* fix: surface active TIC companies + block duplicate org numbers
Three fixes from live-prod testing:
1. Enrichment filter hid the user's directorships. Now accepts both
Completed and PartiallyCompleted status from TIC (tenants without
CompanyRoles enabled still get SPAR) and the /select-company role
filter no longer requires companyStatus === 'Aktivt' — real TIC
payloads have been observed with different values, and positionEnd
alone is the authoritative "currently a director" signal. Added
PII-free diagnostic logs so the next shape-mismatch is debuggable
from Vercel logs without a round trip.
2. Manual wizard silently allowed duplicate org numbers. Added:
- findExistingCompanyByOrgNumber helper in actions.ts (service role,
bypasses RLS to see cross-tenant rows)
- Server-side guard in createCompanyFromOnboarding — returns
'org_number_exists' before the create RPC so we don't leave ghost
companies
- New /api/company/check-org-number endpoint for debounced client
checks
- Warning + disabled submit in Step2CompanyDetails
- Friendly error toasts in WelcomeOnboarding + BankIdCompanyPicker
- Mirror cleaned org_number onto companies.org_number on creation so
future duplicate checks and lookups are reliable
3. /onboarding ignored ?org_number= when the picker routed there as a
fallback. Now reads searchParams and pre-fills settings; also fixed
a latent bug where Step1's entity-type change wiped the pre-fill on
*first* selection (it should only reset on a genuine change).
Tests: duplicate-org guard (with formatted-input normalization),
check-org-number route (auth + 400 + exists true/false +
normalization).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: address PR review feedback on duplicate-org guard
Greptile P1 findings + swedish-compliance feedback:
- findExistingCompanyByOrgNumber now throws on Supabase error instead
of silently returning null. Previously a DB outage or RLS
misconfiguration would bypass the entire duplicate guard and allow
duplicates through.
- createCompanyFromOnboarding catches the throw and returns a
user-facing error ("Kunde inte verifiera organisationsnummer"),
failing closed instead of open.
- companies.update({ org_number }) error is now checked and triggers a
rollback. Silent failure would leave the company without an
org_number, breaking all future duplicate checks for that entity.
- New normalizeOrgNumber helper validates 10- or 12-digit input,
strips the century prefix for 12-digit personnummer form, and
rejects anything else. Malformed input would have corrupted SIE4
(#ORGNR) and SRU (INFO.SRU) exports downstream.
- /select-company now uses loose `== null` for positionEnd — TIC has
been observed returning `undefined` for open-ended positions, which
strict `=== null` would silently filter out. Documented the two
downstream isCeased guards so future maintainers don't remove one
without the other.
- createCompanyFromTicRole refuses to provision when lookup.isCeased
(BFL 2 kap — bokföringsskyldighet ends at avregistrering).
BankIdCompanyPicker surfaces this client-side too.
- WelcomeOnboarding + BankIdCompanyPicker recognise new error codes:
org_number_invalid, company_ceased.
Tests: +4 cases covering malformed input rejection, fail-closed
behaviour on DB error, 12-digit personnummer normalization, and the
ceased-company refusal path. Full suite: 2306 passing.
Out of scope for this PR (follow-up):
- Partial unique index on companies(org_number) WHERE archived_at IS
NULL. Closes the race-condition window but needs a migration plus
any existing-duplicate cleanup — too risky for this hotfix.
- Rate limiting on /api/company/check-org-number. Endpoint is
auth-gated so not an immediate concern.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: add Luhn validation and extract org-number normalization
Third round of PR review feedback (swedish-compliance):
- Add Luhn-10 check-digit validation to normalizeOrgNumber. Rejects
structurally invalid org_numbers (wrong check digit) at the boundary
instead of letting them propagate into SIE4 #ORGNR and SRU INFO.SRU,
where Skatteverket and receiving accounting systems would reject
them later anyway. Reuses the existing luhnValidate helper from
lib/bankgiro/luhn.ts (Bankgirot 10-modulen — same algorithm applies
to both Bolagsverket org numbers and Swedish personnummer).
