Files
accounted/app/api/transactions/bulk-book/__tests__/route.test.ts
T
Jakob WennbergandClaude Sonnet 5 ec27228a8e style: remove em/en dashes repo-wide, add CLAUDE.md rule against them (#890)
Em dashes (—) and en dashes (–) had spread across comments, docs, tests,
and a few UI strings, reading as AI-generated boilerplate rather than
house style. Replaced each with punctuation matching its context: colon
for explanatory clauses, comma for asides, plain hyphen for numeric/legal
ranges (e.g. "21-23§"), "to"/"till" for date ranges, parentheses for
paired-dash asides. messages/en.json and messages/sv.json were fixed by
hand together to keep sv/en in sync.

Left untouched where the dash is the functional subject rather than
decorative punctuation: date-range-parser.ts's separator regex,
charset-repair.ts's CP1252 byte-mapping table (and its test), the SIE
encoding mojibake docs, generic-csv.ts's minus-sign normalizer, the
agent system-prompt files that already instruct against em dashes, and
a golden iXBRL test fixture compared byte-for-byte.

Also fixes two bugs surfaced along the way: an off-by-one in
ApiKeysPanel's scope-label split (a leftover from an earlier partial
pass), and a charset-repair test that had lost the literal en-dash it
exists to verify.

Regenerated the agent atom seed migration (skills:generate) since 27
SKILL.md files changed. Added a CLAUDE.md rule against em/en dashes,
with an explicit carve-out for the functional-dash cases above.

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-04 15:58:06 +02:00

196 lines
6.4 KiB
TypeScript

import { describe, it, expect, beforeEach, vi } from 'vitest'
import {
createMockRequest,
parseJsonResponse,
createQueuedMockSupabase,
} from '@/tests/helpers'
const { supabase: mockSupabase, enqueue, reset } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
vi.mock('@/lib/supabase/server', () => ({
createClient: () => Promise.resolve(mockSupabase),
}))
vi.mock('@/lib/events/bus', () => ({
eventBus: { emit: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined) },
}))
vi.mock('@/lib/init', () => ({
ensureInitialized: vi.fn(),
}))
vi.mock('@/lib/company/context', () => ({
requireCompanyId: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue('company-1'),
getActiveCompanyId: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue('company-1'),
}))
vi.mock('@/lib/auth/require-write', () => ({
requireWritePermission: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ ok: true }),
}))
// applyTemplate is the pure ratio/VAT expander used by the route. The
// route test stubs it so we don't need a real template object.
vi.mock('@/lib/bookkeeping/template-library', () => ({
applyTemplate: vi.fn(),
}))
import { POST } from '../route'
import { applyTemplate } from '@/lib/bookkeeping/template-library'
const TX1 = '11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111'
const TX2 = '22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222'
const TPL = '33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333'
const JE = '44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444'
describe('POST /api/transactions/bulk-book', () => {
const mockUser = { id: 'user-1', email: 'test@test.se' }
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
reset()
mockSupabase.auth.getUser.mockResolvedValue({ data: { user: mockUser } })
})
it('returns 400 when neither template_id nor existing_journal_entry_id is set', async () => {
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/bulk-book', {
method: 'POST',
body: { tx_ids: [TX1] },
})
const response = await POST(request)
expect(response.status).toBe(400)
})
it('returns 400 when both template_id and existing_journal_entry_id are set', async () => {
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/bulk-book', {
method: 'POST',
body: {
tx_ids: [TX1],
template_id: TPL,
existing_journal_entry_id: JE,
mode: 'one_line_per_tx',
entry_description: 'Test',
},
})
const response = await POST(request)
expect(response.status).toBe(400)
})
it('link path passes through to RPC and returns the success envelope', async () => {
// RPC returns the link-existing happy path.
enqueue({
data: {
ok: true,
mode: 'link_existing',
journal_entry_id: JE,
voucher_series: 'A',
voucher_number: 12,
linked_tx_count: 2,
tx_sum: 300,
},
error: null,
})
// Event re-fetch (empty is fine for the test).
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/bulk-book', {
method: 'POST',
body: {
tx_ids: [TX1, TX2],
existing_journal_entry_id: JE,
},
})
const response = await POST(request)
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
data: { mode: string; journal_entry_id: string; linked_tx_count: number }
}>(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(body.data.mode).toBe('link_existing')
expect(body.data.journal_entry_id).toBe(JE)
expect(body.data.linked_tx_count).toBe(2)
})
it('create-new path fetches template, expands per mode, and calls RPC', async () => {
// Template fetch.
enqueue({
data: {
id: TPL,
name: 'Försäljning 25%',
lines: [
{ account: '1930', label: 'Bank', side: 'debit', type: 'settlement' },
{ account: '3001', label: 'Försäljning', side: 'credit', type: 'business', ratio: 0.8 },
{ account: '2611', label: 'Utg moms 25%', side: 'credit', type: 'vat', vat_rate: 0.25 },
],
is_active: true,
},
error: null,
})
// Tx fetch: 2 incomes totalling 300.
enqueue({
data: [
{ id: TX1, amount: 100, currency: 'SEK', description: 'Swish 1', date: '2026-06-05' },
{ id: TX2, amount: 200, currency: 'SEK', description: 'Swish 2', date: '2026-06-05' },
],
error: null,
})
// applyTemplate stub: return a balanced 3-line set per call.
vi.mocked(applyTemplate).mockImplementation((_lines, total) => [
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: String(total), credit_amount: '', line_description: 'Bank' },
{ account_number: '3001', debit_amount: '', credit_amount: String(total * 0.8), line_description: 'Försäljning' },
{ account_number: '2611', debit_amount: '', credit_amount: String(total * 0.2), line_description: 'Utg moms 25%' },
])
// Account dimension rules pre-check (PR10) — none configured.
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
// RPC returns happy path.
enqueue({
data: {
ok: true,
mode: 'create_new',
journal_entry_id: JE,
voucher_series: 'A',
voucher_number: 13,
linked_tx_count: 2,
tx_sum: 300,
},
error: null,
})
// Event re-fetch.
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/bulk-book', {
method: 'POST',
body: {
tx_ids: [TX1, TX2],
template_id: TPL,
mode: 'one_line_per_tx',
entry_description: 'Samlingsverifikation 2026-06-05',
},
})
const response = await POST(request)
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
data: { mode: string; journal_entry_id: string }
}>(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(body.data.mode).toBe('create_new')
expect(body.data.journal_entry_id).toBe(JE)
// Template expansion was invoked once per tx in one_line_per_tx mode.
expect(vi.mocked(applyTemplate)).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2)
})
it('maps RPC structured failure code to errorResponseFromCode', async () => {
enqueue({
data: { ok: false, code: 'BULK_BOOK_DATE_MISMATCH', details: { expected: '2026-06-05', got: '2026-06-06' } },
error: null,
})
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/bulk-book', {
method: 'POST',
body: { tx_ids: [TX1, TX2], existing_journal_entry_id: JE },
})
const response = await POST(request)
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: { code: string } }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(400)
expect(body.error.code).toBe('BULK_BOOK_DATE_MISMATCH')
})
})