Files
accounted/lib/invoices/__tests__/invoice-matching.test.ts
T
MattssonandClaude Fable 5.1 d670fe6663 feat(invoices): named payee accounts and per-invoice choice of bank account (#2233)
* fix(enable-banking): read BBAN from AccountIdentification.other and store it on the account

Enable Banking has no top-level `bban` key on AccountIdentification: a
Swedish BBAN (clearing + account number) arrives as `other.identification`
with `other.scheme_name = 'BBAN'`, or in `all_account_ids`. The client typed
`bban?: string` and read `.bban`, so the value was always undefined: no
connected account ever carried its clearing + account number, and domestic
counterparty accounts on transactions were dropped.

Type the identifiers per the OpenAPI spec, add extractBban() and
pickAccountIdentifier(), read counterparty identifiers through the scheme
list (IBAN, then BBAN/BGNR/PGNR, then anything), and store `bban` on
StoredAccount from the OAuth callback. The external_id dedup scope stays
IBAN-then-uid and is untouched.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaZTY21HVN57hJoPXKSLjV

* feat(invoices): named payee accounts on cash_accounts with a default per currency

A company had exactly one set of payment instructions per invoice currency
(company_settings.invoice_payment_accounts), picked by currency alone. A
second SEK bank account, or a second bankgiro number, had nowhere to live.

cash_accounts is already the per-company bank-account entity. Migration
20260903150000 adds the payee fields (bankgiro, plusgiro, clearing +
account number, BBAN, BIC, Swish, foreign routing) plus invoice_payee, a
small invoice_payee_defaults table (one default account per currency; one
account may be the default for several currencies, a SEK account with an
IBAN is the usual EUR payee), and a SECURITY DEFINER mirror that rewrites
the legacy map and the SEK bank columns from the default accounts. Every
existing reader (PDF, email, reminders, v1, MCP) keeps working; the three
writers that only touched legacy columns (PUT /api/settings, v1 settings,
MCP update_company_settings) now write through to the default account, so
what an agent sets is what the PDF prints. Peppol PaymentMeans is built
from the resolver instead of the raw legacy column. bg_pg is dropped
(never read or written; NULL on every prod and staging row).

Backfill lands only on existing cash accounts (primary, IBAN match, or the
only enabled account in the currency). Entries with no target stay in the
map as the resolver fallback and get an attach action in settings.

New: POST /api/cash-accounts (manual bank account on the next free 19xx),
PATCH /api/cash-accounts/[id] payee fields (owner/admin), GET/PUT
/api/cash-accounts/payee-defaults. Settings page rewritten as an account
list with per-currency defaults. Behandlingshistorik and the full archive
cover the new table and columns.

Verified on staging: migration applied (11 defaults landed), mirror
trigger observed rewriting company_settings from a payee edit.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaZTY21HVN57hJoPXKSLjV

* feat(invoices): choose which bank account an invoice is paid to, frozen at issue

Migration 20260903160000 adds invoices.payment_cash_account_id (FK to
cash_accounts, SET NULL) and invoices.payment_details, the payee fields
frozen when the account is chosen and refreshed at issue.

Resolver: resolveInvoicePaymentAccount / companyWithInvoicePaymentAccount /
assertInvoicePaymentAccountForRender take an optional override, and
hasRequiredInvoicePaymentAccount reads it from the invoice row, so every
surface (PDF, Swish QR, email, reminders, payment confirmation, Peppol,
recurring, staged MCP send) prints the frozen payee when one exists and the
company default per currency otherwise. Invoices that never chose an
account behave exactly as before.

Issue paths (mark-sent, send, v1 send, v1 mark-sent, Peppol send,
recurring, MCP send and mark-sent) refresh the snapshot from the account as
it is at issue; a chosen account that is disabled, un-flagged or unusable
for the currency blocks with INVOICE_SEND_PAYMENT_ACCOUNT_INVALID.

Writers: dashboard POST/PATCH, v1 create/update and MCP create_invoice
accept payment_cash_account_id and validate it against the company's payee
accounts (INVOICE_PAYEE_ACCOUNT_INVALID). Credit notes inherit the
original's payee; copies carry the choice; preview-pdf renders the chosen
account. The editor shows "Betalas till" under the currency when the
company has two or more usable payee accounts for that currency.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaZTY21HVN57hJoPXKSLjV

* feat(invoices): book manual payments on the invoice's chosen bank account

Manual mark-paid (dashboard, v1, MCP gnubok_mark_invoice_as_paid) and the
booking dialog's proposed lines debited 1930 regardless of which bank
account the invoice asked to be paid to. They now resolve the chosen
payee account's ledger account (resolveInvoiceSettlementAccount) and fall
back to 1930 only when no account was chosen or the row is gone.

