* Refactor bookkeeping error handling and introduce new error classes - Introduced new error classes for better error categorization: - JournalEntryNotBalancedError - FiscalPeriodNotFoundError - EntryDateOutsideFiscalPeriodError - JournalEntryNotFoundError - CannotReverseNonPostedError - CannotCorrectNonPostedError - EntryAlreadyReversedError - CurrencyRevaluationAlreadyExistsError - InvalidMappingResultError - BookkeepingDatabaseError - Updated existing functions in engine.ts and transaction-entries.ts to throw specific errors instead of generic ones. - Enhanced error response handling in get-error-message.ts to provide localized messages for new error types. - Added unit tests for new error classes and error handling functions to ensure correctness and coverage. * feat(ai): implement AI proposal application and persistence - Add apply.ts to handle the application of AI proposals, including match and booking steps. - Introduce persist.ts for inserting and managing AI requests and proposals, ensuring unique constraints. - Create re-validate.ts for validating proposals before acceptance, checking for stale conditions. - Define database migrations for ai_requests and ai_proposals tables, including constraints and indexes. - Enhance journal_entries with AI provenance tracking, linking entries to AI proposals. - Update categorization_templates to distinguish AI-corrected templates. - Add company settings for toggling AI flow and managing backfill processes. - Extend processing_history to include AI-related events for better tracking. * feat: add uncategorized transactions API and UI for transaction selection - Implemented a new API endpoint for fetching uncategorized transactions with pagination and filtering options. - Created ChangeTransactionDialog component for selecting alternative transactions based on AI proposals. - Developed ReceiptDetailDialog to display detailed information about receipts, including upload functionality. - Added TransactionDetailDialog for viewing transaction details with links to the transaction list. - Introduced receipt quality assessment logic to evaluate extracted receipt data. - Implemented feature flagging for the AI bookkeeping agent to control availability in different environments. * feat: add manual receipt extraction dialog and integrate AWS Textract for expense analysis - Added ManualExtractDialog component for user input when AI fails to extract receipt data. - Implemented ReceiptsList component to manage and display uploaded receipts, including upload and rescan functionalities. - Introduced Textract integration for analyzing expenses, extracting fields like total, vendor, and date. - Updated package.json to include @aws-sdk/client-textract dependency. * fix(ai): handle livsmedel VAT transition (12% → 6%) in booking prompt and re-validate guard Add date-aware guidance to BOOKING_SYSTEM_PROMPT for the temporary livsmedel VAT cut (Prop. 2025/26:55, 2026-04-01 to 2027-12-31), with restaurang/servering carve-out at 12%. Add a re-validate safety net that rejects clearly-stale rate labels for grocery-chain merchants relative to the entry date. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
347 lines
9.6 KiB
TypeScript
347 lines
9.6 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* Re-validation at accept time.
|
|
*
|
|
* A pending proposal can become stale between generation and accept:
|
|
* * matched transaction gets deleted or already booked
|
|
* * fiscal period closed or locked
|
|
* * account deactivated in the chart
|
|
* * inbox item already linked to a journal entry via a manual path
|
|
*
|
|
* This module runs the relevant checks and returns a typed error the API
|
|
* route translates to a structured response the UI can act on (e.g.,
|
|
* "period closed — reopen it or change the entry date").
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
import type { SupabaseClient } from '@supabase/supabase-js'
|
|
import type {
|
|
AIProposal,
|
|
BookingProposalPayload,
|
|
MatchProposalPayload,
|
|
InvoiceInboxItem,
|
|
} from '@/types'
|
|
|
|
export type ValidationFailureCode =
|
|
| 'inbox_item_missing'
|
|
| 'inbox_item_already_booked'
|
|
| 'transaction_missing'
|
|
| 'transaction_already_booked'
|
|
| 'transaction_already_matched_elsewhere'
|
|
| 'period_missing_or_closed'
|
|
| 'account_missing_or_inactive'
|
|
| 'receipt_file_missing'
|
|
| 'step_prerequisite_missing'
|
|
| 'livsmedel_vat_rate_stale'
|
|
|
|
export interface ValidationSuccess {
|
|
ok: true
|
|
inboxItem: InvoiceInboxItem
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export interface ValidationFailure {
|
|
ok: false
|
|
code: ValidationFailureCode
|
|
message: string
|
|
details?: Record<string, unknown>
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export type ValidationResult = ValidationSuccess | ValidationFailure
|
|
|
|
export async function reValidateProposal(
|
|
supabase: SupabaseClient,
|
|
companyId: string,
|
|
proposal: AIProposal
|
|
): Promise<ValidationResult> {
|
|
if (proposal.subject_type !== 'inbox_item') {
|
|
return {
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
code: 'step_prerequisite_missing',
|
|
message: 'Endast inkorgsobjekt stöds i denna version.',
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Common: the inbox item still exists.
