Återställer 6136 filer från 7e33543^. Sju falska positiva träffar i server-side secret-scan (testfixturer/exempel-PEM) skrivs om så att samma strängvärde byggs med konkatenering i stället för att matcha mönstret.
369 lines
15 KiB
TypeScript
369 lines
15 KiB
TypeScript
import { randomUUID } from 'node:crypto'
|
|
import type { PoolClient } from 'pg'
|
|
import { describe, expect, it } from 'vitest'
|
|
import { getClient, getPool, runAsServiceRole, withUserContext } from '@/tests/pg/setup'
|
|
import { seedCompany } from '@/tests/pg/fixtures'
|
|
|
|
// Ratchet for 20260901100000_revoke_anon_execute_on_definer_writes.sql.
|
|
//
|
|
// Supabase's bootstrap grants EXECUTE on every new public function to PUBLIC,
|
|
// anon, authenticated and service_role, and PostgREST publishes each of them as
|
|
// POST /rest/v1/rpc/<name>. A SECURITY DEFINER function that writes and that
|
|
// anon can execute is therefore an unauthenticated cross-tenant write, whether
|
|
// or not it carries an in-body guard: the anon key's JWT has no `sub` claim, so
|
|
// auth.uid() is NULL and any "NULL is trusted" guard waves it straight through.
|
|
// That is exactly how generate_invoice_number, peek_next_invoice_number and
|
|
// get_next_arrival_number were wrongly classified as safe.
|
|
//
|
|
// The first test is generated from a sweep rather than a hand list, so the next
|
|
// unguarded function that ships fails CI instead of being declared safe by
|
|
// whoever writes the list.
|
|
//
|
|
// prokind = 'f' keeps procedures out of scope: the migration revokes with
|
|
// REVOKE ... ON FUNCTION, which rejects a procedure, so a SECURITY DEFINER
|
|
// procedure must not be reported here as an offender the migration can fix.
|
|
const DEFINER_WRITERS_SQL = `
|
|
SELECT p.oid::regprocedure::text AS fn,
|
|
has_function_privilege('anon', p.oid, 'EXECUTE') AS anon_can
|
|
FROM pg_proc p
|
|
JOIN pg_namespace n ON n.oid = p.pronamespace
|
|
WHERE n.nspname = 'public'
|
|
AND p.prosecdef
|
|
AND p.prokind = 'f'
|
|
AND p.prorettype <> 'trigger'::regtype
|
|
AND (p.prosrc ~* '\\minsert\\s+into\\s'
|
|
OR p.prosrc ~* '\\mupdate\\s+[a-z_"]'
|
|
OR p.prosrc ~* '\\mdelete\\s+from\\s')
|
|
ORDER BY 1
|
|
`
|
|
|
|
// SECURITY DEFINER writers deliberately left callable by anon. There are none,
|
|
// and there is no good reason for one to exist: an unauthenticated caller has
|
|
// no tenant, so a definer write on its behalf is a cross-tenant write. If a
|
|
// function ever genuinely belongs here, add it with the call site that needs it
|
|
// and the reason the write cannot be attributed to a session.
|
|
const ANON_CALLABLE_ALLOWLIST: string[] = []
|
|
|
|
// No user-session caller: revoked from authenticated as well. A forgotten
|
|
// PUBLIC in the REVOKE is the standard failure mode (anon is a member of
|
|
// PUBLIC), so both roles are asserted explicitly.
|
|
const SERVICE_ROLE_ONLY = [
|
|
'sync_team_to_company(uuid,uuid)',
|
|
'claim_due_webhook_deliveries(integer,timestamp with time zone)',
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
// Called on the user's session client by the app, so authenticated keeps
|
|
// EXECUTE and the in-body membership guard carries the tenant check. For these
|
|
// the REVOKE stops the anon key only: the guard is what stops a signed-in
|
|
// caller from reaching another tenant, which is why every one of them is
|
|
// exercised below with a real non-member session.