Bank-transaction matching keeps debiting the account the money landed on
and does not filter by the chosen account; between equal-confidence
candidates it prefers the invoice that asked to be paid to the landing
account. Scores are untouched, so nothing new auto-matches.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaZTY21HVN57hJoPXKSLjV

* chore(invoices): keep the payload-size and phantom-column ceilings after the payee work

Shorten the new gnubok_create_invoice argument description (tools/list
payload was 29 bytes over the 60 kB budget), inline the cash-account payee
UPDATE/INSERT payloads and the settings select strings as literals so the
phantom-column scanner can read their columns, and reuse ACCOUNT_NUMBER_RE
instead of a hand-rolled copy.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaZTY21HVN57hJoPXKSLjV

* fix(invoices): harden the payee model after review (admin-only payee columns, separate payee IBAN, company-scoped FK)

Review findings from CodeRabbit, Superagent, the Swedish accounting review
and three skeptic passes, resolved in one batch:

Schema (both migrations are unshipped and edited in place):
- cash_accounts.payee_iban: the printed IBAN is its own column. iban stays
  the bank identity written by every sync and used to re-pair on reconnect,
  so a sync can no longer rewrite an invoice instruction or resurrect a
  cleared IBAN. The backfill copies each currency entry verbatim onto the
  target account (IBAN match first, then primary), so every invoice keeps
  printing exactly what it printed before; the bank IBAN is never pushed
  onto invoices that did not carry one.
- Payee columns are owner/admin-only at the database (BEFORE trigger,
  service role exempt): cash_accounts is member-writable for bank sync, and
  the SECURITY DEFINER mirror would otherwise have let a member rewrite
  where customers pay.
- Revoking an account as payee or disabling it drops its defaults; deleting
  a default drops that currency from the map and clears the legacy SEK
  columns (an admin saying "nothing to print" must not keep printing a
  closed account). The mirror leaves the legacy SEK columns alone when the
  map has no SEK entry, so legacy-only companies are never wiped by a
  mirror run for another currency.
- Audit and mirror triggers fire on the same column set; anon and
  authenticated can no longer execute the trigger-only definer functions.
- invoices.payment_cash_account_id is a composite same-company FK with
  SET NULL scoped to the account column.

Code:
- Only 19xx bank accounts can be payee: PATCH, the defaults PUT (which now
  also requires enabled, payee-flagged and usable for the currency),
  resolveInvoicePayeeChoice, and the mark-paid settlement resolver (which
  also refuses disabled rows and logs every fallback to 1930).
- createManualBankAccount excludes every ledger slot any row already holds
  (findFreeLedgerAccount treats a manual holder as free; this path inserts).
- The legacy settings writers (PUT /api/settings, v1, MCP) write through to
  the account BEFORE updating company_settings and fail the request on
  error; the account is written before it is adopted as default so the
  mirror never sees an empty payee.
- snapshotInvoicePayee: dry runs no longer persist; a failed snapshot write
  blocks issue (INVOICE_PAYEE_SNAPSHOT_FAILED). v1 mark-sent/mark-paid
  projections carry the payee columns; v1 create validates the payee
  before the dry-run return and echoes it in the preview.
- pickAccountIdentifier: supplementary IBAN wins over a primary BBAN, and
  non-account schemes (card PANs) are never persisted.
- Editor shows the payee select for a single usable account with no
  default; the booking dialog waits for cash accounts before proposing
  lines; a failed default write no longer hides a created account.
- Behandlingshistorik names the account on created/deleted defaults.
- Regenerated skills/accounted-api; MCP argument description trimmed under
  the tools/list payload ceiling.

Declined: clearing legacy columns via a forward migration (the mirror now
does it on delete); Swedish review's "show the debit account in the
mark-paid UI" (the booking dialog already proposes and lets the user edit
the debit line); manual ledger collision (UNIQUE exists, and the create
path now rejects it with a clear error); Peppol aligning to the PDF value
for companies whose legacy column had drifted from the map (the PDF is the
customer-facing document; both now agree).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaZTY21HVN57hJoPXKSLjV

* fix(invoices): read NEW.invoice_payee only on the cash_accounts branch of the mirror trigger

trg_mirror_invoice_payee_defaults fires for both tables; plpgsql resolves
record fields per expression, so the combined condition failed with
"record new has no field invoice_payee" whenever a default row changed,
which took down every pg-real case on the payee tables. The revoke/disable
check now sits inside its own TG_TABLE_NAME branch. The MCP settings
executor test mocks the payee write-through like the settings route test
already does.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaZTY21HVN57hJoPXKSLjV

* fix(invoices): keep member disables from revoking payee defaults, gate payee on 1920-1999, fit the MCP payload

Cycle 3 of /resolve-pr on #2233.