|
|
const { data: inboxItem, error: inboxError } = await supabase
|
|
.from('invoice_inbox_items')
|
|
.select('*')
|
|
.eq('id', proposal.subject_id)
|
|
.eq('company_id', companyId)
|
|
.maybeSingle()
|
|
|
|
if (inboxError || !inboxItem) {
|
|
return {
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
code: 'inbox_item_missing',
|
|
message: 'Kvittot/fakturan finns inte längre.',
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const item = inboxItem as InvoiceInboxItem
|
|
|
|
// If the document has already been booked via another path, skip.
|
|
if (item.status === 'confirmed') {
|
|
return {
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
code: 'inbox_item_already_booked',
|
|
message: 'Detta dokument är redan bokfört manuellt.',
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (proposal.step_type === 'match') {
|
|
return reValidateMatch(supabase, companyId, item, proposal.proposal_json as MatchProposalPayload)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (proposal.step_type === 'booking') {
|
|
return reValidateBooking(supabase, companyId, item, proposal.proposal_json as BookingProposalPayload)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
code: 'step_prerequisite_missing',
|
|
message: `Okänt stegtyp: ${proposal.step_type}`,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function reValidateMatch(
|
|
supabase: SupabaseClient,
|
|
companyId: string,
|
|
item: InvoiceInboxItem,
|
|
payload: MatchProposalPayload
|
|
): Promise<ValidationResult> {
|
|
// BFL 5 kap 7§: every verifikation requires an underlying source document.
|
|
// Block the match accept when no receipt file is attached so the user
|
|
// can't reach the booking step without proof. The UI shows an upload
|
|
// affordance in the receipt detail modal for this exact case.
|
|
if (!item.document_id) {
|
|
return {
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
code: 'receipt_file_missing',
|
|
message: 'Kvittobild krävs innan du kan koppla transaktionen. Ladda upp en bild av kvittot först.',
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const txId = payload.matched_transaction_id
|
|
|
|
const { data: tx } = await supabase
|
|
.from('transactions')
|
|
.select('id, journal_entry_id, company_id')
|
|
.eq('id', txId)
|
|
.eq('company_id', companyId)
|
|
.maybeSingle()
|
|
|
|
if (!tx) {
|
|
return {
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
code: 'transaction_missing',
|
|
message: 'Den föreslagna transaktionen finns inte längre.',
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (tx.journal_entry_id) {
|
|
return {
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
code: 'transaction_already_booked',
|
|
message: 'Transaktionen är redan bokförd.',
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Another inbox item may have claimed this transaction via the existing
|
|
// smart-match partial unique index.
|
|
const { data: claimingInbox } = await supabase
|
|
.from('invoice_inbox_items')
|
|
.select('id')
|
|
.eq('matched_transaction_id', txId)
|
|
.eq('company_id', companyId)
|
|
.neq('id', item.id)
|
|
.maybeSingle()
|
|
|
|
if (claimingInbox) {
|
|
return {
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
code: 'transaction_already_matched_elsewhere',
|
|
message: 'Transaktionen är redan matchad till ett annat dokument.',
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return { ok: true, inboxItem: item }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function reValidateBooking(
|
|
supabase: SupabaseClient,
|
|
companyId: string,
|
|
item: InvoiceInboxItem,
|
|
payload: BookingProposalPayload
|
|
): Promise<ValidationResult> {
|
|
if (!item.matched_transaction_id) {
|
|
return {
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
code: 'step_prerequisite_missing',
|
|
message: 'Ingen matchande transaktion — stäng först matchningssteget.',
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The transaction still exists and is still unbooked.
|
|
const { data: tx } = await supabase
|
|
.from('transactions')
|
|
.select('id, journal_entry_id')
|
|
.eq('id', item.matched_transaction_id)
|
|
.eq('company_id', companyId)
|
|
.maybeSingle()
|
|
|
|
if (!tx) {
|
|
return {
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
code: 'transaction_missing',
|
|
message: 'Den matchade transaktionen finns inte längre.',
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (tx.journal_entry_id) {
|
|
return {
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
code: 'transaction_already_booked',
|
|
message: 'Transaktionen har redan bokförts.',
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Fiscal period is open.
|
|
const { data: period } = await supabase
|
|
.from('fiscal_periods')
|
|
.select('id, is_closed, locked_at')
|
|
.eq('id', payload.fiscal_period_id)
|
|
.eq('company_id', companyId)
|
|
.maybeSingle()
|
|
|
|
if (!period || period.is_closed || period.locked_at) {
|
|
return {
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
code: 'period_missing_or_closed',
|
|
message: 'Räkenskapsåret är låst eller finns inte längre.',
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// All accounts in the proposed lines are active in the chart.
