split into compliance/CodeRabbit lines and updated to
  describe the deferred detach.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(reconciliation): literal reconciliation_method payloads for the phantom-column scanner

The conditional spreads introduced with the deferred detach pushed the
scanner's unresolvable-expression count past its ceiling (380 > 378).
reconciliation_method: null is correct unconditionally on a confirmed
invoice/supplier match (null is already the value on every row that was
not reconciliation-linked), so the payloads become plain literals the
guard can verify. No behavior change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-13 23:12:27 +02:00

338 lines
11 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* Tests for POST /api/reconciliation/bank/run.
*
* Exercises the route through the real withRouteContext wrapper, mocking only
* its auth/company/write dependencies plus the runReconciliation service.
* Covers: 401, 403 viewer, unknown cash account (400), and the happy path.
*/
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
import { createQueuedMockSupabase, createMockRequest, parseJsonResponse } from '@/tests/helpers'
const { supabase, enqueue, reset } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
const requireAuthMock = vi.fn()
vi.mock('@/lib/auth/require-auth', () => ({
requireAuth: (...args: unknown[]) => requireAuthMock(...args),
}))
vi.mock('@/lib/company/context', () => ({
getActiveCompanyId: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue('company-1'),
requireCompanyId: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue('company-1'),
}))
const requireWriteMock = vi.fn()
vi.mock('@/lib/auth/require-write', () => ({
requireWritePermission: (...args: unknown[]) => requireWriteMock(...args),
}))
vi.mock('@/lib/init', () => ({ ensureInitialized: vi.fn() }))
const runReconciliationMock = vi.fn()
vi.mock('@/lib/reconciliation/bank-reconciliation', () => ({
runReconciliation: (...args: unknown[]) => runReconciliationMock(...args),
DEFAULT_UNATTENDED_CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD: 0.9,
}))
const sweepMock = vi.fn()
vi.mock('@/lib/reconciliation/unattended-sweep', () => ({
runUnattendedReconciliationSweep: (...args: unknown[]) => sweepMock(...args),
}))
import { POST } from '../route'
const emptyParams = { params: Promise.resolve({}) }
describe('POST /api/reconciliation/bank/run', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
reset()
requireAuthMock.mockResolvedValue({ user: { id: 'user-1' }, supabase })
requireWriteMock.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true })
runReconciliationMock.mockResolvedValue({ matches: [], applied: 0, errors: [] })
})
it('returns 401 when unauthenticated', async () => {
requireAuthMock.mockResolvedValue({
user: null,
supabase,
error: NextResponse.json({ error: 'Unauthorized' }, { status: 401 }),
})
const request = createMockRequest('/api/reconciliation/bank/run', {
method: 'POST',
body: { dry_run: true },
})
const response = await POST(request, emptyParams)
expect(response.status).toBe(401)
})
it('returns 403 for a viewer', async () => {
requireWriteMock.mockResolvedValue({
ok: false,
response: NextResponse.json({ error: 'Forbidden' }, { status: 403 }),
})
const request = createMockRequest('/api/reconciliation/bank/run', {
method: 'POST',
body: { dry_run: true },
})
const response = await POST(request, emptyParams)
expect(response.status).toBe(403)
})
it('rejects an out-of-range confidence_threshold with 400', async () => {
const request = createMockRequest('/api/reconciliation/bank/run', {
method: 'POST',
body: { dry_run: false, confidence_threshold: 1.5 },
})
const response = await POST(request, emptyParams)
expect(response.status).toBe(400)
expect(runReconciliationMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('rejects a negative confidence_threshold with 400', async () => {
const request = createMockRequest('/api/reconciliation/bank/run', {
method: 'POST',
body: { dry_run: false, confidence_threshold: -0.1 },
})
const response = await POST(request, emptyParams)
expect(response.status).toBe(400)
expect(runReconciliationMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('passes confidence_threshold and selected_matches through to runReconciliation', async () => {
// cash_accounts lookup: no row, '1930' default is exempt.
enqueue({ data: null })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/reconciliation/bank/run', {
method: 'POST',
body: {
dry_run: false,
confidence_threshold: 0.85,
selected_matches: [
{
transaction_id: '11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111',
journal_entry_id: '22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222',
},
],
},
})
const response = await POST(request, emptyParams)
expect(response.status).toBe(200)
expect(runReconciliationMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
supabase,
'company-1',
'user-1',
expect.objectContaining({
confidenceThreshold: 0.85,
applyOnly: [
{
transactionId: '11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111',
journalEntryId: '22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222',
},
],
}),
)
})
it('defaults a no-selection apply to the 0.9 unattended floor when the client sends no threshold', async () => {
// Merged semantics (#1571 x bank-and-sie-match): an explicit
// confidence_threshold always wins; WITHOUT one, an apply with no
// selected_matches is effectively unattended, so it floors at 0.9 and
// persists the review band instead of auto-committing fuzzy matches.