Superagent P1: the SECURITY DEFINER mirror trigger deleted an admin's
invoice_payee_defaults rows whenever cash_accounts.enabled flipped to
false, and enabled is member-writable (the bank picker's "Synkas ej"), so
a member could undo an admin's payee decision. The trigger now drops
defaults only on the admin-only invoice_payee true -> false revoke; the
mirror trigger's WHEN no longer lists enabled. Disabled accounts stay out
of the pick lists and the send gate already refuses an invoice that chose
one. Applied to staging as the same function + trigger definition and
probed inside a rolled-back block: disable keeps the default and the
mirrored bankgiro, revoke clears both.

pg-real: the admin-guard test ran three expectations inside one
withUserContext transaction; the first raise aborted it and the next
statement failed with "current transaction is aborted". One transaction
per expectation now, and the member case also flips enabled to prove the
column stays member-level.

Swedish review: payee eligibility was /^19\d\d$/, which admits 1910 Kassa
and the 1911-1919 tills. A customer pays to a giro or bank account, so
isBankCashAccount, CreateCashAccountSchema.ledger_account and the PATCH
route now require BAS 1920-1999; tests cover 1910 and 1919.

Unit tests (3/4): the tools/list payload guard read 60 025, then 60 014
tokens after main merged #2166 and #2163 alongside this branch. The
ceiling is not bumped and no read on this surface is a demotion
candidate, so gnubok_create_invoice drops payment_cash_account_id;
agent-created invoices print the per-currency default and v1 REST plus
the editor keep the field. Recorded in DECISIONS.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaZTY21HVN57hJoPXKSLjV

* chore(migrations): move invoices_payment_cash_account to 20260903183000 after colliding with main's KPI migration

origin/main merged 20260903160000_kpi_monthly_include_reversed_originals
while this branch held the same version; identical versions abort the
Supabase apply. Staging's schema_migrations row was moved to the new
version with the file.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaZTY21HVN57hJoPXKSLjV

* fix(invoices): gate invoice_payee on BAS 1920-1999 at the database, and unblock the typecheck ratchet

Cycle 4 of /resolve-pr on #2233, on Emil's go.

Swedish review: the 1920-1999 payee rule lived only in the routes. The
cash_accounts_payee_admin_only trigger now also refuses invoice_payee on
any other ledger (INVOICE_PAYEE_ACCOUNT_INVALID, 23514), whoever writes
it, and the backfill only targets giro/bank rows, so a company whose
single enabled cash_accounts row is a Stripe clearing account keeps its
legacy bankgiro in company_settings instead of landing it on 1686. pg
test covers insert and update on 1686 and 1910; the function was applied
to staging and probed.

Typecheck ratchet: main is red from two merges that landed with failing
Checks, and every branch that syncs it inherits the errors.
  - #2242 added POST(req) calls to the fiscal-periods route test without
    the route params argument withRouteContext handlers take (25 errors
    in the file, baseline 23). All 25 calls now pass
    createMockRouteParams({}).
  - #2247 made SyncResult.requestedFromDate and historyNarrowed required;
    the 13 mockedSync results in the enable-banking accounts-route test
    lacked them. They now carry a fixed date and historyNarrowed: false.
Both files' tests pass unchanged in behaviour.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(migrations): move invoices_payment_cash_account to 20260903193000 after colliding with main's party_promotion

origin/main merged 20260903183000_party_promotion while this branch held
the same version. Staging's schema_migrations row must follow (pending:
the Supabase MCP was disconnected at the time of this commit).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-03 21:06:45 +02:00

