Em dashes (—) and en dashes (–) had spread across comments, docs, tests, and a few UI strings, reading as AI-generated boilerplate rather than house style. Replaced each with punctuation matching its context: colon for explanatory clauses, comma for asides, plain hyphen for numeric/legal ranges (e.g. "21-23§"), "to"/"till" for date ranges, parentheses for paired-dash asides. messages/en.json and messages/sv.json were fixed by hand together to keep sv/en in sync. Left untouched where the dash is the functional subject rather than decorative punctuation: date-range-parser.ts's separator regex, charset-repair.ts's CP1252 byte-mapping table (and its test), the SIE encoding mojibake docs, generic-csv.ts's minus-sign normalizer, the agent system-prompt files that already instruct against em dashes, and a golden iXBRL test fixture compared byte-for-byte. Also fixes two bugs surfaced along the way: an off-by-one in ApiKeysPanel's scope-label split (a leftover from an earlier partial pass), and a charset-repair test that had lost the literal en-dash it exists to verify. Regenerated the agent atom seed migration (skills:generate) since 27 SKILL.md files changed. Added a CLAUDE.md rule against em/en dashes, with an explicit carve-out for the functional-dash cases above. Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
390 lines
14 KiB
TypeScript
390 lines
14 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
|
|
import {
|
|
createMockRequest,
|
|
parseJsonResponse,
|
|
createMockRouteParams,
|
|
createQueuedMockSupabase,
|
|
makeTransaction,
|
|
makeJournalEntry,
|
|
} from '@/tests/helpers'
|
|
import { eventBus } from '@/lib/events'
|
|
|
|
const { supabase: mockSupabase, enqueue, reset } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/supabase/server', () => ({
|
|
createClient: () => Promise.resolve(mockSupabase),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/init', () => ({
|
|
ensureInitialized: vi.fn(),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/company/context', () => ({
|
|
requireCompanyId: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue('company-1'),
|
|
getActiveCompanyId: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue('company-1'),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/auth/require-write', () => ({
|
|
requireWritePermission: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ ok: true }),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
const mockCreateJournalEntry = vi.fn()
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/bookkeeping/engine', () => ({
|
|
createJournalEntry: (...args: unknown[]) => mockCreateJournalEntry(...args),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
// Booking-time duplicate guard: mocked so route tests exercise the WIRING
|
|
// (warn / force / mismatch); the detection query itself is unit-tested in
|
|
// lib/transactions/__tests__/booking-duplicate-detection.test.ts.
|
|
const mockDetectDup = vi.fn()
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/transactions/booking-duplicate-detection', () => ({
|
|
detectBookingDuplicate: (...args: unknown[]) => mockDetectDup(...args),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
// Behandlingshistorik append: mocked so we can assert the dismissal is
|
|
// persisted without reaching the service-role client.
|
|
const mockAppendProcessingHistory = vi.fn()
|
|
vi.mock('@/lib/processing-history/append', () => ({
|
|
appendProcessingHistory: (...args: unknown[]) => mockAppendProcessingHistory(...args),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
import { POST } from '../route'
|
|
|
|
const VALID_UUID = '550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440000'
|
|
const SIBLING_UUID = '660e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440111'
|
|
const OTHER_UUID = '770e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440222'
|
|
const VOUCHER_JE_UUID = '880e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440333'
|
|
|
|
describe('POST /api/transactions/[id]/book', () => {
|
|
const mockUser = { id: 'user-1', email: 'test@test.se' }
|
|
const validBody = {
|
|
fiscal_period_id: VALID_UUID,
|
|
entry_date: '2025-01-15',
|
|
description: 'Test booking',
|
|
lines: [
|
|
{ account_number: '6200', debit_amount: 500, credit_amount: 0 },
|
|
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
|
|
],
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
|
reset()
|
|
eventBus.clear()
|
|
mockSupabase.auth.getUser.mockResolvedValue({ data: { user: mockUser } })
|
|
// No booking-duplicate by default; guard tests override per-case.
