Jakob WennbergandClaude Sonnet 5
ec27228a8e
Em dashes (—) and en dashes (–) had spread across comments, docs, tests, and a few UI strings, reading as AI-generated boilerplate rather than house style. Replaced each with punctuation matching its context: colon for explanatory clauses, comma for asides, plain hyphen for numeric/legal ranges (e.g. "21-23§"), "to"/"till" for date ranges, parentheses for paired-dash asides. messages/en.json and messages/sv.json were fixed by hand together to keep sv/en in sync. Left untouched where the dash is the functional subject rather than decorative punctuation: date-range-parser.ts's separator regex, charset-repair.ts's CP1252 byte-mapping table (and its test), the SIE encoding mojibake docs, generic-csv.ts's minus-sign normalizer, the agent system-prompt files that already instruct against em dashes, and a golden iXBRL test fixture compared byte-for-byte. Also fixes two bugs surfaced along the way: an off-by-one in ApiKeysPanel's scope-label split (a leftover from an earlier partial pass), and a charset-repair test that had lost the literal en-dash it exists to verify. Regenerated the agent atom seed migration (skills:generate) since 27 SKILL.md files changed. Added a CLAUDE.md rule against em/en dashes, with an explicit carve-out for the functional-dash cases above. Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
89 lines
3.3 KiB
TypeScript
89 lines
3.3 KiB
TypeScript
import { createClient } from '@/lib/supabase/server'
|
|
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
|
|
import { ensureInitialized } from '@/lib/init'
|
|
import { runReconciliation } from '@/lib/reconciliation/bank-reconciliation'
|
|
import { validateBody } from '@/lib/api/validate'
|
|
import { RunReconciliationSchema } from '@/lib/api/schemas'
|
|
import { requireCompanyId } from '@/lib/company/context'
|
|
import { requireWritePermission } from '@/lib/auth/require-write'
|
|
|
|
ensureInitialized()
|
|
|
|
export async function POST(request: Request) {
|
|
const supabase = await createClient()
|
|
const { data: { user } } = await supabase.auth.getUser()
|
|
|
|
if (!user) {
|
|
return NextResponse.json({ error: 'Unauthorized' }, { status: 401 })
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const writeCheck = await requireWritePermission(supabase, user.id)
|
|
if (!writeCheck.ok) return writeCheck.response
|
|
|
|
const companyId = await requireCompanyId(supabase, user.id)
|
|
|
|
const validation = await validateBody(request, RunReconciliationSchema)
|
|
if (!validation.success) return validation.response
|
|
const { date_from, date_to, account_number, dry_run, selected_matches } = validation.data
|
|
|
|
const accountNumber = account_number ?? '1930'
|
|
|
|
// Defense-in-depth: reject a non-default account the company hasn't
|
|
// registered as a cash account. The default '1930' is exempt: when no
|
|
// cash_accounts row exists it falls back to currency-only scoping
|
|
// (cashAccountId undefined), so a company reconciling its primary SEK account
|
|
// without a row behaves exactly as before this feature. Matches the status
|
|
// endpoint, which is likewise lenient for '1930'.
|
|
const { data: cashAccount } = await supabase
|
|
.from('cash_accounts')
|
|
.select('id, currency, is_primary')
|
|
.eq('company_id', companyId)
|
|
.eq('ledger_account', accountNumber)
|
|
.maybeSingle()
|
|
|
|
if (!cashAccount && accountNumber !== '1930') {
|
|
return NextResponse.json(
|
|
{ error: 'Okänt kassakonto för det här företaget' },
|
|
{ status: 400 },
|
|
)
|
|
}
|
|
const currency = (cashAccount?.currency as string | undefined) ?? 'SEK'
|
|
|
|
const result = await runReconciliation(supabase, companyId, user.id, {
|
|
dateFrom: date_from,
|
|
dateTo: date_to,
|
|
accountNumber,
|
|
currency,
|
|
cashAccountId: cashAccount?.id as string | undefined,
|
|
// Only the primary account claims unassigned (NULL cash_account_id) rows:
|
|
// a secondary same-currency account must scope strictly to its own id.
|
|
includeUnassigned: Boolean(cashAccount?.is_primary),
|
|
dryRun: dry_run ?? false,
|
|
applyOnly: selected_matches?.map((m) => ({
|
|
transactionId: m.transaction_id,
|
|
journalEntryId: m.journal_entry_id,
|
|
})),
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
return NextResponse.json({
|
|
data: {
|
|
matches: result.matches.map((m) => ({
|
|
transaction_id: m.transaction.id,
|
|
transaction_date: m.transaction.date,
|
|
transaction_description: m.transaction.description,
|
|
transaction_amount: m.transaction.amount,
|
|
journal_entry_id: m.glLine.journal_entry_id,
|
|
voucher_number: m.glLine.voucher_number,
|
|
voucher_series: m.glLine.voucher_series,
|
|
entry_date: m.glLine.entry_date,
|
|
entry_description: m.glLine.entry_description,
|
|
method: m.method,
|
|
confidence: m.confidence,
|
|
})),
|
|
applied: result.applied,
|
|
errors: result.errors,
|
|
dry_run: dry_run ?? false,
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
}
|