748 lines
28 KiB
TypeScript

import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
import {
amountsMatchExact,
amountsMatchFuzzy,
customerNameMatches,
calculateMatchScore,
findMatchingInvoices,
findInvoiceMatchCandidates,
getBestInvoiceMatch,
} from '../invoice-matching'
import type { Transaction, Invoice, Customer } from '@/types'
import {
makeTransaction,
makeInvoice,
makeCustomer,
createMockSupabase,
createQueuedMockSupabase,
} from '@/tests/helpers'
// ============================================================
// amountsMatchExact
// ============================================================
describe('amountsMatchExact', () => {
it('matches identical amounts', () => {
expect(amountsMatchExact(1000, 1000)).toBe(true)
})
it('matches amounts differing only in floating-point noise', () => {
// 1000.004 rounds to 1000.00, same as 1000.00
expect(amountsMatchExact(1000.004, 1000)).toBe(true)
})
it('rejects amounts differing by 0.01', () => {
expect(amountsMatchExact(1000.01, 1000)).toBe(false)
})
})
// ============================================================
// amountsMatchFuzzy
// ============================================================
describe('amountsMatchFuzzy', () => {
it('matches amounts within 1% tolerance', () => {
// 990 vs 1000 → diff=10, tolerance=min(10,500)=10 → 10 <= 10
expect(amountsMatchFuzzy(990, 1000)).toBe(true)
})
it('rejects amounts outside 1% tolerance', () => {
// 980 vs 1000 → diff=20, tolerance=min(10,500)=10 → 20 > 10
expect(amountsMatchFuzzy(980, 1000)).toBe(false)
})
it('returns false when invoiceTotal is 0', () => {
expect(amountsMatchFuzzy(100, 0)).toBe(false)
})
it('caps tolerance at 500 SEK for large invoices', () => {
// 100000 vs 100600 → diff=600, tolerance=min(100000*0.01=1000, 500)=500 → 600 > 500
expect(amountsMatchFuzzy(100600, 100000)).toBe(false)
// 100000 vs 100400 → diff=400, tolerance=500 → 400 <= 500
expect(amountsMatchFuzzy(100400, 100000)).toBe(true)
})
})
// ============================================================
// customerNameMatches
// ============================================================
describe('customerNameMatches', () => {
it('matches when significant word from customer name appears in description', () => {
expect(customerNameMatches('Kontorsbolaget AB', 'Betalning Kontorsbolaget', null)).toBe(true)
})
it('ignores words shorter than 3 characters', () => {
// "AB" is 2 chars, filtered out
expect(customerNameMatches('AB', 'AB payment', null)).toBe(false)
})
it('matches against merchant_name', () => {
expect(customerNameMatches('Kontorsbolaget', 'Random description', 'Kontorsbolaget AB')).toBe(true)
})
it('returns false when customerName is undefined', () => {
expect(customerNameMatches(undefined as unknown as string, 'Description', null)).toBe(false)
})
it('is case-insensitive', () => {
expect(customerNameMatches('KONTORSBOLAGET', 'betalning kontorsbolaget', null)).toBe(true)
})
})
// ============================================================
// calculateMatchScore
// ============================================================
describe('calculateMatchScore', () => {
function makeTx(overrides: Partial<Transaction> = {}): Transaction {
return makeTransaction({ amount: 12500, description: 'Betalning Kundnamn AB', merchant_name: null, ...overrides })
}
function makeInv(overrides: Partial<Invoice & { customer?: Customer }> = {}): Invoice & { customer?: Customer } {
return {
...makeInvoice({ total: 12500 }),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Kundnamn AB' }),
...overrides,
}
}
it('returns 0.95 for exact amount + customer name match', () => {
const { confidence } = calculateMatchScore(makeTx(), makeInv())
expect(confidence).toBe(0.95)
})
it('returns 0.80 for exact amount without customer match', () => {
const { confidence } = calculateMatchScore(
makeTx({ description: 'Random payment', merchant_name: null }),
makeInv({ customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Completely Different Co' }) })
)
expect(confidence).toBe(0.80)
})
it('returns 0.70 for fuzzy amount + customer name match', () => {
// 12375 is within 1% of 12500 (diff=125, tolerance=min(125,500)=125)
const { confidence } = calculateMatchScore(
makeTx({ amount: 12375 }),
makeInv()
)
expect(confidence).toBe(0.70)
})
it('returns 0.50 for fuzzy amount without customer match', () => {
const { confidence } = calculateMatchScore(
makeTx({ amount: 12375, description: 'Random', merchant_name: null }),
makeInv({ customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Completely Different Co' }) })
)
expect(confidence).toBe(0.50)
})
it('returns 0 confidence when no amount match', () => {
const { confidence } = calculateMatchScore(
makeTx({ amount: 99999 }),
makeInv()
)
expect(confidence).toBe(0)
})
})
// ============================================================
// findMatchingInvoices (integration: mock Supabase)
// ============================================================
describe('findMatchingInvoices', () => {
const { supabase, mockResult } = createMockSupabase()
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
})
it('returns empty for expense transactions (amount <= 0)', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: -1000 })
const result = await findMatchingInvoices(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result).toEqual([])
})
it('returns empty when Supabase query errors', async () => {
mockResult({ data: null, error: { message: 'db error' } })