|
|
mockDetectDup.mockResolvedValue(null)
|
|
mockAppendProcessingHistory.mockResolvedValue('evt-1')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns 401 when not authenticated', async () => {
|
|
mockSupabase.auth.getUser.mockResolvedValue({ data: { user: null } })
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
|
|
method: 'POST',
|
|
body: validBody,
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(401)
|
|
expect(body).toEqual({ error: 'Unauthorized' })
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns 400 when missing required fields', async () => {
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
|
|
method: 'POST',
|
|
body: { fiscal_period_id: VALID_UUID },
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(400)
|
|
expect(body.error).toBe('Validation failed')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns 404 when transaction not found', async () => {
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, error: { message: 'Not found' } })
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-999/book', {
|
|
method: 'POST',
|
|
body: validBody,
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-999' }))
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(404)
|
|
expect(body.error).toBe('Transaction not found')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns 409 when transaction already has a journal entry', async () => {
|
|
const tx = makeTransaction({
|
|
id: 'tx-1',
|
|
journal_entry_id: 'je-existing',
|
|
})
|
|
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
|
|
method: 'POST',
|
|
body: validBody,
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(409)
|
|
expect(body.error).toBe('Transaction already has a journal entry')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns 400 when journal entry creation fails (engine error)', async () => {
|
|
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', journal_entry_id: null })
|
|
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
|
|
|
|
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockRejectedValue(new Error('Entry is not balanced'))
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
|
|
method: 'POST',
|
|
body: validBody,
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(400)
|
|
expect(body.error).toBe('Entry is not balanced')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('creates journal entry and links to transaction (happy path)', async () => {
|
|
const tx = makeTransaction({
|
|
id: 'tx-1',
|
|
amount: -500,
|
|
journal_entry_id: null,
|
|
})
|
|
const je = makeJournalEntry({ id: 'je-new' })
|
|
|
|
// Fetch transaction
|
|
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
|
|
|
|
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue(je)
|
|
|
|
// Update transaction
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
|
|
|
const emitSpy = vi.spyOn(eventBus, 'emit')
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
|
|
method: 'POST',
|
|
body: validBody,
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
|
success: boolean
|
|
journal_entry_id: string
|
|
data: { id: string }
|
|
}>(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(body.success).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(body.journal_entry_id).toBe('je-new')
|
|
expect(body.data.id).toBe('je-new')
|
|
|
|
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.anything(), 'company-1', 'user-1', {
|
|
fiscal_period_id: VALID_UUID,
|
|
entry_date: '2025-01-15',
|
|
description: 'Test booking',
|
|
source_type: 'bank_transaction',
|
|
source_id: 'tx-1',
|
|
lines: validBody.lines,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
expect(emitSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ type: 'transaction.categorized' })
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns 500 when transaction update fails', async () => {
|
|
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', journal_entry_id: null })
|
|
const je = makeJournalEntry({ id: 'je-new' })
|
|
|
|
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
|
|
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue(je)
|
|
// Update fails
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, error: { message: 'Update failed' } })
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
|
|
method: 'POST',
|
|
body: validBody,
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(500)
|
|
expect(body.error).toBe('Failed to update transaction')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// ── Booking-time duplicate guard ──────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
it('returns 409 duplicate warning when a booked sibling shares date+amount', async () => {
|
|
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: -500, journal_entry_id: null })
|
|
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null }) // fetch
|
|
mockDetectDup.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
transaction_id: SIBLING_UUID,
|
|
journal_entry_id: 'je-existing',
|
|
voucher_label: 'A142',
|
|
entry_date: '2025-01-15',
|
|
description: 'redan bokförd',
|
|
amount: -500,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', { method: 'POST', body: validBody })
|
|
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
|
error: { code: string; details: { candidate: { transaction_id: string; voucher_label: string } } }
|
|
}>(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(409)
|
|
expect(body.error.code).toBe('TRANSACTION_BOOK_POSSIBLE_DUPLICATE')
|
|
expect(body.error.details.candidate.transaction_id).toBe(SIBLING_UUID)
|
|
expect(body.error.details.candidate.voucher_label).toBe('A142')
|
|
// Critically: no verifikat is created when a duplicate is flagged.
|
|
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
// Blocking a duplicate is not a dismissal: nothing is logged.