- Extract normalizeOrgNumber into lib/company-lookup/normalize-org-number.ts
so the server action and /api/company/check-org-number use the same
rule. Previously the API route only stripped hyphens/spaces, so a
12-digit input would miss a stored 10-digit duplicate and mislead the
client debounce check ("not a duplicate" → submit → server rejects).
- /api/company/check-org-number now returns exists=false for
Luhn-invalid input rather than querying the DB. The submit-time
server action surfaces org_number_invalid, which is the right place
for the error.
Test coverage: dedicated normalize-org-number.test.ts (10 cases
covering both-lengths, Luhn, whitespace tolerance, garbage). Updated
existing tests to use Luhn-valid numbers (real Volvo 5560125790,
synthetic personnummer 8001011231). New failing-Luhn test in
actions.test.ts. New 12-digit-normalization and
luhn-invalid-returns-false tests in route.test.ts.
Full suite: 2315 passing.
Not fixed (out of scope for this hotfix):
- 10↔12 digit round-trip fragility for personnummer born 2000+. This
is a codebase-wide architectural choice (see lib/skatteverket/format.ts
which uses a two-digit-year heuristic to choose 19/20 at export).
Migrating to 12-digit storage is a separate refactor.
- Server-side re-fetch of TIC /lookup for isCeased. The trust boundary
here is user-to-their-own-onboarding, not adversarial; doubling TIC
API cost isn't proportionate.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
491 lines
17 KiB
TypeScript
491 lines
17 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('next/cache', () => ({
|
|
revalidatePath: vi.fn(),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/supabase/server', () => ({
|
|
createClient: vi.fn(),
|
|
createServiceClient: vi.fn(),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/company/context', () => ({
|
|
setActiveCompany: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
import { createClient, createServiceClient } from '@/lib/supabase/server'
|
|
import { createCompanyFromTicRole, createCompanyFromOnboarding } from '../actions'
|
|
import type { CompanyLookupResult } from '@/lib/company-lookup/types'
|
|
|
|
const mockCreateClient = vi.mocked(createClient)
|
|
const mockCreateServiceClient = vi.mocked(createServiceClient)
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Build a service-role client mock. Seed `existingOrgNumber` when you want
|
|
* the duplicate-org guard in createCompanyFromOnboarding to find a match.
|
|
* Any other service-role query resolves to `{ data: null, error: null }`.
|
|
*/
|
|
function mockServiceClientForOrgNumber(existingOrgNumber?: string) {
|
|
const serviceFrom = vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => {
|
|
const chain: Record<string, unknown> = {}
|
|
const methods = ['select', 'eq', 'is', 'in', 'order', 'limit', 'maybeSingle']
|
|
for (const m of methods) {
|
|
chain[m] = () => {
|
|
if (m === 'maybeSingle') {
|
|
return Promise.resolve({
|
|
data: existingOrgNumber ? { id: 'other-company', name: 'Other AB' } : null,
|
|
error: null,
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
return chain
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
chain.then = (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) => resolve({ data: null, error: null })
|
|
return chain
|
|
})
|
|
mockCreateServiceClient.mockReturnValue({ from: serviceFrom } as never)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type CapturedCall = { table: string; method: string; args: unknown[] }
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Builds a chainable Supabase mock that records every method call, allows
|
|
* per-table result seeding, and returns a capture log the test can assert on.
|
|
*
|
|
* - `results[table][method]` (optional) is returned when the chain ends on
|
|
* that method. Chains otherwise resolve to `{ data: null, error: null }`.
|
|
* - Unknown methods on the chain no-op and return the chain so callers can
|
|
* keep chaining freely.