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 12500 })
const result = await findMatchingInvoices(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result).toEqual([])
})
it('never proposes a quote or proforma: the candidate query is scoped to fakturor', async () => {
const queued = createQueuedMockSupabase()
queued.enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 12500 })
await findMatchingInvoices(queued.supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(queued.findCalls('invoices', 'eq')).toContainEqual(['document_type', 'invoice'])
})
it('breaks a confidence tie in favour of the invoice that asked to be paid to the account the money landed on', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 12500, description: 'Betalning', merchant_name: null, cash_account_id: 'ca-1931' })
const base = { total: 12500, status: 'sent' as const, remaining_amount: 12500, currency: 'SEK' as const }
mockResult({
data: [
{ ...makeInvoice({ id: 'inv-default', invoice_number: 'F-1', ...base }), payment_cash_account_id: null },
{ ...makeInvoice({ id: 'inv-1931', invoice_number: 'F-2', ...base }), payment_cash_account_id: 'ca-1931' },
],
error: null,
})
const result = await findMatchingInvoices(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result).toHaveLength(2)
// Same score for both (exact amount, no customer name): scores untouched.
expect(result[0].confidence).toBe(result[1].confidence)
expect(result[0].invoice.id).toBe('inv-1931')
})
it('matches by OCR reference with confidence 0.99', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 12500, reference: 'F-2024001' })
mockResult({
data: [
{ ...makeInvoice({ invoice_number: 'F-2024001', total: 12500, status: 'sent', remaining_amount: 12500, currency: 'SEK' }) },
],
error: null,
})
const result = await findMatchingInvoices(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result).toHaveLength(1)
expect(result[0].confidence).toBe(0.99)
expect(result[0].matchReason).toContain('OCR-referens')
})
it('never suggests a credit note, even when its OCR reference matches', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 12500, reference: 'KR-F-2024001' })
mockResult({
data: [
makeInvoice({
invoice_number: 'KR-F-2024001',
status: 'sent',
total: -12500,
credited_invoice_id: 'original-invoice-1',
}),
],
error: null,
})
const result = await findMatchingInvoices(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result).toEqual([])
})
it('returns immediately on OCR match without further scoring', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 12500, reference: 'F-2024001' })
mockResult({
data: [
{ ...makeInvoice({ invoice_number: 'F-2024001', total: 12500, status: 'sent', remaining_amount: 12500, currency: 'SEK' }) },
// Second invoice with exact amount: should not be scored
{
...makeInvoice({ id: 'inv-2', invoice_number: 'F-2024002', total: 12500, status: 'sent', remaining_amount: 12500, currency: 'SEK' }),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Test match description' }),
},
],
error: null,
})
const result = await findMatchingInvoices(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
// Only the OCR match should be returned
expect(result).toHaveLength(1)
expect(result[0].confidence).toBe(0.99)
})
it('scores exact amount + customer name at 0.95', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 12500, description: 'Betalning Testbolaget', reference: null })
mockResult({
data: [{
...makeInvoice({ total: 12500, status: 'sent', remaining_amount: 12500, currency: 'SEK' }),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Testbolaget AB' }),
}],
error: null,
})
const result = await findMatchingInvoices(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result).toHaveLength(1)
expect(result[0].confidence).toBe(0.95)
})
it('scores exact amount only at 0.80', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 12500, description: 'Unrelated text', merchant_name: null, reference: null })
mockResult({
data: [{
...makeInvoice({ total: 12500, status: 'sent', remaining_amount: 12500, currency: 'SEK' }),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Completely Different Name' }),
}],
error: null,
})
const result = await findMatchingInvoices(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result).toHaveLength(1)
expect(result[0].confidence).toBe(0.80)
})
it('sorts matches by confidence descending', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 12500, description: 'Betalning Testbolaget', merchant_name: null, reference: null })
mockResult({
data: [
// Exact amount, no name match → 0.80
{
...makeInvoice({ id: 'inv-low', total: 12500, status: 'sent', remaining_amount: 12500, currency: 'SEK' }),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Nope Corp' }),
},
// Exact amount + name match → 0.95
{
...makeInvoice({ id: 'inv-high', total: 12500, status: 'sent', remaining_amount: 12500, currency: 'SEK' }),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Testbolaget AB' }),
},
],
error: null,
})
const result = await findMatchingInvoices(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result).toHaveLength(2)
expect(result[0].confidence).toBe(0.95)
expect(result[1].confidence).toBe(0.80)
})
it('filters out matches below 0.50 threshold', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 99999, description: 'No match', merchant_name: null, reference: null })
mockResult({
data: [{
...makeInvoice({ total: 50000, status: 'sent', remaining_amount: 50000, currency: 'SEK' }),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Irrelevant' }),