|
|
expect(mockAppendProcessingHistory).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('books when force=true and the expected sibling still matches', async () => {
|
|
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: -500, journal_entry_id: null })
|
|
const je = makeJournalEntry({ id: 'je-new' })
|
|
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null }) // fetch
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // update
|
|
mockDetectDup.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
transaction_id: SIBLING_UUID,
|
|
journal_entry_id: 'je-existing',
|
|
voucher_label: 'A142',
|
|
entry_date: '2025-01-15',
|
|
description: null,
|
|
amount: -500,
|
|
})
|
|
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue(je)
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
|
|
method: 'POST',
|
|
body: { ...validBody, force: true, expected_duplicate_transaction_id: SIBLING_UUID },
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ success: boolean; journal_entry_id: string }>(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(body.success).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(body.journal_entry_id).toBe('je-new')
|
|
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
|
|
// The dismissal is recorded to behandlingshistorik (BFNAR 2013:2 kap 8).
|
|
expect(mockAppendProcessingHistory).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
eventType: 'BankTransactionDuplicateDismissed',
|
|
aggregateType: 'BankTransaction',
|
|
aggregateId: 'tx-1',
|
|
actor: { type: 'user', id: 'user-1' },
|
|
payload: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
transaction_id: 'tx-1',
|
|
dismissed_transaction_id: SIBLING_UUID,
|
|
}),
|
|
}),
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns 409 when a ledger-only voucher (no sibling transaction) already books this movement', async () => {
|
|
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 98565, journal_entry_id: null })
|
|
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null }) // fetch
|
|
// A voucher-keyed candidate has no transaction_id: it's bound by je id.
|
|
mockDetectDup.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
transaction_id: null,
|
|
journal_entry_id: VOUCHER_JE_UUID,
|
|
voucher_label: 'A2',
|
|
entry_date: '2026-03-30',
|
|
description: 'Inbetalning kundfaktura 2026001',
|
|
amount: 98565,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', { method: 'POST', body: validBody })
|
|
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
|
error: { code: string; details: { candidate: { transaction_id: string | null; journal_entry_id: string } } }
|
|
}>(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(409)
|
|
expect(body.error.code).toBe('TRANSACTION_BOOK_POSSIBLE_DUPLICATE')
|
|
expect(body.error.details.candidate.transaction_id).toBeNull()
|
|
expect(body.error.details.candidate.journal_entry_id).toBe(VOUCHER_JE_UUID)
|
|
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('books a voucher-keyed duplicate when force=true binds the expected journal_entry_id', async () => {
|
|
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 98565, journal_entry_id: null })
|
|
const je = makeJournalEntry({ id: 'je-new' })
|
|
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null }) // fetch
|
|
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // update
|
|
mockDetectDup.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
transaction_id: null,
|
|
journal_entry_id: VOUCHER_JE_UUID,
|
|
voucher_label: 'A2',
|
|
entry_date: '2026-03-30',
|
|
description: null,
|
|
amount: 98565,
|
|
})
|
|
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue(je)
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
|
|
method: 'POST',
|
|
body: { ...validBody, force: true, expected_duplicate_journal_entry_id: VOUCHER_JE_UUID },
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ success: boolean; journal_entry_id: string }>(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
|
expect(body.success).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
|
|
expect(mockAppendProcessingHistory).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
eventType: 'BankTransactionDuplicateDismissed',
|
|
payload: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
dismissed_transaction_id: null,
|
|
dismissed_journal_entry_id: VOUCHER_JE_UUID,
|
|
}),
|
|
}),
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects force=true when the expected sibling no longer matches the detected one', async () => {
|
|
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: -500, journal_entry_id: null })
|
|
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null }) // fetch
|
|
mockDetectDup.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
transaction_id: SIBLING_UUID, // server detects this one…
|
|
journal_entry_id: 'je-existing',
|
|
voucher_label: 'A142',
|
|
entry_date: '2025-01-15',
|
|
description: null,
|
|
amount: -500,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
|
|
method: 'POST',
|
|
body: { ...validBody, force: true, expected_duplicate_transaction_id: OTHER_UUID }, // …caller claims another
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
|
|
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: { code: string } }>(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(409)
|
|
expect(body.error.code).toBe('TRANSACTION_BOOK_FORCE_CANDIDATE_MISMATCH')
|
|
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns 400 when force=true is sent without expected_duplicate_transaction_id', async () => {
|
|
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
|
|
method: 'POST',
|
|
body: { ...validBody, force: true },
|
|
})
|
|
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
|
|
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
|
|
|
|
expect(status).toBe(400)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|