|
|
*/
|
|
function buildSupabase(opts: {
|
|
user: { id: string } | null
|
|
results?: Record<string, Record<string, { data?: unknown; error?: unknown }>>
|
|
rpcResults?: Record<string, { data?: unknown; error?: unknown }>
|
|
}) {
|
|
const calls: CapturedCall[] = []
|
|
const { user, results = {}, rpcResults = {} } = opts
|
|
|
|
function makeChain(table: string) {
|
|
const record = (method: string, args: unknown[]) => {
|
|
calls.push({ table, method, args })
|
|
}
|
|
const chain: Record<string, unknown> = {}
|
|
const methods = ['select', 'eq', 'is', 'in', 'order', 'limit', 'maybeSingle', 'single', 'insert', 'upsert', 'delete', 'update']
|
|
for (const m of methods) {
|
|
chain[m] = (...args: unknown[]) => {
|
|
record(m, args)
|
|
const canTerminate = results[table]?.[m]
|
|
if (canTerminate) {
|
|
return Promise.resolve({
|
|
data: canTerminate.data ?? null,
|
|
error: canTerminate.error ?? null,
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
return chain
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
chain.then = (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) => resolve({ data: null, error: null })
|
|
return chain
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const supabase = {
|
|
auth: {
|
|
getUser: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ data: { user } }),
|
|
},
|
|
from: vi.fn().mockImplementation((table: string) => makeChain(table)),
|
|
rpc: vi.fn().mockImplementation((name: string) => {
|
|
const result = rpcResults[name]
|
|
if (result) {
|
|
return Promise.resolve({ data: result.data ?? null, error: result.error ?? null })
|
|
}
|
|
return Promise.resolve({ data: null, error: null })
|
|
}),
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return { supabase, calls }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
|
// Default: no existing company with this org_number. Individual tests can
|
|
// override by calling mockServiceClientForOrgNumber('...') inside the test.
|
|
mockServiceClientForOrgNumber(undefined)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('createCompanyFromTicRole', () => {
|
|
it('returns Unauthorized when no user session', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase } = buildSupabase({ user: null })
|
|
mockCreateClient.mockResolvedValue(supabase as never)
|
|
|
|
const result = await createCompanyFromTicRole({
|
|
teamId: 'team-1',
|
|
orgNumber: '5560125790',
|
|
legalName: 'Acme AB',
|
|
legalEntityType: 'AB',
|
|
lookup: null,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result.error).toBe('Unauthorized')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects unmappable entity types before any DB work', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, calls } = buildSupabase({ user: { id: 'user-1' } })
|
|
mockCreateClient.mockResolvedValue(supabase as never)
|
|
|
|
const result = await createCompanyFromTicRole({
|
|
teamId: 'team-1',
|
|
orgNumber: '969696-1212',
|
|
legalName: 'Beta HB',
|
|
legalEntityType: 'Handelsbolag',
|
|
lookup: null,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result.error).toMatch(/manuellt/i)
|
|
// Entity-type rejection should short-circuit — no table writes.
|
|
const writes = calls.filter((c) => ['insert', 'upsert', 'delete', 'update'].includes(c.method))
|
|
expect(writes).toEqual([])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('refuses to guess when TIC lookup is missing (prevents silent ML 17 kap violation)', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, calls } = buildSupabase({ user: { id: 'user-1' } })
|
|
mockCreateClient.mockResolvedValue(supabase as never)
|
|
|
|
const result = await createCompanyFromTicRole({
|
|
teamId: 'team-1',
|
|
orgNumber: '5560125790',
|
|
legalName: 'Acme AB',
|
|
legalEntityType: 'AB',
|
|
lookup: null,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result.error).toBe('lookup_missing')
|
|
// Must not have provisioned anything with a guessed VAT status.
|
|
const writes = calls.filter((c) => ['insert', 'upsert', 'delete', 'update'].includes(c.method))
|
|
expect(writes).toEqual([])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('provisions with sensible defaults for a VAT-registered aktiebolag', async () => {
|
|
const lookup: CompanyLookupResult = {
|
|
companyName: 'Acme Konsult AB',
|
|
isCeased: false,
|
|
address: { street: 'Storgatan 1', postalCode: '11122', city: 'Stockholm' },
|
|
registration: { fTax: true, vat: true },
|
|
bankAccounts: [],
|
|
email: null,
|
|
phone: null,
|
|
sniCodes: [],
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const { supabase, calls } = buildSupabase({
|
|
user: { id: 'user-1' },
|
|
results: {
|
|
// Seed an enrichment row so the cleanup branch runs and the test
|
|
// can verify it fires.