}],
error: null,
})
const result = await findMatchingInvoices(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result).toEqual([])
})
it('uses remaining_amount for partially_paid invoices', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 5000, description: 'Unrelated', merchant_name: null, reference: null })
mockResult({
data: [{
...makeInvoice({ total: 12500, remaining_amount: 5000, status: 'partially_paid', currency: 'SEK' }),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Different' }),
}],
error: null,
})
const result = await findMatchingInvoices(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result).toHaveLength(1)
expect(result[0].confidence).toBe(0.80) // exact amount match
})
it('skips invoices with non-matching currency', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 12500, currency: 'SEK', description: 'Payment', merchant_name: null, reference: null })
mockResult({
data: [{
...makeInvoice({ total: 12500, remaining_amount: 12500, status: 'sent', currency: 'EUR', total_sek: null }),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Different' }),
}],
error: null,
})
const result = await findMatchingInvoices(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
// EUR invoice with no total_sek → currency mismatch → skipped
expect(result).toEqual([])
})
})
// ============================================================
// getBestInvoiceMatch
// ============================================================
describe('getBestInvoiceMatch', () => {
const { supabase, mockResult } = createMockSupabase()
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
})
it('returns highest-confidence match when above minConfidence', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 12500, description: 'Unrelated', merchant_name: null, reference: null })
mockResult({
data: [{
...makeInvoice({ total: 12500, status: 'sent', remaining_amount: 12500, currency: 'SEK' }),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Different' }),
}],
error: null,
})
const result = await getBestInvoiceMatch(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result).not.toBeNull()
expect(result!.confidence).toBe(0.80)
})
it('returns null when best match below minConfidence', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 12500, description: 'Unrelated', merchant_name: null, reference: null })
mockResult({
data: [{
...makeInvoice({ total: 12500, status: 'sent', remaining_amount: 12500, currency: 'SEK' }),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Different' }),
}],
error: null,
})
// minConfidence 0.90 → 0.80 match rejected
const result = await getBestInvoiceMatch(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx, 0.90)
expect(result).toBeNull()
})
it('defaults minConfidence to 0.80', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 12500, description: 'Unrelated', merchant_name: null, reference: null })
mockResult({
data: [{
...makeInvoice({ total: 12500, status: 'sent', remaining_amount: 12500, currency: 'SEK' }),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Different' }),
}],
error: null,
})
// Exact amount only → 0.80, meets default threshold
const result = await getBestInvoiceMatch(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result).not.toBeNull()
})
})
// ============================================================
// findMatchingInvoices: paid-voucher status-leak guard
// ============================================================
//
// Defensive filter added because manual verifikationer (booked outside the
// match-invoice flow) leave the invoice in 'sent' status even though a
// payment voucher exists via invoice_payments. Matching such an invoice
// would double-book the bank receipt. Tests verify that:
// - sent/overdue invoices with an invoice_payments.journal_entry_id are
// excluded from the candidate list
// - partially_paid invoices remain candidates regardless (they may take
// more payments legitimately)
// - invoices without payment rows still pass through unchanged
describe('findMatchingInvoices: status-leak guard', () => {
it('excludes a sent invoice that already has a payment voucher', async () => {
const { supabase: queuedSupabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
const inv = {
...makeInvoice({
id: 'inv-leaked',
total: 1000,
status: 'sent',
remaining_amount: 1000,
currency: 'SEK',
}),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Acme AB' }),
}
enqueue({ data: [inv], error: null })
enqueue({ data: [{ invoice_id: 'inv-leaked' }], error: null })
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 1000, description: 'Acme payment', reference: null })
const result = await findMatchingInvoices(queuedSupabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result).toEqual([])
})
it('keeps a partially_paid invoice as a candidate even with a prior payment voucher', async () => {
const { supabase: queuedSupabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
const inv = {
...makeInvoice({
id: 'inv-partial',
total: 1000,
status: 'partially_paid',
remaining_amount: 400,
currency: 'SEK',
}),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Acme AB' }),
}
enqueue({ data: [inv], error: null })
// The status-leak guard only queries when there are sent/overdue rows;
// partially_paid invoices skip the second query, so no enqueue needed.
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 400, description: 'Acme partial', reference: null })