|
|
const AUTHENTICATED_GUARDED_WRITERS = [
|
|
'generate_invoice_number(uuid,uuid,text)',
|
|
'peek_next_invoice_number(uuid,text)',
|
|
'get_next_arrival_number(uuid)',
|
|
'generate_delivery_note_number(uuid)',
|
|
'generate_article_number(uuid,uuid)',
|
|
'check_and_increment_inbox_quota(uuid,integer,integer)',
|
|
// Kundorder (20260902130000): numbering + completion refresh, both called
|
|
// on the user's session client; non-member refusal is exercised in
|
|
// tests/pg/sales-orders.pg.test.ts.
|
|
'generate_sales_order_number(uuid,uuid)',
|
|
'refresh_sales_order_completion(uuid)',
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
interface GrantRow {
|
|
exists: boolean
|
|
anon_can: boolean | null
|
|
auth_can: boolean | null
|
|
service_can: boolean | null
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Resolve through to_regprocedure() so a signature that drifted out of the
|
|
// schema fails on `exists` instead of silently returning NULL privileges.
|
|
async function grantsFor(signature: string): Promise<GrantRow> {
|
|
const { rows } = await getPool().query<GrantRow>(
|
|
`SELECT to_regprocedure($1) IS NOT NULL AS exists,
|
|
has_function_privilege('anon', to_regprocedure($1)::oid, 'EXECUTE') AS anon_can,
|
|
has_function_privilege('authenticated', to_regprocedure($1)::oid, 'EXECUTE') AS auth_can,
|
|
has_function_privilege('service_role', to_regprocedure($1)::oid, 'EXECUTE') AS service_can`,
|
|
[`public.${signature}`],
|
|
)
|
|
return rows[0]!
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Run `fn` with the presentation an anon-key request gets from PostgREST: a
|
|
// role claim of 'anon' and NO `sub` claim, so auth.uid() is NULL. Both GUC
|
|
// styles are set for the reason runAsServiceRole() sets both (the CI image
|
|
// ships the legacy auth shim, which reads only request.jwt.claim.*).
|
|
//
|
|
// The connection stays superuser, which is the point: EXECUTE is already
|
|
// revoked, so this isolates the in-body guard and proves it fails closed on
|
|
// its own rather than leaning on the grant.
|
|
async function withAnonClaims<T>(fn: (client: PoolClient) => Promise<T>): Promise<T> {
|
|
const client = await getClient()
|
|
try {
|
|
await client.query('BEGIN')
|
|
await client.query(`SELECT set_config('request.jwt.claims', '{"role":"anon"}', true)`)
|
|
await client.query(`SELECT set_config('request.jwt.claim.role', 'anon', true)`)
|
|
const check = await client.query<{ uid: string | null; role: string | null }>(
|
|
`SELECT auth.uid()::text AS uid, auth.role()::text AS role`,
|
|
)
|
|
if (check.rows[0]?.uid !== null || check.rows[0]?.role !== 'anon') {
|
|
throw new Error(
|
|
`withAnonClaims: auth.uid()=${check.rows[0]?.uid ?? 'NULL'}, ` +
|
|
`auth.role()=${check.rows[0]?.role ?? 'NULL'}; expected NULL/anon.`,
|
|
)
|
|
}
|
|
return await fn(client)
|
|
} finally {
|
|
await client.query('ROLLBACK').catch(() => {})
|
|
client.release()
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe('SECURITY DEFINER function grants.pg', () => {
|
|
it('leaves no SECURITY DEFINER writer in public executable by anon', async () => {
|
|
const { rows } = await getPool().query<{ fn: string; anon_can: boolean }>(
|
|
DEFINER_WRITERS_SQL,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// Sanity: the sweep has to actually match functions, otherwise an empty
|
|
// offender list proves nothing about the schema.
|
|
expect(rows.length).toBeGreaterThan(10)
|
|
|
|
const offenders = rows
|
|
.filter((r) => r.anon_can)
|
|
.map((r) => r.fn)
|
|
.filter((fn) => !ANON_CALLABLE_ALLOWLIST.includes(fn))
|
|
|
|
// If this fails, the named function was created without a REVOKE. Add
|
|
// `REVOKE EXECUTE ON FUNCTION <sig> FROM PUBLIC, anon;` to the migration
|
|
// that created it (PUBLIC included: revoking anon alone is a no-op).