|
|
extension_data: {
|
|
maybeSingle: { data: { id: 'enrichment-1', value: {} } },
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
rpcResults: {
|
|
create_company_with_owner: { data: 'new-company-id' },
|
|
seed_chart_of_accounts: { data: null },
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
mockCreateClient.mockResolvedValue(supabase as never)
|
|
|
|
const result = await createCompanyFromTicRole({
|
|
teamId: 'team-1',
|
|
orgNumber: '5560125790',
|
|
legalName: 'Acme Konsult AB',
|
|
legalEntityType: 'AB',
|
|
lookup,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result.companyId).toBe('new-company-id')
|
|
expect(result.error).toBeUndefined()
|
|
|
|
// The settings upsert on company_settings should reflect our derived defaults.
|
|
const settingsUpsert = calls.find((c) => c.table === 'company_settings' && c.method === 'upsert')
|
|
expect(settingsUpsert).toBeDefined()
|
|
const settings = (settingsUpsert!.args[0] as Record<string, unknown>)
|
|
expect(settings.entity_type).toBe('aktiebolag')
|
|
expect(settings.company_name).toBe('Acme Konsult AB')
|
|
expect(settings.org_number).toBe('5560125790')
|
|
expect(settings.f_skatt).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(settings.vat_registered).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(settings.moms_period).toBe('quarterly')
|
|
expect(settings.accounting_method).toBe('accrual')
|
|
expect(settings.address_line1).toBe('Storgatan 1')
|
|
expect(settings.postal_code).toBe('11122')
|
|
expect(settings.city).toBe('Stockholm')
|
|
|
|
// The enrichment row must be cleaned up by the one-click path so the
|
|
// picker doesn't re-offer this company on a return visit.
|
|
const enrichmentDelete = calls.find(
|
|
(c) => c.table === 'extension_data' && c.method === 'delete',
|
|
)
|
|
expect(enrichmentDelete).toBeDefined()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('defaults enskild firma to kontantmetoden (K1), leaves moms_period null when non-VAT', async () => {
|
|
const lookup: CompanyLookupResult = {
|
|
companyName: 'Liten EF',
|
|
isCeased: false,
|
|
address: null,
|
|
registration: { fTax: true, vat: false },
|
|
bankAccounts: [],
|
|
email: null,
|
|
phone: null,
|
|
sniCodes: [],
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const { supabase, calls } = buildSupabase({
|
|
user: { id: 'user-1' },
|
|
rpcResults: {
|
|
create_company_with_owner: { data: 'new-company-id' },
|
|
seed_chart_of_accounts: { data: null },
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
mockCreateClient.mockResolvedValue(supabase as never)
|
|
|
|
await createCompanyFromTicRole({
|
|
teamId: 'team-1',
|
|
orgNumber: '8001011231',
|
|
legalName: 'Liten EF',
|
|
legalEntityType: 'Enskild firma',
|
|
lookup,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const settingsUpsert = calls.find((c) => c.table === 'company_settings' && c.method === 'upsert')
|
|
const settings = settingsUpsert!.args[0] as Record<string, unknown>
|
|
expect(settings.entity_type).toBe('enskild_firma')
|
|
expect(settings.vat_registered).toBe(false)
|
|
expect(settings.moms_period).toBeNull()
|
|
// EF entities default to cash per K1/BFNAR 2013:2; AB must use accrual (K2/K3).
|
|
expect(settings.accounting_method).toBe('cash')
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('createCompanyFromOnboarding — duplicate org_number guard', () => {
|
|
it('refuses to create a company when the org number already exists', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, calls } = buildSupabase({
|
|
user: { id: 'user-1' },
|
|
rpcResults: {
|
|
create_company_with_owner: { data: 'should-not-be-called' },
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
mockCreateClient.mockResolvedValue(supabase as never)
|
|
mockServiceClientForOrgNumber('5560125790') // pretend this org is already taken
|
|
|
|
const result = await createCompanyFromOnboarding({
|
|
teamId: 'team-1',
|
|
settings: {
|
|
entity_type: 'aktiebolag',
|
|
company_name: 'Acme AB',
|
|
org_number: '5560125790',
|
|
},
|
|
fiscalPeriod: {
|
|
startDate: '2026-01-01',
|
|
endDate: '2026-12-31',
|
|
name: 'Räkenskapsår 2026',
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result.error).toBe('org_number_exists')
|
|
expect(result.companyId).toBeUndefined()
|
|
|
|
// Guard must short-circuit before the create RPC runs — otherwise we'd
|
|
// leave a ghost company behind when the duplicate is detected.