const result = await findMatchingInvoices(queuedSupabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result).toHaveLength(1)
expect(result[0].invoice.id).toBe('inv-partial')
})
it('passes sent invoices through when no payment rows exist for them', async () => {
const { supabase: queuedSupabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
const inv = {
...makeInvoice({
id: 'inv-clean',
total: 1000,
status: 'sent',
remaining_amount: 1000,
currency: 'SEK',
}),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Acme AB' }),
}
enqueue({ data: [inv], error: null })
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 1000, description: 'Acme payment', reference: null })
const result = await findMatchingInvoices(queuedSupabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result).toHaveLength(1)
expect(result[0].invoice.id).toBe('inv-clean')
})
})
// ============================================================
// findInvoiceMatchCandidates: unconverted foreign-currency invoices
// ============================================================
//
// A foreign-currency invoice with no stored SEK conversion is not comparable
// to a kronor bank row, so it is excluded from candidacy. That is correct (the
// alternative is "matching" 1 000 EUR against 1 000 kr) but it used to be
// silent: the user saw no suggestion and no explanation. The exclusion is now
// reported so a caller can point at the repair,
// POST /api/invoices/{id}/refresh-exchange-rate.
describe('findInvoiceMatchCandidates: unconverted FX exclusions', () => {
function enqueueSingleInvoice(inv: unknown) {
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
enqueue({ data: [inv], error: null })
// Status-leak guard's invoice_payments lookup.
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
return supabase
}
it('reports no exclusions for an ordinary SEK match', async () => {
const supabase = enqueueSingleInvoice({
...makeInvoice({ total: 12500, status: 'sent', remaining_amount: 12500, currency: 'SEK' }),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Different' }),
})
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 12500, description: 'Unrelated', merchant_name: null, reference: null })
const result = await findInvoiceMatchCandidates(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result.matches).toHaveLength(1)
expect(result.matches[0].confidence).toBe(0.80)
expect(result.unconvertedFxCount).toBe(0)
expect(result.unconvertedFxInvoices).toEqual([])
})
it('still matches a EUR invoice that has a stored SEK conversion', async () => {
// 1 000 EUR booked at 12.50 → total_sek 12 500 vs a 12 500 kr receipt.
const supabase = enqueueSingleInvoice({
...makeInvoice({
total: 1000,
remaining_amount: 1000,
status: 'sent',
currency: 'EUR',
total_sek: 12500,
exchange_rate: 12.5,
}),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Different' }),
})
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 12500, currency: 'SEK', description: 'Unrelated', merchant_name: null, reference: null })
const result = await findInvoiceMatchCandidates(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result.matches).toHaveLength(1)
expect(result.matches[0].confidence).toBe(0.80)
expect(result.unconvertedFxCount).toBe(0)
})
it('excludes a EUR invoice with no SEK conversion AND reports it', async () => {
const supabase = enqueueSingleInvoice({
...makeInvoice({
id: 'inv-eur-no-rate',
invoice_number: 'F-2024099',
total: 1000,
remaining_amount: 1000,
status: 'sent',
currency: 'EUR',
total_sek: null,
exchange_rate: null,
}),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Different' }),
})
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 12500, currency: 'SEK', description: 'Unrelated', merchant_name: null, reference: null })
const result = await findInvoiceMatchCandidates(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result.matches).toEqual([])
expect(result.unconvertedFxCount).toBe(1)
expect(result.unconvertedFxInvoices).toEqual([
{
invoiceId: 'inv-eur-no-rate',
invoiceNumber: 'F-2024099',
currency: 'EUR',
reason: 'unconverted_fx',
},
])
})
it('does not report a SEK invoice against a foreign bank row as an FX exclusion', async () => {
// Nothing a rate refresh on the invoice would fix: the bank row is the
// foreign side. Still excluded, just not as an unconverted-FX invoice.
const supabase = enqueueSingleInvoice({
...makeInvoice({ total: 12500, remaining_amount: 12500, status: 'sent', currency: 'SEK' }),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Different' }),
})
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 12500, currency: 'EUR', description: 'Unrelated', merchant_name: null, reference: null })
const result = await findInvoiceMatchCandidates(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result.matches).toEqual([])
expect(result.unconvertedFxCount).toBe(0)
})
// total_sek = 0 passes the `total_sek != null` currency guard and then hits
// the conversion's old `return invoiceAmount` fallback, comparing 1 000 EUR
// against a 1 000 kr receipt and scoring it an exact match at 0.80. The
// fallback now returns null, so the invoice is not comparable at all.
const zeroConversionInvoice = () => ({
...makeInvoice({
id: 'inv-eur-zero-sek',
total: 1000,
remaining_amount: 1000,
status: 'sent',
currency: 'EUR',
total_sek: 0,
}),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Different' }),
})
const zeroConversionTx = () =>
makeTransaction({ amount: 1000, currency: 'SEK', description: 'Unrelated', merchant_name: null, reference: null })