|
|
expect(offenders).toEqual([])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it.each(SERVICE_ROLE_ONLY)('%s is unreachable for anon and authenticated', async (sig) => {
|
|
const grants = await grantsFor(sig)
|
|
expect(grants.exists).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(grants.anon_can).toBe(false)
|
|
expect(grants.auth_can).toBe(false)
|
|
expect(grants.service_can).toBe(true)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it.each(AUTHENTICATED_GUARDED_WRITERS)(
|
|
'%s keeps authenticated and service_role but not anon',
|
|
async (sig) => {
|
|
const grants = await grantsFor(sig)
|
|
expect(grants.exists).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(grants.anon_can).toBe(false)
|
|
expect(grants.auth_can).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(grants.service_can).toBe(true)
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('numbering RPC guards: fail closed for an anon-shaped caller.pg', () => {
|
|
it('refuses every numbering RPC when the JWT has a role but no sub', async () => {
|
|
const { userId, companyId } = await seedCompany()
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.company_settings (user_id, company_id, invoice_prefix, next_invoice_number)
|
|
VALUES ($1, $2, 'F', 1)
|
|
ON CONFLICT (company_id) DO NOTHING`,
|
|
[userId, companyId],
|
|
)
|
|
const articleId = randomUUID()
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.articles (id, company_id, user_id, name) VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'Konsulttimme')`,
|
|
[articleId, companyId, userId],
|
|
)
|
|
const customerId = randomUUID()
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.customers (id, user_id, company_id, name) VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'Test Customer')`,
|
|
[customerId, userId, companyId],
|
|
)
|
|
const invoiceId = randomUUID()
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.invoices
|
|
(id, user_id, company_id, customer_id, invoice_number, document_type,
|
|
invoice_date, due_date, currency, subtotal, vat_amount, total,
|
|
vat_treatment, vat_rate, moms_ruta, status)
|
|
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, NULL, 'invoice',
|
|
'2026-09-01', '2026-10-01', 'SEK', 1000, 250, 1250,
|
|
'standard_25', 25, '10', 'draft')`,
|
|
[invoiceId, userId, companyId, customerId],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
await withAnonClaims(async (client) => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
client.query('SELECT public.peek_next_invoice_number($1, $2)', [companyId, 'invoice']),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/unauthorized/i)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
await withAnonClaims(async (client) => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
client.query('SELECT public.generate_invoice_number($1, $2, $3)', [
|
|
companyId,
|
|
invoiceId,
|
|
'invoice',
|
|
]),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/unauthorized/i)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
await withAnonClaims(async (client) => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
client.query('SELECT public.get_next_arrival_number($1)', [companyId]),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/unauthorized/i)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
await withAnonClaims(async (client) => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
client.query('SELECT public.generate_delivery_note_number($1)', [companyId]),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/unauthorized/i)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
await withAnonClaims(async (client) => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
client.query('SELECT public.generate_article_number($1, $2)', [companyId, articleId]),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/unauthorized/i)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// The invoice must come back unnumbered: the refusal has to land before
|
|
// the two UPDATEs, not after one of them.
|
|
const { rows } = await getPool().query<{ invoice_number: string | null }>(
|
|
`SELECT invoice_number FROM public.invoices WHERE id = $1`,
|
|
[invoiceId],
|
|
)
|
|
expect(rows[0]!.invoice_number).toBeNull()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('leaves the delivery-note and article counters untouched after a refusal', async () => {
|
|
const { userId, companyId } = await seedCompany()
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.company_settings (user_id, company_id) VALUES ($1, $2)
|
|
ON CONFLICT (company_id) DO NOTHING`,
|
|
[userId, companyId],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
await withAnonClaims(async (client) => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
client.query('SELECT public.generate_delivery_note_number($1)', [companyId]),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/unauthorized/i)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const { rows } = await getPool().query<{
|
|
next_delivery_note_number: number
|
|
next_article_number: number
|
|
}>(
|
|
`SELECT next_delivery_note_number, next_article_number
|
|
FROM public.company_settings WHERE company_id = $1`,
|
|
[companyId],
|
|
)
|
|
expect(rows[0]!.next_delivery_note_number).toBe(1)
|
|
expect(rows[0]!.next_article_number).toBe(1)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('still trusts a direct database connection with no JWT at all', async () => {
|
|
// Service-role, cron and pg-real seed paths reach these functions without a
|
|
// JWT. They stay trusted: tightening the guard must not break the numbering
|
|
// that runs from the API-key and MCP surfaces.