|
|
const rpcCreate = supabase.rpc.mock.calls.find(([name]) => name === 'create_company_with_owner')
|
|
expect(rpcCreate).toBeUndefined()
|
|
// And no company_settings upsert should have happened.
|
|
expect(calls.find((c) => c.table === 'company_settings' && c.method === 'upsert')).toBeUndefined()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('tolerates formatted org_numbers when detecting duplicates (hyphens/spaces stripped)', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase } = buildSupabase({
|
|
user: { id: 'user-1' },
|
|
rpcResults: { create_company_with_owner: { data: 'x' } },
|
|
})
|
|
mockCreateClient.mockResolvedValue(supabase as never)
|
|
mockServiceClientForOrgNumber('5560125790')
|
|
|
|
const result = await createCompanyFromOnboarding({
|
|
teamId: 'team-1',
|
|
settings: {
|
|
entity_type: 'aktiebolag',
|
|
company_name: 'Acme AB',
|
|
// User-typed format — the guard should still catch this as a duplicate.
|
|
org_number: '556677-8899',
|
|
},
|
|
fiscalPeriod: {
|
|
startDate: '2026-01-01',
|
|
endDate: '2026-12-31',
|
|
name: 'Räkenskapsår 2026',
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result.error).toBe('org_number_exists')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('normalizes 12-digit personnummer input down to the 10-digit canonical form', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase } = buildSupabase({
|
|
user: { id: 'user-1' },
|
|
rpcResults: { create_company_with_owner: { data: 'x' } },
|
|
})
|
|
mockCreateClient.mockResolvedValue(supabase as never)
|
|
// The existing company is stored as the 10-digit canonical form.
|
|
mockServiceClientForOrgNumber('8001011231')
|
|
|
|
const result = await createCompanyFromOnboarding({
|
|
teamId: 'team-1',
|
|
settings: {
|
|
entity_type: 'enskild_firma',
|
|
company_name: 'Anna EF',
|
|
// User types full 12-digit personnummer with century prefix.
|
|
org_number: '19800101-1231',
|
|
},
|
|
fiscalPeriod: {
|
|
startDate: '2026-01-01',
|
|
endDate: '2026-12-31',
|
|
name: 'Räkenskapsår 2026',
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Should detect the duplicate despite the 12-digit input.
|
|
expect(result.error).toBe('org_number_exists')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects malformed org_numbers at the guard boundary', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase } = buildSupabase({
|
|
user: { id: 'user-1' },
|
|
rpcResults: { create_company_with_owner: { data: 'x' } },
|
|
})
|
|
mockCreateClient.mockResolvedValue(supabase as never)
|
|
|
|
const result = await createCompanyFromOnboarding({
|
|
teamId: 'team-1',
|
|
settings: {
|
|
entity_type: 'aktiebolag',
|
|
company_name: 'Broken AB',
|
|
org_number: 'abc123', // not a 10- or 12-digit number
|
|
},
|
|
fiscalPeriod: {
|
|
startDate: '2026-01-01',
|
|
endDate: '2026-12-31',
|
|
name: 'Räkenskapsår 2026',
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result.error).toBe('org_number_invalid')
|
|
// Must NOT have reached the create RPC — otherwise we'd save a malformed
|
|
// org_number and poison SIE/SRU exports.
