* feat(salary): recurring payroll lines per employee (#2042) A standing per-employee payslip row derived into every salary run inside its validity window, e.g. a benefit-bike bruttolöneavdrag of -670 kr/month. Mirrors the employee_benefits pattern end to end: - employee_recurring_lines table with RLS, audit + updated_at triggers, and a salary_line_items.source_recurring_line_id back-link; amount sign and account format enforced by CHECKs - run-calculation step 8d3 derives rows with flags computed from the item type (gross deductions reduce tax + AGA bases, net deductions post-tax); derived rows are excluded from the manual-line set like benefit rows - CRUD routes under /api/salary/employees/[id]/recurring-lines with the same 401/403/404/400 contract as the benefits routes - EmployeeRecurringLinesPanel on the employee page, sv/en strings - registered in the BFL full-archive export Closes #2042 Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(salary): address #2044 review: feed recurring rows to the engine, guard deletes - Derived recurring rows are now appended to the calculateSalary lineItems set: they were inserted into salary_line_items but excluded from the in-memory calculation, so a recurring deduction never affected the payslip math (CodeRabbit, major). - DELETE deactivates a line that has derived rows instead of hard-deleting: ON DELETE SET NULL would turn a draft run's derived row into an apparent manual row that recalculation keeps forever; deactivation preserves the provenance link and lets the next recalculation drop the draft rows (CodeRabbit, major). The panel hides inactive lines. - POST employee lookup uses maybeSingle and answers 500 on lookup failure, 404 only on zero rows. - Panel: try/finally releases loading/submitting on network failure, and a request sequence guard stops a stale load from overwriting a newer list. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(migrations): move employee_recurring_lines off 20260830140000, which upstream now occupies Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(migrations): bind employee_id to company_id with a composite FK (review) The dimensions pattern: UNIQUE (id, company_id) on employees plus a composite FK, so RLS company scoping cannot be sidestepped by pointing a recurring line at another company's employee (IDOR, CWE-639). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(salary): address review: deductions only, race-free delete, engine and pg tests Review round on #2044: - Blocker: recurring 'other' additions removed from the whitelist, the migration CHECK and the panel. calculateSalary only treats ADDITION_TYPES as additions, so a recurring taxable addition rendered on the payslip without entering gross, tax, AGA or AGI. Re-add only together with engine support (recorded in DECISIONS.md). - Delete race: salary_line_items.source_recurring_line_id is now NO ACTION instead of SET NULL; the DELETE route deletes first and falls back to deactivation on 23503, so a deletion racing a concurrent derivation can never orphan a derived row into an apparent manual row. NO ACTION defers to statement end, so company-deletion cascades are unaffected. - Correction runs copy source_benefit_id / source_recurring_line_id, so recalculating a correction no longer derives the copied rows a second time (pre-existing for benefits, now pinned). - Engine tests: gross_deduction_other through calculateSalary asserts gross, taxable income and avgifterBasis drop while the semester base stays; net_deduction_union only moves the paid-out net. - pg-real tests for the new table: RLS membership, composite FK cross-company refusal, deduction-only CHECKs, and the NO ACTION back-link blocking deletes of derived-into lines. - Nice-to-haves: POST rounds the stored amount to ore, the redundant single-column employees FK is dropped (composite carries the cascade), the schemas.ts comment references the real migration version, and the panel explains the validity-window semantics (payment date, bounds inclusive, no proration). - Rebased onto main; the phantom-columns ceiling re-measured at 395 on the merged tree. - DECISIONS.md records the vacation-basis judgment call (semester base not reduced by recurring gross deductions). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(salary): gate recurring-line writes on the writer role, 404 unmatched deletes Two findings from the 2026-09-02 review round: - Superagent P1: the write policies were membership-only, so a read-only viewer could write recurring payroll deductions straight through PostgREST, bypassing the route's requireWrite. The table now carries aa_enforce_company_writer_role, the same gate 20260902093000 attaches to every company-scoped table (it also fires inside SECURITY DEFINER bodies, where RLS does not apply). The migration is re-versioned to 20260902140000 so the function exists when a fresh database replays the folder in order. - CodeRabbit: a filtered DELETE reports no error when nothing matches, so an unknown or cross-company line answered 200 deleted: true. The delete now selects the removed row and answers 404 when it is null. Tests: pg-real asserts a viewer is refused insert, update and delete with 42501 while the row survives unchanged, plus a non-member case; the route tests pin the 404. 896 salary tests green, rebased on main. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(salary): pin the recurring-line payload column sets Answers the phantom-column ceiling finding with scoped assertions rather than a bare ceiling raise: the PATCH route test now asserts the exact writable column set, and the comment records that the pg-real test covers the derived-row shape against the real table. Making the PATCH payload a literal would turn a partial update into last-write-wins, which is why the shape stays unresolved. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(salary): round recurring line amounts with roundOre check:guards naive-ore-round ratchet: the derived recurring row used Math.round(x * 100) / 100 (baseline 615, +1); roundOre is already imported in run-calculation.ts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(migrations): guard the employees unique-key add against #2145 merge order #2145 (expense claims) also adds employees_id_company_id_key. Wrap this migration's ADD CONSTRAINT in an idempotent DO block so whichever of the two PRs merges second does not fail on a duplicate constraint. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <311770904+jakobwennberg-oss@users.noreply.github.com>
74 lines
2.5 KiB
TypeScript
74 lines
2.5 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest'
|
|
import {
|
|
RECURRING_LINE_ITEM_TYPES,
|
|
RECURRING_LINE_AMOUNT_SIGN_MESSAGE,
|
|
recurringLineFlags,
|
|
validateRecurringLineAmount,
|
|
} from '../recurring-lines'
|
|
|
|
describe('recurringLineFlags', () => {
|
|
it('marks gross deductions as taxable, avgift-basis gross deductions', () => {
|
|
for (const t of ['gross_deduction_pension', 'gross_deduction_other'] as const) {
|
|
expect(recurringLineFlags(t)).toEqual({
|
|
is_taxable: true,
|
|
is_avgift_basis: true,
|
|
is_vacation_basis: false,
|
|
is_gross_deduction: true,
|
|
is_net_deduction: false,
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('marks net deductions as after-tax only', () => {
|
|
for (const t of [
|
|
'net_deduction_union',
|
|
'net_deduction_benefit_payment',
|
|
'net_deduction_other',
|
|
] as const) {
|
|
expect(recurringLineFlags(t)).toEqual({
|
|
is_taxable: false,
|
|
is_avgift_basis: false,
|
|
is_vacation_basis: false,
|
|
is_gross_deduction: false,
|
|
is_net_deduction: true,
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('every supported type is a deduction with exactly one deduction flag set', () => {
|
|
// 'other' (recurring addition) is deliberately absent: the engine does
|
|
// not treat generic taxable rows as additions, see recurring-lines.ts.
|
|
expect(RECURRING_LINE_ITEM_TYPES).not.toContain('other')
|
|
for (const t of RECURRING_LINE_ITEM_TYPES) {
|
|
const flags = recurringLineFlags(t)
|
|
expect(flags.is_gross_deduction && flags.is_net_deduction).toBe(false)
|
|
expect(flags.is_gross_deduction || flags.is_net_deduction).toBe(true)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('validateRecurringLineAmount', () => {
|
|
it('requires deductions to be negative', () => {
|
|
expect(validateRecurringLineAmount('gross_deduction_other', -670.17)).toBeNull()
|
|
expect(validateRecurringLineAmount('gross_deduction_other', 670.17)).toBe(
|
|
RECURRING_LINE_AMOUNT_SIGN_MESSAGE,
|
|
)
|
|
expect(validateRecurringLineAmount('net_deduction_union', -100)).toBeNull()
|
|
expect(validateRecurringLineAmount('net_deduction_union', 100)).toBe(
|
|
RECURRING_LINE_AMOUNT_SIGN_MESSAGE,
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('never accepts zero, positive or non-finite amounts', () => {
|
|
expect(validateRecurringLineAmount('gross_deduction_other', 0)).toBe(
|
|
RECURRING_LINE_AMOUNT_SIGN_MESSAGE,
|
|
)
|
|
expect(validateRecurringLineAmount('net_deduction_other', Number.NaN)).toBe(
|
|
RECURRING_LINE_AMOUNT_SIGN_MESSAGE,
|
|
)
|
|
expect(validateRecurringLineAmount('gross_deduction_pension', Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY)).toBe(
|
|
RECURRING_LINE_AMOUNT_SIGN_MESSAGE,
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|