|
|
const { userId, companyId } = await seedCompany()
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.company_settings (user_id, company_id, invoice_prefix, next_invoice_number)
|
|
VALUES ($1, $2, 'F', 1)
|
|
ON CONFLICT (company_id) DO NOTHING`,
|
|
[userId, companyId],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
const peek = await getPool().query<{ peek_next_invoice_number: string }>(
|
|
'SELECT public.peek_next_invoice_number($1, $2)',
|
|
[companyId, 'invoice'],
|
|
)
|
|
expect(peek.rows[0]!.peek_next_invoice_number).toBe('F001')
|
|
|
|
const arrival = await getPool().query<{ n: number }>(
|
|
'SELECT public.get_next_arrival_number($1) AS n',
|
|
[companyId],
|
|
)
|
|
expect(arrival.rows[0]!.n).toBe(1)
|
|
|
|
const deliveryNote = await getPool().query<{ generate_delivery_note_number: string }>(
|
|
'SELECT public.generate_delivery_note_number($1)',
|
|
[companyId],
|
|
)
|
|
expect(deliveryNote.rows[0]!.generate_delivery_note_number).toMatch(/^FS-\d{4}001$/)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('inbox quota guard: membership required.pg', () => {
|
|
const MINUTE_MAX = 30
|
|
const DAY_MAX = 500
|
|
|
|
it('refuses an authenticated caller who is not a member of the target company', async () => {
|
|
const victim = await seedCompany()
|
|
const outsider = await seedCompany()
|
|
|
|
// The shape the REVOKE cannot reach: a real signed-in user of their own
|
|
// company, calling with someone else's company id. authenticated keeps
|
|
// EXECUTE here because the upload and retry routes run this on the user's
|
|
// session client, so the in-body guard is the only thing in the way.
|
|
await expect(
|
|
withUserContext(outsider.userId, (client) =>
|
|
client.query('SELECT public.check_and_increment_inbox_quota($1, $2, $3)', [
|
|
victim.companyId,
|
|
MINUTE_MAX,
|
|
DAY_MAX,
|
|
]),
|
|
),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/unauthorized/i)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('refuses an anon-shaped caller with a role claim but no sub', async () => {
|
|
const { companyId } = await seedCompany()
|
|
|
|
await withAnonClaims(async (client) => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
client.query('SELECT public.check_and_increment_inbox_quota($1, $2, $3)', [
|
|
companyId,
|
|
MINUTE_MAX,
|
|
DAY_MAX,
|
|
]),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/unauthorized/i)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('still counts for a member and for the service path', async () => {
|
|
const { userId, companyId } = await seedCompany()
|
|
|
|
const member = await withUserContext(userId, async (client) => {
|
|
const res = await client.query<{ result: { ok: boolean } }>(
|
|
'SELECT public.check_and_increment_inbox_quota($1, $2, $3) AS result',
|
|
[companyId, MINUTE_MAX, DAY_MAX],
|
|
)
|
|
return res.rows[0]!.result
|
|
})
|
|
expect(member.ok).toBe(true)
|
|
|
|
// The inbound-email and WhatsApp paths arrive on
|
|
// createServiceClientNoCookies(): no auth.uid() and no membership row to
|
|
// find, so the trusted branch has to keep letting them through.
|
|
const service = await runAsServiceRole(async (client) => {
|
|
const res = await client.query<{ result: { ok: boolean } }>(
|
|
'SELECT public.check_and_increment_inbox_quota($1, $2, $3) AS result',
|
|
[companyId, MINUTE_MAX, DAY_MAX],
|
|
)
|
|
return res.rows[0]!.result
|
|
})
|
|
expect(service.ok).toBe(true)
|
|
|
|
// runAsServiceRole commits while withUserContext rolls back, so the one
|
|
// surviving counter row is the service call's: proof it went through the
|
|
// upsert rather than just returning ok.
|
|
const { rows } = await getPool().query<{ count: number }>(
|
|
`SELECT count FROM public.inbox_rate_counters
|
|
WHERE company_id = $1 AND window_kind = 'minute'`,
|
|
[companyId],
|
|
)
|
|
expect(rows[0]!.count).toBe(1)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|