// cash_accounts lookup: no row, '1930' default is exempt.
enqueue({ data: null })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/reconciliation/bank/run', {
method: 'POST',
body: { dry_run: false },
})
const response = await POST(request, emptyParams)
expect(response.status).toBe(200)
expect(runReconciliationMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
supabase,
'company-1',
'user-1',
expect.objectContaining({ confidenceThreshold: 0.9, persistSuggestions: true }),
)
})
it('rejects a non-default account with no cash_accounts row', async () => {
// cash_accounts lookup finds nothing for 1932.
enqueue({ data: null })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/reconciliation/bank/run', {
method: 'POST',
body: { account_number: '1932', dry_run: true },
})
const response = await POST(request, emptyParams)
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(400)
expect(body.error).toBe('Okänt kassakonto för det här företaget')
expect(runReconciliationMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('runs reconciliation on the default 1930 account even without a cash_accounts row', async () => {
// cash_accounts lookup: no row, but '1930' is exempt.
enqueue({ data: null })
runReconciliationMock.mockResolvedValue({
matches: [
{
transaction: { id: 't-1', date: '2024-06-15', description: 'Betalning', amount: 1250 },
glLine: {
journal_entry_id: 'je-1',
voucher_number: 12,
voucher_series: 'A',
entry_date: '2024-06-15',
entry_description: 'Kundfaktura',
},
method: 'exact',
confidence: 1,
},
],
applied: 1,
errors: [],
})
const request = createMockRequest('/api/reconciliation/bank/run', {
method: 'POST',
body: { date_from: '2024-06-01', date_to: '2024-06-30' },
})
const response = await POST(request, emptyParams)
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
data: { matches: { transaction_id: string }[]; applied: number; dry_run: boolean }
}>(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(body.data.applied).toBe(1)
expect(body.data.dry_run).toBe(false)
expect(body.data.matches[0].transaction_id).toBe('t-1')
expect(runReconciliationMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
supabase,
'company-1',
'user-1',
// A no-selection apply run persists the review band as suggestions
// behind the unattended confidence floor ("Kör matchning igen").
expect.objectContaining({
accountNumber: '1930',
currency: 'SEK',
dryRun: false,
confidenceThreshold: 0.9,
persistSuggestions: true,
}),
)
})
it('keeps the legacy no-threshold behavior for a reviewed selected_matches apply', async () => {
// cash_accounts lookup: no row, '1930' exempt.
enqueue({ data: null })
runReconciliationMock.mockResolvedValue({
matches: [],
applied: 0,
errors: 0,
skippedBelowThreshold: 0,
suggested: 0,
candidates: 0,
})
const request = createMockRequest('/api/reconciliation/bank/run', {
method: 'POST',
body: {
selected_matches: [
{
transaction_id: '11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111',
journal_entry_id: '22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222',
},
],
},
})
const response = await POST(request, emptyParams)
expect(response.status).toBe(200)
const options = runReconciliationMock.mock.calls[0][3] as Record<string, unknown>
expect(options.applyOnly).toHaveLength(1)
// The user already reviewed these pairs in the dry-run preview: no floor,
// no suggestion persistence.
expect(options.confidenceThreshold).toBeUndefined()
expect(options.persistSuggestions).toBeUndefined()
})
it('routes all_accounts to the per-account sweep ("Kör matchning igen")', async () => {
sweepMock.mockResolvedValue({
accounts: [
{ accountNumber: '1930', applied: 3, suggested: 1 },
{ accountNumber: '1931', applied: 1, suggested: 0 },
],
applied: 4,
errors: 0,
skippedBelowThreshold: 1,
suggested: 1,
unmatched: 2,
})
const request = createMockRequest('/api/reconciliation/bank/run', {
method: 'POST',
body: { all_accounts: true },
})
const response = await POST(request, emptyParams)
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
data: { applied: number; suggested: number; unmatched: number }
}>(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(body.data.applied).toBe(4)
expect(body.data.suggested).toBe(1)
expect(body.data.unmatched).toBe(2)
expect(sweepMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(supabase, 'company-1', 'user-1', {
dateFrom: undefined,
dateTo: undefined,
})
expect(runReconciliationMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('rejects all_accounts combined with dry_run: the sweep has no preview form and must never apply on a requested preview', async () => {
const request = createMockRequest('/api/reconciliation/bank/run', {
method: 'POST',
body: { all_accounts: true, dry_run: true },
})
const response = await POST(request, emptyParams)
expect(response.status).toBe(400)
expect(sweepMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(runReconciliationMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('rejects all_accounts combined with account_number or selected_matches', async () => {
for (const body of [
{ all_accounts: true, account_number: '1930' },
{ all_accounts: true, confidence_threshold: 0.85 },
{
all_accounts: true,
selected_matches: [
{
transaction_id: '11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111',
journal_entry_id: '22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222',
},
],
},
]) {
const request = createMockRequest('/api/reconciliation/bank/run', { method: 'POST', body })
const response = await POST(request, emptyParams)
expect(response.status).toBe(400)
}
expect(sweepMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
})