it('never matches the raw foreign total when the stored conversion is zero', async () => {
const supabase = enqueueSingleInvoice(zeroConversionInvoice())
const result = await findMatchingInvoices(supabase as never, 'company-1', zeroConversionTx())
expect(result).toEqual([])
})
it('reports the zero-conversion invoice as an unconverted FX exclusion', async () => {
const supabase = enqueueSingleInvoice(zeroConversionInvoice())
const result = await findInvoiceMatchCandidates(supabase as never, 'company-1', zeroConversionTx())
expect(result.unconvertedFxCount).toBe(1)
expect(result.unconvertedFxInvoices[0].invoiceId).toBe('inv-eur-zero-sek')
})
it('keeps the array-returning wrapper working for existing callers', async () => {
const supabase = enqueueSingleInvoice({
...makeInvoice({ total: 12500, status: 'sent', remaining_amount: 12500, currency: 'SEK' }),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Different' }),
})
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 12500, description: 'Unrelated', merchant_name: null, reference: null })
const result = await findMatchingInvoices(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(Array.isArray(result)).toBe(true)
expect(result).toHaveLength(1)
})
})
// ============================================================
// findInvoiceMatchCandidates: currency normalization
// ============================================================
//
// `invoices.currency` and `transactions.currency` are both nullable with
// DEFAULT 'SEK', so a legacy NULL (or a lowercase code) means kronor. The raw
// `invoice.currency === transaction.currency` comparison sent those rows down
// the cross-currency branch, where `total_sek` (DEFAULT 0) is never usable, so
// legacy NULL-currency invoices were excluded from ALL matching with no
// exclusion report either (isUnconvertedForeignInvoice required a truthy
// currency). Both helpers now normalize through normalizeCurrencyCode.
describe('findInvoiceMatchCandidates: currency normalization', () => {
function enqueueSingleInvoice(inv: unknown) {
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
enqueue({ data: [inv], error: null })
// Status-leak guard's invoice_payments lookup.
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
return supabase
}
it('matches a legacy NULL-currency invoice against a SEK bank row', async () => {
const supabase = enqueueSingleInvoice({
...makeInvoice({
total: 12500,
remaining_amount: 12500,
status: 'sent',
currency: null as unknown as Invoice['currency'],
total_sek: 0,
}),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Different' }),
})
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 12500, currency: 'SEK', description: 'Unrelated', merchant_name: null, reference: null })
const result = await findInvoiceMatchCandidates(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result.matches).toHaveLength(1)
expect(result.matches[0].confidence).toBe(0.80)
// NULL means SEK per the column default: never an FX exclusion.
expect(result.unconvertedFxCount).toBe(0)
expect(result.unconvertedFxInvoices).toEqual([])
})
it('compares currency codes case-insensitively', async () => {
const supabase = enqueueSingleInvoice({
...makeInvoice({
total: 12500,
remaining_amount: 12500,
status: 'sent',
currency: 'sek' as unknown as Invoice['currency'],
}),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Different' }),
})
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 12500, currency: 'SEK', description: 'Unrelated', merchant_name: null, reference: null })
const result = await findInvoiceMatchCandidates(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result.matches).toHaveLength(1)
expect(result.unconvertedFxCount).toBe(0)
})
it('never reports a NULL-currency invoice as an unconverted FX exclusion', async () => {
// Amounts deliberately do not line up: no match, but the miss is an
// ordinary amount miss, not a swallowed FX exclusion.
const supabase = enqueueSingleInvoice({
...makeInvoice({
total: 999,
remaining_amount: 999,
status: 'sent',
currency: null as unknown as Invoice['currency'],
total_sek: 0,
}),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Different' }),
})
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 12500, currency: 'SEK', description: 'Unrelated', merchant_name: null, reference: null })
const result = await findInvoiceMatchCandidates(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result.matches).toEqual([])
expect(result.unconvertedFxCount).toBe(0)
expect(result.unconvertedFxInvoices).toEqual([])
})
it('falls back to the stored exchange_rate when total_sek was never written', async () => {
// Same SEK-resolution as duplicate-guard-currency.ts#invoiceAmountSek (one
// definition): total_sek 0 means "not stored", the booked exchange_rate is
// still a STORED conversion and makes the invoice comparable.
const supabase = enqueueSingleInvoice({
...makeInvoice({
total: 1000,
remaining_amount: 1000,
status: 'sent',
currency: 'EUR',
total_sek: 0,
exchange_rate: 11.5,
}),
customer: makeCustomer({ name: 'Different' }),
})
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: 11500, currency: 'SEK', description: 'Unrelated', merchant_name: null, reference: null })
const result = await findInvoiceMatchCandidates(supabase as never, 'company-1', tx)
expect(result.matches).toHaveLength(1)
expect(result.matches[0].confidence).toBe(0.80)
expect(result.unconvertedFxCount).toBe(0)
})
})