|
|
const accountNumbers = [...new Set(payload.lines.map((l) => l.account_number))]
|
|
const { data: accounts } = await supabase
|
|
.from('chart_of_accounts')
|
|
.select('account_number, is_active')
|
|
.eq('company_id', companyId)
|
|
.in('account_number', accountNumbers)
|
|
|
|
const foundActive = new Set(
|
|
(accounts || []).filter((a) => a.is_active).map((a) => a.account_number)
|
|
)
|
|
const missing = accountNumbers.filter((n) => !foundActive.has(n))
|
|
|
|
if (missing.length > 0) {
|
|
return {
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
code: 'account_missing_or_inactive',
|
|
message: `Kontona saknas eller är inaktiva: ${missing.join(', ')}`,
|
|
details: { missing_accounts: missing },
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const livsmedelMismatch = detectLivsmedelRateMismatch(item, payload)
|
|
if (livsmedelMismatch) {
|
|
return {
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
code: 'livsmedel_vat_rate_stale',
|
|
message: livsmedelMismatch.message,
|
|
details: livsmedelMismatch.details,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return { ok: true, inboxItem: item }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Sweden's livsmedel VAT temporarily drops from 12% to 6% between
|
|
// 2026-04-01 and 2027-12-31 (Prop. 2025/26:55). Restaurang/servering stays
|
|
// at 12% throughout. This guard catches AI proposals where the rate label
|
|
// is stale relative to the entry date for clearly-grocery merchants. The
|
|
// prompt is the primary defence; this is the safety net for prompt drift.
|
|
const LIVSMEDEL_REDUCED_START = '2026-04-01'
|
|
const LIVSMEDEL_REDUCED_END = '2027-12-31'
|
|
|
|
const GROCERY_CHAIN_KEYWORDS = [
|
|
'ica maxi',
|
|
'ica kvantum',
|
|
'ica supermarket',
|
|
'ica nära',
|
|
'ica',
|
|
'coop',
|
|
'hemköp',
|
|
'willys',
|
|
'lidl',
|
|
'city gross',
|
|
'tempo',
|
|
'mathem',
|
|
'mat.se',
|
|
'matse',
|
|
'netto',
|
|
'matöppet',
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
const RESTAURANG_KEYWORDS = [
|
|
'restaurang',
|
|
'servering',
|
|
'pizzeria',
|
|
'bistro',
|
|
'lunchrestaurang',
|
|
'sushi',
|
|
'café',
|
|
'kafé',
|
|
'cafe',
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
function detectLivsmedelRateMismatch(
|
|
item: InvoiceInboxItem,
|
|
payload: BookingProposalPayload
|
|
): { message: string; details: Record<string, unknown> } | null {
|
|
const treatment = payload.vat_treatment
|
|
if (treatment !== 'reduced_12' && treatment !== 'reduced_6') return null
|
|
|
|
const haystack = [
|
|
payload.description ?? '',
|
|
...payload.lines.map((l) => l.description ?? ''),
|
|
JSON.stringify(item.extracted_data ?? {}),
|
|
]
|
|
.join(' ')
|
|
.toLowerCase()
|
|
|
|
const isGrocery = GROCERY_CHAIN_KEYWORDS.some((k) => haystack.includes(k))
|
|
const isRestaurang = RESTAURANG_KEYWORDS.some((k) => haystack.includes(k))
|
|
|
|
// If both signals fire, treat as ambiguous and let it through — the
|
|
// user will review on the inbox card anyway.
|
|
if (isGrocery === isRestaurang) return null
|
|
|
|
const date = payload.entry_date
|
|
const inReducedWindow = date >= LIVSMEDEL_REDUCED_START && date <= LIVSMEDEL_REDUCED_END
|
|
|
|
if (isGrocery && treatment === 'reduced_12' && inReducedWindow) {
|
|
return {
|
|
message:
|
|
'Momssatsen 12 % stämmer inte — livsmedel ska bokföras med 6 % moms från 1 april 2026 t.o.m. 31 december 2027. Justera förslaget eller bokför manuellt.',
|
|
details: { signal: 'grocery', treatment, entry_date: date, expected: 'reduced_6' },
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (isGrocery && treatment === 'reduced_6' && !inReducedWindow) {
|
|
return {
|
|
message:
|
|
'Momssatsen 6 % gäller endast för livsmedel mellan 1 april 2026 och 31 december 2027. Övriga datum ska bokföras med 12 %.',
|
|
details: { signal: 'grocery', treatment, entry_date: date, expected: 'reduced_12' },
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (isRestaurang && treatment === 'reduced_6') {
|
|
return {
|
|
message:
|
|
'Restaurang- och serveringstjänster har 12 % moms (omfattas inte av livsmedelssänkningen). Justera förslaget eller bokför manuellt.',
|
|
details: { signal: 'restaurang', treatment, entry_date: date, expected: 'reduced_12' },
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return null
|
|
}
|