|
|
const rpcCreate = supabase.rpc.mock.calls.find(([name]) => name === 'create_company_with_owner')
|
|
expect(rpcCreate).toBeUndefined()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects right-length org_numbers with invalid Luhn check digit', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase } = buildSupabase({
|
|
user: { id: 'user-1' },
|
|
rpcResults: { create_company_with_owner: { data: 'x' } },
|
|
})
|
|
mockCreateClient.mockResolvedValue(supabase as never)
|
|
|
|
const result = await createCompanyFromOnboarding({
|
|
teamId: 'team-1',
|
|
settings: {
|
|
entity_type: 'aktiebolag',
|
|
company_name: 'Fake AB',
|
|
// 10 digits but Luhn check digit is wrong (real Volvo is 5560125790;
|
|
// the trailing 1 is an intentional off-by-one). Skatteverket SRU
|
|
// validators and receiving SIE4 consumers would reject this, so we
|
|
// refuse at the boundary.
|
|
org_number: '5560125791',
|
|
},
|
|
fiscalPeriod: {
|
|
startDate: '2026-01-01',
|
|
endDate: '2026-12-31',
|
|
name: 'Räkenskapsår 2026',
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result.error).toBe('org_number_invalid')
|
|
const rpcCreate = supabase.rpc.mock.calls.find(([name]) => name === 'create_company_with_owner')
|
|
expect(rpcCreate).toBeUndefined()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('fails closed when the duplicate lookup errors out (does not silently allow duplicates)', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase } = buildSupabase({
|
|
user: { id: 'user-1' },
|
|
rpcResults: { create_company_with_owner: { data: 'x' } },
|
|
})
|
|
mockCreateClient.mockResolvedValue(supabase as never)
|
|
|
|
// Seed a service client that errors on maybeSingle — simulating a DB
|
|
// outage or RLS misconfiguration.
|
|
mockCreateServiceClient.mockReturnValue({
|
|
from: vi.fn().mockReturnValue({
|
|
select: vi.fn().mockReturnThis(),
|
|
eq: vi.fn().mockReturnThis(),
|
|
is: vi.fn().mockReturnThis(),
|
|
limit: vi.fn().mockReturnThis(),
|
|
maybeSingle: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
|
|
data: null,
|
|
error: { message: 'connection lost' },
|
|
}),
|
|
}),
|
|
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
|
|
} as any)
|
|
|
|
const result = await createCompanyFromOnboarding({
|
|
teamId: 'team-1',
|
|
settings: {
|
|
entity_type: 'aktiebolag',
|
|
company_name: 'Acme AB',
|
|
org_number: '5560125790',
|
|
},
|
|
fiscalPeriod: {
|
|
startDate: '2026-01-01',
|
|
endDate: '2026-12-31',
|
|
name: 'Räkenskapsår 2026',
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Must return a user-facing error, NOT silently proceed with creation.
|
|
expect(result.companyId).toBeUndefined()
|
|
expect(result.error).toBeTruthy()
|
|
// And the create RPC must not have been called.
|
|
const rpcCreate = supabase.rpc.mock.calls.find(([name]) => name === 'create_company_with_owner')
|
|
expect(rpcCreate).toBeUndefined()
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('createCompanyFromTicRole — ceased companies', () => {
|
|
it('refuses to provision when TIC lookup reports the company is ceased', async () => {
|
|
const lookup: CompanyLookupResult = {
|
|
companyName: 'Avregistrerat AB',
|
|
isCeased: true, // <- key field
|
|
address: null,
|
|
registration: { fTax: false, vat: false },
|
|
bankAccounts: [],
|
|
email: null,
|
|
phone: null,
|
|
sniCodes: [],
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const { supabase, calls } = buildSupabase({ user: { id: 'user-1' } })
|
|
mockCreateClient.mockResolvedValue(supabase as never)
|
|
|
|
const result = await createCompanyFromTicRole({
|
|
teamId: 'team-1',
|
|
orgNumber: '5560125790',
|
|
legalName: 'Avregistrerat AB',
|
|
legalEntityType: 'AB',
|
|
lookup,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(result.error).toBe('company_ceased')
|
|
const writes = calls.filter((c) => ['insert', 'upsert', 'delete', 'update'].includes(c.method))
|
|
expect(writes).toEqual([])
|
|
})
|
|
})
|